'Bringing an island back to life': TN govt's Rs 50 crore effort to restore Kariyachalli with 8,500 reef modules, local divers
Artificial coral reef modules that will protect the island's shoreline
Villagers from Tuticorin will soon be diving into the sea, not for recreation, but as part of a bigger mission to help revive a vanishing island in the Gulf of Mannar. The Tamil Nadu govt has launched a Rs 50cr conservation project to restore Kariyachalli Island, one of 21 ecologically fragile islands in the rapidly eroding Gulf of Mannar Marine National Park.
The initiative, part of the TN Sustainably Harnessing Ocean Resources (TNSHORE) programme, aims to boost climate resilience, preserve marine biodiversity and support sustainable livelihoods for coastal communities.
Located off Tuticorin coast, Kariyachalli island, a small strip between India and Sri Lanka, serves as a natural barrier against cyclones and tsunamis, a function brought into focus during the 2004 tsunami.
The island is surrounded by rich coral reefs and seagrass beds that support diverse marine life and provide livelihood support to thousands of small-scale fisherfolk.
The island, however, has lost more than 71% of its land area, shrinking from 20.85ha in 1969 to 5.97ha in 2018, due to sea level rise and degradation of surrounding coral reefs and sea-grass.
Under this initiative, the govt will use 8,500 multipurpose artificial coral reef modules — designed by IIT Madras based on wave dynamicsand bathymetry studies — to protect the island's shoreline, reduce wave energy and increase sediment deposition.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Wolsztyn: ten aparat słuchowy może zmienić wszystko w 2025 roku
GEERS
Undo
'These are ferrocementand-steel trapezoidal structures. Corals will be placed on them and the structures submerged. We will be roping in 300 local fishing villagers to dive in, to place these structures. The heights will vary based on terrain. The growth of corals will be monitored regularly,' says environment secretary Supriya Sahu.
The modules, three tonnes each and perforated to support nutrient flow, are expected to act as wave breaks and create marine habitats.
The island's water depths too have been reduced to half a metre from 3m years ago, say scientists. This project may help get back land area. The model being used here is similar to the interventions at Vaan Island that began in 2015 and, within five years, led to measurable gains in land area, shallower waters, and coral regrowth involving more than 37 species.
At Kariyachalli, plans include scientifically restoring two acres of degraded coral reef and three acres of seagrass beds, ecosystems that play a critical role in carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation and shoreline protection.
'A good sea-grass cover will invite dugongs (sea cows) which feed on seagrass. It will boost the ecological character of the islands, and also open up eco-tourism initiatives,' says Supriya, adding that if interventions aren't done, the island will be lost by 2030.
'It takes between five and seven years for an artificial reef to mature enough to resemble a natural reef, with corals growing at about 1cm per year. Work will begin in a month.'
Heat resilient corals must be grown in the nurseries, says Ramasubramanian R of Coastal and Marine Systems at M S Swaminathan Research Institute. 'Only these can survive rising temperatures. If some corals die as the reef develops, new colonies can emerge. This approach has seen success globally but needs constant monitoring and nurturing of corals in laboratory conditions.' The modules will provide nutrition to organisms attached to them.
Placed at 20m gaps, they will also improve fish production.
Villagers from Sippikulam and Pattinamaruthoor which are within a 12km radius of the island, will be engaged through capacity building, training, and support for eco-tourism and alternative livelihoods.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dino Morea summoned by ED in Mithi River Distilling case
Dino Morea is in trouble. The Enforcement Directorate summoned the Bollywood actor. This is regarding the Rs 65 crore Mithi River desilting scam. Raids occurred at his Mumbai home and other locations. His brother Santino is also under investigation. The ED case is based on a Mumbai Police FIR. It alleges irregularities in Mithi River desilting tenders from 2017-2023. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Enforcement Directorate on Saturday summoned Bollywood actor Dino Morea to appear before it next week in the Rs 65 crore Mithi River Desilting scam Thursday, the agency had raided 15 locations, including the actor's home in Bandra (West), Mumbai . The raids covered other premises located in Mumbai in Maharashtra and Kochi in linked to Morea's brother Santino were also raided, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) officials, contractors and some others, the sources said on Thursday. The investigation is being conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), they ED case stems from a Mumbai Police economic offences wing (EOW) FIR filed in May against 13 people, including contractors and civic officials, for an alleged Rs 65.54 crore scam in the tenders awarded from 2017-2023 for desilting of the Mithi river which flows through Mumbai and acts as a stormwater drainage channel for the metro Uddhav Thackeray-led undivided Shiv Sena controlled the cash-rich BMC from 1997 till the party's split in 2022. After the expiry of the general body in 2022, the civic body was controlled by the state government, which was then headed by Eknath was alleged by the police in its complaint that BMC officials tailored the tender for the desilting contract in such a way that it benefited a particular supplier of machinery, and the contractors reportedly generated fraudulent bills for transporting the sludge out of and his brother were questioned by the Mumbai Police EOW in this case last month. The 49-year-old actor has been questioned twice by Morea brothers were questioned by the police about their alleged links with alleged middleman Ketan Kadam, arrested in the case along with another accused, Jai Joshi, apart from some financial transactions made in a company linked to is the second time that the actor has been in the crosshairs of the ED, In 2021, the agency had attached his assets as part of a money laundering investigation linked to an alleged bank fraud case against Gujarat-based pharmaceutical company Sterling Biotech and its plan to desilt the river was planned by the Mumbai civic authorities following the 2005 floods, which brought the city to a grinding halt.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Stopped for tea break': RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav escapes unhurt as his convoy hit by truck in Bihar; 3 security personnel injured
Tejashwi Yadav NEW DELHI: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav escaped unharmed when a speeding truck collided with two vehicles in his convoy in Bihar's Vaishali district early Saturday, injuring three security personnel. The incident occurred around 12.30am near Goraul on the Patna-Muzaffarpur national highway when the convoy had stopped for a tea break while returning to Patna from Madhepura. The opposition leader's vehicle was not struck in the accident, according to a senior police officer. The three injured security personnel were taken to the nearest government hospital, where their condition was reported as stable. Yadav visited the injured personnel at the hospital to check on their condition. "The accident took place when we were returning from Madhepura to Patna. We had stopped for a tea break near Goraul. A speeding truck rammed into two vehicles of my convoy, injuring three security personnel. I immediately alerted the district police and the administration. The accident took place just five feet away from my vehicle," Yadav told reporters at the hospital. The police have arrested the truck driver and seized the vehicle. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "Action should be taken against those who violate traffic rules," Yadav said. The authorities are investigating the incident, which occurred just five feet away from the opposition leader's vehicle during their return journey from Madhepura to Patna. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump's ambition collides with law on sending migrants to dangerous countries
As the Trump administration ships migrants to countries around the world, it is abandoning a long-standing US policy of not sending people to places where they would be at risk of torture and other persecution. The principle emerged in international human rights law after World War II and is also embedded in US domestic law. It is called "non-refoulement," derived from a French word for return. The issue came into sharp relief in the past month as the Trump administration has tried to deport migrants with criminal records to Libya and South Sudan, countries considered so dangerous that they are on the State Department 's "do not travel" list. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Birla Evara 3 and 4 BHK from ₹ 1.68 Crore* Birla Estates Learn More Undo "What the US is doing runs afoul of the bedrock prohibition in US and international law of non-refoulement," said Robert K. Goldman, faculty director of the War Crimes Research Office at American University's law school. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) In a recent affidavit, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the Trump administration's efforts to send migrants to those two countries as part of a diplomatic push to improve relations. He acknowledged that the Libyan capital, Tripoli, was wracked by violence and instability. Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump administration proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visas: memo To critics of the administration, the sworn statement shows that the United States is no longer considering whether a deportee is more likely than not to be at risk of abuse through repatriation or transfer to a third country. State Department employees were also recently told to stop noting in annual human rights reports whether a nation had violated its obligations not to send anyone "to a country where they would face torture or persecution." The State Department said in a statement that it dropped that requirement to focus the reports on "human rights issues themselves rather than a laundry list of politically biased demands and assertions." "Enforcing US immigration law, including removing those without a legal basis to remain in the United States, is critical to upholding the rule of law and protecting Americans," the statement said. You Might Also Like: Trump's ban on Harvard international students blocked by US judge A judge blocked the transfer of migrants to South Sudan, which is teetering on the brink of civil war, and the men were being held at a US military outpost in Djibouti pending more court action. The Trump administration is also in a showdown in another court over its transfer of Venezuelan deportees described as dangerous gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process. "If they were sending them to Sweden, that would be a different thing than sending them to South Sudan, which is one of the most dangerous places on the planet," said Michael H. Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University's Stern School of Business. Posner, who was the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor from 2009 to 2013, said the United States could send someone from Cuba or Venezuela to another country if it had been determined at a hearing that the place was safe. "We should not be deporting people to third countries where they have no connections and where their lives will be in serious jeopardy," he said. You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban: Why is Trump banning millions from entering the US again? The White House likens its crackdown on illegal migration to combating a national security threat from a hostile enemy. It has pressed military troops into service at the southwestern border and at a small detention operation for migrants at Guantánamo Bay. But even after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States abided by its non-refoulement obligation for prisoners it was holding at Guantánamo Bay, during a period when it flouted international law by torturing other detainees in secret overseas prisons called black sites. In 2004, Secretary of State Colin Powell concluded that the United States would not repatriate Chinese citizens from the Uyghur Muslim minority who had been rounded up in the war against terrorism in 2001 and held at the military base at Guantánamo. The United States believed that the men would be at risk if they were sent to China. Eventually, in 2013, the State Department found other countries to take in all of the Uyghurs. In the past, State Department officials have essentially asked two questions to determine where a detainee could be sent: Would the destination be safe for the individual? Would the United States and its allies be safe if the person was sent there? US officials had to assess whether the receiving country could monitor the activities of the detainees to prevent them from endangering the United States or an ally. Officials were also required to assess whether a deportee would be subjected to torture or other inhumane treatment. The United States adopted the same approach to its efforts to send home Islamic State group members or their relatives who were being housed in camps in northern Syria. "Consistent with both long-standing policy and its legal obligations, the US government cannot send people to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe that they will be mistreated," said Ian Moss, a lawyer and a former senior counterterrorism official at the State Department. In his affidavit, Rubio accused the courts that were reviewing deportation challenges of undermining US foreign policy. He also said that plans to announce "expanded activities of a US energy company in Libya" had been postponed. Rubio did not mention whether any diplomatic agreements surrounding the proposed resettlement included guarantees about how the migrants would be treated. "If these individuals are as dangerous as the administration represents them to be," Moss said, "sending them to a conflict area or country where there is a lack of capacity to manage them undermines the national security justification," Moss said. The State Department statement referred questions about "the removals process, including screening for credible or reasonable fear," to the Department of Homeland Security . The eight men who were to be sent to South Sudan were at a holding site in Texas when they were informed of their destination. An immigration division official, Garrett J. Ripa, said in a sworn statement May 23 that none of the men declared himself afraid to go. Court records showed that an immigration officer gave the men a form that listed their intended place of deportation. None signed the document. "By not signing, people are protesting being sent to a third country in the only way they know how," said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants in the case. Administration officials had previously planned to deport one of the men to Libya, which has been so unstable that Congress has since 2015 not allowed detainees who are cleared for release from Guantánamo Bay to be sent there.
