What to Expect From the Big Bank Earnings
Wall Street's biggest banks begin reporting earnings on Friday as markets deal with extreme volatility and uncertainty brought on by President Donald Trump's tariff war. David George, Baird senior bank analyst, talks about what to expect on "Bloomberg The Close." (Source: Bloomberg)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
10 minutes ago
- E&E News
WTO chief ‘won't keep quiet' to appease Trump
LONDON — Donald Trump wants World Trade Organization chief Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala to play by his rules. She's defying his wishes. A week before Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement, the United States began circulating a communication among World Trade Organization members. Obtained by POLITICO, the note accuses the WTO's Secretariat — the staff body tasked with keeping the organization running — of overstepping its bounds and attempting to 'reinvent itself into a resource to be provided to the public.' Advertisement But speaking at the London School of Economics this week, the WTO director-general made it clear she has no plans to retreat from the global stage.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg opens his wallet for Andrew Cuomo's mayoral bid
NEW YORK — Billionaire Michael Bloomberg was no fan of Andrew Cuomo when the two served overlapping tenures as mayor and governor. But on Friday all appeared forgiven, with Bloomberg's $5 million donation to a super PAC boosting Cuomo's mayoral bid. It's the largest cash infusion yet to the entity and comes in the final 10 days of the Democratic primary to oust Mayor Eric Adams, once a Bloomberg ally. The former mayor — a party hopscotcher who is now a Democrat — is jumping in as Cuomo faces a threat from democratic socialist challenger Zohran Mamdani, whose views on hiking taxes on the rich and criticisms of Israel are anathema to Bloomberg. The donation dovetails with the former mayor's endorsement of Cuomo this week and arrives at a critical time for the ex-governor, as he tries to mount a comeback to lead the nation's largest city. Bloomberg and Cuomo, longtime rivals, now find themselves united by a mutual loathing of the Democratic Party's left flank. After conversations between their aides, the men met earlier this week following Cuomo's Bloomberg TV interview, someone familiar with the sitdown confirmed. The donation to the Cuomo-supporting super PAC Fix the City adds to Bloomberg's $2.6 million contributions this election cycle to groups supporting City Council candidates who back charter schools, long a pet issue for the former mayor. Mamdani represents the opposite of a Bloomberg-style ideal to lead the city: A 33-year-old state lawmaker with a thin resume, an upstart challenger once considered a long shot who wants to hike taxes on rich New Yorkers and has supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting Israeli goods. And so Bloomberg set aside his long-standing animus toward the former governor and instead praised his extensive managerial experience — Cuomo's calling card in the race. The leading contender has stepped up his criticism of Mamdani in recent days by pointing to his paltry legislative record in Albany and questioning whether the young lawmaker has the chops to stand up to President Donald Trump. The Cuomo campaign on Thursday released a TV ad underscoring both points, and Cuomo raised them during a caustic debate Thursday night. Some polls show a tightening race in the crowded field, following months of double-digit leads for Cuomo. A poll conducted by Data for Progress for a super PAC backing Mamdani showed Cuomo would defeat him 51 percent to 49 percent after eight rounds of voting. A survey by Public Policy Polling showed Mamdani leading Cuomo 35 percent to 31, but did not include a ranked-choice voting simulation. Other polls, including one released by Cuomo's campaign and performed by Expedition Strategies, found the ex-governor handily defeating Mamdani. A public poll is expected to be released next week. Helmed by Steve Cohen, a longtime Cuomo confidant, the pro-Cuomo super PAC has received contributions from wealthy hedge fund managers, real estate developers and Trump supporters like Bill Ackman. Its largest donation until Friday was $1 million from the online delivery firm DoorDash. The group has spent more than $10 million on TV and streaming ads, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact. And with this donation, it has raised more than $18 million since forming in March. Bloomberg is accustomed to dipping into his considerable fortune to fund political campaigns and causes. He spent $1 billion on his 104-day 2020 presidential campaign and funds nationwide gun control efforts. His net worth, amassed through the founding of his eponymous media business empire, stands at more than $104 billion, according to Forbes. Spending by the super PAC against Mamdani has backfired in recent days, after a never-sent mailer criticizing the democratic socialist included a doctored photo of him with a darker, heavier beard. Mamdani accused the group of stoking 'the very fears of that division in this city." A spokesperson for the PAC said the mailer was 'rejected for production and subsequently corrected.' The entity has also attracted scrutiny from campaign finance regulators who are probing whether Cuomo's campaign improperly communicated with the super PAC through a practice known as 'redboxing' on the candidate's website. Spokespeople for Cuomo and Fix the City have insisted campaign finance laws have been followed.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP's Tim Scott takes aim at the CBO but makes himself look bad accidentally
In recent weeks, congressional Republicans and the White House have repeatedly gone after the Congressional Budget Office, not because the nonpartisan analysts did something wrong, but because the CBO has provided the public with facts that Donald Trump and his allies don't like. Indeed, the offensive couldn't be any more straightforward: The budget office produced objective data that makes the Republican Party's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — look like a far-right disaster, so the president and GOP officials have scrambled to discredit the source of independent information. Some of these efforts have been more embarrassing than others. The Washington Post reported: Like many congressional Republicans and members of the Trump administration already have, Sen. Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) on Thursday attacked the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office for its scoring of the GOP's massive tax and immigration bill, arguing that the CBO's estimates are inaccurate. In a video shared on X, Scott accused the office ... of being wrong in its scoring of tax cuts implemented in the 1930s and the 1960s. There was, however, a rather glaring problem with the senator's pitch: The Congressional Budget Office wasn't created until 1974. When Scott said, 'Wrong then. Wrong Now,' he was, unfortunately, wrong. And it'd be an unfortunate example of a senator taking aim at the budget office, but stumbling over inconvenient facts, if we were to stop there. But as it turns out, that wasn't the only problem with his pitch. Scott claimed, for example, 'In 2017, the CBO said the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would increase the deficit and the debt by trillions of dollars. What happened? They were wrong.' Actually, no, the CBO was right: The Republicans' 2017 package of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations really did increase the deficit and the debt by trillions of dollars. That's not a matter of opinion; it's simply what happened. Moments later, in the same video, the senator said CBO analysts 'were wrong on the Mellon tax cuts in the 1930s.' The obvious problem with this is the fact that the CBO didn't exist in the 1930s. However, the less obvious problem is that the Mellon tax cuts were approved in the 1920s, not the 1930s, shortly before the Great Depression. But wait, there's more. Also in the minute-long video, Scott said the CBO was also 'wrong on the Reagan tax cuts in the 1980s,' which is sort of true, but not in the way the South Carolinian meant. As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's Marc Goldwein noted, the CBO 'actually overestimated revenue collection in the 1980s,' which was the opposite of the point the senator was trying to make. In his next breath, Scott said of the CBO, 'When have they been right? I don't know either.' Actually, I do know: The office's track record on forecasting future budget deficits has been pretty impressive in recent years, whether or not the senator is aware of this. For good measure, let's not skip past the fact that Scott went on to say, 'The Laffer Curve is right. ... It has always worked; I think it always will work.' The Laffer Curve is a creation of Art Laffer, arguably the nation's preeminent cheerleader for a ridiculous idea: Tax cuts are self-financing. He's spent decades telling policymakers they can slash tax rates, especially for the wealthy, and the tax breaks necessarily pay for themselves through stronger economic growth and increased revenue. Republicans have repeatedly tried to govern with this idea in mind, and they've always failed. Critics of the Laffer Curve have consistently been proven right, and proponents of the discredited idea have consistently been proven wrong. Scott really ought to know all of this. He is, after all, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and a member of the Senate Finance Committee. But despite these many glaring, factual errors, the Republican senator not only put this video online, he left it online even after its errors were exposed. It reflects an indifference toward reality that has become a staple of the GOP's offensive against the Congressional Budget Office. This article was originally published on
