logo
Senedd debates calls for smartphone-free schools

Senedd debates calls for smartphone-free schools

SENEDD Members warned 'something must be done' with smartphones causing disruption in classrooms and fuelling mental health problems among pupils.
Carolyn Thomas, who chairs the petitions committee, led a debate in the Senedd on May 14 amid a growing chorus of calls for restrictions on mobile phone use in schools.
The committee launched an inquiry in response to a 3,369-name petition submitted by Zena Blackwell, publishing a report with recommendations for the Welsh Government.
Ms Thomas told the Senedd her committee found no clear consensus, urging Welsh ministers to introduce national guidance rather than an outright ban.
Pointing out that 83% of children have a smartphone by Year 6, she said: 'Classroom teachers… told us phones cause all sorts of problems in schools, we heard some quite shocking evidence on this.'
But she raised evidence from the children's commissioner, NSPCC, Barnardo's, and Parents Voices in Wales, which all expressed concerns about a ban.
The Labour politician, who represents North Wales, pointed to evidence from Diabetes UK that smartphones help children manage their condition throughout the schoolday.
Labour MS Carolyn Thomas
Ms Thomas added that exemptions could be required for young carers and disabled or neurodivergent children who may similarly rely on their smartphones.
'We all struggle with the addictive nature of phones,' she said. 'There's the strong argument that children are that much more vulnerable and need greater protection.
'But they also need to learn how to safely function in a digital world. Legislators, and society in general, are still struggling to find the right answers.'
She said: 'The evidence base is still quite limited but growing all the time. As a committee, we felt strongly that 'something has to be done' but actions need to be evidence-based.'
Calling for guidance to ensure a consistent approach across the country, she emphasised the importance of parental engagement and being mindful of teachers' workloads.
South Wales East MS Natasha Asghar, the Conservatives' shadow education secretary, similarly said: 'We cannot continue with the… status quo – something needs to give.'
South Wales East Senedd Member Natasha Asghar
But Ms Asghar went further than the committee in supporting an outright ban on smartphones, save for exceptional circumstances such as medical needs.
She told the Senedd: 'Mobile phones can indeed be a major distraction, taking our students' focus away from learning, which is exactly what schools are for.'
Ms Asghar pointed to research showing pupils in schools with an effective ban achieved GCSE results up to two grades higher compared to children in schools with laxer policies.
Criticising plans to let Welsh schools set their own restrictions, she said: 'The evidence shows that simply doesn't work, with one in eight pupils saying schools never confiscate phones even when rules forbidding them are indeed ignored.'
With more and more countries 'waking up to the damage phones are doing in our schools', Ms Asghar called for a non-ambiguous approach to ensure consistency.
She said: 'I believe a ban, which sees phones locked up at the start of each school day in lockers and retrieved at the end of the day, is the best approach. It's the right thing for teachers, it's the right thing for children and it's the right thing for parents.'
Cefin Campbell, Plaid Cymru's shadow education secretary, suggested national guidance with local implementation by schools would be the best way ahead.
Plaid Cymru MS Cefin Campbell
Mr Campbell said: 'We have to strike the right balance… between not harming learners – and there is evidence, of course, that that's happening – and, on the other hand, preparing them for the technical world we live in today.'
John Griffiths emphasised the importance of considering screen use at home as well as in school, with children from 'alarmingly' young ages spending a lot of time on smartphones.
The Labour Senedd Member, who represents Newport East, expressed concerns about psychologists being drafted in to make mobile phone games as addictive as possible.
'I see evidence of that in my own family, as I'm sure just about everyone else does,' he said.
Rhys ab Owen, an independent member of the petitions committee, agreed phones can be more of a problem at home with children staying up late at night. 'Very often that's when the bullying happens, at home rather than at school,' he said.
Plaid Cymru MS Cefin Campbell
Backing an outright ban, the Tories' Gareth Davies raised restrictions introduced by France from 2018 with a 'digital pause' seeing pupils hand over phones at the start of the day.
Lynne Neagle set out the Welsh Government's formal response to the report, accepting three of the committee's five recommendations in full and the other two in principle.
Wales' education secretary said: 'Like the committee, I recognise that an outright national ban does not allow the space for schools to manage the needs of their learners.
Lynne Neagle, cabinet secretary for education
'Our approach has always been to give schools autonomy to make decisions on the use of mobile phones… however, I also recognise the need for additional support.'
Ms Neagle told the Senedd an expert group will examine mobile phone use, developing national guidance and exemptions alongside the wider school community.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Reform a right-wing party?
Is Reform a right-wing party?

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Is Reform a right-wing party?

If the problem with Labour is that it believes in nothing, the problem with Reform is that it believes in everything. The dispute over the burqa is only the latest example. In pushing Keir Starmer to ban the burqa 'in the interests of public safety', new MP Sarah Pochin undoubtedly spoke for a significant section of the party's supporters. For that matter, polling has previously indicated the British public's backing for a ban. For some, it is indeed a safety issue: presented with a stranger, covered head-to-foot, identifiable only by their eyes, how can we know who that person is, whether they ought to be there, and what their intentions are? For others, it's a symbol of the cultural separatism that sees entire communities of Muslims live parallel lives in Britain, indifferent or hostile to our inherited customs and conventions.

Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive
Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On April 15, 2010, the UK held its first-ever televised general election debate, pitting Labour's Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, against David Cameron of the Conservatives, with Nick Clegg expected to do little more than make up the numbers. However, if that was the anticipated script, no one told Clegg, who spoke so persuasively that the catchphrase of the night was 'I agree with Nick' as both Cameron and Brown sought to side with him. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In a snap YouGov poll after the contest, 51 per cent declared the Liberal Democrat leader to be the winner, with Cameron on 29 and Brown on 19. While 'Cleggmania' proved short-lived, the clear lesson was that agreeing with a political opponent tends to benefit them. Delegates at the Conservative party conference in 2023 pose for a photograph with Nigel Farage (Picture: Oli Scarff) | AFP via Getty Images A political cataclysm looms Fifteen years later, and the Conservatives' current strategy to defeat Reform UK, by echoing its rhetoric, is backfiring even more badly. While the 2010 debate was a one-off event, the Tories have effectively been campaigning for Reform for years. In Thursday's Hamilton by-election, the Conservative candidate received just 1,621 votes, down from 6,332 at the last Scottish Parliament election, while Reform got 7,088, not far behind the winner, Labour's Davy Russell, and the SNP in second. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the Scottish Tories prepare for their party conference this week, a major topic of discussion must be about finding ways to disagree with Reform, if they wish to survive what threatens to become a political event as cataclysmic as the collapse of the old Liberal party after the First World War. Farage is out to destroy the Tories, and they must be as determined and ruthless. There is much to go at. Many of Reform's policies are patently ridiculous and some are downright dangerous. Keir Starmer's claim that Farage would 'crash the economy' like Liz Truss was a good line, and the Conservatives need to find similarly resonant ways of highlighting the very real dangers of voting for Reform.

Labour's by-election win only highlights SNP's detachment from reality
Labour's by-election win only highlights SNP's detachment from reality

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Labour's by-election win only highlights SNP's detachment from reality

Boothman of The Times is also here of course. 'What the hell's going on then, John,' I ask him. 'Some people are telling me the Labour vote has collapsed,' he tells me. To be fair to Boothman though, he's among the first later to suggest that the smiles on the threshing floor where the count will take place are all on the faces of Labour folk. I attempt to mock his initial analysis. 'Didn't you say Labour's vote was collapsing,' I say. 'Aye it's collapsed into the ballot box,' he says. Boothman's an old fox and not easily caught out. Read More: There's Hutcheon of the Record, scurrying hither and yon, fresh from having chivvied Sir Alex Ferguson and Graeme Souness into backing Davy Russell to take the seat for Labour. If he had lost badly then to Hutcheon would have fallen the task of finding some lipstick for his front page the following day. The changes that social media have wrought in the newspaper industry are never starker than when applied to an election night. The task now is to transmit your thoughts as they're happening and based on little more than the body language of the participants and the snatched asides of party activists which you must first rinse of its in-built prejudice. Even as you're sending out your 20-word digital despatches you know you risk being confounded at any moment by incoming kites and the excursions and alarums of the counting floor. My paper is now asking for a selfie of me with Mr Learmonth and Ms McCurdy where the trick once more is to channel an air of authority and confidence that I'm not really feeling. Our editor, Catherine Salmond, kindly calls us her 'top team' in her social media post. On my feed though, a chap is begging to differ. He calls us 'filthy partisan sock puppets for England.' Always mindful of everyone's mental health, I'm glad he's got it off his chest. McKenna, Learmonth and McCurdy: Salmond's top team (Image: Newsquest) The night then becomes all about juggling narratives. And in the 48 hours since Mr Russell's seemingly unlikely victory it's been about trying to discern the runes of what his win portends. The most profoundly important consequence of Labour's triumph and Reform's massive electoral breakthrough here is that Scottish independence is off the table for another generation, effectively killed off by the SNP's own folly. The SNP now exists for one purpose only: to try to cling to power in Holyrood by any means necessary. Sir John Curtice has already predicted that Reform, on the basis of their showing on Thursday, could win up to 28 seats in 2026. That alone kills independence until at least 2031 and then only as an unlikely prospect. What should worry the SNP most is that the Yes vote in 2014 was reinforced by up to 30% of traditional Labour voters who backed independence as a means of decoupling from a UK polity which was being controlled by the hard right Toryism of Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg. Now that the SNP have effectively ditched independence there's no reason for any former Labour voter to stay with them. During this campaign, the SNP's obsession with gender politics also came home to roost: not so much on the doorsteps, but in the calibre of people they sent out to them. The course of the GRR debate didn't harm them as much as the resignations en masse of hard-working, intelligent and reasonable female activists who had been the backbone of their success between 2007 and 2024. They were missing at the UK election in 2024 and again last week in South Lanarkshire and the results are there for all to see. The disconnection between professional politics and the everyday people of Scotland has never been more starkly evident than with this party. A slew of poisonous social media attacks in the last 48 hours on the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall voters by prominent SNP supporters (and at least one Councillor) has been depressing to behold. The clock is now ticking for John Swinney's leadership as the wage thieves on his backbenches begin to tumble to this and what it means for their mortgages and school fees. But time has already been called on Scottish independence. Counting begins for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election at the South Lanarkshire Council headquarters in Hamilton. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Meanwhile, Scottish Labour should probably calm down now. To read some analysis of their admittedly adroit campaign in South Lanarkshire you'd have thought it had been run by alchemists who'd found the secret of turning base metal into gold. Behave yourselves. Labour has a longer term problem here and solving it will mean getting real about the challenge of Reform. In Scotland there has always been a large cohort of aspirational working class: well-informed; skilled and conservative in their community and family values. It was these people who handed the Conservatives the only electoral majority vote percentage in a Scottish election as they did in 1955. It has been thought that societal changes; the upward progression of the Irish/Catholic community in Scotland and the class malevolence of Thatcherism had killed mass Toryism for good. To admit to voting Tory in some of Scotland's working-class communities was to risk becoming a social and cultural pariah. But here's the nightmare scenario for Labour in Scotland. What if these voters hadn't merely held their noses and voted reluctantly for Reform as a howl against a supercilious Holyrood elite? What if instead they'd gladly voted for them because it didn't indicate class betrayal and was thus safe to do so? One senior Labour figure told me yesterday that the Scottish left in general, faced with the challenge of Reform, must re-imagine what it actually stands for. 'The Left in Scotland has been too focused on identity politics and flying flags for issues that aren't of concern to ordinary working people,' he told me. Scottish Labour's Davy Russell arrives at the count before being declared winner for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) 'There needs to be some very deep thinking on what we stand for on what it means to be on the Left. And then we must seek to communicate those priorities. You can say what you like about Tony Blair, but he built a broad coalition in a party where John Prescott, Gordon Brown and John Reid thrived.' It's doubtful if these men would get house-room inside Keir Starmer's Labour Party now. UK Labour is currently speaking to no-one but some of London's salon neighbourhoods around Canary Wharf, Islington and Shoreditch and the café society of the Southside of Glasgow. What Davy Russell represents is more in tune with what their former voters expect of Labour.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store