
How China stands to gain from US strikes on Iran
The Israel-Iran war escalated rapidly following the United States' bombing of Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, a move China framed as a blow to Washington's global reputation.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
On Tuesday, just hours after US President Donald Trump announced the beginning of a "complete and total ceasefire" between Israel and Iran, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said missiles had been launched from Iran toward Israel.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said he had instructed the IDF to "respond with force" to the missile launch.
The Israeli army said one or two missiles launched from Iran toward the north of Israel had been intercepted.
However, Iran's armed forces denied any missile launch toward Israel in recent hours, according to local media in Iran.
Trump's ceasefire plans followed US strikes on Iran's key nuclear enrichment sites over the weekend. In response, Tehran on Monday targeted a US military base in Qatar, a key regional hub for American forces.
China has not immediately commented on the latest developments.
On Sunday, its Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jiakun, criticized the US attack on Iran as a serious violation of the United Nations Charter, the founding UN treaty that largely prohibits the use of force between countries except in self-defence or with the approval of the UN Security Council.
Guo said Beijing was "ready to work with the international community for restoring peace and stability in the Middle East," without providing specific details.
The rhetoric echoed earlier criticism from China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong, who said US credibility had been "damaged" both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations.
What is at stake for Beijing?
China's call for stability in the Middle East comes amid economic concerns Iran could close off the Strait of Hormuz, which would destabilize oil prices worldwide.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The narrow waterway between Oman and Iran that connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea is a critical gateway for oil transport.
Washington has previously urged China — Iran's largest trading partner and primary oil export market — to dissuade Tehran from blocking the key waterway.
"An increase in the oil and gas prices would, of course, put pressure on [China's] economy. It would make inflation worse," said Ja Ian Chong, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore.
"Beijing certainly has reason to make sure that escalation doesn't get out of control. But whether it's able to fully restrain Iran is a different story altogether," he added.
China is Iran's key economic backer, especially amid Western sanctions and Tehran's growing international isolation stemming from its nuclear program and human rights record.
Iran is a significant partner in China's Belt and Road Initiative, a massive infrastructure plan that aims to connect Chinese trade and influence across dozens of countries.
"With a weakened Iran, one that's perhaps militarily bordering on either full-on conventional war or civil war as a result of US military intervention, it's going to make Iran a lot less effective partner for China's outreach in the Middle East," said Wen-Ti Sung, a non resident fellow with the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub.
China's chance to gain diplomatic capital
Sung told DW that China is likely to earn more diplomatic goodwill in the wake of the US military attack on Iran's nuclear sites.
"So long as the potential for further future military strikes from the US is not off the table, the diplomatic effect will be the same," he said.
China has long portrayed the US as a destabilizing force, while framing itself as a responsible advocate for peace and stability.
"[China] will now have more ability to talk about the US being a disruptive actor, being a potential threat. They have been especially active in pushing this narrative in the global south," said Chong.
In 2023, China brokered a landmark agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran to restore diplomatic relations after seven years of severed ties — a move Beijing portrayed as a major diplomatic success.
But in the current crisis, Beijing's backing of Tehran has remained mostly rhetorical, with no indications of it playing a similar mediation role.
"Beijing is influential, but just like the US cannot control Israel, Beijing cannot [restrain Iran]," Chong said.
Beijing could benefit if Washington shifts focus from Asia
Meanwhile, a US that is devoting less attention and resources to the Indo-Pacific region could potentially relieve international pressure on China over its growing military presence in Asia.
Earlier this month, a US aircraft carrier originally scheduled to arrive at a port in Vietnam was rerouted and headed toward the Middle East due to an "emergent operational requirement," the US Embassy in Hanoi said.
"That port visit was supposed to show the US commitment to security and stability in Asia.
Now, that shifts away," Chong said.
"If there's going to be a prolonged drain on US attention toward the Middle East, Beijing may recalculate [its strategy]," Chong said, referring to China's approach toward Taiwan, a self-ruled island Beijing claims as its own. Beijing has not ruled out the possibility of using force to achieve "reunification."
With the US now deeply entangled in the Middle East, its regional allies including Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia "will have to do more themselves and also work harder with each other," Chong said.
At this stage it's unclear whether the US strike on Iran is an isolated incident before Washington refocuses on Asia, or if it signals a broader pivot toward prioritizing the Middle East.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Aap Jaisa Koi' Trailer: Madhavan and Fatima Sana Shaikh starrer 'Aap Jaisa Koi' Official Trailer
Trump Bombs Iran, Rebrands MAGA As MIGA; Tehran Gamble Shocks America Donald Trump, once a self-proclaimed candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize, now finds himself at the center of a major military conflict. After launching U.S. airstrikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, Trump shocked the internet with a post on Truth Social suggesting regime change: 'If the current Iranian regime can't Make Iran Great Again, why not a regime change?' His slogan 'MIGA' is trending — and not for the reasons he hoped. Critics online are furious, while anti-war protests erupt across U.S. cities. Despite growing backlash, Trump continues to hail the military strikes as a victory marked by 'precision and strength.' The world now watches as tensions rise dangerously between nations. 8.5K views | 2 days ago

Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Owaisi Slams Netanyahu, Says Gaza Bombardment By Israel Is ‘Because Of Evil Netanyahu'
/ Jun 25, 2025, 07:00PM IST AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi strongly condemned Israeli strikes on Gaza, calling them inhumane. He accused Prime Minister Netanyahu of waging a brutal campaign that violates basic human rights. Owaisi urged international voices to speak out against the violence inflicted on Palestinians.#owaisi #gaza #israelpalestine #netanyahu #gazacrisis #humanrights #palestineunderattack


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Under Trump's pressure, Nato commits to 5% defense spending by 2035; restates 'ironclad commitment' to collective defense
US President Donald Trump, left, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrive before the start of a plenary session of the NATO summit of heads of state and government in The Hague. Nato leaders on Wednesday agreed to a sweeping increase in defense and security spending, pledging to invest 5% of GDP annually by 2035, in a move widely seen as a response to mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump. The 32-member alliance also reaffirmed its 'ironclad commitment' to mutual defense under Article 5, but not before Trump's earlier remarks sparked concern among allies. The final joint statement read, 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defense requirements as well as defense- and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.' A mid-point review is scheduled for 2029 to assess progress and reassess threats, notably from Russia. Trump's Article 5 ambiguity rattles allies Trump, who had raised eyebrows on his way to the summit by saying his support for Article 5 'depends on your definition,' attempted to clarify his position on Wednesday. 'I stand with it, that's why I'm here,' he said during a meeting with Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof. Still, the earlier comment, 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?', caused unease within the alliance. Article 5, the core principle of Nato, declares that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video] getfittoday Trump's hedging came as Nato leaders sought to present a united front against global security threats. UK ramps up military commitments British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the delivery of 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million ($95 million) from interest earned on seized Russian assets. In addition, the UK will purchase 12 US-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear weapons, joining Nato's shared airborne nuclear mission, the UK's biggest nuclear upgrade in a generation. Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the move, calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to Nato.' 'A new Nato is born,' says Finland Finland's President Alexander Stubb described the moment as the 'birth of a new Nato,' pointing to broader burden-sharing and stronger deterrence. While many Eastern European countries backed the 5% target, Spain said it could not meet the commitment, drawing Trump's criticism. 'There's a problem with Spain. Spain is not agreeing, which is very unfair to the rest of them, frankly,' Trump said. Trump lashes out at media over Iran intel leaks The summit was also marked by Trump's strong criticism of US media for reporting on a leaked intelligence assessment suggesting US airstrikes only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months. Trump claimed the media were being 'disgusting' and 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives.' To support his claim, the White House released a statement from Israel's Atomic Energy Commission saying the strikes, combined with Israeli operations, had set Iran's program back by 'many years.' Hungary breaks ranks on Russia threat Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, known as Russian President Vladimir Putin's closest ally in the EU, dismissed concerns over a potential Russian attack on Nato territory. 'I think Russia is not strong enough to represent a real threat to us. We are far stronger,' he told reporters, hands in pockets. Massive network outage hits host country As the summit unfolded, mobile networks across the Netherlands went down. The issue stemmed from provider Odido and its subsidiaries. While no cyberattack has been confirmed, Dutch cybersecurity officials said they would step in only if an attack is verified. Royal hospitality, historic security Trump, who spent the night at Huis Ten Bosch palace as a guest of Dutch King Willem-Alexander, began his day with a private breakfast with the monarch and Queen Máxima. 'The King and Queen are beautiful and spectacular people,' Trump posted on social media. 'Our breakfast meeting was great!' The summit, held in The Hague, saw the largest security operation ever conducted in the Netherlands. Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte opened the summit with a call for unity and fairness in defense spending. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden. That changes today,' he said.