logo
Gloomy days ahead for American journalism

Gloomy days ahead for American journalism

Business Times13-05-2025

I RECENTLY returned from the reunion celebrations of my (1980) class at Columbia University's School of Journalism in New York City with a sense that American journalism is facing a major crisis.
Dr Jelani Cobb, the dean of the Columbia Journalism School, expressed fears about the threats that America's free press may be facing under President Donald Trump. Dr Cobb pointed to access issues, such as President Trump barring the Associated Press from White House pool events for refusing to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as 'Gulf of America', as well as the investigations by the Federal Communications Commission into media outlets such as NBC, ABC, CBS.
Taken individually, all of these actions might seem like one-off cases, but when put together they paint a really alarming picture of deteriorating media freedom in the US.
But the challenges facing American journalism go beyond potential threats to freedom of the press and are existential on many levels.
The reality is that fewer people read newspapers these days. People tend to receive most of their news from the Internet, and in particular from the unreliable social media.
Many of the large local markets that used to have two or three newspapers now have none, and even the big news organisations, such as the Washington Post, face economic problems and end up being financially dependent on the support of billionaires, such as Jeff Bezos of Amazon.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Indeed, Bezos – mindful of his interest in maintaining a good relationship with the Trump administration – has berated the Washington Post, which he owns, for its criticism of President Trump's policies and demanded to have full control of its editorial page.
Moreover, some of those attending the meetings at Columbia University over the weekend recalled that there was a time when a graduate of the journalism school would not only have no problems getting a job; he or she would be bombarded by many offers from media organisations.
But young men and women these days should probably think twice before choosing a career in journalism where the job opportunities have become limited, with very few graduates landing jobs in the large media outlets, and instead ending up mostly in low-paying part-time positions.
The template for a journalism career used to be the following: After graduation you looked for a job in a newspaper in a small town and after gaining experience you moved to a larger market, hoping that one day you would be hired by the New York Times.
These days, however, there are no small-town newspapers where a young journalist could launch a career.
And on some level, there is a sense that working in journalism lacks the influence it once had. Most Americans, according to the opinion polls, don't trust journalists, particularly those who are regarded as liberal and elitists.
In a way, many of those residing in Middle America agree with President Trump's dismissal of what he refers to as the 'legacy press' that is out of touch with most Americans.
This is a political and media reality very different from the one that members of the Class of 1980 had faced 45 years ago when the sky seemed to be the limit when it came to the job opportunities in journalism – and also to the prestige that we enjoyed as members of a free and vibrant press.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel strikes kill top Iran military leaders, hit nuclear sites
Israel strikes kill top Iran military leaders, hit nuclear sites

CNA

time36 minutes ago

  • CNA

Israel strikes kill top Iran military leaders, hit nuclear sites

TEHRAN: Israel unleashed a wave of strikes on Iran on Friday (Jun 13), hitting about 100 targets including nuclear facilities and military command centres, and killing senior figures, among them the armed forces chief and top nuclear scientists. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Israel it faced a "bitter and painful" fate over the attacks, while the Iranian military said there were "no limits" to its response. The Israeli military said later Iran launched around 100 drones in retaliation, with air defences intercepting them outside Israeli territory. Neighbouring Jordan said it intercepted drones and missiles that violated its airspace, as air raid sirens sounded in Amman. US President Donald Trump told Fox News he had prior knowledge of the Israeli strikes, which Israel said involved 200 fighter jets. Trump also stressed that Tehran "cannot have a nuclear bomb". The United States underlined that it was not involved in the Israeli action and warned Iran not to attack its personnel or interests. But Tehran said Washington would be "responsible for consequences" as Israel's operation "cannot have been carried out without the coordination and permission of the United States". Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel struck at the "heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme", taking aim at the atomic facility in Natanz and nuclear scientists. The strikes would "continue as many days as it takes", the Israeli leader said, while the military said intelligence showed Iran was approaching the "point of no return" on its nuclear programme. The strikes killed Iran's highest-ranking military officer, armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, and the head of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, Iranian media reported. "The precise targeting of senior commanders of the Revolutionary Guards, the Iranian military, and nuclear scientists - all of whom were involved in advancing the plan to destroy Israel - sends a strong and clear message: those who work toward Israel's destruction will be eliminated," Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said. AFP images showed a gaping hole in the side of a Tehran high-rise residential building that appeared to have sustained a targeted and localised strike. State media said civilians, including women and children, were killed. Tasnim news agency said six nuclear scientists were killed. Flights suspended Tehran's streets were deserted except for queues at petrol stations, a familiar sight in times of crisis. Air traffic was halted at Tehran's main gateway, Imam Khomeini International Airport, while Iraq and Jordan also closed their airspace and suspended flights. Gulf airlines cancelled flights to and from Iran, as well as Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Israel declared a state of emergency and closed its airspace, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying Israel was braced for Iran's expected retaliation. Hours later, the Jordanian military said its aircraft and air defence systems intercepted "a number of missiles and drones that entered Jordanian airspace". There are "no limits in responding to this crime", Iran's armed forces said, accusing Israel of crossing "all red lines". Oil prices surged while stocks sank on the Israeli strikes, which came after Trump's warning of a "massive conflict" in the region. Trump had also said the US was drawing down staff in the Middle East, after Iran had threatened to target US military bases in the region if conflict broke out. Prior to the strikes, Trump said he believed a deal on Iran's nuclear programme was "fairly close", cautioning, however, that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement. The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Netanyahu, but said: "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it." Trump quickly added: "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." "Within reach" US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran not to respond to Israeli strikes by hitting US bases, saying Washington was not involved. Ahead of Friday's attack, Iran had threatened to hit US bases in the Middle East if conflict were to erupt. With the violence raising questions on whether a sixth round of talks planned between the US and Iran will still take place on Sunday in Oman, Trump said Washington is still "hoping to get back to the negotiating table". Confirming Natanz among targets, the UN's nuclear watchdog said it was "closely monitoring" the situation. "The agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country," said Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "Extremist" Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees Iran as an existential threat. Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza. Since the Hamas attack, Iran and Israel have traded direct attacks for the first time. Aside from Hamas, Israel is also battling Iranian proxies Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. The US and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied. Israel again called for global action after the IAEA accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as "extremist", while Tehran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 per cent, far above the 3.67 per cent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear warhead.

Chinese firms in talks to join group for Li Ka-Shing's ports
Chinese firms in talks to join group for Li Ka-Shing's ports

Business Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Chinese firms in talks to join group for Li Ka-Shing's ports

[HONG KONG] China's largest shipping company is among the firms in talks to invest in a multinational consortium seeking to buy billionaire Li Ka-shing's global ports, according to people familiar with the matter, in an effort to ease Beijing's concerns over the controversial deal. China Cosco Shipping Corp is one of several Chinese state-backed companies in discussions with the consortium led by Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's Terminal Investment on matters including how they might participate in the port deal, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. The buying group also includes US firm BlackRock and its Global Infrastructure Partners unit. The inclusion of Chinese investors in the consortium emerged as one of the options to advance the ports sale after high-stakes talks in Switzerland last month between Chinese and US officials, some of the people said. Beijing has fiercely opposed the sale – including two ports along the Panama Canal – over concerns it could affect its global shipping and trade ambitions. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump celebrated the deal as returning the strategic waterway to American influence. Once completed, the agreement to sell the two Panama ports and 41 others around the world is expected to net tycoon Li's CK Hutchison Holdings more than US$19 billion in cash. Talks are ongoing and the details are not yet finalised, the people said. Cosco, CK Hutchison and the Aponte family's MSC Mediterranean Shipping, which controls Terminal Investment, did not respond to requests for comment. BlackRock declined to comment. The talks are the latest twist in one of billionaire Li's most geopolitically challenging deals amid escalating tensions between the world's two largest economies over global trade. The development has raised hopes that it could ease China's concerns over the proposed transaction, which has been blasted by pro-Beijing newspapers as a betrayal of the nation and kowtowing to US pressure. The country's market watchdog has vowed to review the sale, and Bloomberg News reported in March that authorities told state-owned firms to hold off on any new collaboration with businesses linked to Li and his family. Despite the progress of the talks, a deal could still falter. A 145-day period for exclusive talks between CK Hutchison and the consortium ends in late July and the parties have already missed an initial goal of signing an agreement on the Panama part of the deal by early April. The current structure of the buyer consortium will give Terminal Investment ownership of all the ports except the two in Panama, whose control will go to BlackRock, Bloomberg reported in April. Terminal Investment parent MSC has 28 offices across Greater China. It runs a terminal in China's eastern city Ningbo and operates dozens of shipping services between the country and the rest of the world. In an interview with the Financial Times earlier this week, the head of the Panama Canal Authority said the consortium's structure means a concentrated terminal ownership which could threaten the waterway's competitiveness and neutrality. In response, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it supports Panama in defending its independence and reiterated its opposition to economic bullying. BLOOMBERG

Millions of acres of public land sales slated for US tax Bill
Millions of acres of public land sales slated for US tax Bill

Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Business Times

Millions of acres of public land sales slated for US tax Bill

[WASHINGTON] The sale of millions of acres of federal land would provide billions of dollars to help pay for President Donald Trump's massive package of tax cuts and spending in the Senate's version of the Bill released on Wednesday (Jun 11) night. As much as around 1.2 million hectares of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management and the US Forest Service would be mandated for sale in the legislation. The measure, requiring each agency to sell a small percentage of the hundreds of millions of acres of land they manage in eligible states that include Alaska as well as western states, could raise as much as US$10 billion over 10 years, according to a fact sheet. The plan is part of a broader effort to generate as much as US$29 billion through a combination of expanded oil, gas, coal and geothermal lease sales, and new timber sales made public in the legislation unveiled by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Similar energy requirements, included new energy lease sales in the coastal plain of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, were included in the House version of the bill, which passed by a one-vote margin last month. The sale of public lands to help pay for the legislation has been a political lightning rod. A plan to sell about 500,000 acres of federal land in Utah and Nevada was stripped by the House version of the Bill amid opposition from Republicans such as Montana Representative Ryan Zinke. The concept of public land sales has also enraged environmental and conservation groups, who say the proposal threatens wildlife as well as access to lands for outdoor recreation, hunters and fisherman. 'It's a travesty that Senate Republicans are putting more than 3 million acres of our beloved public lands on the chopping block to sell at fire-sale prices to build mega mansions for the ultra-rich,' said Patrick Donnelly, a director at the Center for Biological Diversity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Republicans have said the sales are needed to provide cheap land to help address a housing crisis, and to help western states, where the government owns large swaths of federal land, to restore the areas to economic production and associated tax revenue. 'This proposal allows a fraction of 1 per cent of federal land to be used to build houses,' the Senate energy committee said in the fact sheet. 'In doing so, it will create thousands of jobs, allow millions of Americans to realise the American dream, and reduce the deficit and fund our public lands.' The Senate bill aligns with a Trump administration plan to identify areas of 'underutilised' land suitable for development. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Wednesday the agency had identified some 250,000 acres near cities where development could lower the cost of housing. But New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich, the panel's top Democrat, said the idea was deeply unpopular in the West with 'animosity that runs the entire political spectrum.' 'These are places that belong to all of us,' Heinrich said in an interview Thursday. 'Once this stuff gets sold off to developers, we'll never get it back. It will be behind a no trespassing sign.' BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store