logo
Don't ‘Panican'! Republicans are finally waking up to Donald Trump

Don't ‘Panican'! Republicans are finally waking up to Donald Trump

Independent08-04-2025

Not for the first time, many people – including some leading Republicans – are asking themselves: 'Who can save us from Donald Trump?'
A man who has lived his life disregarding conventions, the law, even the Constitution of the United States, the better to aggregate wealth and power, has now set himself against the rest of the world. With his unprovoked and irrational trade war – one that now finds him playing chicken with President Xi of China – the gangster-in-chief has gone global.
To those rightly concerned about the damage being inflicted on the US and world economy, the president has issued this typically solemn and statesmanlike statement: 'The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO. Don't be Weak! Don't be Stupid! Don't be a PANICAN (A new party based on Weak and Stupid people!). Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!'
Well, it doesn't feel that great yet, but Trump may have inadvertently given rise to a new resistance movement: the Panican Party.
So far from being cowardly and weak and stupid, Panicans are the people who put country before party, and have the guts to stand up to a deluded bully trashing American workers' living standards. These Americans are the strong, courageous and patient people who understand that America is not Trump's personal real estate.
'Panicans' should wear the label with pride, put it on T-shirts, bumper stickers and, yes, red baseball caps.
Thus far, the traditional guardrails against the abuse of power have proved almost entirely ineffective, and where they threatened to actually make some impact, they have been dismantled – notably, certain federal agencies and access for the media.
But with the Trump tariffs looking increasingly likely to deliver a Trump Slump, the Republican Party, long somnolent, is beginning to stir. So are some businesspeople. The Panicans are mobilising.
The most, and also least surprising Panican is Elon Musk. Surprising, because he's been such a buddy of Trump; unsurprising, because Trump's policies will wreck his Tesla, car company and have already wiped billions off his net wealth. Fear not, he still has enough to get by on.
Musk reposted a charming old clip of the great free market economist Milton Friedman using the example of making a pencil to extol the virtues of free trade. Musk also took a side-swipe at Peter Navarro, Trump's clever but misguided trade advisor, remarking of Navarro: 'A PhD in Econ from Harvard is a bad thing, not a good thing. Results in the ego/brains>>1 problem'.
Another Trumpian billionaire-turned-Panican is Bill Ackman, who rightly attracted much attention with his remark that 'we are heading for a self-induced, economic nuclear winter, and we should start hunkering down.'
In Congress there's also vocal opposition, and not confined to Democrats. Ted Cruz, for example, no one's idea of a liberal globalist, warns that 'tariffs are a tax on consumers, and I'm not a fan of jacking up taxes on American consumers, so my hope is these tariffs are short-lived, and they serve as leverage to lower tariffs across the globe'. The Congressional midterm elections next year, he predicts, will be a 'bloodbath'.
Former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, Senator Rand Paul and others tend to agree: the Trump Tariffs make little economic or financial sense.
Can they and their allies stop Trump? The answer is that if the Panicans don't panic, in the sense of being intimidated by Trump, and work across the aisle with their political rivals, they could do.
The great irony in this is that trade policy, including setting tariffs, is a matter assigned to Congress in the Constitution, ie in Article 1, Section 8. It ought to have the power to take back control over trade policy, provided the Supreme Court permits it to do so. There are efforts to make this happen – but, at the moment, it looks like the grip Trump has on the House of Representatives will stymie any such move.
More realistically is simple political pressure from within the Republican Party, or at least those elements of it that haven't fallen prey to the Maga mind virus.
Behind the various senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen are millions of Americans – workers, consumers, savers… and voters. When they get laid off by firms struggling with collapsed supply chains, when they are faced with a huge rise in prices for imported goods, and they see how devalued their pension funds have become, they will take their anger out on the party they hold responsible.
Either Trump changes course soon, in the knowledge that a disaster awaits him when the Democrats reclaim Congress; or he defies the Panicans and blunders into that electoral 'bloodbath' talked about by Cruz.
Using the grip that the Maga movement has over Republican candidate selection, Trump can always threaten dissidents with getting 'primaried' – sacked by proxy. Congressman Thomas Massie from Kentucky is only the latest to be intimidated in this way, over the budget bill. So America is headed for yet another test of the resilience of its system of governance and a constitutional crisis – to add to the trade crisis and the international security crises Trump has also caused.
But, as Trump might put it, if the Republicans don't do something about the guy, they won't have a country, let alone a party, any more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say
US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US Justice Department fires two tied to Trump probes, people familiar say

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department this week fired two more employees who worked on investigations into President Donald Trump's retention of classified records and efforts to overturn the 2020 election, according to three people familiar with the matter. Including those two, the Justice Department has fired 17 people who worked on former Special Counsel Jack Smith's team prosecuting Trump since he returned to power in January. One of the people fired on Monday worked as a lawyer on Smith's team and also previously helped prosecute some of the defendants who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in a failed bid to block Congress from certifying Democratic President Joe Biden's election win over Trump. The second person who was also fired Monday worked in a support staff role for Smith's team, the people added. The firings were ordered by Attorney General Pam Bondi, the people said. Both people were most recently working in different divisions at the department. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Fourteen attorneys were fired en masse on January 27 because of their work on the cases against Trump. In April, the Justice Department fired a career public affairs employee who had served as a spokesperson for Smith. Trump, who faced criminal charges in four different federal and state prosecutions, campaigned for president on a vow to exact retribution against his political enemies. He has long accused the Justice Department of targeting him for political reasons - a claim that Smith's team repeatedly denied in court filings.

House passes Republican-led bills to repeal D.C. laws on noncitizen voting and policing
House passes Republican-led bills to repeal D.C. laws on noncitizen voting and policing

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

House passes Republican-led bills to repeal D.C. laws on noncitizen voting and policing

WASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled House is poised to pass a trio of bills this week to repeal Washington, D.C., laws on immigration, voting and policing, even as it has yet to restore a painful a $1 billion cut to the city's budget. The House passed two of the bills on Tuesday. One would bar noncitizens from voting in local elections in the nation's capital, overturning a D.C. law that was passed in 2022. The other would restore collective bargaining rights and a statute of limitations for D.C. police officers involved in disciplinary cases. Then, on Thursday, the House is expected to pass a third bill, the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act, which would require the D.C. government to comply with requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security to share information and detain undocumented immigrants. Under current D.C. law, local authorities do not work with federal immigration officials unless they have a judicial warrant. All together, the bills represent House Republicans' attempt to assert authority over deep-blue D.C. at a time when the GOP has unified control of the federal government. ' Home rule ' — where the D.C. mayor and city council make their own laws but Congress has the ability to review them — has long been a point of contention. Democrats have pushed in recent years to grant full statehood to D.C., while Republicans have slammed decisions made by local leaders and sought to reverse them. 'D.C.'s City Council made radical decisions in our nation's capital under the Biden-Harris administration, passing local laws that are woefully inconsistent with national standards or constitutional principles,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, the chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee who authored the GOP voting bill, said in a statement to NBC News. 'I'm proud that the House is taking action to overturn several of these reckless measures — including my legislation to prohibit noncitizens from voting in local D.C. elections,' he said. At the same time, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Republican leaders have been dragging their feet on a legislative fix for D.C.'s budget. A government funding bill that Congress passed in March to avert a shutdown included a provision requiring the city to revert back to fiscal year 2024 funding levels, leaving it with a $1.1 billion shortfall. The move was quickly met with opposition from local D.C. leaders. The Senate voted by unanimous consent in March to undo it and restore D.C.'s authority to use local tax dollars as its leaders see fit. President Donald Trump endorsed the fix, calling on the House to 'immediately' pass that bill in a social media post on March 28. But months later, Johnson still hasn't held a vote on the bill, prompting criticism from Democrats and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. 'It's absurd that the House hasn't taken it up. It's absolutely irresponsible, unfair and beneath the credibility of leadership,' said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., who represents a congressional district just D.C. 'It's not our money, it's D.C.'s money ... and I don't know why the speaker hasn't put the Senate bill on the floor. It'll pass overwhelmingly.' 'This is a particular egregious example of substituting their judgment for those who are locally elected to govern the District of Columbia,' Hoyer said. Last month, Johnson told reporters he was in communication with Bowser and that the House would take up the funding fix 'as quickly as possible.' The speaker said that passing Trump's massive domestic policy package had taken up 'all of our energy' and insisted the delay was not for a 'political purpose.' 'We're working on it right now. It's not like we've closed the door to that,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., told NBC News on Tuesday. 'But obviously there are other problems we're trying to resolve along the way.' Bowser's office denounced the GOP bills to revoke DC law and — while noting that D.C. has mitigated the most 'catastrophic' impacts of the budget restrictions — urged Congress to pass the funding fix. 'Mayor Bowser continues to oppose all congressional interference in the lives and affairs of Washingtonians. DC will continue to fight to protect our home rule and self-determination,' a Bowser spokesperson said in an email. 'If Congress wants to be helpful, they should pass the District of Columbia Local Funds Act to fix their damage to DC's FY25 budget.' Johnson's office had no comment when asked Tuesday when — or whether — he still plans to hold a vote on the funding fix. Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., the No. 4 in Republican leadership, said, 'I honestly don't know. I haven't heard yes or no,' when asked if the funding fix will come up for a vote. Other congressional Democrats said Republicans should stay out of D.C. issues. 'It's bad enough, usually, when they're playing in D.C. local, home rule issues,' said Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., whose district abuts Washington. 'But then to do it at a time when they haven't returned the $1.1 billion is especially egregious.' Immigration has dominated the national political debate this week, with protests erupting in Los Angeles in response to the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts. Republicans said the fight over immigration is a winning issue for the party, and they've continued to lean into it with the legislation on the floor this week. 'If D.C. wants illegals to vote, we've made it clear at the federal level people here illegally should not vote in any elections,' Scalise said. 'We're still the most generous nation in the world in terms of our legal immigration system,' he continued, 'but we have to fix our broken immigration system. And you could just see what's going on in L.A. to prove the point.'

Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage
Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage

Donald Trump made a huge blunder about World War I in a fiery speech at Fort Bragg, as the U.S. continues to be rocked by riots over the President's mass deportation order US President Donald Trump delivered a speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday, as unrest continued in Los Angeles between protesters and ICE officials over his far-reaching deportation order. Fort Bragg, situated near Fayetteville, North Carolina, is home to the military's Special Operations Command, which includes elite units such as the Green Berets and Rangers. ‌ During his address, Trump made a significant historical blunder, claiming that many countries had recently commemorated the end of World War I, while the US did not participate in the celebrations, despite asserting "we're the ones who won the war." ‌ "Without us," Trump said, "You'd all be speaking German right now." "Maybe a little Japanese thrown in. But we won the war," he added. "We're gonna celebrate on Saturday." However, Trump's claim that citizens would have been speaking Japanese is inaccurate, as Japan was an ally of the US, France, Great Britain, Russia, and Italy against the Axis powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire, reports the Mirror US. It appears the President was actually referencing WW2, which was commemorated recently during VE celebrations. The end of WW1 is traditionally commemorated on "Armistice Day" on November 11 each year. The event at Fort Bragg was also attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, and included both active service members and their families. The speech comes ahead of the 250th anniversary of the army and coincidentally, Trump's 79th birthday, which will be marked with a parade in Washington, D.C. ‌ The city is bracing for a massive turnout at the parade this Saturday, with officials already setting up 18 miles of "anti-scale fencing" and deploying drones, despite the usual no-fly zone rules. City representatives have told The Associated Press they're expecting an "preparing for an enormous turnout." ‌ Secret Service's Matt McCool from the Washington Field Office is preparing for "hundreds of thousands" to line the streets, while military sources estimate around 200,000 will join the celebrations. "We have a ton of magnetometers," McCool said. "If a million people show up, then we're going to have some lines." To manage the expected crowds, 175 magnetometers will be in place at security checkpoints throughout the day and for the evening parade. ‌ Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith has warned of "major impacts to traffic" and advises attendees to consider using the Metro instead of driving. "This is a significant event with a large footprint," she stressed. "We're relying on the public to be an extra set of ears and eyes for us." ‌ The event has hit the headlines as a National Special Security Event, with security measures on par with presidential inaugurations or state funerals. This elite status is reserved for high-profile functions drawing sizeable gatherings and the likelihood of significant protests, triggering an increased security collaboration between local officials, the FBI, Capitol Police, and the National Guard, all led by the watchful Secret Service. Officials are also on high alert for possible immigration-related protests, mirroring those in Los Angeles, potentially hitting D. C. 's streets. "We're paying attention, obviously, to what is happening there. We'll be ready," affirmed McCool, underlining the extensive preparations in place to manage any civil unrest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store