logo
Scotland's first 'slap fight' event cancelled

Scotland's first 'slap fight' event cancelled

Yahoo22-02-2025

The first-ever slap fighting competition to take place in Scotland has been cancelled following a health warning.
BritSlap/SlapFight UK was due to hold the event at Glasgow University Union on Saturday evening as part of a wider weightlifting meet.
However, a leading expert on brain injury said it was "inconceivable" the bouts should go ahead due to the elevated risk of concussion.
A spokesperson for the student union said the event had been cancelled "in discussion with organisers".
Slap fighting began in Russia and expanded into Eastern Europe and the United States after going viral on social media.
Unlike in boxing, MMA and Muay Thai where there is a defensive element, here competitors exchange forceful bare-handed blows to the side of the head without defending themselves.
The winner is decided either by knock out, a points win or a stoppage by a medic or referee.
Slap fighting: Controversial event makes Scottish debut
SlapFight UK, which has no independent regulation or governance, is the first independent league to be set up in this country and was due to host its first Scottish meet after several events in England.
But Dr Willie Stewart, a leading researcher at the university's school of neuroscience, urged competitors not to "risk their brain health in the name of sport".
Dr Stewart said the university had led research into traumatic brain injuries for over 50 years, including the "catastrophic outcomes" to brain health suffered by former footballers and rugby players.
He told BBC Scotland News: "There is no question that the University of Glasgow's research has provided the clearest evidence that brain injuries should never be considered trivial or encouraged as 'sport'.
"In this context, it seems inconceivable, if not ill-considered, that a students' union of this university would be hosting such an event.
"I'd suggest that rather than encouraging people to risk their brain health in the name of 'sport', the event organisers spend a few hours in my laboratory and educate themselves on the consequences of brain injuries."
An American study on slap fighting last year warned of a high risk of concussion for participants.
The University of Pittsburgh research analysed footage of 78 fights and found more than half of participants displayed visual signs of concussion.
Its lead author, Dr Raj Swaroop Lavadi said the lack of defensive element meant each blow was "amplified".
He also said promoters should be "more transparent about its risks".
The student union previously said it was "satisfied" with safety measures in place.
A statement released late on Friday said: "In discussion with the event organisers, the slap fighting element of this weekend's weightlifting competition is no longer going ahead."
BBC Scotland has contacted the union for further comment.
SlapFightUK and Glasgow University have also been contacted for comment.
Health warning over face-slap fighting
Slap fighter looking to open his own gym

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rare Feat at US Open as Star Golfer Notches Historic Albatross
Rare Feat at US Open as Star Golfer Notches Historic Albatross

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rare Feat at US Open as Star Golfer Notches Historic Albatross

Rare Feat at US Open as Star Golfer Notches Historic Albatross originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Heading into the 2025 U.S. Open at Oakmont Country Club, much of the conversation was centered on just how difficult the course will be. Advertisement Through the early portion of day one, J.J. Spaun's -4 is the best so far, but we have seen many players struggle to make par despite the conditions probably being the best of the tournament. While the course is loved for being so challenging, amazing shots can be made and Patrick Reed delivered one for the ages. On the fourth hole, which is a 622 year par five, Reed hit a beautiful shot from 286 yards out on his second attempt and it trickled all the way into the hole. It's one of the rarest shots in the sport and just the fourth double eagle in U.S. Open history. To make it more impressive, he shot it blind, only realizing he made it because of the crowds' reaction. With one swing of the club he moved from one over to two under, which could go a long way for the entire tournament. Advertisement Reed, a 34-year-old American golfer born in San Antonio, Texas, became a professional in 2011 after helping Augusta State University win back-to-back NCAA Division I titles, and has since amassed nine PGA Tour victories, including the 2018 Masters Tournament. He joined LIV Golf like many other notable players in 2022 and his best finish in a U.S. open is fourth, which he achieved in 2018. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 12, 2025, where it first appeared.

Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less
Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less

"Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics," asserted Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his June 9 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Public confidence is waning." This is true. But the HHS secretary bears responsibility for much of that division and waning confidence. And he's just made it worse. How? Kennedy has politicized the U.S. vaccine approval process by summarily firing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) earlier this week. Typically appointed to four-year terms, Kennedy has taken the unprecedented step of prematurely sacking the entire panel. Two days later, he announced his selection of eight new members, many of whom are chiefly famous for espousing contrarian views with respect to vaccine safety and efficacy. So what did Kennedy find wrong with the original ACIP panel? The secretary asserted that it "has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interests" stemming from members' "immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy." At least in his Journal op-ed, the secretary offers no evidence of any unreported or improper conflicts of interest among those he just fired. It is worth noting that the fired ACIP members were vetted before they were appointed and that they each declare any conflicts that later emerge before each of the committee's meetings. What about RFK Jr.'s vague claims hinting at nefarious "immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms" on the part of committee members? If your automobile keeps stalling out, you take your jalopy to a trained mechanic for diagnosis and repair. If your computer system has been hacked, you seek help from qualified computer engineers. You earnestly hope that your mechanics and computer engineers are fully immersed in their respective systems of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms—that is, you hope they are experts who know what they are doing. Looking over the pre-firing ACIP membership list, they chiefly appear to be immersed in the fields of immunology, vaccinology, and epidemiology. In other words, they, on the face of it, have the training you would expect them to have in order to expertly diagnose the relative safety and efficacy of vaccines. For the most part, the new appointees are notably lacking in such professional expertise. The HHS secretary gives his game away when he characterizes his wholesale firing as being "above any pro- or antivaccine agenda." With respect to his new ACIP appointees, Kennedy promised that "none of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers." That's great. After all, an anti-vaccine agenda makes as much sense as anti–automobile repair or anti–computer debugging agendas. The agendas we want are pro–making cars run, pro–computers correctly ciphering, and pro–vaccines that protect against diseases. However, in looking over the backgrounds of the new ACIP members, several of them can be fairly characterized as being at least anti-vaxxer-adjacent. First, there is physician researcher Robert Malone, who has made exaggerated claims about being the inventor of the mRNA technologies that led to the development of the successful mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Eventually, Malone became a COVID-19 vaccine skeptic, asserting that "they are not working." In 2023, he credulously cited a bogus analysis that claimed COVID-19 vaccines were responsible for 17 million excess deaths worldwide. Later epidemiological research suggests that the vaccines averted around 4 million deaths globally. A 2024 Brookings Institution report suggests "the delivery of vaccines to a substantial majority of the American population by mid-2021 saved close to 800,000 American lives relative to what would have occurred had vaccines not been developed." Then there is public health nurse Vicky Pebsworth. She is a board member of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). NVIC continues to peddle the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism, as does our HHS secretary. Next up is Massachusetts Institute of Technology management professor Retsef Levi. In 2023, Levi called for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 vaccination programs. His chief concern was the reported detection of heart inflammation (myocarditis) cases in young males who had been vaccinated. Subsequent research has shown that post-vaccination myocarditis is considerably less harmful than post–COVID infection myocarditis and conventional myocarditis. In his announcement of the new ACIP members, Kennedy declared, "All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense." Maybe so, but the backgrounds of several of these appointees provide good reasons for skepticism. The post Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less appeared first on

Fans don't appear to be snatching up tickets to the Club World Cup
Fans don't appear to be snatching up tickets to the Club World Cup

Fox Sports

timean hour ago

  • Fox Sports

Fans don't appear to be snatching up tickets to the Club World Cup

Associated Press If slashed ticket prices, closed stadium sections and moved seats are any indication, fans aren't exactly clamoring to attend the Club World Cup. The tournament opens Saturday with Lionel Messi's Inter Miami facing Al Ahly at Florida's Hard Rock Stadium. Thirty-two teams are taking part in the newly expanded tournament that will be played across 11 U.S. cities. The final is set for July 13 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. On Ticketmaster, FIFA's official ticketing partner for the Club World Cup, the least expensive tickets to the opener were $349 in December. As of Thursday, there were tickets available for just under $80. Upper deck seats for certain games at Seattle's Lumen Field and Philadelphia's Lincoln Financial Field were no longer available. Links to a smattering of resale tickets in those sections did not work. A person with knowledge of the situation confirmed to The Associated Press that some sections of Lumen Field in Seattle had been closed, but did not offer details. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to speak on the record. In Philadelphia, some ticketholders received messages that said they were moved. 'As we continue preparations to deliver a world-class event, we are making a few enhancements inside the stadium to optimize operations and ensure the best possible matchday experience for fans, players and the global broadcast audience," the message said. 'As a result of these stadium optimizations, some seats, including yours, will be relocated. We want to ensure you that your new seat will be in the same or better value zone than your original one.' Ticketmaster used dynamic pricing for ticket sales, which is based on demand and other factors. They referred all questions about sales to FIFA. FIFA did not respond to questions about whether sections were closed due to slow ticket sales, or whether fans who originally bought tickets in those sections were moved or offered refunds. But soccer's international governing body did offer a general statement. 'We anticipate great attendances and electric atmospheres at its inaugural edition, with excitement growing with every round of matches and the tournament ultimately standing as the undisputed pinnacle of club world football,' the statement said in part. 'The appetite speaks for itself: fans from over 130 countries have already purchased tickets. The top 10 markets are led by the United States, followed by Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, France, Japan, Switzerland, Germany and Portugal — a clear sign of global anticipation and reach.' With 32 international teams, there are undoubtedly some clubs that are unfamiliar to American audiences. There are also 63 total matches, meaning not all can occur in prime hours for fans. Argentine club River Plate is playing Japan's Urawa Red Diamonds at Lumen Field on Tuesday at noon local time ($24 tickets), while a noon game between Brazil's Fluminense and Germany's Borussia Dortmund had tickets available via Ticketmaster for $23. However, some matches were drawing fans, including Paris Saint-Germain's opener against Atletico Madrid on Sunday at the Rose Bowl, where the least expensive seats were $100. The least expensive ticket for July's tournament final available through Ticketmaster was $769. FIFA President Gianni Infantino urged fans to buy tickets at a hype event in the leadup to the tournament this week. 'Be part of history,' he said. 'Football is such an important sport all over the world. We have billions of people watching this Club World Cup from home who would love to club and to attend." ___ AP soccer: recommended

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store