Australians equally distrust both Trump and Xi: survey
[CANBERRA] Australians are equally distrustful of both US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, according to a new survey, complicating Canberra's task of managing ties with its key security ally and biggest trading partner.
A new survey released by the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney showed that 72 per cent of respondents said they did not trust Trump to act responsibly in global affairs, just edging out the 71 per cent who said they did not trust China's Xi. When asked whether Trump or Xi would be a better partner for Australia, the two leaders were tied at 45 per cent apiece.
The results come as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where he could hold his first face-to-face meeting with the US president. Albanese will be hoping to negotiate an exemption on US steel and aluminium tariffs for Australia, as well as trying to secure Trump's support for Aukus following the announcement in Washington of a review of the security accord.
Albanese's balancing act with Trump is a difficult one. Australians' faith in the US has deteriorated following the president's return to the White House. Trust in America as a global player has fallen to just 36 per cent, by far the lowest result in the Lowy survey's 20-year history.
Yet despite an aversion to Trump, Australians are not ready to move away from the US as the nation's primary security partner. The survey showed consistent support for the US alliance, with 80 per cent of respondents saying America was important for Australia's security.
Meanwhile, attitudes to China have slightly improved, although Beijing is generally considered less reliable than the US across most metrics. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Seeking unity, G7 meets amid escalating Ukraine, Middle East conflicts
Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba arrives before world leaders meet in Kananaskis for the G7 leaders' summit, at Calgary International Airport in Calgary, Alberta, Canada June 15, 2025. REUTERS/Amber Bracken/Pool Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz before the G7 Leaders' Summit, in the Rocky Mountains resort town of Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada June 15, 2025. REUTERS/Chris Helgren/Pool France's President Emmanuel Macron arrives before world leaders meet in Kananaskis for the G7 leaders' summit, at Calgary International Airport in Calgary, Alberta, Canada June 15, 2025. REUTERS/Amber Bracken/Pool U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to attend the G7 Leaders' Summit at the Rocky Mountain resort town of Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, June 15, 2025. REUTERS/Chris Helgren/Pool A backdrop sign for the G7 Leaders Summit in the Rocky Mountains resort of Kananaskis is seen outside the media center in Banff, Alberta, Canada June 15, 2025. REUTERS/Chris Helgren KANANASKIS, Alberta - Leaders from the Group of Seven nations begin annual talks on Monday amid wars in Ukraine and the Middle East that add to global economic uncertainty, as host Canada tries to avoid a clash with U.S. President Donald Trump. The G7 leaders from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the U.S., along with the European Union, are convening in the resort of Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies until Tuesday. But beyond the serene and picturesque mountain setting, they confront challenges. The first five months of Trump's second term upended foreign policy on Ukraine, raised anxiety over his closer ties to Russia and resulted in tariffs on U.S. allies. With an escalating Israel-Iran conflict, which is spiking global oil prices, the summit in Canada is seen as a vital moment to try and restore a semblance of unity between democratic powerhouses. "The most important goal will be for the world's seven largest industrial nations to reach agreement and take action," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said before attending his first G7. That will not be easy. After years of consensus, the traditional allies have scrambled to keep Trump engaged and maintain unity. Canada has abandoned any effort to adopt an all-encompassing comprehensive communique to avert a repeat of a 2018 summit in Quebec, when Trump instructed the U.S. delegation to withdraw its approval of the final communique after leaving. Instead, Ottawa has sought to get consensus for a chair's statement that summarizes the key discussions and six other pre-negotiated declarations on issues such as migration, artificial intelligence and forest fires. Talks on Monday will centre around the economy, advancing trade deals, and China. Efforts to reach an agreement to lower the G7 price cap on Russian oil even if Trump decided to opt out have been complicated by the surge in oil prices since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 12, two diplomatic sources said. The escalation between the two regional foes is on the agenda, with diplomatic sources saying they hope to achieve at least a joint statement to urge restraint and a return to diplomacy. "We are united. Nobody wants to see Iran get a nuclear weapon and everyone wants discussions and negotiations to restart," France's President Emmanuel Macron told reporters in Greenland on Sunday before travelling to Canada. He added that given Israel's dependence on U.S. weapons and munitions, Washington had the capacity to restart negotiations. Trump said on Sunday many calls and meetings were taking place to broker peace. RUSSIAN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM Highlighting the unease among some of Washington's allies, Trump spoke on Saturday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and suggested the Russian leader could play a mediation role. Macron dismissed the idea, arguing that Moscow could not be a negotiator because it had started an illegal war against Ukraine. A European diplomat said Trump's suggestion showed that Russia, despite being kicked out of the group in 2014 after annexing Crimea, was very much on U.S. minds. "In the eyes of the U.S., there's no condemnation for Ukraine; no peace without Russia; and now even credit for its mediation role with Iran. For Europeans, this will be a really tough G7," the diplomat said. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will attend the summit on Tuesday. European officials said they hoped to use the meeting, and next week's NATO summit, to convince Trump to toughen his stance on Putin. "The G7 should have the objective for us to converge again, for Ukraine to get a ceasefire to lead to a robust and lasting peace, and in my view it's a question of seeing whether President Trump is ready to put forward much tougher sanctions on Russia," Macron said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Asia-Pacific equities are a compelling investment proposition
A MONTH is a long time in equity markets. Since Apr 9 when US President Donald Trump announced a 90-day pause in his plan to impose 'reciprocal' tariffs on the rest of the world, the S&P 500 has rallied hard. The 90-day detente between the US and China, announced on May 12, and soft US inflation data on May 13 solidified the US market gains, putting talks of a rotation from US assets on the back burner. Given the US' trade framework agreement with the UK and its 90-day detente with China still imply much higher tariffs levels, we think the euphoria may be premature. The negative impact of Trump's trade policies will hit the US the hardest – and that is not yet reflected in economic data. In previous cycles, equity market weakness has translated to US dollar strength in a 'flight to safety'. But that appears to have changed in this cycle with the US dollar proving vulnerable to swings in market confidence. Moreover, the US fiscal position is likely to worsen, with Trump certain to plough revenues from tariffs into tax cuts, and that would be US dollar-negative. Global investors remain very overweight on US equities, and we believe there will be a gradual move to increase allocations to other regions, and especially the Asia-Pacific. Asia-Pacific starting to get inflows Investors remain very underweight Asia-Pacific equities which is more a reflection of the past decade of US dominance than Asia's economic fundamentals. However, in recent weeks, there has been a nascent change in trend with April 2025 inflows into Asia equity exchange-traded funds at US$33.3 billion, exceeding flows into the US (US$31 billion) and European (US$9.1 billion) equivalents. This indicates that the region is a destination for those seeking to diversify. Japan is seen as a particularly attractive market for the 'dedollarisation' trade, attracting US$57 billion into equities and bonds, the biggest monthly inflows since records began. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Asia-Pacific equity valuations are close to trough levels compared to the US. On that basis, even given the US tariff headwinds, there is significant value to unlock. This makes the region a target-rich stock-picking environment. Pressure on to reduce US tariffs Asia-Pacific economies are very exposed to global trade flows. Major export economies such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan potentially face very high tariff levels (24 per cent, 26 per cent and 32 per cent, respectively), unless they can agree on a framework for reductions by early July when the 90-day reciprocal tariff pause expires. Emerging export-driven economies are in the same boat, with Vietnam (46 per cent), Indonesia (32 per cent), and Thailand (37 per cent) all seeking to negotiate. Given the detente with China, the Trump administration's desire to be seen to do deals, and geopolitical leverage via longstanding security ties, we expect the tariff levels to trend towards the baseline 10 per cent Trump originally set. The net effect on transpacific trade will be negative. Economically, this means 2025 Asia-Pacific gross domestic product growth estimates of around 3.7 per cent at the start of the year could be difficult to achieve. But growth will still be much higher than projections for the US and Europe. For the region, the most immediate countervailing policy response will be fiscal expansion in key economies including China, India and Indonesia. Moreover, inflation is already trending lower across the region, giving central banks room to ease policy more – especially if the US dollar weakens further. Positive Asia fundamentals For investors seeking long-term diversification from an overweight position in US equities, Asia-Pacific equities have a compelling investment thesis. An Asia-Pacific portfolio gives exposure to developed markets such as Australia and Singapore as well as emerging markets like Indonesia and India across all sectors – from commodities and industrials to technology, financials and consumer discretionary. We believe exposure to the North Asian industrial economies of China, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan is essential, with world-class companies and an increased focus on shareholder value. We retain a positive stance on Japan equities, thanks to reasonable valuations, increased shareholder returns, governance reform and structural reform. South Korea's 'value up' initiative is at an earlier stage but should have a similar impact on corporate governance there. Confidence in China's international competitiveness and continued ability to innovate was boosted in January 2025 by the release of the DeepSeek Large Language Model (LLM), which was developed at lower cost than similar LLMs from the US. China is already capitalising on advantages – such as rapid adoption of new technologies, a vast domestic market and an unrivalled manufacturing base – to lead in key industries including electric vehicles and renewable energy. Dynamic emerging economies In the emerging markets of South-east Asia where population is growing, technology adoption and mass consumption are underpinning domestic-driven growth to complement traditional strength in commodities and manufacturing. Recent weakness due to fears over the impact of US tariffs is providing good entry points for long-term opportunities that fit into our value-driven investment process. In contrast, India equities have been richly valued compared to Asian peers so we are being very selective and remain underweight on the country. Nevertheless, India is building on its economic momentum by extending its manufacturing base. Trade deals with the UK, and perhaps later in the year with the US, help. From the market peak in 2024, Indian equities have underperformed Asian peers. Combined with the recent tension with Pakistan, this has brought valuations to more reasonable levels, and investors can now gradually increase India exposure. Valuation gap will close Our conviction is that the enormous valuation gap between Asia-Pacific and the US will narrow in 2025 and beyond. It is crucial to focus on the fundamentals and take advantage of the volatility to identify medium-term alpha opportunities. We believe an active approach with a prudent stock selection process is the best way to build and hold long-term exposure to Asia-Pacific equities. The writer is head of Asia equities, Robeco
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Middle East conflict escalates
Mr Tim Kaine of Virginia has tried for years to wrest back Congress's authority to declare war from the White House. PHOTO: REUTERS US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Middle East conflict escalates WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator introduced legislation on June 16 to prevent US President Donald Trump from using military force against Iran without Congress's authorisation, as an escalating battle between Israel and Iran raised fears of broader conflict. Mr Tim Kaine of Virginia has tried for years to wrest back Congress's authority to declare war from the White House. During Mr Trump's first term, in 2020, Mr Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in Mr Trump's ability to wage war against Iran. That measure passed both the Senate and House of Representatives, winning some Republican support, but did not garner enough votes to survive the Republican president's veto. Mr Kaine said his latest war powers resolution underscores that the US Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorised by a declaration of war or specific authorisation for the use of military force. "It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into anot h er endless conflict," Mr Kaine said in a statement. Under US law, war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the Senate will be required to promptly consider and vote on the matter. Israel's military launched attacks on Iran on June 13 with the stated aim of wiping out Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, responded with missile attacks on Israel. Both countries have kept up their attacks, killing and wounding civilians and raising concern among world leaders meeting in Canada this week that the biggest battle between the two old enemies could lead to a broader regional conflict. Mr Trump has lauded Israel's offensive while denying Iranian allegations that the US has taken part and warning Tehran not to widen its retaliation to include US targets. Before leaving for the summit in Canada on June 15, Mr Trump was asked what he was doing to de-escalate the situation. "I hope there's going to be a deal. I think it's time for a deal," he told reporters. "Sometimes they have to fight it out." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
