Texas lawmakers approve full THC ban
May 24 (UPI) -- All non-medical products containing THC in any form soon could be outlawed in Texas after state lawmakers approved a full ban on Wednesday.
The Texas House of Representatives on Wednesday night voted 95-44 to approve Senate Bill 3, which bans the sale of all non-medical THC products in the state, CBS News reported.
Recreational cannabis is not legal in Texas, but medical marijuana is legal. So are hemp-derived products containing no more than 0.3% THC content.
Non-medical and hemp-derived products that contain any amount of THC would be banned if Gov. Greg Abbott signs the measure into law.
The measure, sponsored by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, bans the sale of Delta 8, Delta 9 and other forms of THC products, including beverages.
The bill also bans the retail sale of any cannabinoid, except for CBD and CBG products.
Such products were made legal with the passage of the federal Farm Bill of 2018 and at the state level a year later by Texas lawmakers.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a Republican, on Monday said he would halt progress on a state budget bill if the House did not approve S.B. 3, which was a companion measure to the budget.
"It's being sold to school children all across Texas," Patrick said in a video posted on Facebook.
"This is poisonous THC [with] no regulation whatsoever," he added.
Patrick said many of the products sold are more potent than marijuana that is sold by street dealers.
In the video, he shows a map of more than 8,000 smoke and vape shops that opened in Texas over the past three years.
Patrick said most are located within 2,000 feet of schools, and the industry generates $8 billion in annual revenues.
The video includes footage of Perry during Senate floor debate saying the owners of smoke and vape shops "targeted walking distance of every school they could."
The video also shows Sen. Cesar Blanco, D-El Paso, during floor debate, citing a 495% increase in calls for THC overdoses by children aged 5 and under between 2017 and 2022, as reported by the Texas Poison Control network.
Those opposing the THC ban say it could cause economic and medicinal harm.
The proposed THC ban would harm local businesses, farmers and "tens of thousands of hardworking Texans ... who rely on hemp-derived cannabinoids for their wellness," officials with the Texas Hemp Business Council said Wednesday in a press release.
"Despite overwhelming testimony and clear data demonstrating the safety and economic value of federally legal hemp-derived cannabinoids, lawmakers have chosen a path that eliminates an entire sector of our economy," the business council said.
The industry generates $4.3 billion in retail sales, supports 53,300 state jobs and contributes $268 million in tax revenue, according to the council.
"Texas already has strong hemp regulations," the council said.
Instead of a ban, the council proposed restricting sales to those who are 21, requiring child-resistant packaging and establishing minimum distances from schools.
Abbot has not indicated whether or not he intends to sign S.B. 3 into law.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Brazil advances Amazon oil exploration ahead of climate conference
ASUNCIÓN, Paraguay, June 5 (UPI) -- Brazil's environmental authority has approved one of the final requirements for state-run oil company Petrobras to proceed with oil exploration at the mouth of the Amazon River. After several rejections, Petrobras secured approval from the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources for its wildlife protection plan. The decision allows the company to proceed to a preoperational evaluation phase. This stage includes live emergency simulations to test Petrobras' response capabilities. The success of these tests will be key to the environmental authority's final decision whether to issue a drilling license. Petrobras aims to drill a well about 109 miles off the coast of Amapá state, in a maritime zone known as Block 59. The company says the activity will be low-impact and time-limited. Still, the project has sparked widespread environmental and social concerns. Environmental groups and experts have warned about the risks to the mouth of the Amazon River, an ecologically rich region and home to coral reefs, mangroves and endangered species. They also point to a lack of comprehensive environmental studies and the failure to consult Indigenous communities, as required under International Labor Organization Convention 169. The environmental institute' s stance on the project has shifted over time. Throughout 2023, its technical staff repeatedly recommended denying Petrobras permits to drill, citing inadequate environmental assessments and serious risks to biodiversity and local communities. Despite those recommendations, the authority's leadership approved Petrobras' latest protection plan May 19. Claudio Angelo, international policy coordinator at Observatório do Clima -- a Brazilian network of 90 climate-focused organizations -- said the plan's approval amounts to a capitulation to pressure from the state-run oil company. He warned the move could pave the way for auctioning 47 additional blocks at the mouth of the Amazon River, which he described as a setback for environmental protection in Brazil. An investigative report by InfoAmazonia found that Petrobras' strategic plan for 2025 to 2029 includes drilling 15 wells along Brazil's equatorial margin. The company plans to invest $3 billion in the project, representing 38% of its five-year budget for new oil and gas exploration, including projects in both Brazil and Colombia. Brazil's Federal Public Ministry has urged the National Petroleum Agency to suspend the auction of the 47 blocks, scheduled for June 17, citing the absence of required environmental studies and consultations with Indigenous peoples. Although the ministry's recommendations are not legally binding, ignoring them without justification can trigger civil or criminal legal action. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has defended the project, saying oil exploration is essential for national development, and that revenues could support the country's transition to clean energy. Still, his position has drawn criticism for contradicting Brazil's climate commitments, especially with the United Nations Climate Change Conference to be held in November in Belém, a city in Brazil's Amazon region. The event will bring together world leaders, scientists, non-governmental organizations and advocates to discuss and negotiate global climate action. Brazil is expected to play a central role in the talks. It will be the first time a COP is held in the Amazon, underscoring the region's importance in the global climate agenda.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
President Donald Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping discuss trade deal in 'very good' phone call
June 5 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump said Thursday that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone that morning about the trade deal currently in place between the United States and China. Trump described the call as "very good" in a post on Truth Social, adding he and Xi discussed the "intricacies" of the trade deal between the two nations. "The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries." Trump posted to Truth Social Thursday. Trump said the two hashed out a future meeting in regard to rare earth minerals. "There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of rare earth products. Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined," Trump said. The Trump administration had expected China to ease export restrictions on rare earth minerals after talks held last month. China had imposed those restrictions in April in response to tariffs levied by Trump on Chinese goods. Trump also noted that Xi invited him to visit China, which was also confirmed by Chinese state media. "I reciprocated. As presidents of two great nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing," he said. Neither spoke of Ukraine's war on Russia or any issues that involved Iran, according to Trump, who added that the media will be informed when the meeting between the two countries will take place. However, as per the account posted to Chinese state media Thursday, Xi also allegedly said the United States should "handle Taiwan question with caution" in order to avoid "danger of conflict, confrontation," and that Trump told him "Chinese students are welcome to study" in the United States. There has been no confirmation from the Trump administration in regard to either of these claims. The U.S. State Department announced last month it would "aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields. We will also revise visa criteria to enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong." Trump made no mention of either of those points of conversation purported by Chinese state media. The two leaders are believed to have last spoken in January before Trump's inauguration.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Insiders Reveal Why Musk Is Trashing Trump's Bill: ‘Elon Was B*tthurt'
Elon Musk's full-throttle assault on Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is less about fiscal policy and more about bruised ego, insiders say, claiming the billionaire is 'b-tthurt.' The drama reportedly began when Musk's pick for a top federal post, billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman, was rejected by Trump's inner circle. Sources said it was Sergio Gor, Trump's longtime aide and current personnel chief, who blocked the nomination. 'This was Sergio's out-the-door 'f--k you' to Musk,' a White House source told Axios. This triggered a rift which started with the Tesla CEO soft-launching his dissent last week, hours after his time as a 'special government employee' had elapsed. In a sit-down with CBS News's Sunday Morning, the Department of Government Efficiency architect said he was 'disappointed' with the bill, which he said 'increases the budget deficit' and undoes his cost-cutting task force's work. He soon went nuclear against the bill in a series of public posts that culminated in him labeling Trump's economic legislation 'outrageous,' 'pork-filled,' and a 'disgusting abomination.' 'Elon was b-tthurt,' one source said. Insiders have now told Axios that his dissent has spiraled into a full-blown meltdown. Musk is reportedly rattled because the bill slashes the electric vehicle tax credit—a key benefit for automakers like Musk's Tesla. As of late April, Tesla had poured at least $240,000 into lobbying efforts tied to the credit and other company interests. But despite the spending—and Musk's behind-the-scenes push for the provision—sources say his pleas were ignored. White House officials also reportedly hurt Musk's feelings by blocking him from staying on in some capacity after his 'special government employee' status was up after 130 days of service. He was similarly annoyed, sources said, when the Federal Aviation Administration decided against using his Starlink satellite system for national air traffic control. The White House overlooking his ally, Isaacman, served as the final straw on Saturday night, Axios reported. Word in the White House was that Gor was behind that call, but two sources questioned this. They told Axios that it was actually Isaacman's previous economic support for the Democrats that saw his nomination panned. 'Perception is reality, though, and I'm pretty sure Elon thought the NASA situation was a last insult,' one White House official added. 'So here we are.' The White House has been contacted for comment. Sign in to access your portfolio
