I Tested the iPhone 16E and Pixel 9A Cameras and the Results Were Stunning
Google has proved with the Pixel 9A that you can still take good-looking snaps and pay less than $500. Images from the phone look terrific and capture a lot of detail and texture. And Google's algorithm secret sauce for capturing beautiful and natural complexions in portraits is on full display here.
Apple replaced its cheapest phone with the iPhone 16E. In doing so, it tried to pull some of the affordable photographic attention away from the Pixel. The iPhone 16E takes lovely photos, even with one fewer camera than the Pixel. Apple is well-known for pushing the limits of phone photography with the iPhone, but that is usually tied to its iPhone Pro line, which starts at $1,000. While $599 is Apple's lowest price for a new phone, the iPhone 16E misses the Pixel 9A's $500 sweet spot.
If you're looking to save money by buying a base smartphone, are you giving up all hopes of taking good photos? The cameras on flagship phones like the iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are capable of astonishing results, but those and other best-camera options cost $1,000 and up.
So that raises the question: Does a pricier phone take better photos?
To find out, I took the iPhone 16E and Pixel 9A around San Francisco and put them through a camera test. Several hundred photos later, I was surprised by the results, but I ended up with one being my favorite.
Now Playing: Camera Comparison: We Pit the Pixel 9A Against the iPhone 16E
04:44
iPhone 16E and Pixel 9A camera specs Camera Resolution Aperture Notes Pixel 9A wide 48MP f/1.7 OIS Pixel 9A ultrawide 13MP f/2.2 Takes 12MP photos Pixel 9A selfie 13MP f/2.2 Fixed focus iPhone 16E wide 48MP f/1.6 OIS iPhone 16E selfie 12MP f/1.9 Autofocus
The iPhone 16E, left, has one rear camera and costs $599 while the Pixel 9A has two rear cameras and costs $499.
Celso Bulgatti/CNET
Right off the bat, this isn't exactly a level playing field. The Pixel 9A has three cameras: a wide, ultrawide and selfie. The iPhone 16E only has two: a wide and selfie. Each phone's main camera has a 48-megapixel sensor and groups four pixels together to create a "super" pixel that captures more light. That also means photos exhibit less image noise and therefore need less noise reduction, which can otherwise leave your pictures looking like a blurry, soft mess.
Both phones lack a dedicated telephoto camera and use sensor cropping to achieve a 2x magnification that in my testing looks pretty good.
Enlarge Image
Pixel 9A main camera, macro.
CNET
The Pixel 9A has a "macro mode" and can focus on subjects that are close up. Interestingly, it doesn't use its ultrawide camera for macro shots like many other phones do. Sadly, the iPhone 16E lacks a macro mode unlike the rest of its iPhone 16 brothers and sisters. However, I noticed that the main camera can take close up shots with the subject in-focus (maybe not as dramatically close as a dedicated macro mode allows for).
iPhone 16E vs. Pixel 9A: Photos
Take a look at some of my favorite photos from both phones.
Enlarge Image
iPhone 16E main camera.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Enlarge Image
iPhone 16E main camera, night mode.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Enlarge Image
iPhone 16E main camera.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Enlarge Image
Pixel 9A ultrawide camera.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Enlarge Image
Pixel 9A main camera at 2x.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Enlarge Image
Pixel 9A main camera, macro.
Patrick Holland/CNET
iPhone 16E vs. Pixel 9A: Photo comparisons
In general, I found that the Pixel 9A really pushes the dynamic range in its images. The phone captures more details in the shadows but really aggressively brightens them too, like in the photos below of Maisie the cat. The iPhone 16E's image of Maisie doesn't have as much detail and texture in her fur. Somewhere in between the Pixel's photo and the iPhone's image is how the cat actually looked in real life.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's photo on Maisie the cat. And on the right it an image from the iPhone 16E of her.
Patrick Holland/CNET
I also find that the Pixel takes images with a cooler color temperature, while the iPhone's photos have more contrast, especially outdoors. Take a look at the photos below of a brick building here in the Mission in San Francisco. Notice the bricks in each photo.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's photo and on the right is the iPhone 16E's image.
Patrick Holland/CNET
In terms of Portrait mode, neither the Pixel nor iPhone have a dedicated telephoto lens. And remember, the iPhone 16E has only a single rear camera, so it relies solely on AI and machine learning to determine the depth of a scene and create that artistic out-of-focus background.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's portrait mode photo and on the right is the one from the iPhone 16E.
Patrick Holland/CNET
The first thing I notice with the portrait mode photos below of CNET's Faith Chihil is how differently the iPhone and Pixel handled the textures in the yellow sweater and green chair. The "cutout" (from in focus to out of focus) looks natural, except for the green chair in the iPhone's photo. And Faith's complexion looks most true to life in the Pixel 9A image. The iPhone 16E's photo makes her skin look muddy and muted.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's photo and on the right is the iPhone 16E's image.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Something else I noticed is that the iPhone 16E's portrait mode only works on humans; on the iPhone 16 and 16 Pro, animals are automatically recognized as portrait subjects. So, if you want dramatic-looking snaps with artistically blurred backgrounds of Fido or Mr. Cupcakes, then the Pixel is the way to go. Sorry for yet another cat photo, but check out the portrait mode snap below of Maise the cat.
Enlarge Image
Pixel 9A portrait mode.
Patrick Holland/CNET
Both phones take night mode images (Google calls them Night Sight photos). In the photos below of a space shuttle Lego set taken in a very dim room, neither of the images are great. The iPhone 16E's photo has the least image noise, but the contrast is heavy. I prefer the Pixel 9A's photo.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's photo and on the right is the iPhone 16E's image.
Patrick Holland/CNET
I also snapped images of a residential block at dusk where the street lights really make the iPhone's night mode photo look orange. The iPhone's image is brighter. But notice the details in the telephone wires across the top of the images below. The iPhone captures them as continuous lines, whereas the Pixel 9A's image has them made up of tiny jagged line segments.
Enlarge Image
On the left is the Pixel 9A's photo and on the right is the iPhone 16E's image.
Patrick Holland/CNET
iPhone 16E vs. Pixel 9A: Which would I choose?
This is a tough choice, but which phone would I choose based purely on its cameras?
Celso Bulgatti/CNET
Overall, both phones have their shortcomings when it comes to photography. I don't think most people would choose an affordable phone solely based on the camera's performance. Be assured that if you get either phone, you'll be able to take decent snaps with some images bordering on looking great.
The iPhone 16E costs more, lacks an ultrawide lens and, while the pictures it takes are decent, I think that the Pixel 9A's cameras are great for a $500 phone, and would likely opt for it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
Fox News beats ABC, NBC, CBS during weekday primetime while CNN has lowest-rated week of year
Fox News Channel beat all broadcast networks in a key metric last week as CNN had its lowest-rated week of the year. Fox News averaged 2.7 million viewers during primetime on weekdays from May 26-30, compared to 2.4 million for NBC, 2.4 million for CBS and 2.3 million for ABC. While Fox News prevailed against the trio of broadcast networks, it also obliterated CNN. Fox News averaged 1.5 million total day viewers from May 26 through June 1, compared to a dismal 308,000 for CNN. During primetime, Fox News averaged 2.3 million viewers while CNN settled for only 374,000. It was much of the same among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54, as Fox News delivered 175,000 total day demo viewers and 240,000 during primetime, compared to 49,000 total day and 61,000 primetime demo viewers for CNN. CNN finished with its worst week of the year across both primetime and total day as Fox News had its highest cable news share since inauguration week. Along the way, the top 100 cable news telecasts for the week all aired on Fox News. "The Five" averaged 3.7 million total viewers and 409,000 in the critical demo to lead cable news in both categories. "Special Report with Bret Baier," "The Ingraham Angle," "Jesse Watters Primetime," "Hannity," "FOX News @ Night," "Gutfeld!," "Outnumbered," "The Will Cain Show," "America's Newsroom," "America Reports" and Harris Faulkner's "The Faulkner Focus" all had strong weeks, too, to help Fox News crush CNN. Ratings data courtesy of Nielsen Media Research.
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Allina Health doctors, PAs hold first-ever union picket, ask for better work-life balance in new contract
Six hundred Allina doctors, physician assistants and nurse practitioners who work in primary care are asking for a new contract with more work-life balance. They gathered in the pouring rain Tuesday morning for a first-of-its-kind protest. "We are here together as a result of many years of fighting, fighting for primary care and fighting to make things better," workers chanted. While nurses have walked the picket line for years, these picketers are doctors, PA's and nurse practitioners who are admittedly higher compensated. "We all get paid really well, its not about that. It's about having better support for our patients and support in our community and that we want a fair treatment in our contract and protections for everybody," said Dr. Chris Filetti, a pediatrician with Allina Health. WCCO The workers are asking for paid sick leave, instead of having to use vacation time. They're also asking for four hours a week to finish paperwork, instead of doing it in their off time. Additionally, they're asking for more medical assistants and nurses for support. "As a provider I hear story after story about providers who have to cut back from practice because of poor work-life balance," said Filetti. Allina's leaders say they are listening despite the unsettled contract, telling WCCO in a statement: "We continue to negotiate in good faith to reach responsible agreements that maintain competitive pay and benefits for our providers while ensuring that we can sustain our caring mission during these extremely uncertain economic times. It is important to get it right. We remain committed to reaching fair agreements that ensure we can maintain access to the high-quality care people depend on."
Wall Street Journal
12 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Ukraine's Drone Strike Is a Warning—for the U.S.
By now Americans know about Ukraine's remarkable drone strike on Sunday that damaged as many as 40 aircraft deep inside Russia as strategic bombers sat like ducks in a row on military bases. One urgent lesson beyond that conflict is that the U.S. homeland is far more vulnerable than most Americans realize. The details about Ukraine's daring operation are few, but Kyiv managed to sneak cheap drones across the border and use them to destroy costly Russian military assets. The bang for Ukraine's buck was considerable. You don't have to be a fan of thrillers to imagine a similar scenario in the United States.
