logo
Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, African scholar who challenged the West, dies at 83

Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, African scholar who challenged the West, dies at 83

Boston Globe29-04-2025

Advertisement
The book was a 'classic from its inception,' philosopher Séverine Kodjo-Grandvaux wrote in Le Monde in a 2021 appraisal after Dr. Mudimbe's book was translated into French. She compared it to 'Orientalism,' Edward Said's landmark text in postcolonial studies.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Dr. Mudimbe left Congo more than four decades ago. Like other African intellectuals, he found himself unable to develop, within Africa, an outlook that criticized the West's understanding of the continent and left open the question of what was to replace it.
The tipping point for Dr. Mudimbe came in 1980, when the longtime autocratic ruler of what was then called Zaire, Mobutu Sese Seko, asked him to join his Central Committee, the country's second-highest political authority. Dr. Mudimbe had already won renown and prizes there as a novelist and essay writer and was teaching literature at the National University of Zaire in Lubumbashi.
Advertisement
At some risk, he declined Mobutu's offer and went to the United States on a Fulbright fellowship instead. He remained there for the rest of his life, teaching successively at Haverford College in Pennsylvania, Duke, and Stanford University. He returned to Duke at the end of his career.
Educated by Benedictine monks, steeped in Western philosophy and literature and in French ideas about the relation between knowledge and power that had been propagated by Michel Foucault and others, Dr. Mudimbe was troubled by Africa's image in the Western mind and by how it came to be formed.
The questions he asked led to 'The Invention of Africa' and 'The Idea of Africa,' its 1994 successor. It was after the publication of the first book that he was recruited to Duke by Marxist literary scholar Fredric Jameson, who died last year. Dr. Mudimbe spent much of his subsequent career expounding on those two works.
'Europeans have been in contact with Africa since the end of the 15th century,' Mudimbe explained to the African and African American literary periodical Callaloo in 1991. 'They have perceived Africa and Africans and written about them.'
'We can now read these stories, these descriptions,' he continued, 'and say, well, these are constructs which were made at a given moment, and today we can make others. So Europeans have invented Africa, but, today, Africans are inventing their own Africa.'
These ideas were more fully explored in the knotty prose of 'The Invention of Africa,' a book that bristles with a formidable erudition acquired at universities on three continents. In that book, Dr. Mudimbe explored the relationship between Western knowledge and Western domination as it relates to Africa.
Advertisement
'In the accounts of 'explorers' on the Continent,' Mudimbe wrote, 'the discourse on 'savages' is, for the first time, a discourse in which an explicit political power presumes the authority of a scientific knowledge, and vice versa.'
He added: 'Colonialism becomes its project and can be thought of as a duplication and a fulfillment of the power of Western discourses on human varieties.'
The anthropologists who shaped Western views of Africa were no more than the 'scientific adviser' of the 'colonizer,' Dr. Mudimbe wrote.
Dr. Mudimbe's analysis was shaped by 'an extraordinary mastery of the European intellectual world,' Mamadou Diouf, director of Columbia University's Institute for African Studies, said in an interview. He could, he added, 'engage in the epistemological discussion from several different angles: He reflected on Africa from an African angle, and he reflected on the way in which Africa was conceived from Europe.'
The concept of the 'colonial library' became Dr. Mudimbe's trademark. It has colored appreciations of the vast body of European literature on Africa since he first touched on it. These books were the foundations of 'colonial reason,' Dr. Mudimbe wrote in the 'Encyclopedia of African Religions and Philosophy,' and were critical in 'erasing African differences and their impulses.'
He added that under this intellectual domination, the 'evidence belonged to the Western 'sensus communis,'' or common sense, 'supported and justified by a body of knowledge — a colonial library.'
Dr. Mudimbe's approach was not without its critics. The same was true of his difficult writing style, every page larded with references to his heroes and his goats — Foucault, Malinowski, Evans-Pritchard, Sartre, Lévi-Strauss and others more obscure.
Advertisement
Some philosophers have faulted him for overreliance on the very Western modes of thinking and intellectual constructs that he appeared to want Africans to be liberated from.
'Mudimbe's project is a circle; he criticized the Western discourse on Africa, even while making use of this discourse,' Cameroonian philosopher Jean-Godefroy Bidima wrote in 'La Philosophie Négro-Africaine' (1998). And in an interview, Stephen Smith, an emeritus professor of African studies at Duke, said that 'there is some contradiction' in Mudimbe's books, adding, 'If you say the truth of Africa is in the eye of the beholders, you have to ask: Why do so many beholders hold that truth?'
Dr. Mudimbe was unapologetic. 'To the question 'What is Africa?' or 'How to define African cultures?' one today cannot but refer to a body of knowledge in which Africa has been subsumed by Western disciplines such as anthropology, history, theology or whatever other scientific discourse,' he told Callaloo. 'And this is the level on which to situate my project.'
Valentin-Yves Mudimbe was born Dec. 8, 1941, in Likasi, in the Katanga province of what was then the Belgian Congo, to Gustave Tshiluila, a civil servant, and Victorine Ngalula. At a young age, he said in 1991, he 'began living with Benedictine monks as a seminarist' in Kakanda, in pre-independence Congo. He had 'no contact with the external world, even with my family, and indeed had no vacations.'
When he was 17 or 18, he recalled, he decided to become a monk, this time among the Benedictine 'White Fathers' of Gihindamuyaga, in Rwanda. But in his early 20s, already 'completely francophonized,' he abandoned the religious life and entered Lovanium University in Kinshasa, graduating in 1966 with a degree in Romance philology. In 1970, he received a doctorate in philosophy and literature from the Catholic University of Louvain, in Belgium. He then returned to Congo to teach.
Advertisement
In the 1970s, Dr. Mudimbe published, among other writings, three novels, all translated into English: 'Entre les Eaux' (1973), published in English as 'Between the Waters'; 'Le Bel Immonde' ('Before the Birth of the Moon,' 1976); and 'L'Écart' ('The Rift,' 1979). The principal characters in these novels 'find it impossible to tie themselves to anything solid,' scholar Nadia Yala Kisukidi commented in Le Monde.
At the end of the 1970s, when the offer came from Mobutu to be 'in charge of, I guess, ideology and things like that,' as Dr. Mudimbe put it to Callaloo, he reflected that 'I didn't think of myself and I still don't think of myself as a politician.'
After he established himself in the United States, his focus turned to essays and philosophy; among other books, he wrote 'L'Odeur du Père' (1982), 'Parables and Fables' (1991) and 'Tales of Faith' (1997).
Dr. Mudimbe is survived by his sons, Daniel and Claude; a brother, Achille Ngoie; a sister, Josette Shaje; and two grandchildren. His marriage to scholar Elisabeth Mudimbe-Boyi in 1966 ended in divorce in 2022.
'He said that the tragedy of African thinkers was not to be able to get out of the colonial library,' Diouf said. 'He was looking for ways to think about Africa outside of the colonial library.' But perhaps, he added, 'he didn't take into enough account other libraries.'
This article originally appeared in
Advertisement

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most NATO armies likely 'could not meet Ukrainian standards' in combat effectiveness, retired US Army general says
Most NATO armies likely 'could not meet Ukrainian standards' in combat effectiveness, retired US Army general says

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Most NATO armies likely 'could not meet Ukrainian standards' in combat effectiveness, retired US Army general says

A retired US Army general said it's most of NATO, not Ukraine, that has to learn from the other about combat. Ret. Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges was asked in a video interview with the Kyiv Post, published on Tuesday, about what Ukraine's NATO allies could do to help Kyiv's military reach Western standards. But Hodges flipped the question on its head. "Well, actually, it's not about meeting Western standards. Most NATO armies could not meet Ukrainian standards, in terms of actual combat effectiveness," said Hodges, who was the US Army's commanding general in Europe from 2014 to 2017. Hodges highlighted what he said was a gap in NATO capabilities, such as poor cohesion among fighting units from different member states. "We still cannot communicate securely with British or German units," Hodges said. "So I think the Ukrainians kind of look down their noses at us a little bit, you know, when they hear us go: 'We're going to come help train you.'" "We should be begging them to help us learn how to do what they're doing," he continued. NATO said in May that it has trained roughly 192,000 Ukrainian personnel so far. Some were sent to NATO sites to learn how to use Western equipment. At least a dozen brigades were also directly instructed outside Ukraine on tactics and maneuvers by European and American military trainers. Some units have criticized parts of that training, saying there were gaps between what they were taught and the battlefield's realities. The dominant use of cheap hobby drones as deadly weapons, for example, is a new development that's changed the face of war. In his interview, Hodges also cited Kyiv's naval operations in the Black Sea as an example of what NATO forces could learn. "They have shown the entire world that you can defeat a conventional navy, at least in an enclosed body of water like the Black Sea, without having to have capital ships of your own. Lots for us to learn there," he said. "That may not apply in the Atlantic Ocean, but certainly in the Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, these kinds of things. I hope we are paying attention," Hodges added. Romania and Bulgaria, he said, could benefit from building up fleets of uncrewed vessels the way Ukraine created and used its own to counter Russia's Black Sea Fleet. Hodges said he was also impressed by Ukraine's integrated air and missile defense to give it a clear picture of all the incoming aerial threats it's facing at any given time, such as fighter jets, missiles, or drones. "The Ukrainians have developed that for themselves. I would want to be confident that we have a shared picture between them, Poland, Baltic countries, Germany, the US, Romania, for example, Turkey," he said. He said the right system would help prevent NATO states from using the wrong weapons to take down targets. "You're not going to waste Patriots on drones," Hodges said. In February, NATO inaugurated a department in Poland called the NATO-Ukraine Joint Analysis, Training, and Education Center. The alliance said the center would focus on gleaning lessons from the war in Ukraine to "better position NATO's deterrence." Meanwhile, Hodges said that Ukraine does have to learn how to reshape its military as an institution. Much of the country's forces were built on a Soviet organizational culture that Ukrainian troops frequently bemoan as a source of poor decision-making and unnecessary bureaucracy. "That means that the government has got to earn the confidence of the people," Hodges said. "That their sons or daughters will not get sent off to the war until they are properly trained, properly equipped, and put into a well-trained, ready unit."

Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups

time2 hours ago

Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups

ON A PLANE OVER UPPER NILE STATE, South Sudan -- Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week's air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former U.S. intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world's deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend that could allow governments or combatants to use life-saving aid to control hungry civilian populations and advance war aims. In South Sudan and Gaza, two for-profit U.S. companies led by American national security veterans are delivering aid in operations backed by the South Sudanese and Israeli governments. The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the U.S. company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force. 'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow President Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital. But the U.N. and many leading non-profit groups say U.S. contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones. 'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America. ''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.' Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, corn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir. Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups. Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government. But, he maintained: 'We don't want to replace any entity' in aid work. Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to use barges to bring aid to Gaza, where Israeli restrictions were blocking overland deliveries. The United States focused instead on a U.S. military effort to land aid via a temporary pier. Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops in Sudan and South Sudan, east African nations where wars have created some of the world's gravest humanitarian crises. Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former U.N. World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser. Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired U.S. security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the U.N., which Israel says has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups. Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations. Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them. The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces. It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the U.S. says it's not funding it. In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring "expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.' Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops. Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground. After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has struggled to emerge from a civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people. Rights groups say its government is one of the world's most corrupt, and until now has invested little in quelling the dire humanitarian crisis. South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the Trump administration's deep cuts in U.S. Agency for International Development funding. Humanitarian Minister Albino Akol Atak said the drops will expand to help people in need throughout the country. But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives. 'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop," said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group. Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the U.N. World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.' 'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said. In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles. Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution. When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council. Sometimes, that set-up will advance strategic aims, as with Netanyahu's plans to move Gaza's civilians south, Egeland said. The involvement of soldiers and security workers, he added, can make it too 'intimidating' for some in need to even try to get aid. Until now, Western donors always understood those risks, Egeland said. But pointing to the Trump administration's backing of the new aid system in Gaza, he asked: 'Why does the U.S. ... want to support what they have resisted with every other war zone for two generations?' Mark Millar, who has advised the U.N. and Britain on humanitarian matters in South Sudan and elsewhere, said involving private military contractors risks undermining the distinction between humanitarian assistance and armed conflict. Private military contractors 'have even less sympathy for a humanitarian perspective that complicates their business-driven model," he said. 'And once let loose, they seem to be even less accountable.' Knickmeyer reported from Washington. Mednick reported from Tel Aviv, Israel. ___

Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups
Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups

ON A PLANE OVER UPPER NILE STATE, South Sudan (AP) — Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week's air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former U.S. intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world's deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend that could allow governments or combatants to use life-saving aid to control hungry civilian populations and advance war aims. In South Sudan and Gaza, two for-profit U.S. companies led by American national security veterans are delivering aid in operations backed by the South Sudanese and Israeli governments. The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the U.S. company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force. 'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow President Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital. But the U.N. and many leading non-profit groups say U.S. contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones. 'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America. ''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.' 'We don't want to replace any entity' Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, corn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir. Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups. Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government. Shared roots in Gaza and U.S. intelligence Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to use barges to bring aid to Gaza, where Israeli restrictions were blocking overland deliveries. The United States focused instead on a U.S. military effort to land aid via a temporary pier. Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops in Sudan and South Sudan, east African nations where wars have created some of the world's gravest humanitarian crises. Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former U.N. World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser. Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired U.S. security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the U.N., which Israel says has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups. Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations. Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them. The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces. It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the U.S. says it's not funding it. In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring "expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.' South Sudan's people ask: Who's gett ing our aid drops? Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops. Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground. After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has struggled to emerge from a civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people. Rights groups say its government is one of the world's most corrupt, and until now has invested little in quelling the dire humanitarian crisis. South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the Trump administration's deep cuts in U.S. Agency for International Development funding. Humanitarian Minister Albino Akol Atak said the drops will expand to help people in need throughout the country. But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives. 'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop," said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group. Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the U.N. World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.' 'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said. In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles. A 'business-driven model' Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution. When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council. Sometimes, that set-up will advance strategic aims, as with Netanyahu's plans to move Gaza's civilians south, Egeland said. The involvement of soldiers and security workers, he added, can make it too 'intimidating' for some in need to even try to get aid. Until now, Western donors always understood those risks, Egeland said. But pointing to the Trump administration's backing of the new aid system in Gaza, he asked: 'Why does the U.S. ... want to support what they have resisted with every other war zone for two generations?' Mark Millar, who has advised the U.N. and Britain on humanitarian matters in South Sudan and elsewhere, said involving private military contractors risks undermining the distinction between humanitarian assistance and armed conflict. Private military contractors 'have even less sympathy for a humanitarian perspective that complicates their business-driven model," he said. 'And once let loose, they seem to be even less accountable.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store