
Study Finds Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals in Children's Mattresses
Babies and young children spend much of their early life asleep, with infants needing up to 17 hours a day and toddlers and preschoolers up to 14. During those critical hours of rest, however, recent research suggests they may also be breathing in harmful chemicals from their mattresses.
There are a few things parents can do to reduce exposure and support their children's resilience to these effects.
Mattress Chemicals and Children
The findings come from two studies conducted at the University of Toronto and published in Ecotoxicology and Public Health. In the
In the
Hormone disruptors are substances that interfere with growth, mood, reproduction, and other vital bodily functions. The flame retardants and phthalates measured in the study fall into this category and have been linked to impaired memory, learning disorders, behavioral issues, and lower IQ scores. Some are also linked to childhood cancer and asthma. Several of the UV filters identified are hormone disruptors as well.
'Sleep is vital for brain development, particularly for infants and toddlers. However, our research suggests that many mattresses contain chemicals that can harm kids' brains,' said senior author Miriam Diamond, professor at the University of Toronto, in a
Vulnerability of Children
While the chemicals in question can negatively affect adults, children are uniquely vulnerable due to several factors, the researchers noted. Their breathing rate is 10 times higher, and their skin surface relative to body weight is three times higher. Behaviors such as frequent hand-to-mouth contact also increase risk.
A
Fiberglass in Mattresses
The
Related Stories
10/12/2024
4/2/2025
Since not all mattress manufacturers list fiberglass as an ingredient, there is no way to know for sure if a mattress contains it. To help prevent exposure, parents are advised to keep the outer mattress cover sealed.
Reducing Mattress Chemical Exposure
The Canadian researchers offer several recommendations to help reduce exposure:
Wash a child's bedding and sleepwear frequently, as these serve as a protective barrier.
Remove unneeded blankets, pillows, mattress protectors, and toys, which may contribute to exposure.
Choose undyed or neutral-colored fabrics, as strong colors often require UV filters and other potentially harmful chemicals.
It may also help to place a freshly washed sheet or towel between the mattress and final fitted sheet, Diamond told The Epoch Times in an email. She doesn't recommend using waterproof mattress covers, as they may also contain harmful chemicals.
When asked whether an air purifier could help, Diamond said a HEPA filter might reduce some chemical levels in the bedroom air. However, she noted that the highest concentrations were found immediately above the mattress, so it's unclear whether a HEPA filter would significantly reduce those exposures.
Reducing Toxic Load in General
While it's helpful to reduce children's exposure to chemicals in their sleeping environment, lowering their overall toxic load is also important, said Christy Nault, a root cause health practitioner, cellular health coach, and plant medicine expert. A root cause health practitioner aims to identify and address the underlying causes of illness, rather than treating symptoms alone.
The toxic load that children carry isn't about one product in isolation but is cumulative, she told The Epoch Times in an email. 'Although that can feel overwhelming, it's also empowering.'
Nault emphasized that bedrooms serve as the foundation of our homes. By prioritizing clean air, natural materials, and nontoxic products in children's sleep environments, parents can do more than reduce exposure—they can foster long-term resilience and vitality.
Nault advised starting with healthier items that children are in contact with every night. These include organic cotton or bamboo pajamas and Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)-certified sheets. GOTS certification indicates a product is made from natural organic fibers.
She also recommends choosing fragrance-free body and laundry products and installing a bathtub filter to reduce chlorine and heavy metals in the water.
'Remember that whatever touches your child's skin is absorbed directly into their bloodstream, from synthetic clothing dyes to lotion ingredients to water,' Nault said.
Detoxification includes the energetic and electrical environment as well, she added. 'While reducing electronics in the bedroom is essential, turning off the Wi-Fi at night is another simple but powerful step that can dramatically support a child's nervous system and quality of sleep.'
Shopping for Nontoxic Mattresses
'Even small, intentional shifts, like upgrading a mattress, can significantly reduce the burden on a child's developing immune, hormonal, and neurological systems,' Nault said.
She recommends looking for mattresses made from certified organic, natural materials such as GOTS-certified organic cotton, Global Organic Latex Standard latex, and organic wool, which act as a natural flame retardant.
Certifications matter, so prioritize third-party verified standards such as GREENGUARD Gold, OEKO-TEX, and MADE SAFE, which indicate the product has been screened for known toxicants and harmful emissions.
'Avoid mattresses that use polyurethane foam, synthetic latex, or those that don't clearly disclose flame retardant treatments,' Nault said. 'If transparency is lacking, that's a red flag. Reputable nontoxic mattress brands will be proud to list exactly what's inside, and more importantly, what's not,' she added.
If you're unsure about a product, Nault recommends contacting the company directly, noting that responsible brands are typically transparent and open to questions.
Boosting Resilience to Toxins
It's impossible to avoid all environmental toxins, but we can take meaningful steps to support a child's resilience, said Jennifer Habashy, a naturopathic doctor and assistant medical director at Claya.
In this context, resilience means the child's general health offers some protection against the effects of harmful chemical exposure.
'A nutrient-dense diet plays a big role here,' she told The Epoch Times in an email. Foods rich in antioxidants—such as leafy greens, berries, and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cauliflower—help promote the body's detoxification process. Healthy fats, including those from avocados and olive oil, nourish the brain and nervous system.
Gut health is also essential for resilience, Habashy said. A strong, diverse microbiome helps regulate the immune system and supports detoxification. Probiotics and prebiotic-rich foods—like yogurt, kefir, bananas, and fiber-rich vegetables—can make a significant difference.
Staying hydrated and exercising regularly also help keep detox pathways functioning optimally, she said, adding that time outdoors in fresh air and sunlight is another underrated way to support both physical detox and emotional well-being.
The body does its deepest repair, growth, and cellular detoxification during sleep, which is why the sleep environment is one of the most powerful places to reduce toxic load—especially for children, said Nault.
'In a world filled with daily exposures we can't always control, creating a clean and calm sleep space is one of the most impactful steps parents can take to protect and support their child's long-term health.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows 2 States Where Children Warned of Breathing Difficulties
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts continued on Tuesday, with children in two states being warned of "breathing difficulties" if they are exposed to poor air quality. Weather conditions such as light winds and higher temperatures are causing smoke from Canadian wildfires to settle in Ohio, pushing air quality into the unhealthy range, National Weather Service (NWS) observing program leader Brian Mitchell told Newsweek. Why It Matters Smoke from Canadian wildfires prompted widespread air quality alerts across the Upper Midwest, Great Lakes, and Northeast regions over the past few weeks. As of Tuesday, most of the smoke has moved out of the region. However, air quality alerts remain in parts of Ohio and Arizona for fine particulate matter and ozone pollution, respectively. The Air Quality Index (AQI) is expected to be Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups, which includes children and the elderly, in the affected regions. What to Know When inhaled, particles can lodge deep in the lungs and trigger inflammation, while ozone irritates the respiratory system and can exacerbate asthma. Children are particularly vulnerable to the impacts because of their developing respiratory systems and tendency to spend more time outdoors. In Ohio, the air quality alert was issued by the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency and warns of ground-level fine particles affecting the air quality in Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage and Summit Counties. A stock image shows a child coughing while outside. A stock image shows a child coughing while outside. AaronAmat/Getty "Air quality levels will be unhealthy for sensitive groups during this period. If you are in the sensitive groups category of children, the elderly and those with breathing difficulties, please monitor your outdoor activity and check air quality readings at In Arizona, an Ozone High Pollution Advisory was in place for Maricopa County, including more than a million people who live in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Sunlight can contribute to higher ozone levels, making these alerts more common in the summertime. "This means that forecast weather conditions combined with existing ozone levels are expected to result in local maximum 8-hour ozone concentrations that pose a health risk. Adverse health effects increase as air quality deteriorates," the alert said. "Ozone is an air contaminant which can cause breathing difficulties for children, older adults, as well as persons with respiratory problems. A decrease in physical activity is recommended." In both states, people were urged to avoid worsening air quality levels by driving less, not idling in their vehicles, refilling their gas tanks after sunset, and waiting to mow the lawn. An air quality alert also was in place for parts of Michigan, although people in that state were not warned of breathing difficulties. What People Are Saying Air quality alert in Arizona: "You are urged to car pool, telecommute or use mass transit. The use of gasoline-powered equipment should be reduced or done late in the day." Air quality alert for Michigan: "Surface temperatures well into the 80s, ample sunlight, and west-southwest winds will create a conducive environment for Ozone development along the Lake Michigan shoreline. Residual wildfire smoke in the region may also enhance Ozone development over Lake Michigan." What Happens Next Both alerts are in place throughout Tuesday. More air quality alerts could be issued as smoke is expected to return on Wednesday.

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
HHS justifies decision to stop recommending Covid shots during pregnancy with studies supporting the shots' safety
The Department of Health and Human Services is circulating a document on Capitol Hill to explain its decision to remove the Covid-19 vaccine recommendation for pregnant women — citing studies that largely found the shot is safe. The document, which HHS sent to lawmakers days before Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced his plan to fire the panel that advises the CDC on immunizations, says that studies have shown that women who got the vaccine during pregnancy had higher rates of various complications. And it claims that "a number of studies in pregnant women showed higher rates of fetal loss if vaccination was received before 20 weeks of pregnancy,' footnoting a research paper on vaccination during pregnancy. But Dr. Maria P. Velez of McGill University, the lead author of one of the studies, told POLITICO in an email that 'the results of our manuscript were misinterpreted.' The 2023 study shows a slightly higher rate of miscarriages among women who were immunized against Covid-19 during their pregnancies. But, Velez said, that after adjusting for 'variables that can confound a crude association,' like 'age, rurality, neighbourhood income quintile, immigration status, comorbidity' and other factors that could affect the outcome, Canadian researchers found 'no association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and an increased risk of miscarriage.' Raw numbers don't account for significant differences among the groups being compared — such as underlying conditions and when during pregnancy the people were vaccinated, said Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist who's consulted for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Scientists, including the Canadian researchers, use statistical methods to adjust for those factors, she said, which is how they determined the vaccine wasn't associated with miscarriage. In a statement, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon pointed to the raw study data, which showed a slightly higher rate of miscarriage in the first half of pregnancy for women who were vaccinated against Covid compared with those who weren't. "The underlying data speaks for itself — and it raises legitimate safety concerns," he said. "HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay early pregnancy loss." Nixon added that HHS and the CDC encourage people to talk to their providers "about any personal medical decision." Vaccine researchers and obstetricians criticized the decision to remove the recommendation for pregnant women, and researchers cited in the HHS document largely dismissed any connection between Covid vaccination and miscarriages. 'Given that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with serious maternal and neonatal morbidity, the current study can inform healthcare providers, pregnant women and those considering a pregnancy about the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in relation to miscarriage risk,' Velez and her co-authors wrote in the study. That research was based on health-system data from Ontario, Canada, and aligned with similar population studies in the U.S., Scotland and Norway. Similarly, HHS cited an April 2022 study in its document concerning mRNA vaccination in people undergoing in-vitro fertilization, which also found no adverse effects on conception rates or on early pregnancy outcomes. 'Administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was not associated with an adverse effect on stimulation or early pregnancy outcomes after IVF,' the New York City-based researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai West hospital wrote in the study. 'Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women who are trying to conceive.' The HHS document also includes an incorrect link for that study, instead leading to a different study — also cited in HHS' document — by Israeli researchers that found the vaccine 'appears to be safe during pregnancy,' with no increase in preterm labor or in newborns with low birth weight. That February 2022 study did note a possible increase in preterm birth rates for women vaccinated during the second trimester, and the authors suggested future investigations of outcomes based on the timing of immunization. HHS' assertion about significant risks to pregnant women 'contradicts the bulk of published studies,' said Dr. Paul Offit, an expert who has served as an outside adviser on vaccines to the FDA and the CDC. HHS deviated from past practice when it changed the Covid vaccine guidance last month, announcing the decision without the endorsement of an existing outside panel of expert advisers. Dr. Steven Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told POLITICO at the time that he was disappointed by HHS' decision, and pointed to data showing that newborns can benefit from maternal antibodies from the vaccine for protection from Covid. 'In fact, growing evidence shows just how much vaccination during pregnancy protects the infant after birth, with the vast majority of hospitalized infants less than 6 months of age — those who are not yet eligible for vaccination — born to unvaccinated mothers,' Fleischman said.


Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
HHS justifies decision to stop recommending Covid shots during pregnancy with studies supporting the shots' safety
The Department of Health and Human Services is circulating a document on Capitol Hill to explain its decision to remove the Covid-19 vaccine recommendation for pregnant women — citing studies that largely found the shot is safe. The document, which HHS sent to lawmakers days before Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced his plan to fire the panel that advises the CDC on immunizations, says that studies have shown that women who got the vaccine during pregnancy had higher rates of various complications. And it claims that 'a number of studies in pregnant women showed higher rates of fetal loss if vaccination was received before 20 weeks of pregnancy,' footnoting a research paper on vaccination during pregnancy. But Dr. Maria P. Velez of McGill University, the lead author of one of the studies, told POLITICO in an email that 'the results of our manuscript were misinterpreted.' The 2023 study shows a slightly higher rate of miscarriages among women who were immunized against Covid-19 during their pregnancies. But, Velez said, that after adjusting for 'variables that can confound a crude association,' like 'age, rurality, neighbourhood income quintile, immigration status, comorbidity' and other factors that could affect the outcome, Canadian researchers found 'no association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and an increased risk of miscarriage.' Raw numbers don't account for significant differences among the groups being compared — such as underlying conditions and when during pregnancy the people were vaccinated, said Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist who's consulted for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Scientists, including the Canadian researchers, use statistical methods to adjust for those factors, she said, which is how they determined the vaccine wasn't associated with miscarriage. In a statement, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon pointed to the raw study data, which showed a slightly higher rate of miscarriage in the first half of pregnancy for women who were vaccinated against Covid compared with those who weren't. 'The underlying data speaks for itself — and it raises legitimate safety concerns,' he said. 'HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay early pregnancy loss.' Nixon added that HHS and the CDC encourage people to talk to their providers 'about any personal medical decision.' Vaccine researchers and obstetricians criticized the decision to remove the recommendation for pregnant women, and researchers cited in the HHS document largely dismissed any connection between Covid vaccination and miscarriages. 'Given that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with serious maternal and neonatal morbidity, the current study can inform healthcare providers, pregnant women and those considering a pregnancy about the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in relation to miscarriage risk,' Velez and her co-authors wrote in the study. That research was based on health-system data from Ontario, Canada, and aligned with similar population studies in the U.S., Scotland and Norway. Similarly, HHS cited an April 2022 study in its document concerning mRNA vaccination in people undergoing in-vitro fertilization, which also found no adverse effects on conception rates or on early pregnancy outcomes. 'Administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was not associated with an adverse effect on stimulation or early pregnancy outcomes after IVF,' the New York City-based researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai West hospital wrote in the study. 'Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women who are trying to conceive.' The HHS document also includes an incorrect link for that study, instead leading to a different study — also cited in HHS' document — by Israeli researchers that found the vaccine 'appears to be safe during pregnancy,' with no increase in preterm labor or in newborns with low birth weight. That February 2022 study did note a possible increase in preterm birth rates for women vaccinated during the second trimester, and the authors suggested future investigations of outcomes based on the timing of immunization. HHS' assertion about significant risks to pregnant women 'contradicts the bulk of published studies,' said Dr. Paul Offit, an expert who has served as an outside adviser on vaccines to the FDA and the CDC. HHS deviated from past practice when it changed the Covid vaccine guidance last month, announcing the decision without the endorsement of an existing outside panel of expert advisers. Dr. Steven Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told POLITICO at the time that he was disappointed by HHS' decision, and pointed to data showing that newborns can benefit from maternal antibodies from the vaccine for protection from Covid. 'In fact, growing evidence shows just how much vaccination during pregnancy protects the infant after birth, with the vast majority of hospitalized infants less than 6 months of age — those who are not yet eligible for vaccination — born to unvaccinated mothers,' Fleischman said.