Massachusetts judge accused of helping man evade ICE faces disciplinary hearing
BOSTON, June 9 (Reuters) - A Massachusetts judge who was criminally charged during the first Trump administration with helping a migrant slip out from a backdoor of her courthouse to avoid arrest by federal immigration agents faced a judicial misconduct hearing on Monday that could determine if she can remain on the bench.
A court-appointed hearing officer in Boston began to hear arguments and testimony as he weighed whether to find Judge Shelley Joseph engaged in misconduct based on the same actions at issue in the criminal case, which prosecutors dropped in 2022 after Republican President Donald Trump's first term ended.
That criminal case mirrors one the U.S. Department of Justice brought earlier this year against Hannah Dugan, a Wisconsin judge who has pleaded not guilty to helping a migrant evade an arrest outside her courtroom.
Prosecutors dropped the 2019 indictment against Joseph in exchange for an agreement that the judge refer herself to disciplinary authorities. The Massachusetts Judicial Conduct Commission filed charges against her in December.
"This case is about the integrity, impartiality and independence of the Massachusetts judiciary and the appearance of the integrity, impartiality and independence every judge must uphold," Judith Fabricant, special counsel for the commission, told the hearing office, Denis McInerney.
She said the case turned on what was said during a 52 second sidebar proceeding on April 2, 2018, in the Newton, Massachusetts, district court concerning a Dominican man that the judge impermissibly allowed to go unrecorded.
The commission's chief witness, defense attorney David Jellinek, testified he had requested the judge go off-the-record because what he was going to discuss with the judge was "right on the edge of acceptable."
Jellinek had just convinced a local prosecutor to dismiss a charge against his client accusing him of being a fugitive from justice based on a warrant issued out of Pennsylvania because they had the "wrong guy," he said.
Because he only then faced two misdemeanor drug charges, Jellinek's client was set to be released on personal recognizance. But Jellinek said he knew an agent with U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement was waiting in the lobby on the first floor and planned to arrest the man if he was released.
Jellinek testified that Joseph appeared "open to helping solve the problem" and that during the off-record sidebar he asked the judge to send his client downstairs to a court lockup area and allow him to accompany him, which would allow the man to leave through a backdoor.
"To the best of my recollection, she said then, 'That's what we'll do,'" Jellinek said.
But Elizabeth Mulvey, a lawyer for Joseph, disputed that account. She said Joseph allowed the man to be sent to lockup to facilitate a private conversation between him and his attorney and that she assumed ICE would "then do its job."
Nobody told her the man "had gone out of the back door," Mulvey said. "She knew nothing about it."
She called into question Jellinek's credibility, saying his story had shifted over the years and that he was previously granted by federal prosecutors immunity in exchange for testifying against Joseph.
She said that while Joseph was viewed by some as a "folk hero" and others as a "criminal" because of the allegations against her, the media and public at large wrongly believed 100% that she did let the migrant out the backdoor.
"Judge Joseph, at the end of this proceeding, will be seen in a very different light than the way she has been vilified in the media," Mulvey said.
Read more:
Massachusetts judge accused of misconduct by impeding immigrant's arrest
U.S. drops charges against Massachusetts judge in immigration arrest case
Massachusetts judge can be prosecuted for blocking immigration arrest, court rules
Judge accused of blocking ICE arrest tells court she can't be prosecuted
Massachusetts judge loses bid to dismiss ICE arrest obstruction charges
Massachusetts judge faces federal charges for blocking immigration arrest
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Catholic school teacher breaks her silence after having sex with teen student
A Catholic school teacher who admitted to having sex with a teenage student said she was 'not asking for forgiveness' on Tuesday as she was sentenced for her crimes. Emily Nutley, 43, pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual battery for her affair with a 17-year-old pupil at St. Xavier High School in Cincinnati, Ohio, which lasted from November to December 2023. The mother-of-three then returned to Hamilton County Common Pleas Court on Tuesday, when she finally addressed the inappropriate relationship. 'There is no excuse for what I did,' Nutley admitted, according to WLWT. 'I crossed a line that should never have been crossed. 'I think every day about the impact of my actions,' she continued. 'I've lost my husband, my home, my friends. I've caused harm and embarrassment to my children.' She then told Judge Jennifer Branch that she is now 'engaging with professionals who will help me understand [my] choices' after previously claiming that her husband's 'neglect' drove her to pursue relations with the teen. 'I am not asking for forgiveness because I have not earned it,' the former teacher said. But Branch said she was hoping to hear more of an apology from Nutley, as she sentenced the one-time teacher to three years behind bars. 'I was looking for you to say that you acknowledge the harm that you caused this young man... You pretty much ruined the rest of his high school career,' the judge said, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. 'I didn't see it. I didn't hear it.' Her comments came after the teen addressed the situation himself in a letter read in court by Assistant Prosecutor Elyse Deters. He said the entire situation 'altered my high school experience and my life.' 'When the abuse started, I didn't know I was being taken advantage of,' the teen claimed, noting that eventually Nutley 'would not leave me alone. 'She told me she would kill herself if I ended it. Even at sporting events, people yell her name at me,' the victim claimed. He also said that the abuse 'left me confused, lacking self worth and depressed. 'I can't get away from this. I have a hard time trusting people, especially authority figures.' In separate remarks, the victim's father said his dream of going to college on an athletic scholarship was destroyed by Nutley's abuse. The teenager first met Nutley in 2023 through a program she ran for academically struggling students at the Catholic high school. They began texting after school hours last autumn, and she sent him nude selfies and at least nine 'sexually explicit messages'. In one text message Nutley sent the boy the afternoon of November 30, 2023, she wrote: 'What would be wild is that when the whole school is at Mass, I give you the best f**k of your life in my office,' the Enquirer reports. Nutley and the boy wound up having sex several times from November through December 2023, at least once in her office at the all-boys school after hours. She also paid the teen an 'allowance' of $100 a month, would buy him food and at least once plied him with the answers to an exam. But by March of that year, the teenager wanted the relationship to end and asked to be released from the learning center's help. Soon after, the boy's grades plummeted and he was failing three classes. Meanwhile, prosecutors said, Nutley continued texting the student. Eventually, rumors also started to circulate at the $18,130-a-year school that Nutley was having sex with the student, and on October 8, 2024, the teen met with school administrators and reported at least four sexual encounters with the teacher. Nutley was fired as soon as the criminal investigation began, which led to her being indicted by a Hamilton County grand jury and arrested on October 28. St Xavier said at the time it 'believed this case to be an isolated incident.' A few weeks after the indictment, Nutley's husband, Jonathan Nutley, also filed for divorce, prompting his wife to accuse him of 'gross neglect of duty and extreme cruelty' in her legal response, TMZ reported. The disgraced educator has two daughters and a son, the eldest of whom is a junior at a different high school and only slightly younger than the victim. She previously taught at Madeira Elementary School, also in Cincinnati, and posted photos of her work and students there on social media. Nutley then joined the Jesuit school ahead of the 2021-22 year and was listed as the 'multi-tiered systems support coordinator' in the student handbook. In pre-sentencing documents, prosecutors argued Nutley 'preyed on the most defenseless person she could find' as her job at the school entailed identifying at-risk students and monitoring their progress. The prosecutors asked for at least a five-year prison sentence, while the victim's family asked Branch to sentence her to 10 years behind bars. But Nutley's defense argued she has already received threats from prison and has taken significant steps toward rehabilitation. Her lawyers also noted that she has already lost a lot, and said that a doctor who examined Nutley described her as a 'broken woman' plagued by mental health and substance abuse issues. Now, in addition to serving three years in prison, Nutley will serve a five year probation. She will also be required to register as a Tier III sex offender every 90 days for the rest of her life.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US-China trade talks: ‘framework' deal amid dispute over rare earths
Officials from the US and China have agreed on a 'framework' to move forward on trade after two days of talks in London stemming from their confrontation over tariffs. The US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, expressed optimism on Tuesday that concerns about critical or 'rare earth' minerals and magnets 'will be resolved' as the deal is implemented. Lutnick told reporters that the framework puts 'meat on the bones' of a deal reached last month in Geneva to ease retaliatory tariffs. Its implementation had faltered over China's curbs on critical mineral exports. The deal also would remove some US export restrictions that were recently put in place, Lutnick said. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick said. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' In a separate briefing, China's vice commerce minister Li Chenggang said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' Li told reporters. Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of critical minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. 'Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,' Lutnick said. 'You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said, in a balanced way.' Li said: 'Our communication has been very professional, rational, in-depth and candid.' All eyes were on the outcomes of negotiations as both sides were at an impasse over export restrictions, with US officials earlier accusing Beijing of slow-walking approvals for shipments of critical minerals. The world's two biggest economies were also seeking a longer-lasting truce in their escalating tariffs war, with levies reduced temporarily. 'We're moving as quickly as we can,' US trade representative Jamieson Greer told reporters. 'We feel positive about engaging with the Chinese.' With Reuters and Agence France-Presse
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Industry associations highlight cybersecurity risks at US regulatory agencies
Four industry trade associations have called for significant reforms to how federal financial regulators handle sensitive data following a data breach at the Office of the Comproller of the Currency that exposed over 148,000 private correspondences containing sensitive supervisory information about US financial institutions. 0 In a letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, The Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association, MFA and Sifma say that growing threats from hostile nation-states targeting US critical infrastructure serve as a reminder of the urgency to address vulnerabilities. 'Government agencies are increasingly the target of persistent and sophisticated nation-state attacks that could disrupt financial markets and our economy,' the organizations wrote. 'It is imperative that federal regulators recognize that they are equally a target of malicious actors and implement the same or substantially similar cybersecurity and incident response practices that they expect financial institutions to maintain.' Financial institutions are legally required to share sensitive, proprietary and non-public information with their regulators as part of the supervisory process. This information can range from capital and liquidity management to cybersecurity protocols. However, centralizing large amounts of data can create a prime target for illicit actors seeking to harm US economic security, says the organisations. They point out that over the past two years, both the Treasury Department and the OCC have suffered significant cyber incidents. At the OCC, hackers were at work inside its systems for over a year-and-a-half before the intrusion were discovered. Immediately after the breach was reported both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon scaled back electronic information sharing with the agency. To mitigate risk and prevent similar problems in the future, the groups are urging the Treasury to hold federal agencies to the same security and data protection standards as private companies. They want to limit data collection to only what is necessary and avoid centralisation of sensitive data, allowing companies to maintain control and access to their data. The letter states: 'As firms are required to share non-public, highly sensitive information with regulators as part of the supervisory process, compromises at regulatory agencies could expose institutions' vulnerabilities and business information to malicious actors, putting them at strategic disadvantage.'
