Housing site that could have delivered hundreds of homes is scrapped
Housing site that could have delivered hundreds of homes is scrapped
There was a lot of opposition to the potential housing site in north east Barry, but the council is now saying it won't be considered due to "deliverability" issues
Vale of Glamorgan Council is no longer considering a controversial housing site in Barry
(Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne )
A site in Barry that could have delivered hundreds of homes is no longer being considered by Vale of Glamorgan Council due to concerns over its future deliverability. The local authority recently announced that it hopes to put plans for new housing sites in Barry out for consultation soon.
One of the three sites, land near Weycock Cross in north west Barry, replaces the originally proposed site between Argae Lane and the Barry Docks link road in north east Barry.
There were concerns over the deliverability of this site after doubts emerged over whether or not the parcels of land that made up the proposed allocation would be sold. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Vale of Glamorgan Council's cabinet member for community engagement, Cllr Ruba Sivagnanam, said: "The population of Barry is growing, meaning so is demand for homes, particularly affordable housing.
'In order to meet this need, the Council has identified three sites in the town for possible housing development, the largest being near Weycock Cross.
'If agreed by Cabinet, a consultation exercise will begin shortly, offering all interested parties the chance to share their thoughts on the proposals.
Article continues below
'We want everyone to have quality homes in safe neighbourhoods and believe developing sites such as these will help deliver that.'
The council's proposed housing sites are linked to its plan for future development, also known as the Replacement Local Development Plan (RLDP).
A plan of the site in north east Barry
(Image: Vale of Glamorgan Council )
Local Development Plans (LDPs) are used by councils to determine which sites are used for housing and which sites are used for industrial development.
They are also used to lay out which sites should be protected from development.
The proposed sites for housing in Barry that could go out to consultation are as follows:
Land at Hayes Lane in the Bendricks - 54 homes
Land at Neptune Way on Barry Waterfront - 40 homes
Land near Weycock Cross in north west Barry - 376 homes
Under the original proposal for the RLDP, the north east Barry site was earmarked for 900 homes.
The council said the site could eventually help deliver 1,500 homes, but 900 of these were proposed to be delivered during the RLDP period (2021-2036).
Some objections were raised about the use of this site, with residents living nearby fearing a loss of green space and the potential strain on roads and local services.
Natural Resources Wales (NRW) also raised concerns in relation to the proposed scale of development and the site's proximity to the Barry Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
In terms of why the council has decided not to use this site, all it said in its most recent statement was that it "is no longer being considered due to concerns about deliverability".
A council cabinet report says that whilst the council received statements of intent from landowners to sell the land on site, they did not get sufficient evidence to guarantee that this would happen.
The report states: "Whilst statements of intent to release the site for development have been received by the Council for a number of the development parcels, as the plan progresses there is a need for further certainty from all parties in the form of appropriate evidence, such as signed heads of terms, demonstrating commitment from the respective landowners that there is a common agreement on the delivery of the site.
"The Council has actively engaged with the site promoters and landowner representatives throughout the process.
"However, insufficient evidence has been received in respect of full landowner agreement to give sufficient confidence that a site of the scale originally envisaged can be brought forward within the plan period.
"Further time spent seeking to resolve these matters will lead to significant delays to the RLDP timetable.
"Whilst a smaller site involving fewer landowners could potentially be delivered, this would result in a smaller quantum of development that would be unable to support the proposed mix of uses that are deemed critical to the effective placemaking of this site, and relate poorly to the existing settlement pattern.
"In addition, it would be more challenging to deliver the active travel improvements necessary to reduce the car dependency of the location."
Vale of Glamorgan Council said the area in north west Barry is being considered "as it is in a suitable location within reasonable walking and cycling distance of Barry station and range of other services and facilities".
If they had gone ahead with the site to the north east of the town, it would have required improvements to infrastructure, including the upgrading of highways and pedestrian and cycle access from Gilbert Lane and Argae Lane.
Article continues below
The closest rail link is Cadoxton Railway Station, which is about 1km away.
If the council's cabinet members approve the latest proposals at a meeting on Thursday, May 1, there will be an in-person engagement event to discuss them and there will also be a chance for people to share their thoughts online and by telephone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
'How did you get it so wrong?' Mark Drakeford blasted over National Insurance shortfall
'How did you get it so wrong?' Mark Drakeford blasted over National Insurance shortfall The Welsh Government finance minister previously said the UK Government would fully cover the impact of its National Insurance changes but it later emerged that wasn't the case Mark Drakeford had said the National Insurance bill for public sector would be met by UK Government - it won't (Image: Rob Browne/WalesOnline ) Wales' finance minister has been asked to explain how he got it "so wrong" after previously saying the UK Government would fully cover the impact of its National Insurance changes on public bodies in Wales. In November the former First Minister told the Senedd extra money would be provided to plug the huge amount of money public sector organisations - like councils, health boards and government bodies - would have to pay. It has now emerged that the UK Government will only fund £185m of the £257m that its changes will cost. The Welsh Government has spent £36m of its reserves, but for this year alone there remains a gap of £36m. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Charities and councils have warned that they face huge bills to make up the difference. Wales' 22 councils faced a £20m bill, they had predicted, while charities like Tenovus and Marie Curie have warned they will have to at least an additional £250,000 and £260,000 respectively. In November last year, Mr Drakeford told the Senedd: "The UK Government has said that it will provide compensation to public services for the additional national insurance contributions that public service employers will incur. The definition they are using of a public sector worker is the one used by the last government and set out in the Office for National Statistics classifications." However, the UK Government instead chose to use the Barnett formula to determine how much money to give to the devolved nations. Because the public sector is larger in Wales than it is in England, there is a shortfall. Article continues below Conservative MS Sam Rowlands told Mr Drakeford that was "clearly significantly different to what you would have expected" but said he had given guarantees. "You said that there would be additional funding for public sector workers to cover the cost of employer National Insurance contributions, adding that the Treasury would provide full funding to deal with the National Insurance contributions of employers, and now, as I just explained, they haven't provided the full funding as you assured Members of this Senedd. "So, it is concerning that, in November, you were giving guarantees that you are now having to walk away from because of your colleagues in Westminster. But indeed, organisations would have heard those assurances and would have made plans based on those assurances only for them not to come to fruition. "How did you get it so wrong and how can people trust your assurances again in the future?" Mr Drakeford responded: "The assurances that were given in November were based on the statement of funding policy. The statement of funding policy does seem clear to me. It says that when any one of the four governments in the United Kingdom takes a decision that creates costs for any other government, then the government that creates those costs must meet that bill in full. "That, I think, would have been the right way to have dealt with these national insurance contributions. Article continues below "The UK Government takes a different view and has used the Barnett formula instead. We continue to make the case to them for proceeding in a way that I think is consistent with what the statement of funding policy would require." Mr Rowlands said it was "another example of that working together not happening for people here in Wales". He reiterated concerns from the charity sector, which will not be eligible for any additional funding.
Wales Online
11 hours ago
- Wales Online
'We need answers' Anger over major blow to Barry Waterfront project
'We need answers' Anger over major blow to Barry Waterfront project The marina element of the Barry Waterfront redevelopment project will no longer be going ahead after ABP announced it won't commit funds for it Politicians like Plaid Cymru councillor, Cllr Mark Hooper, have called for answers on the latest blow facing the Barry Waterfront project (Image: Brian Carroll ) Politicians have called for answers after a major backer of the Barry Waterfront redevelopment scheme decided to stop committing funds to it. Associated British Ports (ABP) announced on Wednesday, May 28, that it would not be able to fund the marina element of the project, saying it would require "significant investment". Vale of Glamorgan Council's leader, Cllr Lis Burnett, said the latest development would not affect other elements of the wider project like a new public space and water sports centre. However, opposition councillors and a Senedd Member have questioned how the project got to this point and where it goes from here. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Plaid Cymru councillor for the Waterfront area of Barry, Cllr Mark Hooper, said: "I am surprised by this most recent announcement by ABP. The market testing should have been completed long ago, before vast amount of work and cost was undertaken by public officials and others. "We in Barry need answers. Why was so much time and energy sunk into these plans if business partners hadn't already carried out their due diligence? What is going to happen to the rest of the bid proposals if this key part is no longer going ahead? Will Barry still have this £20m to spend, or will Westminster claw it back? We need these answers quickly." The project to redevelop the Waterfront, also known as the Barry Making Waves project, formed the basis of an application for £20m of levelling-up funding. Article continues below Vale of Glamorgan Council announced the county was successful in its bid for funding in November 2023. There was a brief pause in celebration following the general election after the UK Government said it needed to conduct a review of spending. An artist's impression of what the marina in Barry might have looked like (Image: Vale of Glamorgan Council ) However, Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed in October 2024 that Barry would receive its funding. Conservative South Wales Central MS, Andrew RT Davies, said of ABP's recent decision: "This is extremely concerning news. The marina is a key part of plans to level up Barry and losing this investment is a huge blow. 'I've requested an urgent meeting with the council to discuss the future of the scheme. Action is required to attract new partners and it's vital we have clarity.' The Labour leader of the council, Cllr Burnett said she was disappointed to learn ABP would no longer commit to the marina element of Barry Making Waves. Despite the "clear setback", she said the council remains confident the UK Government funding remains viable. Conservative MS, Andrew RT Davies (Image: Getty Images ) She added: "We believe the project can be delivered without the marina component, subject to UK Government agreement. 'The Making Waves scheme will still seek to retain leisure use on the water by bringing a new water sports centre to the Mole which will be operated jointly by the Ocean Water Sports Trust and Cardiff and Vale College. "It will also see the creation of a public park for all to enjoy and will facilitate the delivery of much-needed housing. "The scheme also includes the upgrading of the Grade 2* listed Dock Office into business incubator space to support local economic growth. "We will now focus our attention on delivering these projects and will be seeking the agreement of the UK Government for this amended scheme." Other partners on the project include The Ocean Watersports Trust and Cardiff and Vale College. An ABP spokesperson said: 'Associated British Ports is continuing to work closely with the Vale of Glamorgan Council regarding the Barry Making Waves Regeneration Project. "We are looking at the right, viable ways we can contribute to the Project and to the Council's goals, that ABP shares, of driving more growth and prosperity for Barry. 'ABP has been working closely with the Vale of Glamorgan team regarding the Barry Making Waves project for a number of years, including on the concept of a marina development, and has committed significant resources to the project. "We have recently concluded a thorough market testing exercise, utilising third party experts and including engagement with marina operators, which has led ABP to the regretful conclusion that we can cannot proceed with the significant investment required in a marina. 'We remain committed working with all stakeholders regarding the shared ambition of maximising the opportunity of the Levelling Up Fund award from the UK Government. "We look forward to pursuing our ongoing dialogue with the Vale of Glamorgan Council.' Article continues below
Wales Online
13 hours ago
- Wales Online
UK steel industry welcomes Donald Trump decision not to impose 50% tariffs but ‘uncertainty remains'
UK steel industry welcomes Donald Trump decision not to impose 50% tariffs but 'uncertainty remains' Donald Trump has decided to 'provide different treatment' to the UK with a trade deal still to be finalised Levies will remain at 25% for imports of steel from the UK into America (Image: Getty Images ) The steel Industry has welcomed Donald Trump's decision to keep tariffs at 25% on British steel and aluminium for now, but warned that "uncertainty remains" over the final tax rate. The US president has decided to "provide different treatment" to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London last month, despite him doubling tariffs on imports from elsewhere to 50%. Levies will remain at 25% for imports of steel from the UK into America, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July, or the quotas in the agreement could come into force, effectively eradicating the tax. The 50% tariff rate for imports of steel and aluminium from other nations came into force at 12.01am Washington DC time on Wednesday, shortly after 5am in the UK. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Government said on Tuesday night they were "pleased" that the industry "will not be subject to these additional tariffs". Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel, said Mr Trump's decision was a "welcome pause". Article continues below He added: "Continued 25% tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. "However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely." Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but it has not yet come into force. Officials have been working to try to finalise the details of the agreement. According to the text of the order, published by a White House X account on Tuesday, Mr Trump has "further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025 (EPD), and to accordingly provide different treatment, as described below, for imports of steel and aluminium articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom". The order later says that rates will for now stay at 25% and adds: "On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminium consistent with the terms of the EPD, or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD". The Government has pledged to keep working with the US to get the agreement up and running, and the 25% tariff rate "removed". A spokesperson said: "The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our Plan for Change. "We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed." The Conservatives have said that Labour's "botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo". Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said: "Keir Starmer stood in front of the nation and insisted to the British public that his Labour government had achieved a trade deal with the US – and now one month later our industries face a fresh tariffs blow. "So once again it seems that Keir Starmer's promise was just like the rest: hollow and broken. Labour's botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo and this country simply cannot afford their continuing failure." Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met White House trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. According to the Department for Business and Trade, Mr Reynolds and Mr Greer discussed a desire to implement the deal struck between London and Washington as soon as possible, and committed to working closely to make it happen. The general terms for the agreement between the UK and US were published in May when the deal was announced, and outline the intended plans. Article continues below White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if there was a text of the full deal ready to be released, and told reporters on Tuesday: "There 's most definitely text with this deal, there is language that this side has seen. "You'll have to ask the UK Parliament why they haven't seen it from their own Government, I obviously can't answer that question."
