
What I Wish Parents Knew about Social Media
On Friday afternoons shortly before the school bus arrives, my mom arrives at my house. She ambles into my kitchen to make a cup of tea, and after a few minutes my son will come running in the back door. They will chat briefly, but inevitably my son will ask to watch YouTube videos on my mom's tablet. Then they will go and sit on the couch and watch videos of people playing Minecraft, or Super Mario Odyssey, or some combination of the two for an hour or so, until my husband and I finish work.
Occasionally I will find myself looking over their shoulders as formulaic videos, with the same jump cuts and extreme close-ups, made by people I had never heard of (but still with millions of subscribers), play. I research social media for a living, and I still find myself wondering: Is it ok that my son is watching this? If junk food for the brain existed, these videos might be it.
Clearly, I don't ban all screens in my house, and I wouldn't tell you to ban them in yours, either. But in my work, I've seen how little transparency social media companies offer parents and kids about how their systems operate—and how much harm that invisibility can do. In my recent look at the algorithms that drive these platforms—what's called their feed algorithms—my co-authors and I found that only one of the major platforms, X makes details of how its system works publicly transparent. This is not okay.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
There's some good news though: through research not sponsored by social media platforms, we are learning more about where the most serious risks to kids and teens are, and what things parents can do to manage those risks. Understanding the design of these systems, and talking with your child about them, is one of the most powerful tools you have to keep them safe and supported online.
Here are three things I wish every parent understood about social media—and how to talk to your kids about them.
Your teen isn't the customer—they're the product. I say teen because, in general, kids under age 13 are not supposed to be on these platforms, which make money by selling ads. They do this by collecting fine-grained data about what your kid watches and reacts to, and then monetize that data by literally selling your child's attention to the highest bidder, in the hopes of getting their money today or building a new lifelong customer for the future. Once kids are over 18, social media companies can also directly sell their data to data brokers (just as they can do with yours). Just remember, on social media, advertisers are the customer, not you or your kid.
That doesn't mean that people don't also get value out of social media, but for teens particularly, it can be hard to understand what they are exchanging for the entertainment they are getting.
What you can do:
• Talk to your kids about how the platform's business model works. Make sure they know that their attention and engagement is what's being sold.
• Talk to your teens about what they want to get out of social media. Do they want to keep up with their friends? Do they want to be entertained by influencers? Do they want to learn about trends or games or fitness? Decide together how they can be mindful around those goals and how you can support them in doing that. You should also figure out what they (and you) are and aren't comfortable giving away in exchange for whatever value social media delivers to them.
• Sit down together and go through the platform's ad preferences and privacy settings. Talk about what the settings do, and decide together what's right for your child—and your family.
Algorithmic feeds are designed to maximize usage, not well-being. Every major platform uses feed algorithms to keep users scrolling, watching or clicking as much as possible by offering them what they think the user will like next. There is no platform I'm aware of that observes an 'upper bound' of how much usage they will try to optimize for, meaning that no matter how much social media users consume, their feed algorithms will keep trying to get them to use more. Platforms do this by carefully calibrating aspects of what they show you in feed, from the mix of topics and video length, to other aspects of system design, like how often they notify users about reactions and comments to their own content. Feed algorithms also adapt to each user's behavior and can quickly home in on whatever type of content users pay attention to or engage with the most. I think even the most social media-loving teen understands that more isn't necessarily healthy.
What you can do:
• Talk to your kids about how feed algorithms work. You can use the 'feed cards ' my co-authors and I developed to explain how these systems work on platforms like TikTok, YouTube and Facebook.
• Ask your teen to show you their feed and scroll through it together. Can you 'hack' with the algorithm by watching certain videos or reacting to certain types of content and seeing how quickly the algorithm adapts? Talk to your kids about how (and whether) they can stay in control of their experiences when they are using algorithmic feeds.
• Remember that you can set limits without banning social media. Social media algorithms will always try to get your kids to use them more. Some teens don't yet have the self-control to step away, even when they are having experiences that make them feel bad. Has something on Twitter or Facebook ever made you incandescently angry? If so, that was probably the point—rage-bait works. And if you're over 25, your prefrontal cortex is fully developed—think about how that might have felt to your child. Talk to your kids and decide on sensible limits on how late in the evening they can use social media, and how much time they can spend on social media overall. Use in-app tools to set limits, but remember kids often know how to circumvent these, so pay attention to where your kid's device is too.
Content moderation exists, but don't count on it. It's natural to hope that social media companies are catching and removing harmful content before your child sees it. But surveys show that even young teens report seeing content on social media that disturbs them. How is this possible? Platforms do take down a lot of content, but as my research shows, content removal often occurs after feed algorithms have already shown the harmful content to most people who will ever see it.
What you can do:
• Don't assume that 'the system' will catch everything; it won't.
• Ask open-ended questions about your kids' social media experiences: 'What's the best thing you saw on TikTok this week?' and 'Have you seen anything that upset or confused you this week?'
• Remember that different platforms have different rules, and different enforcement. If your teen is routinely having experiences that make them uncomfortable, it might be time for them to shift to another platform that feels safer for them, or even just take a break to reevaluate if what they are getting from using a given social media platform is really worth it.
The Bottom Line
I'm not going to pretend any of this is easy. My research has also shown that the transparency tools that platforms offer are difficult for users to use and understand. But we parents can give our kids their best chance to develop a healthy relationship with social media if we can stay engaged, curious, and consistent. And finally, it's important to hold the line on some non-negotiables that have the most potential to cause kids harm:
• Make sure kids and teens don't have phones or social media in their bedrooms overnight. Kids need sleep—not all-night Snapchat sessions.
• Don't let kids lie about their age to join platforms early, or to get an 'adult' account instead of a 'teen' one if they're under 18. On many platforms there are meaningful differences in default settings, data collection and even in feed algorithms between teen and adult accounts.
I'm still learning, both as a researcher and a parent. But what I've learned so far tells me this: there are ways to help teens have safer, better online experiences, but kids need involved parents and consistent rules to make sure that happens.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Meghan Markle talks sharing life 'on my own terms' after viral delivery room video
Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, is getting candid about sharing her life on social media. The mom of two and former actress recently sat down for an interview with the "Aspire with Emma Grede" podcast, set for release Tuesday, and spoke about a video she shared that recently went viral. In a promotional clip shared on YouTube ahead of Tuesday's podcast episode, Meghan opens up about the video, which shows her dancing with her husband Prince Harry in the delivery room before the birth of their daughter, Princess Lilibet. "That wasn't yesterday," Meghan says in the promotional clip. "That was four years ago. So it's also a really great reminder that with all the noise or whatever people do, there's a whole life -- a real, authentic, fun life that's happening behind the scenes." "I'm just grateful that now, being back on social as well, I have a place where I can share it on my own terms," she added. Earlier this month, Meghan shared several memories of Lilibet on her birthday, including the video of herself and Harry dancing to the viral song "The Baby Momma Dance" in the delivery room at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital in Santa Barbara, California, ahead of Lilibet's birth. The video is among many personal moments Meghan has shared on her official Instagram account, @meghan, since launching the page in January. Recently, she also shared a sweet Father's Day tribute to Harry, which included several video clips with their two children, Lilibet and older brother Prince Archie.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Theory on Who's in Sabrina Carpenter's Controversial Album Cover Blows Minds
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman has gone viral for sharing her theory on Sabrina Carpenter's newly-released upcoming album artwork, and believes she knows who appears on the cover alongside the popstar. Singer Carpenter, whose 2024 smash hit Espresso clinched the title of the most-streamed song on Spotify last year, got fans in a frenzy in June when she released the lead single, Manchild, from her upcoming album. At the same time, she revealed the name of her next record—Man's Best Friend—and the artwork set to illustrate the cover. But while her new song has racked up more than 54 million Spotify streams, and the accompanying video watched 25 million times on YouTube since its release nine days ago, it has come with some backlash, as some fans accused Manchild of containing lyrics which could be construed as ableist. The album art, too, is not without controversy. Revealed via Carpenter's Instagram account, seen here, it depicts the 26-year-old singer in a black dress and heels, before kneeling before what appears to be a man in a black suit, her hair tangled in their outstretched hand. It sparked a huge discussion online, with some worrying it promoted regressive gender stereotypes, with one TikTok user, @ddiva444, previously telling Newsweek she believes it "paints women as an object used to serve men" and "normalizes violence towards women." As the debate rages on, one woman has turned the album cover on its head, with her theory that what has been shared so far is not the full artwork at all. TikTok user @thespoiledstylistt shared a video to her account on June 12, and said she was "calling it right now." She predicted Carpenter's album cover is "rage bait," and she would eventually release the "zoomed out version, and it will be her holding her own hair." The woman pointed out the proportions of the person in the suit, saying the assumed man in the image "looks tiny and his hands look small." Going further, she pointed out that Carpenter dressed in a suit for the after-party of the Met Gala, and that this is a hint towards the album cover. Newsweek has contacted Carpenter's representatives via email for comment on this story outside of normal working hours and will update this article if they respond. The theory video got a lot of online attention, being like more than 855,000 times and racking up close to 10 million views since being posted just days ago, as commenters continued to share their own opinions, one calling the cover "tone deaf, I am genuinely baffled how anyone is defending it." Sabrina Carpenter wears a sui at the Met Gala After Party on May 5, 2025. Sabrina Carpenter wears a sui at the Met Gala After Party on May 5, 2025. Ilya"I think maybe people are missing the point... she's alluding to that fact that men have treated her like a dog as a joke," another said, while one defended the musician: "I'm so confused on why we care about Sabrina's album cover, are we forgetting what feminism actually is?" Another wasn't keen on the theory, saying "that hand is clearly a man's hand," but another suggested: "I swear this is just a social experiment [on] how people switch up so fast against her." And another said: "I don't think her album is rage bait cause there's nothing to get upset about in the first place. It's her art and she isn't even being offensive to anyone!" The comments continued to pile up on Carpenter's Instagram post, which itself has just under 5 million likes. There comments were polarized there too, with one writing: "This isn't satire, this is not empowering to women. You've missed the mark by so much hun." While someone else said: "People complaining when it's actually genius. It's an imagine full of layers to be seen: There's irony, there's conflict, there's a joke, there's critic, there's self-critic, there's a play with the words in the title. There's a lot." Newsweek has contacted @thespoiledstylistt on TikTok for comment on this story. Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures you want to share? Send them to life@ with some extra details, and they could appear on our website.


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Vice Media hires former NBC marketing exec for CEO role as it plans studio-focused turnaround
Adam Stotsky, a longtime NBCUniversal executive, has taken the helm at Vice Media and plans to lead a turnaround focused on the embattled media conglomerate's studio and advertising divisions, according to a report on Monday. Under his lead, the counterculture media group will focus on its original documentaries, dramas and podcasts – like its popular British crime drama 'Gangs of London' or film 'Bama Rush' about the sorority recruitment process at the University of Alabama. The focus is on 'storytelling that can build a long-term, profitable and sustainable media brand in today's landscape,' Stotsky told the Wall Street Journal. 3 Adam Stotsky at the YouTube Streamy Awards in 2022. Getty Images Bruce Dixon, who served as chief executive at Vice since February 2023, will leave the company. He executed layoffs and focused on cutting costs during his time at Vice, which was acquired by Fortress Investment Group and Soros Fund Management after it filed for bankruptcy in 2023. Dixon last year announced plans to stop publishing content on and sell assets like Refinery29, its media site geared toward young women, and British fashion magazine i-D. 'A lot of the sort of messy stuff has been cleaned up,' Stotsky told the Journal. Now Vice, which was founded in 1994, is profitable and looking to transform its studio business into a major revenue stream, according to Michael Lang, Vice's executive chairman and president of Lang Media Group. Stotsky has spent about three decades working in entertainment television, serving as chief marketing officer at NBCUniversal and later as president of Esquire Network and then E! Entertainment. More recently, he led Dick Clark Productions, which is now owned by Penske Media, and helped Religion of Sports, the sports media venture founded by Tom Brady, Michael Strahan and Gotham Chopra, raise $50 million in an equity round. 3 Vice was acquired out of bankruptcy by Fortress Investment Group and other lenders. Getty Images That doesn't mean Vice expects smooth-sailing from here on out. 'It's going to be really tough for us to compete against Instagram, TikTok and YouTube,' Lang told the Journal. 'So we're going to create great content for digital platforms, but we're not going to be in the digital platform business itself.' The CEO shake-up follows the hiring of Amy Powell, a former Amazon and Paramount executive, to serve as president of Vice Studios. 3 Adam Stotsky at the Billboard Music Awards in 2022. Getty Images for MRC The company also plans to expand its Virtue ad agency's presence in Europe and focus on news podcasts, like 'Shane Smith Has Questions,' hosted by Vice co-founder Shane Smith. Vice has also pushed several new sports series, like 'Calipari: Razor's Edge,' a partnership with Peyton Manning's Omaha Productions about basketball coach John Calipari's first season at the University of Arkansas. It has a new series expected to launch this September called 'NFL Playback,' which adds fresh commentary from celebrities and players, like Manning, to classic games.