Smartphones banned from schools in Afghan Taliban's heartland
AFGHANISTAN: A ban on smartphones in schools issued by Taliban authorities in southern Afghanistan came into force, students and teachers confirmed to AFP on Wednesday, over concerns of 'focus' and 'Islamic law'.
The directive by the provincial Education Department in Kandahar applies to students, teachers and administrative staff in schools and religious schools.
'This decision has been made to ensure educational discipline, focus', the statement said, adding that it was taken from a 'sharia perspective' and that smartphones contribute to 'the destruction of the future generation'.
The policy, which has already taken effect in schools across the province, has divided opinion among teachers and students.
'We did not bring smart phones with us to school today', Saeed Ahmad, a 22-year-old teacher, told AFP.
'I think this is a good decision so that there is more focus on studies,' he added.
Mohammad Anwar, an 11th grader, said 'the teachers are saying if anyone is seen bringing a phone, they will start searching the students.'
Another 12th-grade student, refusing to give his name, said the ban would hinder learning in a country where girls are barred from secondary school and university as part of restrictions the UN has dubbed 'gender apartheid'.
'When the teacher writes a lesson on the board, I often take a picture so I could write it down later. Now I can't. This decision will negatively affect our studies.'
- 'Complete ban' -
The ban has also taken root in religious schools known as madrassas.
'Now there's a complete ban. No one brings smartphones anymore,' Mohammad, 19 years old madrassa student said.
A number of countries have in recent years moved to restrict mobile phones from classrooms such as France, Denmark and Brazil.
The Taliban authorities have already introduced a ban on images of living beings in media, with multiple provinces announcing restrictions and some Taliban officials refusing to be photographed or filmed.
The Taliban's Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada called last week on officials and scholars to reduce their use of smartphones.
'This is the order of the leaders, and we must accept it,' a 28-year-old security forces member told AFP without giving his name as he was not authorized to speak to the media.
'I have now found a brick phone ... I used WhatsApp on my smartphone sometimes, but now I don't use it anymore,' he added.
Some Taliban officials in Kandahar have started sharing their numbers for brick phones and switching off online messaging apps.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump on Iran strikes: 'I may do it, I may not do it'
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said he was considering whether the United States will join Israeli strikes on Iran Wednesday, as he said that Tehran had reached out to seek negotiations. Speaking as he watched installation of a new flagpole at the White House, Trump added that his patience "had already run out" with Iran and repeated his call for the Islamic republic's "unconditional surrender." "I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump told reporters on the South Lawn when asked if he had decided whether to launch US air strikes. "I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate." Trump said Iran had even suggested sending officials to the White House to negotiate on Tehran's nuclear programme to end Israel's air assault, but added that it was "very late." "I said it's very late to be talking. We may meet. There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference," Trump added. "They've suggested that they come to the White House. That's, you know, courageous, but it's, like, not easy for them to do." Asked what he meant when he called in a social media post on Tuesday for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!", Trump again suggested that his patience had run out with Iran. "It's very simple -- unconditional surrender. That means I've had it, okay? I've had it. I give up, no more, we go and blow up all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place," Trump said. Trump compared Iran to "schoolyard bullies", adding: "And now they're not bullies any more, but we'll see what happens." When asked if it was too late for negotiations, he said: "Nothing is too late." - AFP
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Austrian government agrees on plan to allow monitoring of secure messaging
FILE PHOTO: A view of the Parliament building in Vienna, Austria, September 23, 2024. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger/File photo VIENNA (Reuters) -Austria's coalition government has agreed on a plan to enable police to monitor suspects' secure messaging in order to thwart militant attacks, ending what security officials have said is a rare and dangerous blind spot for a European Union country. Because Austria lacks a legal framework for monitoring messaging services like WhatsApp, its main domestic intelligence service and police rely on allies with far more sweeping powers like Britain and the United States alerting them to chatter about planned attacks and spying. That kind of tip-off led to police unravelling what they say was a planned attack on a Taylor Swift concert in Vienna, which prompted the cancellation of all three of her planned shows there in August of last year. "The aim is to make people planning terrorist attacks in Austria feel less secure - and increase everyone else's sense of security," Joerg Leichtfried of the Social Democrats, the junior minister in charge of overseeing the Directorate for State Security and Intelligence (DSN), told a news conference. "That is why this decision by the cabinet today is an important milestone in the fight against terrorism and spying in Austria," he added. Under the new system, monitoring of a person's messaging must be approved by a three-judge panel and should only apply to a limited number of cases. Interior Minister Gerhard Karner told the news conference it was only expected to be used on 25-30 people a year. If it is more than 30, a report must be sent to a parliamentary committee, the government said, addressing concerns about mass surveillance and the infringement of people's privacy. "The police must have a well-founded suspicion of a possible terror attack" to monitor a person's messaging under the new system, a government statement said. Once parliament passes the legislation, a tender process for monitoring technology would be launched, and monitoring would begin in 2027, the government said. (Reporting by Francois Murphy; Editing by Aidan Lewis)
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Outcome of Iran-Israel conflict uncertain
Israel has inflicted damage on strategic sites and killed key figures within Iran's military leadership in aerial attacks that show no signs of abating. But the ultimate outcome is unclear, analysts say. Israel says its offensive aims to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile production capabilities. The Israeli government has not ruled out triggering a wholesale removal of Iran's theocratic system set up after the 1979 revolution that has remained opposed to Israel's existence. Yet, even if Israel succeeds in ousting Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or killing him, the supreme leader will not necessarily be replaced by more moderate forces and the risk exists of further escalation, analysts warn. Diplomacy, meanwhile, remains at a standstill as Israel pounds Iranian targets and Iran hits back with its own strikes on its foe, heightening fears of a wider and prolonged conflict. In television interviews, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not ruled out killing Khamenei, although a United States official said President Donald Trump had vetoed assassinating the supreme leader. Israel, whose intelligence service is widely acknowledged to have deeply penetrated Iran, has killed a host of key figures, including the heads of the Revolutionary Guards and armed forces, which is a huge blow. "This is existential, the most profound of all the crises the Islamic republic has faced," said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the London-based Chatham House think tank. "This is designed to decapitate the leadership of the Islamic republic and degrade the nuclear and broader capabilities of the regime," she said. Rather than an immediate turnaround, what could result is "an unravelling over time", with the Israeli action putting an "accelerant" on a process of change already happening within Iran due to dissatisfaction with the authorities, she said. For Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Non-proliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, Israel's military operation "is about regime change and not eliminating the nuclear programme". "If the regime falls, then it will be an enormous success," he said of the operation Israel dubbed "Rising Lion" — a likely reference to the beast which adorned the pre-revolutionary Iranian flag. Even in the event of a change in leadership, Gregory Brew, senior analyst for Iran and energy at risk analysis firm Eurasia Group, said Khamenei could be replaced with a figure who may be even more hardline and pose a greater danger to Israel. "Kill Khamenei, make him a martyr to the hardliners and empower a new supreme leader who may be much less risk averse. "Or leave him to die or resign in likely disgrace after the war, his credibility in ruins. Which move produces a government better suited to Israel's interests?" Brew said. Iran's ability to cause regional mayhem through its proxies, Hizbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, has been severely degraded by Israeli operations since October 2023. But Teheran still backs the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who have attacked Gulf shipping, while Iran can strike energy facilities or mount cyberattacks. "It remains to be seen if Iran will seek to engage in gray zone activities, including cyberattacks," said analysts at US-based think tank Soufan Center. Israel's airstrikes have put an end, for now, to the latest track of talks seeking to end the stand-off over the Iranian nuclear programme. Analysts say the future of any diplomatic progress lies with the US and Trump. "Netanyahu's goal is to bring Trump into the war," said David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum think tank. Israel has hit the Natanz nuclear site, but has not been able to strike the Fordo enrichment facility, which is deep underground. Analysts believe Israel could damage it only with American bunker-busting bombs. Ali Vaez, Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, argued in an article for Foreign Affairs that Israel would be unable to wipe out the Iranian nuclear programme even in a prolonged conflict. "A diplomatic settlement represents the best and most sustainable way for Trump to avoid both a nuclear Iran and a protracted military entanglement," Vaez said.
