logo
OPINION: OPINION: Talk of the Town

OPINION: OPINION: Talk of the Town

Yahoo07-04-2025

Apr. 6—Education opinion lacked needed details
Clyde Aragon in Sunday's Opinion page opined at length on education. He says we got along much better without either the Departments of Education or the Environmental Protection Agency. How we were better, he neglects to say.
He then denigrates overbearing unions, bloated school bureaucracies, inedible school lunches and unreadable "Marxist" propaganda.
He contends that money spent on education is all wasted. That if the bureaucracy gets more they'll just waste it.
Finally, he deploys his suggested solution. Competition. THE answer to all our problems. With whom and by whom? He doesn't say.
Who does he think holds the schools accountable? Well he assigns that task to the parents. You know, those folks who go to work every day bringing home the bacon? Sure, they've got gobs of time to educate themselves on the ways to measure, assess and judge the quality of their kids' education, and then get organized with the other parents to "hold the schools accountable!"
Who does he suggest should do the teaching? Certainly not those "overbearing teachers' unions." Oh no. Instead, we should hire retired engineers and doctors to teach math and science, and retired military veterans to teach history.
Buried in Aragon's analysis is the tattered, shopworn notion of "common sense." That four years of college in not required to know and be able to teach that two plus two equals four, and water freezes at 32 degree Fahrenheit.
At last, Aragon's proposal to education reform appears to be:
(1) Remove the money wasted on education.
(2) Replace the teachers with retired engineers and doctors.
(3) Put the parents in charge of administration.
(4) Make unreadable Marxist propaganda readable.
(5) Have unspecified individuals compete with each other.
Have I got all this straight?
Tim Taylor
Albuquerque
Teachers need specific training
Clyde Aragon's column (3/30/25) that suggested retired engineers, doctors or veterans can just as easily teach as professional teachers is fundamentally wrong. While those people might make wonderful guest speakers, they are not trained to deal with the daily challenges teachers face. Will those people know how to differentiate lessons and support social-emotional learning and inclusivity? Will they instinctively know how to manage disruptive behaviors such as disrespect, apathy and cell phone use? Obtaining a degree in education is much more than "learning how to say two plus two equals four." Among other things, it involves understanding child development, pedagogy, classroom management, subject expertise and promoting a love for learning.
Racquel Leland
Albuquerque
Legislature missed opportunities
Our New Mexico Legislature has recently completed a full session. Let's check the scorecard: Nothing was done to curb the ever-growing juvenile crime problem. Nothing was done to re-structure our medical malpractice laws, and many more shortfalls. Oh yes, the lawmakers did make it easier for pregnant women in northern New Mexico to obtain their desired "solution".
Our state sits at the top of most negative lists (e.g., DWI) and at the bottom of most positive lists (e.g., education). It seems to me that the Legislature is a shining example of "Democrat-cy" working for (against?) its people.
Reid Griffith
Albuquerque
New policies are bad for America
What we have in our U.S. government is a kakistocracy, a government by the worst people. Supporters just don't get it. Our new government cares little for the health of our people by selecting an antivaxer as secretary of Health and Human Services, eliminating the Department of Education, and laying off hundreds of thousands of workers. Now they want to coerce people into buying only U.S.-made products.
Our economy is based on a global economy. By disrupting that with tariffs and taxes on imported goods, they are forcing a lot of companies who depend on imports either out of business or to do business at a reduced scope. Meanwhile, many immigrants are critical to our economy, and they are sending them back to where they came from. Our ancestors, except for the Native Americans, are all immigrants, and our government is even making life hard for Native Americans. They are trying to change our voting to ensure that many low-income and remote voters will have difficulty voting by forcing them to vote on Election Day, which of course favors the Republicans. It is sick, very sick. Their whole approach, import taxes, etc. should be unconstitutional and I pray the Republican-dominated Supreme Court recognizes this.
Harvey Eastman
Albuquerque
NM was named most stressed state
New Mexico tops Wallethub's "Most & Least Stressed States (2025)" survey as the most stressed state, with family stress — driven by high divorce rates, single parenthood, childcare costs and lack of emotional support — being the primary culprit. As the Family Month Project founder, I find this striking in a state where family ties, rooted in Native American, Hispanic and Anglo heritage, are a source of pride. Yet, these deep bonds may also create pressure, as multi-generational households and economic struggles amplify obligations. Poverty, violent crime (topping U.S. rankings), and poor health care (47th per Wallethub) further strain families. Economic relief, like cutting the gross receipts tax or expanding oil and gas, could bolster small businesses and ease financial woes. Prioritizing crime reduction and health care improvements is also key. Through the Family Month Project, I believe celebrating these bonds can the direction of the state, making family New Mexico's superpower.
Anne Doherty
Santa Fe
A poem for Betsy Arakawa
Was there a cry for help?
Did Gene address it during the
2 calls
Before his demise?
Investors sought
Lawyers suppress
Yet 2 death
Separated apart
Considered as one tragic event
Richard Wittie
Rio Rancho

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump EPA moves to repeal climate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants

time2 hours ago

Trump EPA moves to repeal climate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants

WASHINGTON -- The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, an action that Administrator Lee Zeldin said would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also proposed weakening a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm the brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The rollbacks are meant to fulfill Republican President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to ' unleash American energy ' and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by Democratic President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' Zeldin said Wednesday the new rules would help end what he called the Biden and Obama administrations' 'war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply.' 'The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November,'' he added in a speech at EPA headquarters. 'They wanted to make sure that … no matter what agency anybody might be confirmed to lead, we are finding opportunities to pursue common-sense, pragmatic solutions that will help reduce the cost of living … create jobs and usher in a golden era of American prosperity.' Environmental and public health groups called the rollbacks dangerous and vowed to challenge the rules in court. Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Society Consortium on Climate & Health, called the proposals 'yet another in a series of attacks' by the Trump administration on the nation's 'health, our children, our climate and the basic idea of clean air and water.' She called it 'unconscionable to think that our country would move backwards on something as common sense as protecting children from mercury and our planet from worsening hurricanes, wildfires, floods and poor air quality driven by climate change.' 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of greenhouse gases, driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. Greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas-fired plants 'are a small and decreasing part of global emissions,'' the EPA said, adding: 'This Administration's priority is to promote the public health or welfare through energy dominance and independence secured by using fossil fuels to generate power.' The Clean Air Act allows the EPA to limit emissions from power plants and other industrial sources if those emissions significantly contribute to air pollution that endangers public health. If fossil fuel plants no longer meet the EPA's threshold, the Trump administration may later argue that other pollutants from other industrial sectors don't either and therefore shouldn't be regulated, said Meghan Greenfield, a former EPA and Justice Department lawyer now in private practice at Jenner & Block LLP. The EPA proposal 'has the potential to have much, much broader implications,' she said. Zeldin, a former New York congressman, said the Biden-era rules were designed to 'suffocate our economy in order to protect the environment,' with the intent to regulate the coal industry 'out of existence' and make it 'disappear.' National Mining Association president and CEO Rich Nolan applauded the new rules, saying they remove 'deliberately unattainable standards' for clean air while 'leveling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them.' But Dr. Howard Frumkin, a former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and professor emeritus at the University of Washington School of Public Health, said Zeldin and Trump were trying to deny reality. 'The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal- and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms and many other health threats,' Frumkin said. 'These are indisputable facts. If you torpedo regulations on power plant greenhouse gas emissions, you torpedo the health and well-being of the American public and contribute to leaving a world of risk and suffering to our children and grandchildren.' A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. The Biden rule also would result in 'significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health,' he said.

Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's vehicle emissions rules

time2 hours ago

Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's vehicle emissions rules

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign a measure Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, a White House official told The Associated Press. The resolution Trump plans to sign, which Congress approved last month, aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. He also plans to approve measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. The timing of the signing was confirmed Wednesday by a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to share plans not yet public. The development comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over everything from tariffs to the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California,' Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in an email. "We're fighting back." According to the White House official, Trump is expected to sign resolutions that block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and ending the sale of new ones by 2035. He will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. The president is scheduled to sign the measures and make remarks during an event at the White House on Thursday morning. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin are expected to attend, along with members of Congress and representatives from the energy, trucking and gas station industries. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move will also come a day after the Environmental Protection Agency proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin said it would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. The National Automobile Dealers Association supported the federal government's move to block California's ban on gas-powered cars, saying Congress should decide on such a national issue, not the state. The American Trucking Associations said the rules were not feasible and celebrated Congress' move to block them. Chris Spear, the CEO of the American Trucking Associations, said in a statement Wednesday: 'This is not the United States of California.' It was also applauded by Detroit automaker General Motors, which said it will 'help align emissions standards with today's market realities.' 'We have long advocated for one national standard that will allow us to stay competitive, continue to invest in U.S. innovation, and offer customer choice across the broadest lineup of gas-powered and electric vehicles,' the company said in a statement. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, in anticipation of the president signing the measures, said earlier Thursday that the move would be 'Trump's latest betrayal of democracy.' 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets,' Becker said in a statement.

Trump moves to ax power plant rules
Trump moves to ax power plant rules

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump moves to ax power plant rules

The Big Story The Trump administration is moving to ax all climate rules alongside Biden-era and pollution rules for power plants. © AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File The moves come as the Trump administration looks to promote fossil fuels and are expected to worsen global warming and air pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to find that power plants' greenhouse gas emissions 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution' and therefore should not be regulated. In effect, this proposal would overturn Biden-era rules that required existing coal and new gas plants to capture at least 90 percent of their carbon emissions and tighten restrictions on coal plants' releases of mercury and other toxic metals. The climate rule that the Trump administration is proposing to ax would have prevented an estimated 1.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions between the years 2038 and 2047 — emissions equivalent to taking more than 300 million gas-powered cars off the road for a year, according to Biden-era projections. Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Trump proposes axing all climate rules for power plants The Trump administration is moving to ax all climate rules alongside Biden-era and pollution rules for power plants. House GOP approves 'technical changes' to Trump agenda bill On the energy front, the changes removed a provision that would have reinstated leases for a proposed copper and nickel mine that had been renewed under the first Trump administration but revoked under former President Biden. Federal judge tasks Port of Los Angeles with cleaning up contaminated water The Port of Los Angeles will need to clean up widespread water contamination in the city's harbor by shoring up sewage treatment operations, according to a settlement approved by a federal judge. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Trump's Onshore Wind Pause Is Still On (Heatmap) Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired (The Guardian) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Read more Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned Organizers with the 'No Kings' movement are planning some 1,500 demonstrations across the country to protest the upcoming military parade Saturday. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store