logo
Congress MP: Parliament must be given Yashwant Varma case report

Congress MP: Parliament must be given Yashwant Varma case report

Time of India24-05-2025

NEW DELHI: Pressing for early action on the scandal about cash haul at the residence of high court Justice Yashwant Varma, Congress MP Vivek Tankha expressed concern with the Rajya Sabha chairman that parliamentarians have not been provided with the inquiry report of the case, even though Parliament is the sole authority to decide the fate of HC and SC justices facing allegations of malfeasance.
The three-member SC panel that looked into the scandal submitted its report around three weeks ago.
In a letter to RS chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, Tankha demanded that MPs be given a copy of the inquiry report without delay "to protect our judicial integrity and independence", as also to ensure that the issue moves forward. He added that delay in action in this case has eroded public confidence in the institutions.
MPs are still unaware of the findings of the inquiry, even though Dhankhar himself had expressed shock when the issue was raised in RS on March 21, as per Tankha.
Prefacing his letter with "deep concern for the institutional integrity of both the judiciary and Parliament", Tankha said, "No statement or course of action has been announced by the law minister, despite the matter - an incident that shook the conscience of the nation - having been raised in Parliament. This continued silence is deeply alarming and raises serious concerns about accountability."
The MP, a senior lawyer, said the only statutory mechanism under which judicial misbehaviour can be investigated is Judges (Inquiry) Act and the removal of an HC or SC judge requires a motion initiated by MPs under the Act.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
"President cannot independently act upon the report. Only Parliament, through its members, can initiate removal proceedings," he added.
"Despite MPs being only authority empowered under Article 124(4) and 217 (1) (b) to initiate such proceedings, they have neither been taken into confidence nor provided with the (inquiry) report...," he said. "A report exists but remains inaccessible to members of the constitutionally empowered body, i.e. MPs. This precedent undermines the doctrine of separation of powers in our democracy and devalues the constitutional position, role, and status of the members," Tankha added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran Denies Israel's Attack On World's Largest Gas Field: Why South Pars Is Key To Global Energy Ops
Iran Denies Israel's Attack On World's Largest Gas Field: Why South Pars Is Key To Global Energy Ops

News18

time15 minutes ago

  • News18

Iran Denies Israel's Attack On World's Largest Gas Field: Why South Pars Is Key To Global Energy Ops

Last Updated: Iran shares the South Pars gas field with Qatar. Striking it would mark a major escalation in the conflict, which had already pushed oil prices up 9% on Friday Contrary to media reports, Iran oil ministry on Sunday denied Israel's attack on their oil and gas sector, claiming the Isfahan refinery operations continue without disruption. The semi-official Tasnim news agency had on Saturday reported that Iran had partially suspended gas production at the world's biggest gas field after an Israeli strike caused fire at South Pars gas field. Israel launched an air offensive against Iran on Friday, killing commanders and scientists and bombing nuclear sites in a stated bid to stop Tehran building an atomic weapon. Iran shares the South Pars gas field with Qatar. Striking it would mark a major escalation in the conflict, which had already pushed oil prices up 9% on Friday even though Israel spared Iran's oil and gas on the first day of its attacks. Operations at the Isfahan refinery continue without disruption, Iran's oil ministry told state media on Sunday, denying reports of an incident or attack against the facility.— Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) June 15, 2025 The South Pars field is located offshore in Iran's southern Bushehr province and is responsible for the lion's share of gas production in Iran, the world's third largest gas producer after the United States and Russia. The fire broke out in one of the four units of Phase 14 of South Pars, halting production of 12 million cubic metres of gas, Tasnim had said. Iran produces around 275 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas per year or some 6.5% of global gas output, and consumes it domestically as it cannot export gas due to sanctions. Iran shares the field with Qatar, which calls the field North Field. Qatar produces 77 million tonnes of liquefied gas from the field with the help of global majors such as Exxon and Shell and supplies the gas to Europe and Asia. Israel had so far restricted its strikes to military and nuclear installations. The South Pars gas field attack could change the dynamics. 'This is probably the most important attack on oil and gas infrastructure since Abqaiq," said Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad Energy, referencing the 2019 attack on Saudi oil facilities that shook global markets, as per Bloomberg. THE TIMING Israeli strikes have come at a bad timing for Iran, which is grappling with nationwide protests over chronic water and power shortages. Blackouts have cost industries $20 billion annually, worsened by IRGC-linked Bitcoin mining diverting electricity from civilians. Hyperinflation has exceeded 50% for seven consecutive years, with the currency collapsing to 828,500 rials against one USD. Critical shortages of medicine, fuel, and electricity have eroded public trust. Protesters in 155 cities have been chanting 'No Light, No Water, No Future'. Cement prices have surged 200% in three months, and unpaid bread subsidies have triggered baker strikes. IRGC-controlled conglomerates like Setad and Khatam Base dominate over 50% of the GDP. Public anger is fuelled by scandals, including a $3.7 billion fraud by Debsh Tea. Over 50% of voters boycotted recent elections, showing widespread disillusionment. Movements like 'Women, Life, Freedom' from 2022 persist despite crackdowns. WILL KHARG, HORMUZ BE NEXT? There are fears that Israel could attack Iran's main oil export terminal Kharg Island and the Strait of Hormuz, through which 21 per cent of the world's LNG and 14 million barrels of crude oil daily pass. Earlier, there were fears that Iran would block Hormuz supply line. 'This is a warning shot that Israel is willing to hit Iranian energy infrastructure if Israeli civilians are targeted," said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects, as per The NYT. Analysts warn that if the conflict continues to escalate, Qatar's energy operations and Israel's own infrastructure could also become targets. Both countries play critical roles in energy exports, and any attack could create ripple effects across Asia, Europe, and global supply chains. IMPACT ON US, CHINA In the 1970s, Iran accounted for 10 per cent of the world's oil production. However, after the 1979 revolution, the US crippled the Iranian economy by announcing sweeping sanctions on Tehran. The United States tightened sanctions in 2018 after Trump exited a nuclear accord during his first presidential term. Iran's oil exports fell to nearly zero for some months. China is the biggest importer of Iranian oil. It says it does not recognise sanctions against its trade partners. The main buyers of Iranian oil are Chinese private refiners, some of whom have recently been placed in the US Treasury sanctions list. top videos View all If Israel attacks Iran's oil and gas production, it may also impact China, the United States' biggest strategic and economic rival. Analysts, however, say Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members could compensate for the drop of Iranian supply by using their spare capacity to pump more. About the Author News Desk The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Israel Iran tension Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 15, 2025, 14:59 IST News explainers Iran Denies Israel's Attack On World's Largest Gas Field: Why South Pars Is Key To Global Energy Ops

Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst
Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst

India Gazette

time32 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst

New York [US], June 15 (ANI): New York-based expert on Khalistani terrorism, Puneet Sahani, believes that the Khalistani agitation is severely damaging Canada's international reputation. In an interview, he warned that violent rhetoric and incidents -- most recently the harassment of Canadian Journalist Mocha Bezirgan in Vancouver -- are making Canada appear like 'a Pakistan of the West' and raising fears that the country could become 'a future exporter of terrorism.' Sahani urged Ottawa to confront these extremist networks with the same seriousness it applies to other global threats. The analyst also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to abandon what he described as a 'soft approach' toward Sikh radicals abroad. He advocated for tougher legal measures, including banning overseas Khalistan-linked organisations and placing their leaders on international no-fly lists. Ahead of PM Modi's travel to Canada for the G7 Summit, Sahani warned that the growing influence of Khalistani extremists in Canada may keep New Delhi and Ottawa diplomatically distant for the foreseeable future. He claimed that pro-Khalistan networks now have 'deep roots in every order of the Canadian state.' Sahani explained that, unlike the original wave of militants who migrated in the 1980s, today's Khalistan movement is increasingly driven by a new generation of activists, many of whom were born and raised in North America. These individuals, he said, are 'even more radicalised' than their predecessors, despite having little or no lived experience of life in Punjab. 'These organisations are indoctrinating young people who have never lived in India, pumping them with hatred of Bharat and Hindus,' he said. 'They are essentially bringing a conflict from the subcontinent onto Canadian soil.' Citing public tributes to slain Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, Sahani said such gestures are clear signs of radical penetration into mainstream Canadian politics. 'They had enough influence to hold a minute of silence in Canada's Parliament,' he noted, calling it evidence that sympathisers hold disproportionate sway over political decision-makers. While acknowledging that most Canadian Sikhs condemn violence, Sahani cautioned that prolonged political pressure from extremist organisations may keep bilateral relations in a deep freeze. (ANI)

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog
Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

New Delhi, Despite the Supreme Court clearing the idea nearly five months ago, the high courts seem not to be keen on appointing ad-hoc judges to tackle pending criminal cases, details available with the government showed. According to people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges, none of the high court collegiums have so far recommended names of retired judges to be appointed as ad-hoc judges. There are 25 high courts in the country. Till June 11, no high court collegiums sent any such proposal to the Union Law Ministry. Considering a backlog of over 18 lakh criminal cases, the Supreme Court on January 30 allowed the high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges, not exceeding 10 per cent of the court's total sanctioned strength. Article 224A of the Constitution allows the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in high courts to help deal with pendency. According to the laid down procedure, the respective high court collegiums send recommendations or names of candidates to be appointed as HC judges to the Department of Justice in the law ministry. The department then adds inputs and details of the candidates before forwarding the same to the Supreme Court Collegium. The SC Collegium then takes a final call and recommends to the government to appoint the selected persons as judges. The president signs the 'warrant of appointment' of the newly-appointed judge. The procedure to appoint ad-hoc judges will be the same except that the president will not sign the warrant of appointment. But the assent of the president will be sought for appointing ad-hoc judges. Except in one case, there is no precedence of appointing retired judges as ad-hoc HC judges, officials had earlier pointed out. In a judgement dated April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the high courts, the top court imposed certain conditions. However, later a special Supreme Court bench comprising then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant relaxed certain conditions and kept some in abeyance. The verdict, which was authored by former chief justice S A Bobde, directed retired high court judges to be appointed as ad-hoc ones for a period of two to three years to clear the backlog. While one condition said that ad-hoc judges cannot be appointed if a high court was working with 80 per cent of its sanctioned strength, the other said ad-hoc judges could sit separately on benches to deal with cases. Relaxing the conditions, the court said the requirement that vacancies should not be more than 20 per cent of the sanctioned strength for the time being shall be kept in abeyance. The bench also said each high court should keep the appointment to two to five ad-hoc judges and not exceed 10 per cent of the total sanctioned strength. "The ad-hoc judges will sit in a bench presided over by a sitting judge of the high court and decide pending criminal appeals," the apex court's order said. The rarely used Article 224A of the Constitution deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges in high courts. "The chief justice of a high court for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the president, request any person who has held the office of a judge of that court or of any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court for that state," it says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store