logo
Exactly What to Say During Tough Convos About the Trans Community

Exactly What to Say During Tough Convos About the Trans Community

Yahoo27-03-2025

Since the inauguration in January, Trump and his administration have issued a series of discriminatory executive orders restricting access to gender-affirming care for trans youth, banning trans women and girls from participating in women's sports, declaring that the federal government will only recognize two genders (impacting identifying documents like passports and visas), banning transgender people from serving in the military, and so much more.
Thankfully, many of these executive orders are being challenged in court as we speak. But the messaging has already infiltrated the brains of Trump supporters (and beyond) far and wide, normalizing these hateful thoughts and actions in our country.
So what do we do? We speak out and spread facts. Especially with those closest to us who might not be informed or might not understand. That's not always easy though, especially when emotions get involved and you end up getting upset and flustered. To help, I tapped three experts to create a list of responses to common (and problematic) refrains about the trans community you might come across in future discussions.
, a gender equity consultant and GLAAD's director of communications and advocacy.
, a pediatrician specializing in adolescent medicine and an assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine.
, a communications strategist at the ACLU's Women's Rights Project and LGBTQ & HIV Project and formerly of the National Center for Transgender Equality.
In any discourse with someone who doesn't think like you, it's always important to make sure the other party knows you're actually also listening—not just arguing. But if tensions do get high, the Q&As below can serve as a script of sorts to fall back on when you want to make sure you're hitting all the key talking points while supporting and speaking up for the trans community.
Dr. Meredith McNamara: Actually, some people are born with neither or with genitalia that doesn't fit binary concepts of sex. What sex is someone who is born without a vagina but has XX chromosomes (MRKH Syndrome)? What sex is someone who has XXY chromosomes and little to no detectable testosterone levels in adulthood (Klinefelter syndrome)?
But let's take a step back and look at this from a different angle: Gender and sex are different. Gender identity develops long before the physical change of puberty. People generally know their gender long before secondary sex characteristics develop, because gender identity has its own strong biological basis rooted in the brain and it exists separately from chromosomes, gonads, and hormones.
Gillian Branstetter: And why not? Every culture in human history has had people who reject their gender assignment in one way or another, and decades of feminist legal progress has challenged the idea that biology must be our destiny. Transgender people come from all walks of life—every ethnicity, every background, every country, every political party. All people deserve the freedom to be themselves without fear, and that includes transgender people.
Shane Diamond: Everybody has a gender: an internal sense of self as it relates to the gendered world around us. For many people, that inner sense of self matches the sex they were assigned at birth—for example, someone assigned female at birth who knows herself to be a woman. This simply means they are cisgender! For other people, their inner sense of self is different from their sex assigned at birth, causing an incongruence with who they know themselves to be and how the world sees them. This person might call themselves transgender. That doesn't make anyone's gender more or less valid than someone else's—it just means they're different. At the end of the day, we don't expect everyone to know exactly what it means to be transgender, but we do expect people to respect each other, even when we are different.
Gillian Branstetter: Transgender people face discrimination, mistreatment, and abuse across our lives. We're four times as likely to experience violence and much more likely to experience poverty and homelessness. While nobody should have to pay such a price just for being true to themselves, I hardly think anyone wants that kind of 'attention.' Also, transgender people are raised around cisgender people all the time—it never seems to 'rub off' on us.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: In my practice, I only see the opposite—most young people who are trans try to present as cis for a period of time to deflect attention or to not stand out. It's never been harder to be trans. While many things can be socially influenced, we know that gender identity cannot. Studies have shown that trans people report a long-standing knowledge of their gender identity—it often takes years before they disclose that identity outwardly. Gender conformity is the real social contagion at play, not trans identity.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: Some people regret all types of medical care, whether it's knee replacement surgery, spine surgery, or Accutane. With surgery and hormones, regret rates are less than 1 percent—among the lowest in all of medicine. But it's also important to think about regret itself and what it means. People who express regret about surgery or hormones often say that it's just too hard to be trans in an openly hostile society. For those people, it's not health care at the root of regret—it's housing discrimination, job loss, violence, and political targeting. Until we ensure the same dignities for trans people as we do for everyone else, we need to think about regret in dimensions and never use it as a reason to snuff out opportunities for care.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: You'd probably hold a door open for someone or make an effort to spell their name correctly in an email. You'd probably also expect others to get your pronouns right. Moreover, there are plenty of times when we simply can't discern someone's gender because they haven't told us and we've never met them. We naturally revert to using gender-neutral pronouns in those cases. Keep that in mind and remember that something small can make someone else's day.
Also, it's totally normal to be nervous about getting this wrong. I get people's pronouns wrong and it doesn't feel great, but I own it and move on. I'll usually say, 'Hey, I got your pronouns wrong—next time, I'll get it right!' It removes the awkwardness where the other person feels like they have to comfort the one making a mistake and it gets us back on track to whatever it was we were talking about.
Shane Diamond: I totally get it. It can feel unfamiliar to refer to someone using they/them pronouns, but we actually use those pronouns all the time for individuals. For example, if I found a backpack and was bringing it to a lost and found, I'd say, 'Someone forgot their backpack.' I don't know who forgot it, so using 'their' acts as a singular person pronoun regardless of gender. It can take practice, but it's not grammatically incorrect or even uncommon in our language. If using someone's correct pronouns feels too clunky or too complicated, you can always skip pronouns and just use their name. But at the end of the day, using someone's correct pronouns isn't about you—it's a way of showing respect for someone else.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: Let's get back to biology for a second: Ovaries and testicles both produce estrogen and testosterone. So this statement has some fundamental flaws. But let's also think about what would happen if we applied this statement's logic broadly: We'd cosign a lot of bad health care. We wouldn't offer testosterone replacement therapy to cis men with low libido, we wouldn't help ease cis women into menopause safely or respectfully, and we wouldn't support people who lose those gonadal functions due to cancer. We wouldn't be able to suppress life-threatening menstrual bleeding in people with bleeding disorders like hemophilia! I don't think anyone wants that. If there's a seat at the table of good health care for these cis people, then there's a seat at the table for trans people, too.
Gillian Branstetter: The treatments transgender people access are no different from the treatments millions of cis people rely on for their health needs. And importantly, decisions about medical care should be kept between patients and their doctors—not politicians.
Gillian Branstetter: The good news is you don't have to understand everything about a transgender person to know they're as deserving of respect and equal treatment as everyone else, and that's all most are asking for. Every day we interact with people of different races, religions, and backgrounds, and we don't need to be an expert in their experience to trust them with their experience and treat them with the same dignity we would want for ourselves.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: Imagine if you—as a woman—sprouted hair on your chest and had genitalia hanging outside of your body that made you feel completely unlike yourself. What if society would only treat you with dignity and respect if you wore masculine clothing? If you can step into that headspace for a second and experience a smidge of that discomfort, imagine feeling that every moment of your life. The fact that trans people can and do navigate gender dysphoria is beyond admirable. Let's also reframe the concept of choice: People don't want to be a gender—they are a gender. They choose whether to present themselves to society as that gender, and that choice is what gender-affirming care can facilitate.
Shane Diamond: We already have existing state and federal laws that protect people, specifically women, from predators, harassment, and assault. It's already illegal to assault someone, regardless of gender or location. Despite fearmongering from anti-transgender voices, the truth is, transgender people are actually most at risk for being attacked in the restroom. Being that trans women are women and trans men are men, each should use the respective restroom that aligns with their gender. Ultimately, we're all trying to do the same thing in restrooms—use a likely-under-serviced toilet and check our social media—regardless of our gender.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: Wow, this is news to me! Every patient I've had who's gotten any form of gender-affirming surgery has gone through years of deep introspection about what's right for them. Once they've arrived there, they've jumped through hoop after hoop after hoop to connect with the right providers.
Shane Diamond: First, let's talk about what this really is: medically necessary healthcare for trans and nonbinary people. ('Gender-reassignment surgery' is also an outdated phrase that's not commonly used anymore.) Second, have you ever tried to schedule any kind of surgery in this country?! Nothing in health care happens quickly or easily, and that's not even factoring in maneuvering insurance coverage. It's also important to remember that there's no single way to be transgender or nonbinary, and that not every trans or nonbinary person will choose—or be able to afford—a medical transition. These decisions, like all personal and private health care decisions, are best left to patients, their families if applicable, and their health care providers.
Shane Diamond: It is not true that people are claiming to be transgender when they are not. Given how difficult it is to navigate our complicated and tedious health care system and all the discrimination and challenges trans people face, no one is faking being transgender for any advantage—be it in sports or anywhere else.
Out of the millions of global competitive athletes, there are only a handful of transgender people competing at high-level sports, and—despite sensational media narratives—we're not always winning! It is especially important in the context of youth sports that all kids—transgender and cisgender alike—have an opportunity to participate in sports with their friends to learn valuable, lifelong lessons through being part of a team...without being subjected to gender- and appearance-based discrimination.
Ultimately, these anti-trans actions harm all girls and women, punishing gender non-conformity of any kind and imposing rigid gender roles and expressions on everyone.
Dr. Meredithe McNamara: The American Psychiatric Association doesn't consider gender dysphoria to be a mental illness—it's classified as a sexual health condition that arises from discordance between one's physical body and sense of self. But let's talk about the word 'fix.' How? There is no alternative treatment for gender dysphoria beyond access to thoughtful, multidisciplinary gender-affirming medical care. It's not right for everyone, but it's right for many.
Shane Diamond: Being transgender and/or nonbinary is one of nature's many variations—the way some people have blue eyes, brown eyes, or green eyes. Being transgender is an innate part of who someone is and there's nothing anyone can do to change that. External forces attempting to change someone's gender or sexual orientation are ineffective at best and extremely harmful at worst.
Transgender people are not the problem and are simply trying to live safely. The Trump administration has spent millions of dollars vilifying and discriminating against transgender people—why? The American public has many issues of importance, including the economy and climate change, and yet opponents of equality are wasting important resources and attention perpetuating hatred and divisiveness. If anything needs to be fixed, it's our society's rigid rejection of anyone who is different.
Photos of experts are courtesy of subjects. Answers have been lightly condensed and edited for clarity.
You Might Also Like
Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding
Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's trade talk delegation is set to face off with China's negotiators in London. Here is what's at stake.
Trump's trade talk delegation is set to face off with China's negotiators in London. Here is what's at stake.

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump's trade talk delegation is set to face off with China's negotiators in London. Here is what's at stake.

Three top Trump administration economic officials will face off against Chinese negotiators in a renewed effort to break the US-China trade deadlock. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will be meeting China's delegation in London on Monday. "The meeting should go very well," President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post announcing the talks. This coming meeting will be the first official talk between the two countries since they mutually lowered tariffs in a temporary truce on May 12, after talks in Geneva. The renewed talks follow a 90-minute phone call between Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, a rare direct conversation that Trump later described as "very good." According to Trump, the two leaders also agreed to visit each other in person, without providing more details in terms of a timeline. The Chinese Embassy of Washington did not respond to a request for who would be attending this negotiation from its side. The team they sent to Geneva consisted of Vice Premier He Lifeng, Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang, and Vice Finance Minister Liao Min. Notably, Li has a Master of Laws from the University of Hamburg in Germany and has been part of China's delegation to the World Trade Organization since 2021. International trade experts previously told Business Insider that much is at stake for both China and the US to strike a deal, or at the very least, continue the truce beyond August 12 when the 90-day tariff pause will expire. "The Trump administration made their job harder because the tariff policies they've implemented are costly to Americans and American companies, and therefore, the market doesn't like it," said Philip Luck, director of the CSIS Economics Program. "They are under a lot of pressure to do things fast." Meanwhile, a lawsuit that threatens to undo all of Trump's tariffs enacted under the IEEPA also looms over negotiations with China. Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm, told BI that if the court strikes down tariffs before trade deals could come to pass, other routes of imposing tariffs could be more complicated and time-consuming. The White House did not provide Business Insider with any additional comment beyond Trump's Truth Social post.

DOJ Official Resigns Over Decision To Charge Abrego Garcia - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Audio
DOJ Official Resigns Over Decision To Charge Abrego Garcia - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Audio

CNN

time31 minutes ago

  • CNN

DOJ Official Resigns Over Decision To Charge Abrego Garcia - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Audio

DOJ Official Resigns Over Decision To Charge Abrego Garcia Erin Burnett OutFront 49 mins The man mistakenly sent to El Salvador from Maryland is back in the United States, just appearing in court where he is now facing criminal charges. The charges have led one criminal prosector to resign in the past hour. Plus, Trump speaks out about his very public breakup with Elon Musk.

Government drones used in 'runaway spying operation' to peek into backyards in Sonoma County, lawsuit says
Government drones used in 'runaway spying operation' to peek into backyards in Sonoma County, lawsuit says

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Government drones used in 'runaway spying operation' to peek into backyards in Sonoma County, lawsuit says

Three residents filed a lawsuit this week against Sonoma County seeking to block code enforcement from using drones to take aerial images of their homes in what the American Civil Liberties Union is calling a "runaway spying operation." The lawsuit, filed by the ACLU Wednesday on behalf of the three residents, alleges that the county began using drones with high-powered cameras and zoom lenses in 2019 to track illegal cannabis cultivation, but in the years since, officials have used the devices more than 700 times to find other code violations on private property without first seeking a warrant. "For too long, Sonoma County code enforcement has used high-powered drones to warrantlessly sift through people's private affairs and initiate charges that upend lives and livelihoods. All the while, the county has hidden these unlawful searches from the people they have spied on, the community, and the media," Matt Cagle, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Foundation of Northern California, said in a statement. A spokesperson for Sonoma County said the county is reviewing the complaint and takes "the allegations very seriously." Read more: Will these drones 'revolutionize' 911 response? L.A. suburb will be first to test The lawsuit comes amid a national debate over the use of drones by government agencies who have increasingly relied on the unmanned aircraft during disasters and for environmental monitoring and responding to emergency calls. More recently, some agencies in California and in other states have explored using drones to investigate code enforcement violations. In 2024, nearly half of Sonoma County's drone flights involved non-cannabis violations, including construction without a permit, junkyard conditions and zoning violations, according to data included in the complaint. "The use of drones over someone's private space raises a question of what is considered private," said Ari Ezra Waldman, a professor of law at UC Irvine. Waldman said if law enforcement on the ground wants to see on the other side of a tall fence or trees into someone's property they have to get the person's consent or they need probable cause for a warrant. "Why shouldn't that apply above ground too?" he said. California doesn't have a law that regulates the use of drones by code enforcement agents. In 2015, lawmakers in the state Assembly approved a measure that would have restricted the use of drones over private property without the owner's permission. Then-Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed the bill saying at the time that it could expose hobbyists or commercial users to "burdensome litigation." The ACLU argues that the county's use of drones as an investigative tool violates the California Constitution which provides people the right to privacy and against unreasonable searches and seizures. "I think that our expectations of privacy are based on social norms and people don't normally expect that someone is going to have a super high powered, detailed ability to capture extraordinary detail with a camera that's just buzzing over their property," Waldman said. "We shouldn't have to walk around life expecting that just because this technology exists that we have no privacy from anything anymore, from any direction." The lawsuit also alleges that the county's drone policy has loosened in the past several years. In 2019, the policy required inspectors to receive a complaint about a property before deploying a drone. Now, officials have no such requirement, allowing them instead to launch "discretionary proactive investigations," the complaint states. Residents named in the lawsuit say that the drones hovering above their homes have resulted in ongoing privacy concerns and a loss of enjoyment of their property. One plaintiff, Benjamin Verdusco, decided to sell his home after he learned that the county had been taking pictures of his backyard with a drone in 2021, according to the complaint. Read more: Police drones could soon crisscross the skies. Cities need to be ready, ACLU warns Another plaintiff, Nichola Schmitz, who is deaf, wasn't able to hear the buzz of the drone hovering above her property on Oct.10, 2023. When a worker on her property pointed it out she "became confused and worried," the complaint states. She rushed to her bedroom and closed the curtains, concerned about how long the drone had been there and whether it had seen her naked on her property earlier that day. She alleges the drone made two big loops around her property and, shortly after, a red tag appeared on her gate alleging two violations of the county code — one for illegal grading and another for having on her property an unpermitted dwelling, a small cabin that her father had built on the land in 1981. She spent $25,000 for a contractor to fix the alleged grading issue but still faces $10,000 in fines. ACLU attorneys allege the evidence obtained by the drone was done so unlawfully because officials did not have a search warrant. "This horrible experience has shattered my sense of privacy and security," Schmitz said in a statement. "I'm afraid to open my blinds or go outside to use my hot tub because who knows when the county's drone could be spying on me." A third plaintiff, Suzanne Brock, confronted county officials after she learned that they had taken detailed aerial photos of her outdoor bathtub and shower that she and her daughter used daily. She expressed concern to inspectors that they might have seen her naked in the bathtub. Code Enforcement Inspector Ryan Sharp told her that "when we see something like that, we turn around," according to the complaint. When Brock asked if county officials see people during the flights, Sharp told her yes, according to the complaint, but added that "we don't put that in the camera footage." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store