CA bill could make health insurers pay $1 million for denying care
A new bill in the California Senate could help residents fight back against denials by health insurance companies.
Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) has introduced Senate Bill 363, the Health Insurance Accountability Act, which intends to provide 'critical transparency and accountability for health insurance companies for baseless denials of coverage for medically necessary care,' Wiener's office said in a news release.
'Accountability is critical when insurance companies wrongfully deny Californians health care coverage,' said Wiener. 'The facts are alarming. Over 70% of mental health denials that make it all the way through the appeals process are overturned. This suggests insurers are engaging in widespread violations of state law and wrongfully denying urgently needed healthcare, potentially in a widespread way. We must gain a clearer picture of what is happening with coverage decisions and hold health plans accountable for unwarranted denials.'
Not only would Wiener's bill require health insurance companies to 'submit a written explanation regarding claim denials and modifications and the reason for such action,' but they'd also face increasing penalties for excessive denials.
Arguments over whether Luigi Mangione is a 'hero' offer a glimpse into an unusual American moment
Financial penalties, which will fund children's health care services, begin at $50,000 for the first violation, $400,000 for the second and $1 million for ensuing noncompliance.
Wiener's push comes after the high-profile killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, which was allegedly committed by Luigi Mangione and motivated by insurers' use of a 'deny, defend, depose' strategy to avoid covering some procedures and medications.
While Wiener made no mention of Mangione, who is believed to have suffered from a back condition that may have prompted his conflict with the health insurance industry, though the highlighted others who have also struggled with having their health conditions properly covered.
'Between my own care, and that of my daughter's care, who lives with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, we've received dozens if not hundreds of denials from our health insurance plan over the years,' a woman named Colleen Henderson said in the release. 'It's ridiculous that I pay for insurance, yet they're never there when we need them. I'm grateful Senator Wiener is standing up for patients like us by requiring insurers be held accountable for their actions.'
The bill is expected to be heard in its first committee in March, according to Wiener's office.
The California Association of Health Plans, which represents the industry, has not yet taken a position on the bill, a spokesperson said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Medicaid spending in Mass. has nearly quadrupled in the past 20 years. It needs reform.
Advertisement Medicaid was The cost of this is staggering. The budget for the state's Medicaid program, called MassHealth, has to over Advertisement But this explosion in the cost of Medicaid begs the question: Has all this spending led to better health outcomes? Surprisingly, Despite these findings, even modest Medicaid reform in Republican proposals before Congress — like encouraging community engagement through volunteering or work, preventing duplicate payments to insurers, and closing state-level However, it should be noted that the current proposals in Washington — which the House passed last week and are now in the Republican-controlled Senate — will result in more Medicaid spending over 10 years, not less. The bill merely slows the rate of growth. Only in Washington, D.C., is more spending decried as a cut. The fundamental issue remains: Are we prioritizing the right goals? Advertisement The evidence on the power of connection is . Past state-level experiments with work engagement in programs like food stamps and welfare cash assistance offer a promising road map. A Medicaid reform could similarly refocus state efforts on connecting enrollees with community engagement rather than solely maximizing federal funding. Encouragingly, these past reforms also saw a halving of the time individuals needed to stay on public assistance. Shouldn't we celebrate if someone like J.D. could earn enough to transition to employer-based or ACA coverage? Sadly, too often, critics characterize any transition off Medicaid as Advertisement While Medicaid reform often faces bipartisan heartburn, paradoxically there's longtime bipartisan agreement that major entitlement programs are growing unsustainably. If we can't at least slow the rate of growth, in part by delivering better outcomes, then our fiscal house of cards may fall, which hurts the most vulnerable. Our leaders must shift the debate from simply protecting the flow of federal dollars to ensuring that every Medicaid dollar genuinely improves patient health. Current inertia seems more about preserving the status quo than addressing the health impact on individuals like J.D. Meanwhile, our communities suffer as we miss out on J.D.'s contributions to society. The federal proposals provide a crucial moment to discuss opening doors of opportunity rather than defending a system that requires poverty for coverage. It's time to move beyond simply paying insurance companies for a card in J.D.'s pocket and focus on reforms that foster human thriving.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Luigi Mangione's Chilling Diary Reveals Motive on CEO Killing
A red notebook could hold the motive behind one of the most jarring killings in corporate America. ABC News reported that according to a new court filing, diary entries written by 27-year-old Luigi Mangione reveal his thinking before he allegedly gunned down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan last December. Mangione, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, was arrested hours later at a McDonald's in Pennsylvania. The handwritten entries detail Mangione's rage against the health insurance industry and his belief that a high-profile killing could ignite a broader conversation. 'The target is insurance,' he wrote in August 2024. 'It checks every box.' The Manhattan District Attorney's Office filed the notebook excerpts in response to Mangione's legal team, which sought to pause or dismiss the case. Prosecutors argue that the writings—alongside the fact that shell casings at the scene were etched with the words 'delay,' 'deny' and 'depose'—show clear intent to commit murder in furtherance of terrorism. Mangione, a former Ivy League student from a privileged background, allegedly viewed the killing as a way to strike at what he saw as systemic greed. 'Do you bomb the HQ? No. Bombs=terrorism,' he wrote. 'Targeted, precise and doesn't risk innocents.' Prosecutors say the killing triggered a cascade of threats against health insurance employees, forcing UnitedHealthcare to pull executive headshots from its website, hire private security, and advise employees to stop wearing branded clothing. Despite the violence, Mangione has become a cult-like figure to some online. A legal defense fund has raised more than $1 million, and many frustrated with rising health costs have voiced support. The motive, authorities argue, wasn't personal. It was symbolic. 'He chose UHC solely because they were the largest,' the filing reads. The entry explains Mangione's motive in this high-profile, shocking case. Luigi Mangione's Chilling Diary Reveals Motive on CEO Killing first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Townhall of concerned Arkansans voice fears over Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's proposed bill
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -In a packed town hall at the Hillary Rodham Clinton Children's Library and Learning Center, central Arkansans gathered to voice their concerns about the effects of proposed cuts to Medicaid and SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). The discussion centered on President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' currently under consideration in the U.S. Senate and its potential to impact those across the country with disabilities, the elderly and low-income families. Faith leaders protest 'big, beautiful bill' One of the most impassioned voices at the town hall was that of William Gerard, a SNAP beneficiary with cerebral palsy who also depends on Medicaid to survive. Unable to work due to his condition, Gerard shared his testimony about how these programs are 'literally life-saving' for him. 'If I didn't have Medicaid, I don't know how I would survive,' said Gerard, who is on a regimen of 10 to 12 medications, some of which cost thousands of dollars. 'Some of my seizure medications, for example, can be in the thousands. With Medicaid paying for it, I might have to pay $2, and that really helps me.' Gerard's story is a poignant reminder of how Medicaid and SNAP provide vital support for millions of Americans. Under the budget reconciliation bill that passed the House of Representatives, $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid could result in nearly 11 million Americans losing coverage over the next decade according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis released Wednesday. For Gerard and approximately 190,000 other Arkansans, these cuts would have catastrophic consequences. Beyond the cuts to Medicaid, the proposed bill also includes steep reductions to SNAP benefits, totaling an estimated $230 billion over the next ten years. Gerard, who receives just $60 in food stamps each month, expressed the challenges this would create. 'I only get $60 in food stamps. So, what's $60 going to buy me?' he asked. 'We need to get Arkansans more food stamps that deserve it, instead of taking it away from us and making us decide what can I eat?' This concern was echoed by others at the meeting, who worried that the cuts to both Medicaid and SNAP would place an even greater burden on already struggling families, according to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. The bill proposes several requirements, including the potential for states to take on more financial responsibility for these programs. The town hall participants discussed the wider implications of these cuts, particularly the snowball effect they would have on the lives of Arkansans. The potential loss of Medicaid coverage alone could leave thousands of individuals without access to necessary healthcare, while the SNAP cuts could push more people into food insecurity, according to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. According to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, more than 97,000 people in Arkansas Congressional District 2 could be impacted by the proposed $109 million cut to SNAP. These cuts could devastate families, particularly those with children, since nearly 45% of SNAP enrollees in Arkansas are parents who rely on the program to feed their families, according to . Another significant concern voiced at the town hall was the proposed work requirements that would accompany these cuts. Gerard, who receives both Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), expressed his fears for those who, like him, are unable to work due to their disabilities. 'What about the elderly, the disabled, the people who can't work? How are they supposed to make a living?' Gerard asked. 'I went to a school for handicapped children, and I've seen kids who could barely feed themselves, let alone work.' Big, beautiful bill heads to the Senate For many at the town hall, these proposed cuts aren't just about numbers in Washington—they represent the erosion of a safety net for vulnerable citizens who have no other means of support. The bill, if passed, could force these individuals into even more precarious situations, with few options for survival. 'I'm not fighting for just me,' Gerard said. 'I'm fighting for all Arkansans who are struggling to make ends meet, for all of us who depend on Medicaid and food stamps to survive.' The town hall concluded with a clear message: for concerned Arkansans to contact their congressional representatives and 'make their voices heard.' 'Stop and think about what you're doing to Arkansans—those on disability, the elderly, the most vulnerable,' Gerard said. 'If these cuts go through, it's not just about money, it's about survival.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
