Alex Murdaugh accomplice pleads guilty despite chance at new federal trial, what to know
Despite a high-court-ordered new trial, former Hampton banker and accused Alex Murdaugh fraud accomplice Russell Laffitte has opted to plead guilty to federal charges before standing trial on the first of his state criminal charges later this year.
On April 11, Laffitte, the former CEO of Palmetto State Bank in Hampton and a member of a South Carolina Lowcountry legacy banking family, signed a plea agreement admitting guilt in six counts of federal criminal charges in United States District Court, District of South Carolina's Beaufort Division.
In exchange for his plea to bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and three counts of misapplication of bank funds, and complying with several other provisions, Laffitte would be sentenced to 60 months (five years) in federal prison, followed by a period of supervised release, as well as fines, fees and restitution.
Laffitte was indicted in both state and federal courts in 2022 in connection with a financial crime spree orchestrated by disbarred attorney and convicted fraudster and murderer Richard "Alex" Murdaugh.
While awaiting trial on state charges, Laffitte was convicted in November 2022 on several federal charges and sentenced to seven years in federal prison.
However, in 2024, a federal appeals court vacated the conviction and sentence based on violations of Laffitte's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when a juror was ruled to have been improperly dismissed.
Laffitte's second federal trial was scheduled to begin May 5 but will no longer be needed.
Laffitte is now set to stand trial on the first of his state criminal indictments sometime in Allendale County in October of this year.
By pleading guilty, Laffitte potentially shaved off two years from his federal sentence, but the maximum sentence allowed by law on each charge was 30 years.
In exchange for his guilty plea, Laffitte also agreed to forfeit a certain amount of property, to be identified and determined by the federal government, $3,555,884.80 in criminal restitution, a monetary judgment of $85,854.73, and other fines, fees, and court costs.
The restitution and judgment must be paid on or before sentencing.
Per the agreement, if Laffitte violates any term of this plea agreement, federal prosecutors can seek the maximum punishment allowed by law.
Laffitte and one of his attorneys signed Laffitte's plea agreement, Mark C. Moore, on April 11 and by Emily Limehouse, Assistant United States Attorney, on April 14, when it was filed in the federal court's online public index.
The agreement awaits final approval by a federal judge, likely Richard Gergel, who oversaw the original conviction.
Assistant United States Attorneys Katie Stoughton and Winston Holiday also prosecuted the case.
This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Alex Murdaugh accomplice Russell Laffitte pleads guilty, what to know
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lori Vallow Daybell found guilty in 3rd trial
Lori Vallow Daybell was found guilty on Thursday in her second murder conspiracy trial in Arizona. The jury concluded Vallow Daybell conspired to kill Brandon Boudreaux, her niece's ex-husband. Vallow Daybell, who represented herself, pleaded not guilty. This marks her third trial in recent years. Earlier in spring, she was found guilty of conspiring to murder her estranged husband, Charles Vallow, in Arizona. She awaits sentencing for this trial. Vallow Daybell was also convicted in Idaho for killing her children — Tylee and JJ — and Tammy Daybell, her husband Chad Daybell's first wife in Idaho. She is serving several life sentences without the possibility of parole. Despite a shaky start to the trial last Friday, when Vallow Daybell appeared in court in a wheelchair and asked the judge for more time, the proceedings ended this week. She ran into a confrontation with Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Justin Beresky in court on Friday. Vallow Daybell wanted the judge to allow the inclusion of character evidence but the judge told her that could leave the door open for the prosecution to include evidence of her prior convictions. The judge advised her to consult her advisory council during the lunch break. 'You don't need to yell at me,' Vallow Daybell responded. After a brief back and forth, where the judge stressed he didn't raise his voice, he ordered Vallow Daybell to be escorted out of the courtroom. She argued she'd been 'very courteous' to Beresky. The judge didn't take to her remark too kindly, saying, 'No, you have been nothing near courteous to me during the course of these proceedings.' She apologized to Beresky 15 minutes later. The judge offered her a warning: another slip up and he could revoke her right to represent herself. In addition to juggling the Arizona trial, Vallow Daybell is also attempting to file an appeal in Idaho, where she is serving several life sentences. 'Lori Daybell respectfully asks this Court to reverse her judgment of conviction and remand for an order dismissing all charges against her based on a violation of her statutory and constitutional right to a speedy trial,' the brief, filed May 30, states, according to KTVB 7. Her attorney argued the court disqualified her chosen attorney, violating her Sixth Amendment.
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. needs competitive pay for defense lawyers
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Legislators ought to listen to the committee. Ensuring that there are enough lawyers to uphold the constitutional right to representation enshrined in the Sixth Amendment should be a legislative priority. Whether in the state budget or in some other legislative vehicle, such as a supplemental budget, lawmakers should find a way to boost compensation rates across all categories of indigent defense, which span criminal, mental health, family law, and juvenile cases. Doing so would cost the state about $29 million annually. Advertisement Massachusetts' minimum bar advocate rate of $65 per hour is an outlier in New England. Maine's minimum rate is $150, New Hampshire's is $125 to $150, and Rhode Island's is $112 for most cases. Current rates in Massachusetts don't reflect the complexity of modern court cases, the overhead costs private attorneys pay out of pocket, or the state's sky-high cost of living. Advertisement The Senate's version of the budget does boost rates — but only for mental health appointments and Superior Court cases. The work stoppage is underscoring the critical work bar advocates produce. Since the stoppage began on May 27, the committee and its in-house counsel have struggled to provide attorneys for all clients that need them. Now, a slew of people accused of crimes are waiting, either in jails or out on bail — more than 150 people in Boston as of June 9, according to the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. These numbers are estimates, and bar advocate participation in the work stoppage varies between counties. But leaders agree that the number of unrepresented clients across Massachusetts is already in the hundreds and will continue to grow. Without representation, defendants are forced to stay in jail for days without arraignment, a violation of their constitutional rights. As early as next week, the Supreme Judicial Court may have to consider implementing the A shortage of bar advocates has put courts under pressure before. In 2019, Hampden County couldn't represent all of its clients, and a court instituted a day rate of $424 to incentivize additional private lawyers to handle arraignments. It was effective — and proved that low compensation really is a dissuasive factor for most private attorneys. Advertisement The legislature shouldn't wait for the crisis to deepen to provide a pay raise for bar advocates. Waiting to act will force more defendants to languish without representation, risking case mismanagement or pouring money into finding other private attorneys willing to do the work. This doesn't have to happen. The best way to solve this issue is to pay bar advocates fairly in the upcoming budget, allowing them to uphold the constitutional rights of their clients and ensuring due process across the Commonwealth. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Court rules owner in default for downtown property slated for $117.8M apartment development
The owner of the former YWCA building in downtown Pittsburgh is in default. According to a May filing in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan ruled City Club Apartments affiliate CCA CBD Pittsburgh LLC is in default for the mortgage on 305 Wood Street to Maryland-based The Union Labor Life Insurance Co. The filing further states that the defendant 'failed to plead or otherwise defend' against the impending foreclosure action. The owner now owes the lender $3.82 million, plus interest, according to the filing. Click here to read more from our partners at the Pittsburgh Business Times. Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
