Why many potential buyers have been scared away from Florida's condo market
Fort Lauderdale, Florida — Mayra Villalona is sitting on what she thought was real estate gold.
She bought a two-bed, two-bath condo near Fort Lauderdale in 2021 for $145,000, hoping to pounce on pandemic-era real estate prices.
"This is really a great community to live in," Villalona told CBS News. "It's just to me, for me, it's not an investment right now. It's not a good one."
Villalona's condo has been on the market since last November. Despite spending $20,000 upgrading the kitchen and the bathrooms, she has seen virtually no potential buyers. She has lowered the price twice with no luck. It is currently listed for $255,000.
"Because it wasn't moving…And…I wanted to sell it," Villalona said of why she lowered the price.
In an already challenging U.S. real estate market, many South Florida condo owners cannot sell because some buyers have been scared off from a surge in special assessment fees that are used to make safety upgrades to older condominiums in response to a new state law passed following the 2021 partial building collapse of the 12-story Champlain Towers in Surfside, killing 98 people, one of the deadliest building collapses in U.S. history.
Older buildings, like Villalona's that are three stories or higher, are now required to increase inspections and build up a reserve to fund restoration projects. Fees are paid by the homeowners, which can range in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Villalona says her fund restoration fees have increased "three times already" because of the law, from about $20,000, to now over $50,000.
"Well, it used to be 20 and then they went to 35, and now I owe over 50," Villalona said.
In hindsight, would Villalona have still bought the condo back in 2021?
"Probably not this one," she said.
Brokers told CBS News that mortgage giant Fannie Mae has compiled a list of 1,400 condo developments across Florida that are considered high-risk to secure a mortgage because the buildings are either underinsured or have overdue repairs making them harder to sell.
Sneak peek: The Detective's Wife
Judge halts own order demanding Kilmar Abrego Garcia updates
NIH | Sunday on 60 Minutes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Advocates for Balanced Trade Over Tariffs. Could Import Certificates Provide a Better Path for the Stock Market?
Buffett thinks import certificates would be better than tariffs. With Buffett's idea, U.S. exporters would receive import certificates that they could sell to companies importing goods to the U.S. His idea would likely be better for stocks because it would remove the uncertainty associated with the Trump administration's trade policy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Warren Buffett has been in the business world for more than seven decades. He also reads voraciously. It shouldn't be surprising, therefore, that the legendary investor has an opinion on tariffs. In a nutshell, he doesn't like them. In a March 2025 interview with CBS News' Norah O'Donnell, Buffett called tariffs "an act of war, to some degree." However, the Oracle of Omaha put forward an intriguing alternative to tariffs years ago that's still garnering attention today. In 2003, Buffett wrote an article for Fortune magazine warning about the U.S. trade deficit. He noted that trade deficits began to concern him going back to 1987. Buffett wrote, "We were taught in Economics 101 that countries could not for long sustain large, ever-growing trade deficits." Buffett didn't just point out the problem, though. He presented a potential solution that he called import certificates. His idea was to issue these import certificates to all U.S. exporters. The exporters would get import certificates equal to the dollar value of the products they exported to other countries. They would then be able to sell their import certificates to anyone wanting to import products into the U.S. For example, let's suppose Acme Corporation exports $1 million in products from the U.S. to other countries. Acme would receive $1 million worth of import certificates that it could sell to any other company seeking to export products from other countries to the U.S. The end result would be a trade balance. Buffett acknowledged, "My remedy may sound gimmicky, and in truth it is a tariff called by another name." However, there are major differences between his proposed import certificates and the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. For one thing, Buffett's idea doesn't try to protect specific industries as the president's steel tariffs do. Nor do they attempt to punish specific countries like Trump's initial calls for exceptionally high tariffs on China and the European Union. What happened after Buffett proposed import certificates in 2003? Nothing. Fortune reposted the article in 2016. Buffett said then that he still agreed for the most part with what he originally wrote. However, he acknowledged that the problem of trade deficits had "diminished a bit" thanks to lower oil prices and increased domestic production of oil. Does Buffett still like the idea of import certificates? He told Berkshire Hathaway shareholders at their annual meeting in May 2025 that the idea is "certainly better than what we're talking about now." Buffett expressed concern about the impact the Trump administration's tariffs are having on other countries' views of the U.S. He said at the Berkshire shareholder meeting: [I]t's a big mistake when you have 7.5 billion people who don't like you very well, and you have 300 million people crowing about how well they've done. I don't think it's right, and I don't think it's wise. The more prosperous the rest of the world becomes, it won't be at our expense -- the more prosperous we'll become and the safer we'll feel and your children will feel someday. The 94-year-old multibillionaire argued, "The main thing is that trade should not be a weapon." He continues to believe that "balanced trade is good for the world." You might have noticed a pattern with the stock market in 2025. News about increased tariffs or tariff threats from the Trump administration has usually caused stocks to sink. But any hints that tariffs will be eased or delayed, even temporarily, have typically caused stocks to rise. It doesn't take an investing guru to see that tariffs have been perceived as bad for stocks. Would Buffett's import certificates pave a better path for the stock market? I think so. If nothing else, Buffett's idea would remove the animosity that punitive tariffs could create with major U.S. trading partners and be much less likely to ignite a trade war that could cause economic harm. Perhaps more importantly, though, Buffett's proposal would remove much of the uncertainty that has been prevalent with President Trump's tariffs. Buffett developed a logical and structured market-based approach to address trade deficits. Instead of on-again, off-again tariffs with rates that change frequently, investors would know what to expect. However, Buffett didn't seem to have much hope that his import certificates would gain traction at Berkshire Hathaway's recent shareholder meeting. He joked, "[D]on't expect my import certificate idea to go down in history with Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations." Investors might wish otherwise. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $363,030!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,088!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $674,395!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Keith Speights has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett Advocates for Balanced Trade Over Tariffs. Could Import Certificates Provide a Better Path for the Stock Market? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Calls Anyone Who'll Listen to Prove He's Not Thinking About Elon
The White House frantically worked to move forward from this week's blowup between President Donald Trump and his former first buddy Elon Musk. But the frenzied level at which the president insisted everything is all good suggested the opposite. The president did what amounted to a weekday version of a 'Full Ginsburg' Friday morning when he spoke with reporters from across the major television networks and got his thoughts off his chest. It's hard to believe everything is fine when the president was going full-court press with those he has blasted as 'fake' at one point or another. In one brief call, the president spoke to CNN's Dana Bash. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said. But the president's media blitz did not stop there. When ABC News' Jonathan Karl called shortly before 7 a.m., the president picked up the phone. During that conversation, Trump called Musk the 'man who has lost his mind.' He also said he was 'not particularly' interested in talking with the world's richest man right now, despite early reports of plans for a call between the two being in the works. Then there was the call with CBS News Friday morning. The president told the network's Robert Costa he was 'totally' focused on domestic and foreign policy. 'That's all I focus on,' Trump said. 'I don't focus on anything else.' Also Friday morning, there was a call with Fox News, where the president told Bret Baier he was not interested in discussing Musk but got in that 'Elon's totally lost it.' The president's early chats with reporters did not just stop with television networks. He also spoke with one of his favorite papers, the New York Post. During that brief phone call, the president reportedly played it cool and insisted 'nothing catches me by surprise. Nothing,' when asked about the personal attacks on him from his one-time close ally. He also had a brief chat with Politico, a favorite target of criticism of the Trump administration, on Thursday. Of the breakup, Trump said 'Oh, it's okay' and claimed 'it's going very well, never done better.' Perhaps the president really does want to just get past the not-so-beautiful breakup. He also spoke of his polling numbers, inflation, and gas prices on his Friday morning calls. But it was unusual for the president to do such a widespread round robin like the one the world saw Friday morning, insisting Musk isn't top of mind. By Friday afternoon, Trump made another somewhat out-of-character move: he remained quiet. The president did not take questions as he departed the White House on Friday afternoon. It was not the first time he made an exit without seeking out the press. But after fielding calls across the board hours before, it was notable to reject giving more oxygen to their relationship.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple to pay $95 million in Siri eavesdropping settlement; Here's how to file your claim
Those who own Siri-enabled devices, including iPhones, MacBooks, and iPads, may be eligible to file a claim in Apple's $95 million settlement over allegations that Siri has been eavesdropping on consumers. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] As reported by CBS News, California resident Fumiko Lopez filed a lawsuit in 2021 claiming that several types of Apple devices have been eavesdropping on Apple consumers. The lawsuit claims that the private and confidential discussions Siri had allegedly listened to were being shared with third-party businesses that then targeted consumers with ads in Apple search and Safari, according to CBS News. 'Apple denies all of the allegations made in the lawsuit and denies that Apple did anything improper or unlawful,' the settlement website states. Apple agreed to the settlement earlier this year, and now consumers can file claims to get a piece of the $95 million agreement. TRENDING STORIES: Deputies: Wood thrown at officers in high-speed chase; ends in wrong-way crash on I-75 Injuries reported after car slams into Miami County home Child, adult dead after being pulled from SUV that went into pond Consumers who owned Siri-enabled iPhones and other Apple devices between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024, and 'experienced an unintended Siri activation during a confidential or private communication,' are eligible to file a claim, according to the settlement website. Consumers who owned iPhones, iPads, an iPod Touch, an iMac, a MacBook, an Apple Watch, an AppleTV, and/or a HomePod could all be eligible for payment. The amount consumers could earn ultimately depends on how many people file claims, but CBS News reported there's a cap of $20 per Siri-enabled device that a person owns. Apple consumers can file a claim for as many as five Siri-enabled devices, for a maximum payout of $100, according to the settlement site. To submit a claim, visit the settlement website here. The settlement's final approval hearing is scheduled for August 1, 2025, at 9 a.m., but there could be an appeal that would delay the payout, as reported by CBS News. The settlement payment will not come until later this year at the earliest. There is no confirmed date. Settlement payments, if you receive them, will be sent via physical check, e-check, or direct deposit. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
