logo
From Blue Sky Research To Next-Gen AI: Europe's Innovation Crossroads

From Blue Sky Research To Next-Gen AI: Europe's Innovation Crossroads

Forbesa day ago

By Dr. Stefano Tasselli
Europe stands at an innovation crossroads. While the United States dominates the AI landscape and China leads in electric vehicle production, the European Union - despite representing 17% of global GDP - struggles to translate its research excellence into market-dominating technologies. New data reveals both challenges and opportunities for European innovation in an increasingly competitive global landscape.
The wealth gap between the EU and US, which was 17% in 2002, has widened to 30% in 2023, with 72% of this gap attributed to productivity differentials rather than labor contribution. A stark illustration of this divide appears in market capitalisation figures: US companies' capitalisation is nearly nine times that of EU companies (20.4 versus 2.3 USD trillions), with both East Asia and Arab countries exceeding EU capitalisation.
"Only four of the world's top 50 tech companies are European," notes a recent EU competitiveness report. This technological divide is particularly apparent in emerging sectors:
Perhaps most concerning is Europe's struggle to retain its innovations. Between 2008 and 2021, EU countries produced 147 "unicorns" (startups valued over $1 billion) - but 40 subsequently relocated their headquarters abroad, primarily to the United States.
(Original Caption) Space Center Houston: The Space Shuttle Challenger orbits over a blue Earth ... More speckled with white clouds during its STS-7 mission. This photo was taken by a remote camera aboard the SPAS satellite during the six day flight.
Europe's complex regulatory environment may contribute to its innovation challenges. Currently, the EU operates with approximately 100 tech-focused laws and more than 270 digital networks regulators across member states.
"The net effect of this burden of regulation is that only larger companies - which are often non-EU based - have the financial capacity and incentive to bear the costs of complying," the EU competitiveness report observes.
This regulatory environment creates particularly high barriers for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which form the backbone of the European economy. While 30% of large European companies utilize AI, only 7% of SMEs do - a critical gap considering that over 90% of European companies are classified as "micro" or "small."
As AI development costs escalate - with training next-generation systems potentially reaching $10 billion by 2030 - the ability of European companies to compete independently diminishes without strategic intervention.
Research investment reflects similar patterns. The aggregate R&D expenditure in the US reached 762 billion PPP USD in 2022, followed by China at 620 billion. Germany, the highest-spending EU country, invested just 131 billion USD, with all other EU nations below 100 billion.
Education statistics tell a related story. Among OECD countries, Canada leads with 54% of its population holding tertiary education, followed by Israel (49%), Japan (48%), South Korea (46%), Taiwan (45%), and the US (44%). None of Europe's four largest economies exceeds 35%.
Despite these challenges, several strategic approaches could strengthen Europe's position in the global innovation landscape:
Europe could capitalise on its historical role as a global trade leader. The EU has traditionally accounted for nearly 20% of global trade in goods and services. By harmonis
ing trade policies and investing in bridge-building technologies across different regions, Europe could position itself as a crucial connector in the global innovation ecosystem.
"Recent estimates suggest that this role is declining, with 10% of potential EU GDP hampered by remaining trade frictions in the EU," according to a 2019 European Commission discussion paper - highlighting both the challenge and opportunity.
Europe's emphasis on high-quality standards and sustainability presents another avenue for innovation leadership. Recent research suggests that "setting and implementing high standards of design, production and consumption might be a European way to reacquire centrality in the innovation value chain."
This approach would leverage existing European strengths, including:
The "European dream" of balancing growth with inclusion remains powerful. European countries dominate global rankings of healthcare systems characterized by universal access and defining health as a right rather than a commodity.
While aging populations, migration pressures, and public deficits challenge these achievements, they represent distinctive European values that could drive innovation focused on social as well as economic returns.
Europe's innovation future depends on balancing its regulatory tradition with growth-oriented policies. Energy costs remain a significant challenge, with European companies paying 2-3 times more for electricity and 4-5 times more for natural gas than their US counterparts.
To compete in emerging technologies like AI and quantum computing, Europe must address these fundamental cost issues while creating environments where innovation can flourish within its distinctive model of sustainable, human-centered development.
As Antoine de Saint-Exupéry observed, "A pile of rocks ceases to be a rock pile when somebody contemplates it with the idea of a cathedral in mind." Europe's innovation challenge now lies in constructing that cathedral - building on its foundational strengths while adapting to a rapidly changing technological landscape.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Marco Rubio declares war on the global censors
Opinion - Marco Rubio declares war on the global censors

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Marco Rubio declares war on the global censors

Winston Churchill once warned that 'appeasement is feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last.' When it comes to the crocodile of censorship, history is strewn with defenders who later became digestives. Censorship produces an insatiable appetite for greater and greater speech limits, and today's censorship supporters often become tomorrow's censored subjects. This week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stopped feeding the crocodile. On May 28, 2025, Rubio shocked many of our allies by issuing a new visa restriction policy that bars foreign nationals deemed 'responsible for censorship of protected expression' in the U.S. The new policy follows a major address by Vice President J.D. Vance in Munich challenging our European allies to end their systematic attacks on free speech. Vance declared, 'If you are running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing America can do for you. Nor, for that matter, is there anything that you can do for the American people that elected me and elected President Trump.' At the time, I called the speech 'Churchillian' in drawing a bright line for the free world. Rubio's action is no less impressive and even more impactful. Europe has faced no consequences for its aggressive efforts at transnational censorship. Indeed, this should not be a fight for the administration alone. Congress should explore reciprocal penalties for foreign governments targeting American companies or citizens for engaging in protected speech. After Vance spoke in Munich, I spoke in Berlin at the World Forum, where European leaders gathered in one of the most strikingly anti-free speech conferences I have attended. This year's forum embraced the slogan 'A New World Order with European Values.' That 'new world order' is based on an aggressive anti-free speech platform that has been enforced for years by the European Union. At the heart of this effort is the Digital Services Act, a draconian law that allows for sweeping censorship and speech prosecutions. Most importantly, it has been used by the EU to threaten American corporations for their failure to censor Americans and others on social media sites. After the World Forum, I returned home to warn that this is now an existential war over a right that defines us as a people —the very 'Indispensable Right' identified by Justice Louis Brandeis, which is essential for every other right in the Constitution. The irony was crushing. I wrote about how this nation has fought to protect our rights in world wars, yet many in Congress simply shrug or even support the effort as other countries move to make Americans censor other Americans. What was most unnerving about Berlin was how Americans have encouraged Europeans to target their fellow citizens. At the forum was Hillary Clinton who, after Elon Musk purchased Twitter on a pledge to dismantle its massive censorship system, called upon the EU to use the Digital Services Act to force him to resume censorship. Other Americans have appeared before the EU to call upon it to oppose the U.S. Nina Jankowicz, the former head of President Joe Biden's infamous Disinformation Governance Board, has recently returned to he EU to rally other nations to oppose what she described as 'the autocracy, the United States of America.' She warned that the Digital Services Act was under attack, and that the EU had to fight and beat the U.S.: 'Do not capitulate. Hold the line.' Former European Commissioner for Internal Markets and Services Thierry Breton even threatened Musk for interviewing Trump before our last presidential election. He told Musk that he was being 'monitored' in conducting any interview with now-President Trump. The EU is doubling down on these efforts, including threatening Musk with prosecution and massive confiscatory fines if he does not resume censoring users of X. The penalties are expected to exceed $1 billion. Other countries are following suit. Brazilian Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes shut down X in his entire country over Musk's refusal to remove political posts. These countries could remotely control speech within the U.S., forcing companies like X to meet the lowest common denominator set by the EU and anti-free speech groups. There are free speech concerns even in such measures designed to protect free speech. This policy should be confined to government officials, particularly EU officials, who are actively seeking to export European censorship systems worldwide. It should not extend to academics or individuals who are part of the growing anti-free speech movement. Free speech itself can counter those voices. These are the same voices that we have heard throughout history, often using the very same terms and claims to silence others. However, Rubio showed Europe that the U.S. would not simply stand by as European censors determined what Americans could say, read, or watch. As the EU threatens companies like X with billion-dollar fines, it is time for the U.S. to treat this as an attack on our citizens from abroad. Franklin Delano Roosevelt put it simply during World War II: 'No man can tame a tiger into a kitten by stroking it.' It is time to get serious about the European threat to free speech. And Rubio is doing just that — finally imposing real consequences for censorship. We are not going to defeat censors by yelling at them. Speech alone clearly does not impress them. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of 'The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

France's prison population reaches record high
France's prison population reaches record high

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

France's prison population reaches record high

France's prison population has reached a record high of more than 80,000 inmates amid a government drive for fast-track justice. Over the past year, the number of people incarcerated grew by 6,000, taking the occupancy rate to 133.7 per cent. France now has 83,681 inmates held in facilities that have a total capacity of just 62,570. That figure is around 30 per cent worse than in England and Wales, where there are 88,000 prisoners and 89,000 places, figures last month showed. The record overcrowding has seen 23 out of France's 186 detention facilities operating at more than twice their capacity, forcing some prisoners to sleep on mattresses on the floor. The policy of fast-track justice in Emmanuel Macron's government, where prosecutors can bring a person to trial soon after being taken into custody, has been blamed for the situation. These immediate hearings mean more people can be sentenced in a shorter amount of time, funnelling people into prison at a faster rate. In 90 per cent of these cases, the outcome of these fast-track hearings is detention, whether pre-trial or to serve out a sentence, according to Dominique Simonnot, the head of a prison watchdog group in France. France now sits behind Cyprus as the second worst country in the European Union for prison overcrowding, according to latest statistics. Separate data published by Eurostat, the EU's statistical office, found that the highest overcrowding was observed in Cyprus, with an occupancy rate of 226.2, France at 122.9, and Italy at 119.1. Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin, a hardline figure in Mr Macron's cabinet, unveiled proposals last month to house the country's most dangerous prisoners in French Guiana - an overseas territory situated north of Brazil - to try and accommodate the overflow. Prison overcrowding is 'bad for absolutely everyone,' Mr Darmanin said in late April, citing the 'appalling conditions' for prisoners and 'the insecurity and violence' faced by prison officers. That same month, 10 French prisons, from Paris to Marseille in the south, were hit by coordinated attacks in response to government attempts to tackle drug trafficking. In the space of two days arsonists set fires to parked cars, many belonging to prison staff, outside jails in Villepinte, Nanterre, Aix-Luynes and Valence, while the entrance to one prison in Toulon was sprayed with more than a dozen bullets from an automatic weapon. No injuries were reported. No group claimed responsibility for the attacks, but Le Parisien newspaper reported that vandalised cars were found tagged with the letters DDPF, which stands for Defending the Rights of French Prisoners. A law currently going through the French parliament would also create a special prosecutor's office to deal with narcotics crimes and give new powers to investigators. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Building An ‘AI-First' Culture: What Does That Even Mean?
Building An ‘AI-First' Culture: What Does That Even Mean?

Forbes

time15 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Building An ‘AI-First' Culture: What Does That Even Mean?

AI-first means people-first Lately, there's been no shortage of talk of managing organizations around 'AI-first' approaches, meaning managers would consider whether AI could do a job, or set of tasks, before humans are brought in. But AI-first goes deeper than that, suggesting an organization's entire culture can be redesigned to incorporate the broad intelligence solutions that AI platforms and tools can offer. How would such an organization look, and is this something a decades-old company could pull off? Cisco Systems, which was founded more than 40 years ago, has been undertaking such a transformation over the past three years across all aspects of its business. This includes transforming 'the way that we build product, the way that our products get used by customers, the way that we actually get jobs done within the company,' said Jeetu Patel, president and chief product officer for Cisco. Even in what is one of the most technology-savvy companies in the world, such an effort will meet resistance, Patel recently explained on a recent episode of Michael Krigsman's CXOTalk. 'It's a cultural shift. It's actually fraught with a level of skepticism." Still, 'If you looked at us a year and a half, two years ago, no one would have really said that Cisco is AI first,' he said. An issue being encountered is 'people have actually been afraid of AI, saying, 'Hey, AI's going to take my job, so I'm not going to go out and use it,' Patel added. 'I actually find that it's less about AI taking your job, it's more about someone that uses AI better than you in their jobs is probably the one who's going to take your job.' Ultimately, 'the dexterity that you need to show in the way in which you do everything with AI is going to be pretty important,' he said. 'We've always felt like there's only going to be two kinds of companies in the world. Ones that are dexterous with the use of AI, and others who really struggle for relevance.' There are three key considerations in building an AI-first culture, Patel explained: Customers are also part of the transformation to an AI-first culture. 'One area that we struggle with is that the pace and rate of change is so fast that communicating that to our customers and having them digest that change is a challenge,' said Patel. 'I don't think we've cracked the code on that.' Customers have a view of Cisco from more than three years back, 'and frankly, it's an entirely different company than what it used to be three years ago,' he added. 'I feel like there's so much coming at people all the time that you have to make sure that you distill it down to a few things that make sense.' For example, AI is accelerating the company's responses to support tickets. It also is helping to reduce overhead costs. On the sales side, AI will help accelerate sales meetings, as well as legal and accounting processes involved with the sale. 'All of those things will have AI as a pretty critical component of it, and I do feel like the sales process is going to change quite materially over the course of the next few years. And you will never be in this position where you go completely blind and unprepared into a conversation because AI can get you prepared within a very, very compressed amount of time on what needs to happen.' What's important now for the new generation that's entering the workforce – as well as existing workers – is not to operate out of fear of AI, Patel advised. 'You have to operate from a place of looking at the possibilities and looking at the opportunities that actually can be unlocked. I would urge people to just have a very different kind of mental model, which is, there's nothing that should stop us from actually being curious about how we might be able to use AI, and this technology is going to get easier and easier and easier, where no longer is technical dexterity going to be an impediment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store