Oregon appeals court rules in favor of voter-approved gun control law Measure 114
Magazines that can hold more than 10 bullets are banned under Oregon's new law. (Connor Radnovich/Oregon Capital Chronicle)
This is a developing story and will be updated
Oregon's second-highest court affirmed Wednesday that the voter-approved gun control law Measure 114 is constitutional, potentially clearing the way for the law to take effect after being on hold for years because of a Harney County judge's ruling.
Voters in 2022 narrowly approved Measure 114 to limit sales of some ammunition magazines and require a permit and completed background check before purchasing a gun. Two Harney County residents, joined by national gun rights groups, promptly sued in Harney County, and Judge Robert Raschio blocked the bill from taking effect.
A three-judge panel of the appeals court, led by Presiding Judge Darlene Ortega, found Wednesday that Raschio erred and that the law didn't violate Oregon's constitution.
'We conclude that all of Measure 114 is facially constitutional,' Ortega wrote in a 25-page opinion.
Plaintiffs have a little more than a month to challenge the appeals court's decision, and an appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court is expected.
Measure 114's backers also prevailed in a federal case filed by an eastern Oregon sheriff,a Keizer gun store owner and a pro-gun group. Judge Karin Immergut ruled last summer that the law didn't violate the federal Second Amendment because it doesn't protect large-capacity magazines and Oregon's restrictions are consistent with a long history of firearm regulation.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, whose justice department defended Measure 114, said it was time to move ahead with 'common-sense safety measures.'
'Today's decision is a big step forward for gun safety in Oregon,' Rayfield continued. 'This measure gives us the tools to make sure gun buyers go through background checks and get proper permits, helping to keep firearms out of the wrong hands and making our communities safer.'
Supporters of Measure 114 sought to prevent circumstances that contributed to some of the deadliest mass shootings in recent years, including the 2017 Las Vegas shooting at a country music festival, the 2016 Pulse night club shooting in Orlando, Florida and the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting.
Shooters in all three locations had large-capacity magazines, allowing them to keep firing bullets into crowds. The Las Vegas shooter killed 60 people and wounded more than 400 others, the Pulse night club shooter killed 49 people and the Virginia Tech shooter killed 32 people.
In other mass shootings, including the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown Connecticut, and a 2019 synagogue shooting in California, people were able to run or overpower the shooter when he stopped to reload his weapon.
Requiring a completed background check is meant to close the 'Charleston loophole,' named after the 2015 incident where a shooter killed nine people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina. In that case, the shooter had a criminal record that would have disqualified him from buying a gun, but his background check was delayed, allowing the purchase.
Lawmakers' efforts to pass parts of Measure 114 through the Legislature in 2023 contributed to Republicans' six-week quorum-denying walkout, and Democratic leaders abandoned most gun restrictions as part of negotiations to bring Republicans back and finish the legislative session.
This year, lawmakers are considering House Bill 3075 to provide deadlines, fees and other structure to pre-purchase permit applications if Measure 114 takes effect.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colorado joins lawsuit against ATF over deal ending ban on rapid-fire triggers for rifles
DENVER (KDVR) — Colorado is one of 16 states that have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. Governor signs bill requiring training for semiautomatic guns, banning rapid-fire conversion devices 'It's hard enough for our local law enforcement officials to protect Colorado communities from gun violence without the federal government willfully ignoring the law,' said Attorney General Weiser. 'The law is clear: machine guns, and devices that turn a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun, are illegal. We're suing to stop the ATF and the administration from making our communities more dangerous by distributing thousands of devices that turn firearms into weapons of war. These weapons have no place in our communities, and I will continue to fight to keep Coloradans safe from gun violence.' The Colorado law banning the sale of rapid-fire conversion devices, including forced-reset triggers, was signed into law in April and will go into effect on Aug. 1, 2026. Second Amendment supporters have called on the U.S. Attorney General to investigate the measure as an infringement on the U.S. Constitution. Weiser said in a release announcing the state's participation in the lawsuit that machine gun conversion devices like the forced-reset triggers are frequently used in violent crimes and mass shootings. The state attorney general said that by using these devices, firearms can exceed the rate of fire of many military machine guns. 'ATF has noted a significant rise in the use of these types of devices, leading to incidents of machine-gun fire increasing by 1,400% from 2019 through 2021,' Weiser said in a press release. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. The ATF previously classified the triggers as machine guns, but under a directive from the Trump Administration, the bureau signed the settlement agreement that promises to stop enforcing federal law against the devices. New requirements begin July 1 for Colorado concealed carry permits Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
VIDEO: MNPD releases bodycam footage from deadly officer-involved shooting in downtown Nashville
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — The Metro Nashville Police Department released a 911 call and dashboard footage from a deadly-officer involved shooting in downtown Nashville. In a video posted to social media, the MNPD released body camera footage as well as dashboard camera footage and the audio of a 911 call made before the shooting, which happened around 8:45 a.m. Monday near the intersection of Hermitage and Lea Avenues. ORIGINAL STORY | MNPD: Armed man killed by Metro officer in downtown Nashville In the 911 call, a person who described themselves as 'a big Second Amendment advocate' and 'friend of law enforcement' said he saw a man walking along the roadside with a gun in his hand, adding that he 'didn't look well.' The caller said they were on Driftwood Avenue. Following the 911 call, the video included footage from the dashboard camera of an MNPD patrol car. That footage showed the man walking along the side of Hermitage Avenue with a handgun in his left hand. The patrol car followed the man for several blocks. At one point, the patrol car stopped in a turn lane and the officer got out of the car and told the man to put down the handgun. The man did not stop walking and the patrol car continued to follow him until they arrived at the intersection of Hermitage and Lea Avenues. At that point, an officer can be heard outside the car repeatedly telling the man to drop the handgun. The man continued to walk down the street. As seen on video, the man turned around and ran toward the officer — Sergeant Robert Weaver. Weaver fired two shots and the man hit the ground. The MNPD also released Weaver's body camera footage, which showed Weaver get out of his vehicle and tell the man repeatedly to drop the gun. The man spoke in response to Weaver, but the exact words could not be made out on the footage. Once Weaver fired the shots, Weaver reported that shots were fired. ⏩ MNPD spokesperson Don Aaron said the man's fingerprints would be run through a database in an effort to identify him. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and the Davidson County District Attorney's Office has opened an investigation into the incident. Aaron added that by policy, the MNPD would also conduct a review of the interaction to 'ensure that it meets the high standards' of the department. No further details were immediately released. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Miami Herald
14 hours ago
- Miami Herald
PRESS RELEASE: LIE to YOUR BANK and LOSE YOUR GUNS RIGHTS, Says US COURT of APPEALS. (Opinion Attached)
Zherka: 'My Banks Got Paid, My Rights Got Taken' - Government Overreach Mirrors Trump's Political Witch Hunt Real estate titan vows Supreme Court appeal after court upholds lifetime gun ban for nonviolent conviction: 'This is lawfare, plain and simple.' NEW YORK, NY / ACCESS Newswire / June 9, 2025 / On June 9, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that real estate magnate and political commentator Selim "Sam" Zherka can be permanently stripped of his Second Amendment rights-even though his conviction was for a nonviolent financial offense, for lying to his bank yet his banks were paid in full, and no one lost a dime. The ruling, in Zherka v. Bondi, upheld the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), a statute that prohibits felons from possessing firearms if the firearm has ever moved in or affected interstate commerce. Zherka, who has no history of violence, challenged the law as unconstitutional "as applied" to him. "I filed an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g), which prohibits felons from possessing any firearm that has moved in or affects interstate commerce," Zherka said. "There are currently conflicting opinions among the federal circuits, which makes my case ripe for a Supreme Court challenge." Zherka drew a direct comparison between his case and that of President Donald J. Trump. "I built a major real estate business like Trump. I was outspoken against both parties. I ran a newspaper that exposed corrupt politicians-and they came after me just like they're going after him. My banks all got paid and love me. But this didn't matter. It's the same political witch hunt." "This decision poses a threat to every American," he warned. "It allows the government to strip away your constitutional rights based on a technicality-without any violence, without any harm, without any loss. Every American who has ever filled out a credit application should be very concerned. Even if you pay your bills, beware." "This decision opens the door to the government's ability to strip any American of their rights-not for violence or harm-but simply for allegedly lying. That is not what our forefathers intended. That is not freedom." The Second Circuit acknowledged that Zherka is part of "the people" protected by the Second Amendment, but ruled that Congress may disarm him anyway based on the fact of a felony conviction-regardless of context or threat. "I respect the Judges but strongly disagree with their decision," Zherka said. "I'm taking this to the Supreme Court. And God willing, a victory there will not only restore my rights-it will set a precedent that protects President Trump and every other American from being railroaded." The case comes amid national debate over political prosecutions, government overreach, and whether nonviolent financial offenders can be stripped of fundamental rights-without due process and without individualized review. (Opinion of the US Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit attached ) Contact Information Sam Zherka samzherka@ SOURCE: Concrete Ventures LLC press release
