UPI fuels rural women's digital leap—but few own their phones
Even as millions of rural women in India are using mobile phones and the internet, and making digital payments, many may be doing so on borrowed devices.
A new government survey of 142,065 people across India reveals a striking paradox: while 76.3% of rural women aged 15 and above use mobile phones—for personal calls or internet access—just 48.4% actually own one. That means more than a quarter of female mobile users in rural India don't own the device they use, exposing a deeper gap in digital agency and privacy.
These findings, from the Comprehensive Modular Survey: Telecom (CMS:T) conducted by the statistics ministry between January and March 2025, highlight how India's digital revolution, fuelled by affordable smartphones and cheap internet, still leaves large swathes of women behind.
In contrast, 89.5% of rural men use mobile phones, with an ownership rate of 80.7%.
Read this | How India pays online: UPI leads with 65% share, EMIs make up 20%—in charts
The gender gap is especially stark in states like West Bengal, where 80% of rural women use mobile phones, but only 43% own them, the largest gap recorded in the country. Madhya Pradesh (67% usage vs 32% ownership) and Uttar Pradesh (75% vs 43%) show similar trends. States such as Kerala (92% usage, 85% ownership) and Goa (94% usage, 90% ownership), however, demonstrate more equitable access.
Progress, but with caveats
The usage-ownership gap is significant, but it doesn't mean rural women haven't made progress in recent years.
Compared to the findings of Comprehensive Annual Modular Survey (CAMS), conducted between July 2022 and June 2023, more rural women are now using mobile phones and the internet, sending messages with attachments, and performing online banking transactions.
While the two surveys—CAMS 2022-23 and CMS:T 2025—aren't strictly comparable due to differences in duration and definitions, they still offer a sense of momentum. Mobile phone usage among rural women rose modestly by 1.4 percentage points, from 74.9% to 76.3%. But sharper gains were seen in internet use (up 15 percentage points), the ability to send attachments (up 13.9 points), and performing online transactions (up 12.9 points).
Gender gap persists
Despite notable improvements, the gender gap in digital access remains pronounced, much like in many other areas of life.
Younger rural women (aged 15–29) are better placed than the overall group of rural women (15 and above), but they still lag significantly behind their male counterparts.
Among the younger cohort, mobile phone and internet usage rates are nearly on par with rural men. But the disparities emerge sharply in phone ownership—81.2% of young rural men own a mobile phone, compared to just 56.9% of women—and in the ability to conduct online transactions (75.9% vs. 50.4%).
Read this | Cash transfers to women offer a quick fix but mask deeper problems
The gaps are even wider when looking at all rural women aged 15 and above. Mobile ownership and internet usage are skewed heavily in favour of men, though the gap in the ability to perform online transactions is only marginally smaller: 23.9 percentage points overall, versus 25.5 points among the younger age group.
UPI helps bridge the gap
Shifts in payment habits after demonetisation, the covid pandemic, and the widespread ease and accessibility of UPI have enabled more rural women to perform online transactions.
While just 30% of rural women are able to transact online, compared to 51% of urban women and 54% of rural men, nearly 89% of them rely solely on UPI. This suggests that low digital literacy and language barriers may be limiting the use of other payment modes like net banking.
Also read | Behind PAN data, a quiet story of women's rise in India's economy
UPI is popular across user groups, but urban men and women are far more likely to diversify into other forms of online banking. The data underscores how targeted innovations like UPI can meaningfully reduce access barriers for disadvantaged groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
What more to expect from Paraguayan President's visit
A lot can happen over a maiden visit of a State leader. Paraguayan President Santiago Peña's three day long maiden visit to India from June 2- 4 presents a momentum in turning point in the ties of New Delhi and Asuncion, the capital of the landlocked, riverine nation. An economist by degree and occupation, President Peña brings a data-driven perspective to governance, viewing society through analytical metrics not just by his political ideology and preconceived principles, drawing from office. Prior to assuming the presidency, President Pena was the finance minister and once led the Central Bank of Paraguay. President Peña's maiden visit after a brief gap of any leader's visit to India occurs at an time when China has almost no naysayers in Latin America. Paraguay is the only country in South America that maintains diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Strategically, India and Paraguay share a common outlook on supporting Taiwan's autonomy. In December, Paraguay expelled Chinese envoy Xu Wei for alleged interference in its internal affairs. During his visit to New Delhi, President Peña held comprehensive talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on a wide range of issues. He emphasized that Paraguay produces enough food to feed ten times its own population. The nation possesses an intimate knowledge of the soil, yet remains bereft of technological acumen. Agritech and high-tech collaboration are essential between two aspiring nations. India is a perfect match in advancing its ambition for global food security through such partnerships. Interestingly, Paraguay also produces stevia, a natural sweetener permitted in India; however, Indian importers currently rely mostly on China and the US. There is clear scope for Indian players to tap into Paraguay as a new and reliable source. Paraguay's export portfolio is traditionally reserved to the periphery, with most of its trade directed to China, Brazil, and Argentina. However, it is now actively seeking to diversify its partners. As a landlocked nation with no coastline to secure, Paraguay benefits from a relatively low defence burden. It borders Argentina to the south and southwest, Brazil to the east and northeast, and Bolivia to the northwest—all trade partners, not threats. Given its strategic central location in South America, Paraguay could serve as a valuable regional hub for India to access broader Latin American markets. Both countries are eager to strengthen and expand their existing trade links under the India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement. However, consensus among all five MERCOSUR member states is required to expand any talks between India and MERCOSUR. Paraguay's trade with China is about $5 billion plus whereas with India time to time differs from $130 million to $470 million. India wouldn't be in a position to reach anything near that China's export but it should rapidly increase the trade volume. India's advances in IT, digitalisation, innovation, and platforms like UPI and UIDAI have drawn interest from many South American countries, including Paraguay. Paraguay has historically maintained modest defence expenditures, but recent years have seen a shift in strategy. As India begins producing AK-203 assault rifles in Uttar Pradesh in collaboration with Russia, there is growing interest in expanding defence cooperation. Paraguay may consider imports of defence and surveillance items for traditional as well as cyber threats, including Indian-manufactured small arms and police equipment. Paraguay has overcome its traumatic past marked by two wars - the War of the Triple Alliance (1864–1870) against Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay, which resulted in the loss of a large part of its territory and left the nation devastated for decades. And the other, Chaco War against Bolivia (1932–1935). Despite being landlocked, Paraguay is crisscrossed by large rivers and generates nearly all its electricity from hydroelectric sources. The Itaipu Dam, a joint operation with Brazil, supplies about 90% of Paraguay's electricity. India's capabilities in riverine and flood data management, as well as weather prediction, could be of immense value to Paraguay's hydro-focused energy sector. Given Paraguay's extensive river systems, there may also be opportunities for India and Paraguay to exchange knowledge or develop initiatives related to riverine connectivity - benefiting from each other's experience as major riverine nations. A member of the Lima Group, Paraguay is a vocal supporter of reforming the United Nations Security Council and other multilateral institutions, including global financial systems. India, with its rich civilizational heritage and growing global influence, is well-positioned to build a deep and enduring relationship with Paraguay—one that spans not just trade, but also for a defiant advocate of multipolarity. For an economist or a social scientist, society is the largest laboratory. During his visit, President Peña has already engaged with numerous leaders and heads of institutions. He showed particular interest in the Vande Bharat trains and connectivity projects, signalling plans to explore and possibly collaborate in these areas. Paraguay, a nation of around seven million people is a vast agrarian country, with approximately 40% of its territory covered in forest. It also possesses rich mineral resources, including critical minerals such as uranium and lithium which are in demand in India. Paraguay has had its share of challenges despite being a high performer in the agriculture sector. India should come forward identifying and helping to eradicate them. With its brigade of travel influencers, India must promote the nation's civilisation-based tourism and Spanish speaking youtubers bring more visitors to India. Paraguay is dire need of applied technology especially IT. Business ties between India and Paraguay could expand beyond meat and soybean exports. Major Indian automobile companies are already present in Paraguay, but there is scope for exporting superior tech-driven mobility equipment such as two-wheelers, lifts, elevators, and goods transporters. This article is authored by Ayanangsha Maitra, journalist, Center of Geoeconomics for the Global South, UAE.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
India's Digital Health Infrastructure Is Not Yet Sovereign
In a world increasingly defined by digital sovereignty, few sectors remain as exposed and as under-examined as healthcare. Over the past decade, discussions about data localization have centered on payments, social media, and consumer platforms. Despite its scale and sensitivity, healthcare has rarely been treated with the same urgency. That oversight is unlikely to endure. The digital systems that underpin modern care, including AI diagnostics, electronic health records, and remote monitoring, have evolved beyond mere service tools into strategic national infrastructure. Yet even as these systems advance, the foundations beneath them continue to reflect dependencies that are neither obvious nor sustainable. This dependency often emerges quietly. It appears in clinical models trained on foreign datasets, in health data stored on overseas servers, and in compute capacity concentrated in a few urban centers and operated by firms outside national oversight. These are not minor operational choices. They are signs of structural imbalance. In a world where governance increasingly lives within infrastructure, such imbalances tend to widen over time. One early indicator came when the United States restricted exports of high-end GPUs to China. Presented as a safeguard against general-purpose AI, the move also disrupted China's capacity to develop sovereign healthcare technology. Without domestic compute capabilities, efforts to build clinical models grounded in national data become constrained, creating reliance on external intelligence shaped by foreign priorities and assumptions. India, by contrast, has made significant progress. Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker, CoWIN, and the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission form one of the most ambitious public digital infrastructures in the world. These systems have enabled unprecedented access at scale. But building digital rails alone does not guarantee a sovereign destination. Without foundational control over compute infrastructure, data governance, and system resilience, healthcare remains locally administered yet externally contingent. The challenge ahead is not only to expand existing infrastructure but to design systems inherently sovereign. Health data now sits at the intersection of ethics, economics, and strategy. It influences hospital triage decisions, determines how insurers model risk, and guides how algorithms learn. At national scale, this data quietly accumulates into a form of strategic leverage. Countries unable to govern this data autonomously risk a subtle yet persistent erosion of strategic agency. India's opportunity lies in constructing infrastructure aligned with long-term national priorities rather than shortterm efficiencies. Compute capacity should be distributed according to population density, not merely the flow of investment capital. Clinical models must be developed using Indian datasets within governance frameworks that ensure interoperability without sacrificing autonomy. Institutional partnerships should emphasize durable alignment of interests over immediate vendor integration. This transition is already underway. India's evolving data governance frameworks and the federated architecture of its health data systems point to a deeper intent to decentralize trust and build genuine internal resilience. But ambition without execution creates only the appearance of readiness. What matters now is execution – measured not in press releases, but in hardware, architecture, and lasting institutional ownership. The countries best prepared to protect public health in the coming decades will not necessarily be those with the largest budgets or the newest hospitals. They will be those that understand where strategic exposure truly lies: in compute, in code, and in control over the systems that connect them. India still has time to build what others are scrambling to defend. This article is written by Aakanxit Khullar, Vice President at a Global Consulting Firm. (DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and does not necessarily subscribe to it. shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly)
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
India could add $500 billion to GDP by 2035 through strategic AI adoption: Acuité's Sankar Chakraborti
The strategic adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) could boost India's annual GDP growth by 1.3%, contributing an additional $500 billion to the economy by 2035, says Sankar Chakraborti, MD of Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. In an interview with ET Digital, Chakraborti highlights the pivotal role of AI in fostering innovation, generating jobs, and stimulating economic growth. However, he notes that the primary obstacles are inadequate high-performance computing capacity and continued brain drain. He asserts that AI should extend beyond urban centres to rural and semi-urban India. This expansion will require investments in infrastructure, affordable internet, and localised AI applications for small businesses to fully realise the potential of this opportunity. Edited excerpts: ET: How significant is the economic potential of AI for India's long-term growth trajectory?Sankar Chakraborti (SC): AI has been a game changer, and our analysis reveals that if adopted strategically, it has the potential to add 1.3% to the country's annual GDP growth. To put that in perspective, that's potentially half a trillion dollars added to India's economy by 2035. These are not just numbers; these are the indicators of better opportunities, more innovation, and a tech-savvy Viksit Bharat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When the Camera Clicked at the Worst Possible Time Read More Undo ET: What factors contribute to India's unique position for accelerating large-scale AI adoption? SC: India enjoys a strong digital and demographic foundation. Our mobile internet usage is high, with 796 million users and 16.4 GB average monthly data consumption per user—the highest globally. The country has an unmatched human capital scale with a median age of 28. It produces 1.4 million IT graduates annually. India's digital infrastructure holds a massive advantage for expedited AI penetration; add to this a young population, 1.4 million IT graduates annually, and pioneering platforms like Aadhaar and UPI (Unified Payments Interface), and you have an ecosystem well-suited for rapid AI penetration across sectors. Live Events ET: Given the potential impact of AI on the job market, what steps can India take to address this issue? SC: AI is an inherently transformative technology. As AI models get more refined, they can automate more routine tasks, and that will impact certain jobs. Research suggests that over 40% of working hours could be automated by 2030, potentially affecting millions of jobs. But this isn't just about job losses; it's about job transformation. The key is how we respond. Such huge disruption will also create new jobs that will require specialised skills to develop and manage AI. The government has a crucial role to play in reskilling and upskilling our workforce, helping people adapt to these changes and seize the opportunities that AI will create. India currently accounts for just 9.2% of global AI research publications, far behind China's 23.2% and the US's 15.2%. Barring a few top educational institutes, there is negligible effort for producing world-class AI research. The onus should be on developing skills for the AI age, rather than creating a state of anxiety around AI-triggered job losses. ET: In India, there is a stark variation in internet penetration. The penetration of AI also varies across different sectors. How can India ensure inclusive AI development and global competitiveness compared to nations like the US and China? SC: To make AI equitable, we need to narrow the existing digital divide in India. The focus should be on building digital infrastructure in rural areas and tier-II and tier-III cities. Affordable internet and localised AI solutions tailored for smaller businesses in these regions are key. We also need to boost research and innovation through academic partnerships and incentivise industries to explore AI. India has just 6 supercomputers in the global top 500, compared to 63 in China and 173 in the US. This highlights the shortfall in digital infrastructure. If we can tackle these issues head-on, India can compete with global AI leaders like the US and China. ET: Which sectors are poised to gain the most from the AI boom in India? SC: AI has the potential to touch every part of our economy, but some sectors are poised for major transformation. Healthcare is a big one. Think about AI helping doctors diagnose diseases earlier and more accurately. Agriculture can be revolutionised with precision farming techniques. Education can become much more personalised. And financial services can reach more people and prevent fraud. These are just a few examples. Now, will every job in these sectors be replaced? Not really. But many jobs, especially for clerical and administrative workers, are expected to become extinct. The smart move is to focus on how AI can augment human capabilities, not just replace them. ET: Despite the government's support, what are the key roadblocks that could slow AI adoption in India ? SC: In AI adoption, complacency and rigidness can be major challenges. A successful AI rollout requires a mindset geared toward continuous learning and innovation. Bridging the skills gap is crucial, as is improving data quality and infrastructure. Importantly, India must establish clear guidelines around responsible AI, privacy, and ethics to ensure sustainable, trust-driven growth in the sector.
