
Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians
It depicts US president Donald Trump as a firefighter arriving at an emergency scene somewhere – most likely Los Angeles – declaring: 'I'm here to put out the fire.'
Facing off against him is a lone US citizen who duly points out to the firefighter that what, in fact, he's carrying is not a water hose but a flamethrower.
To say that it encapsulates what is happening in Los Angeles right now would be an understatement, for the United States is changing in ways rarely seen before.
READ MORE: SNP minister responds to 'secret meeting to discuss John Swinney leadership' reports
Some, rightly, will argue it was ever going to be thus after the last US presidential election, and Trump was unleashed by the American people on themselves.
In retrospect, doubtless some Americans regret electing Trump now that they see him set about the nation, brandishing every available tool or weapon capable of causing division or harm.
'Chainsaw' or 'flamethrower,' these have become Trump's weapons of choice in reshaping his country's democracy in tandem with imposing a blueprint of authoritarian rule.
Yes, Trump has insisted that sending in federal troops is aimed at restoring calm or 'putting out the fire' of radical 'left-wing' agitators. He's even suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to quell the protesters in Los Angeles.
But the real insurrection here – as back in January 2021 – is one ignited by Trump himself. There is a familiar even deeper historical pattern emerging here too, one that I was reminded of while watching a repeat on BBC4 recently of the landmark series, Rise Of The Nazis.
As one newspaper review of the original series aired back in 1999 rightly noted, it served as a lesson in 'how easily – and petrifyingly quickly – a democratic country can move to a totalitarian dictatorship'.
(Image: Evelyn Hockstein, REUTERS)
Those who say such an observation is nothing but hyperbole in relation to America right now, need to think again. For watching the Rise Of The Nazis is to recall the ease with which propaganda, economic exploitation, and political manipulation came together and were harnessed for authoritarian rule.
Trump like Hitler – and all those with authoritarian tendencies – know the political value in triggering those same tendencies among supporters by presenting them with a perceived threat to their shared way of life.
Just as the Nazis manufactured crises to work to their advantage, so too does the Trump administration. Right now, the federal intervention in the US – again like 1930s Germany – is aimed at creating a showdown by painting a picture of a threat of disorder to the country at large.
In Los Angeles, the template being deployed was outlined succinctly this week in The Economist magazine and goes as follows.
First, 'announce an immigration crackdown on a city whose leadership does not want it, wait for protests, then call in the troops to put down the protesters. Cracking heads serves as a warning to other cities that might resist. It is also a signal to MAGA loyalists that Trump is doing what they elected him for'.
(Image: MARK FELIX, AFP /AFP via Getty Images)
Trump then is increasingly keen on using the military to quell protests against his policies. Sound familiar?
'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' he said, when asked about the situation in Los Angeles.
And that's just the start, for Americans will see lots more US military personnel and weaponry on the streets of Washington this weekend as parades marking the US Army's 250th anniversary get underway.
That there are echoes here of the Nuremberg rallies of 30s Nazi Germany has not been lost on many.
The deployment of federal troops and US Marines in Los Angeles aside, we've also seen paratroopers drop from the sky with Trump giving a partisan encore speech to troops at Fort Bragg.
This weekend it will culminate in a 'big beautiful' parade to coincide with the 'great leader's' birthday that will make last month's Victory Day parade in Moscow look quaint by comparison.
Only the most blinkered could fail to see what Trump is doing here. This, after all, is a president with whom the US military has by and large had little truck until now. Trump's timely diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels that led to his medical exemption from the military during Vietnam never did him any favours in the eyes of many veterans.
His unwillingness to recognise their sacrifice in fighting fascism in the Second World War led also to that infamous remark that Europe's military cemeteries 'were filled with losers'.
But now, for Trump, it's time to think again, for that's what despots and dictators do when they need the military onside.
All this wooing of America's armed forces with false praise allows Trump to make a point of showing executive force he always coveted but could only dream of during his first term.
Admittedly, not everyone is convinced by Trump's newfound 'celebration' of America's military might, with reports that US veterans are split over their president's true motives.
While some see it as a thing to be proud of, others remain wary of Trump's manipulation of it for his own political ends.
Which takes me back to events unfolding in Los Angeles, for here the devil lies in the detail. That detail is how Trump's administration has cited a provision in the armed forces code allowing the president to put National Guard members under federal control when there is a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion' against the authority of the US government.
It's almost as if Trump and his cabal know what's coming with regard to America's future as they cynically seek to expand the powers of his presidency by riding roughshod over America's political system of checks and balances between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Some might say so what? Trump, they argue, was elected democratically by a sweeping majority. But so too have other leaders who went on to consolidate authoritarian regimes.
Back in 1930, while appearing before a constitutional court, Adolf Hitler brazenly informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to shape the government as he saw fit.
'So, only through constitutional means?' a judge asked, to which Hitler's now infamous sharp reply was, 'Jawohl'. Yes indeed.
Just as Germany transformed politically in the 1930s before the world's eyes, likewise the momentum in America's shift toward authoritarian rule is accelerating by the day. It's high time we sat up and took notice of just what that could mean for us all.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
15 minutes ago
- NBC News
Federal judge blocks Trump from deploying National Guard to California
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard to California in the midst of the anti-ICE protests. The judge has also paused his order to give both sides time to appeal. June 13, 2025


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration seeks to distance US from Israeli strikes on Iran
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration sought to distance the United States on Thursday from Israel's strikes on Iran, attacks that are likely to complicate Trump's drive for a nuclear deal with Tehran. Israel said it had struck Iranian nuclear targets to block Tehran from developing atomic weapons, even as the Trump administration was preparing to hold a sixth round of talks on Sunday on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment program. Marco Rubio, Trump's secretary of state and national security adviser, stressed that Israel's strikes were unilateral, while saying the U.S. had known attacks would occur. "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense." Just hours before the strikes, Trump had urged a diplomatic solution to the tensions, while saying a strike on Iran "could very well happen." Iran says its nuclear energy program is only for peaceful purposes, although the International Atomic Energy Agency on Thursday declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Rubio had a stark warning for Iran, a day after the United States ordered some U.S. personnel to leave the Middle East in response to tensions in the area. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel," he said. His statement did not mention whether Washington would support Israel if it faces retaliatory strikes, a standard line in the past. Trump has been increasingly at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over both Iran and his handling of the Israel's war in Gaza, wanting to seal a deal with Tehran and accelerate food aid into Gaza. Trump and Netanyahu spoke on Monday, and Trump told reporters the main topic was Iran. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, he suggested an Israeli attack was imminent. "Well, I'd love to avoid conflict. Iran's going to have to negotiate a little tougher, meaning they're going to have to give us some things that they're not willing to give us right now," he said. Retaliation by Iran for Israel's strikes could put U.S. troops and diplomats around the region at risk, given that the United States is Israel's main backer. Security concerns had risen since Trump said on Wednesday that U.S. personnel were being moved out of the region because "it could be a dangerous place" and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. Washington and Tehran on Thursday had announced plans for another round of talks on Sunday in Oman between U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi. Whether that meeting will take place is now unclear. A Witkoff spokesperson did not immediately respond to a query.


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel's strikes on Iran show Trump is unable to restrain Netanyahu as Middle East slips closer to chaos
As Israeli jets struck targets in Iran on Friday morning, the US moved quickly to distance itself from Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to target Tehran in an escalation that threatens an all-out war in the Middle East. The unilateral strikes indicated a collapse of Donald Trump's efforts to restrain the Israeli prime minister and almost certainly scuttled Trump's efforts to negotiate a deal with Iran that would prevent the country from seeking a nuclear weapon. It also will likely lead to an Iranian retaliation that could develop into a full-scale war between Israel and Iran, a new conflict that Trump has publicly sought to avoid. As the dust was still settling from the strikes in Tehran, senior US officials were reduced to calling the Israeli strike a 'unilateral' action and warned Tehran away from retaliating against US embassies and bases in the region. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' said secretary of state Marco Rubio in a statement. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence,' he continued. 'President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel.' Washington officials and analysts had expected that Israel would hold off on launching strikes until after the US exhausted attempts to negotiate a deal with Iran. During a phone call on Monday, Trump asked Netanyahu not to attack Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported. But by Wednesday, Trump began to pull non-essential personnel out of embassies and bases in the Middle East within striking distance of Iran. Still, Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, was expected to travel to Muscat in Oman in order to conduct a sixth round of talks with Iran on Sunday in what was seen as a last chance for diplomacy. And the strikes took place just hours after Trump had publicly urged the Netanyahu government not to attack Iran, with the US president saying that he believed an Israeli offensive would 'blow' up the negotiations. 'I'd love to avoid a conflict,' Trump said in remarks from the White House on Thursday. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement … I'd much prefer an agreement. As long as I think there is an agreement I don't want them going in because I think that would blow it.' But, in a nod to speculation that the US was intentionally signaling an imminent attack against Iran, he noted that a strike could also compel Iran to make a deal that would limit its efforts to seek a nuclear weapon. 'It might help it actually but it also could blow it,' he said. That is now a reality. Critics have said the US decision to retreat from the region, stemming from Trump's decision to abandon the Iranian nuclear deal called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action under the first Trump administration has led to a greater likelihood of conflict in the region. The attack was 'clearly intended to scuttle the Trump administration's negotiations with Iran,' said Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, and is 'further evidence of how little respect world powers – including our own allies – have for President Trump'. 'This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict,' he added. 'Iran would not be this close to possessing a nuclear weapon if Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had not forced America out of the nuclear agreement with Iran that had brought Europe, Russia and China together behind the United States to successfully contain Iran's nuclear ambitions.'