The Golden Mile gets going, with or without the nimbys
After nearly a decade of let's-and-let's-not, Wellington City Council has officially commenced work on the Golden Mile upgrade. It's hard to imagine why city dwellers wouldn't want a better place to live, argues Lyric Waiwiri-Smith.
The truck carrying a load of port-a-loos had stopped at the least opportune time. Idling at the intersection between Courtenay Place and Cambridge Terrace on Monday morning, the green machine rolled past the city councillors circling a traffic island and, by the time they had stopped, so had the truck, sitting in the money shot right behind mayor Tory Whanau. The sod turning for the first stage of the Golden Mile upgrade needed to wait another 30 seconds for the truck to get the green light and go, but a handful of seconds is nothing against the backdrop of a nearly decade-long wait.
Using a shovel already caked with a bit of mud, Whanau gently dug into the moist earth, then curled the blade upwards and lifted the spade high in the air, letting the morning sunlight gleam off it – the silver lining of a multimillion-dollar headache for some, a long-overdue upgrade to many more.
After nine years of council in-fighting, foiled attempts to loosen the purse strings and bite-back from businesses and central government, the Golden Mile was officially under way. The councillors who had fought to kill construction hadn't hidden in the shrubbery for their moment to swoop in and swipe Whanau's spade, as our Wellington editor Joel MacManus had predicted they might.
There was no sign of councillor Tony Randle rushing down the street to call a last-minute motion, and councillor Nicola Young avoided dragging a business owner out of the bushes with her. The council, as a council should, simply got on with it, a rare feat for a bunch of New Zealanders in local government.
It's hard to imagine why those living in a city constantly plagued by bad headlines – whether they concern broken pipes, money woes, a vibecession, or just straight up asking whether Wellington is in the shit – wouldn't want their city to get better. Whether the Golden Mile is the antidote to Wellington's ailments will be seen within the next five years or so, when construction has finally concluded – but it's either take this, or let things stay the way they are.
You'd be hard pressed to walk through the capital's streets and find a Wellingtonian who a) doesn't think at least one block of the 2.43km of roads that make up the Golden Mile (don't ask me why they choose that name with the information available) needs a facelift, and b) is somehow ignorant to the fact that Wellington's inability to get itself moving has made it the butt of the rest of the country's jokes.
The Golden Mile covers Courtenay Place, Manners Street, Willis Street and Lambton Quay, all main roads in the city and all in varying states of shambles. Courtenay Place, the nightlife hub, is trendy at the Mt Vic end and scummy at the Manners Street end, where the dilapidated, piss-soaked and grime-covered Reading Cinemas (due to be reopened later this year) sits. Then there is Manners Street itself, the subject of weekly Vic Deals horror stories, where there's little to see except for some crime here and there.
Meanwhile, Willis Street is thriving. There are food and retail options, and as the connector between bureaucratic Lambton Quay and chill-vibes Cuba Street, there's plenty of foot traffic (the entire 'mile' is also at the heart of the city's public transport system, which 95% of all of the city's buses run through). And Lambton Quay is Lambton Quay – a hotspot on work days during work hours, but at any other time, essentially a ghost town.
The city council's official line is that the Golden Mile works – which include pedestrianising the streets, more greenery, a new bike lane, widened footpaths and slip-safe paving – will help to 'revitalise' Wellington and 'create a vibrant, accessible, and thriving environment'. If you are too jaded by bureaucrat-speak to understand what this all means, here is a quick breakdown:
Widened footpaths will mean you won't have to angrily shove past the slow-moving mobs on Lambton. Better paving means you won't fall on your ass after a night out on the booze on Courtenay. Seeing a tree in an urban space will remind you to touch grass. God forbid we want anything more.
The whole song and dance is reminiscent of where Auckland stood about 10 years ago, around the same time the Golden Mile was conceptualised, when the City of Sails was staring down the barrel of the City Rail Link. An underground train line, in little old Auckland city? Dare we dream of a reality that makes us a real city? Dare we want more from this life? Nearly 10 years on, Aucklanders will soon reap the benefits of an improved public transport system – Wellingtonians can't even decide if a cycleway is too controversial.
'Projects like this happen all over the world all the time, and it generates negativity – that is the norm,' Whanau told The Spinoff. 'Change is hard, but people will love it.'
Things take time. Things also cost money. Things that take time and cost money are hard to imagine the end result of. But perhaps in five years, as you seek refuge from the sun under the new green foliage on Courtenay Place, the painful Golden Mile decision-making process will come back as a flicker of a bad dream. You'll try to clear your head with a bike ride down a polished Manners Street, stop at the end of Lambton Quay, shock yourself by discovering there are actually other people here too, walk out onto the car-less street, raise your hands to the sky and scream that if you can make it here, you can make it anywhere.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Manawatū Tararua Highway Should Open As A Toll Road
Press Release – Infrastructure New Zealand New infrastructure such as the Manawat Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesnt make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who … The opening of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway is a significant milestone for the lower North Island, with safety and travel times both set to improve. However, the decision not to toll the route is disappointing, says Infrastructure New Zealand. 'Not tolling the Manawatū Tararua Highway is a missed opportunity to help fund the ongoing maintenance and future resilience of this critical transport route through a 'user pays' approach,' says Chief Executive Nick Leggett. 'Tolling a new highway isn't about penalising the users of that road or the communities in the area. It's about being honest about the ongoing costs required to ensure the responsible management of the asset and ensuring that those who benefit from the road are making a direct contribution to its delivery and maintenance.' 'New Zealand's problem is that nobody thinks about maintaining a new road when it's nice and new, other than those who are responsible for building it. Those people don't control the money, though.' 'New infrastructure such as the Manawatū Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesn't make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who will never use the road,' Leggett says. 'If we want high-quality, modern infrastructure that is well maintained and resilient, we need to be smarter in how we manage and fund it. Having an annual amount of money generated from the road, means that New Zealanders can transparently follow that the money goes back into maintaining the road which generates it.' 'Tolling is one of the few tools we have that can directly link use with funding. It also helps protect the sustainability of the National Land Transport Fund so further investments can be made in critical transport projects into the future.' 'We need to be more inventive with how we fund and maintain infrastructure. Nothing should get off the ground without pricing road usage properly,' Leggett says. 'If New Zealand wants better infrastructure, it's going to need to do things differently at every stage of design, build and operations. That includes funding through tolls.'
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Manawatū Tararua Highway Should Open As A Toll Road
The opening of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway is a significant milestone for the lower North Island, with safety and travel times both set to improve. However, the decision not to toll the route is disappointing, says Infrastructure New Zealand. 'Not tolling the Manawatū Tararua Highway is a missed opportunity to help fund the ongoing maintenance and future resilience of this critical transport route through a 'user pays' approach,' says Chief Executive Nick Leggett. 'Tolling a new highway isn't about penalising the users of that road or the communities in the area. It's about being honest about the ongoing costs required to ensure the responsible management of the asset and ensuring that those who benefit from the road are making a direct contribution to its delivery and maintenance.' 'New Zealand's problem is that nobody thinks about maintaining a new road when it's nice and new, other than those who are responsible for building it. Those people don't control the money, though.' 'New infrastructure such as the Manawatū Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesn't make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who will never use the road,' Leggett says. 'If we want high-quality, modern infrastructure that is well maintained and resilient, we need to be smarter in how we manage and fund it. Having an annual amount of money generated from the road, means that New Zealanders can transparently follow that the money goes back into maintaining the road which generates it.' 'Tolling is one of the few tools we have that can directly link use with funding. It also helps protect the sustainability of the National Land Transport Fund so further investments can be made in critical transport projects into the future.' 'We need to be more inventive with how we fund and maintain infrastructure. Nothing should get off the ground without pricing road usage properly,' Leggett says. 'If New Zealand wants better infrastructure, it's going to need to do things differently at every stage of design, build and operations. That includes funding through tolls.'
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Call to rethink tax on KiwiSaver
KiwiSaver members could be significantly better off if New Zealand adopted a taxation model similar to Australia's, an economist says. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub ran some numbers modelling a system similar to Australia's, where contributions and returns are taxed at 15%. In New Zealand, full tax is paid on income contributed to KiwiSaver, and returns in PIE schemes taxed at an investor's prescribed investor rate up to 28%. Eaqub said an "average" KiwiSaver investor starting now could end up $60,000 better off in nominal terms at retirement on a model similar to Australia's. If tax was not paid on contributions or returns, they could be about $1 million better off - and if only taxes on returns were removed the gain would be about $300,000. "In Australia, the context is there's some conversation about whether the tax breaks are too generous for richer people. It's not that it's perfect but the point is in other countries it's heavily incentivised for people to save in their private pension." ADVERTISEMENT But it was not in New Zealand. Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, said the Australian model was different because that country has a means-tested pension. "The tax break that occurs in New Zealand occurs when you retire, when you get national super... that is the equivalent of about $500,000. So I think it's hard to do a comparative analysis without acknowledging that there are significant differences between the schemes and what they are trying to achieve." Winter's here, supermarket spying, and TikTok's new feature. (Source: 1News) But he said if the tax on savings for New Zealanders was reduced it would give future governments more "fiscal options" in relation to superannuation. He said New Zealand previously had a system that was EET — or exempt, exempt, taxed, where contributions were tax-exempt, exempt from tax within the scheme and then fully taxed when withdrawn. The Tax Working Group in 2018 acknowledged that the change from that system had potentially created incentives for New Zealanders to direct savings into investments like houses instead. ADVERTISEMENT Hope said it would be expensive to adjust back to EET but there could be other changes that would be more affordable. The tax working group estimated that ignoring behavioural changes, it would cost $200m to $300m a year to move to a system where returns and withdrawals were not taxed, and $2.5b a year to move to an EET system. "The higher initial cost for an EET regime arises from the fact that there will be a substantial deferral period before significant amounts are withdrawn from the scheme, and thus taxed under the third 't'. Although these are very different initial costs, the costs will be the same in the long run on a net present value basis." Hope said providing different forms of tax incentives would be beneficial for savers. He said removing or reducing the employer contribution tax would be particularly useful for low-income people. Kernel Wealth founder Dean Anderson said New Zealand was one of the few countries operating a TTE — taxed contributions, taxed returns and exempt withdrawal — model. "Our future savings would be much better off under an EET approach, where we don't pay tax on the way in but on the way out. ADVERTISEMENT "With low savings rates in NZ, the government should be exploring everything in its powers to grow savings rates, which benefits NZ and Kiwis over the long term. "But it's not a surprise. The recent meek KiwiSaver policy announcement did all the hard work to announce a positive gradual increase to KiwiSaver contributions, yet they fell short by announcing a three-year policy rather than outlining a decade plus long policy of incremental KiwiSaver increases." Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said KiwiSaver members were at a disadvantage compared to Australians because there was no upfront tax incentive or concession as in Australia to encourage them to contribute more. "Maybe consideration of a mid-tier flat tax rate on savings up to a certain amount would encourage savings." She said employer contributions were also taxed so investors lost the benefits of compounding, and investors paid tax on bonds and deemed dividends on global equities so they were effectively paying a capital gains tax. "So contrary to the government's stated goal of helping New Zealanders' grow their KiwiSaver balances, these factors mean New Zealanders have less incentives to make voluntary contributions and pay more tax on investment earnings, resulting in smaller balances at retirement relative to our Australian friends."
