logo
ACT raises the age of criminal responsibility to 14

ACT raises the age of criminal responsibility to 14

The sound of leather pounding leather punctuates the cold Canberra night.
In an unassuming gym next to a church, young people have found purpose and a safe haven through boxing.
Some are "doing it tough", others have been in and out of the criminal justice system.
"Boxing is all about discipline, respect and working hard. If you can develop those here and then you can take those out into life," Cuz Boxing founder Joe Hedger said.
"When they come to the gym, we can just see their confidence and self-esteem build."
The Bundjalung and Yorta Yorta man has been running boxing classes for two decades and knows the power of diverting kids away from detention.
"Young people don't belong behind bars," he said.
The ACT will make history tomorrow as the first Australian jurisdiction to raise to 14 the age at which a child can be held responsible for a crime.
The move has been applauded by experts and advocates, who say locking up young people only entrenches crime and disproportionately impacts First Nations families.
But already-stretched services in the territory warn that without more funding, they will struggle to support the volume of children diverted their way.
Across Australia, children as young as 10 can be imprisoned.
The ACT first raised the age of criminal responsibility to 12 in November 2023, with the intention to increase it again to 14 this July.
Rather than facing charges, children will be referred to a therapeutic support panel to help address the causes of their offending.
There will be exceptions for serious crimes, including murder, intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm and specific sexual offences.
National Children's commissioner Anne Hollonds commended the ACT's approach, at a time when she said the political will to raise the age had mostly disappeared.
"Criminalising young children really does no-one any good," she said.
"It doesn't help the children – in fact, it harms the children – but also it doesn't keep communities any safer.
"You can see that all around Australia now, where the age is 10, there are huge problems and unfortunately a lot of governments are really struggling with these issues."
In Queensland, the LNP Crisafulli government recently introduced "adult crime, adult time" legislation, aimed at cracking down on young offenders.
The Northern Territory's CLP government passed legislation last year to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 12 to 10.
The Victorian Labor government also backflipped on its pledge to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 14.
Lawyer Adrian McKenna from the ACT Law Society's criminal law committee, which consulted on the reforms, acknowledged the new system was "not going to be perfect".
"There's going to be some growing pains for police and others involved in dealing with the real-world effects of not being able to charge 12 and 13-year-olds for most offences," Mr McKenna said.
"It's not going to be easy … but I think the time is right and it's time to take a chance for some good.
Earlier this month, ACT police raised concerns about support services not being "fully in place" in time for the change.
Since then, Chief Police Officer Scott Lee said he had been given assurances that the Safer Youth Response Service would begin operating as a 24/7 crisis service.
Mr McKenna said the ACT Law Society had ongoing concerns about how police would frisk search and detain young people under the age of 14.
"The last thing we want is to have some sort of alternative regime that's quasi-policing without the charge, that still allows them broad, sweeping powers to – in all but name – arrest and detain young people for periods of time or harshly search them," he said.
The Canberra PCYC, which runs intensive crime diversionary programs for young people in the ACT, said it was not prepared for the influx of referrals it was expecting to receive.
Chief executive Cheryl O'Donnell said police had advised the organisation it would be "slammed", rapidly adding to the more than 220 children aged between 12 and 14 already on its waitlist.
"There is concern [among organisations] because the financial resources haven't been put into services that are available so that they can actually increase the intake of young people," Ms O'Donnell said.
She said the organisation had been "pleading" for funding for many years to duplicate one of its key programs.
"You'd like to think that ACT … can be a shining example of how to provide support to those young people – but again, it comes back to investment in programs," Ms O'Donnell said.
Mr Hedger agreed, pointing out that his boxing gym does not receive any government funding.
"A lot of those kids have been in and out of the [justice] system and we know that when we support them, it's very rarely that they go back into the system."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AFL 2025; Tom Lynch to face tribunal for striking
AFL 2025; Tom Lynch to face tribunal for striking

Daily Telegraph

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Telegraph

AFL 2025; Tom Lynch to face tribunal for striking

Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News. Richmond star Tom Lynch was fined twice and faces up to five weeks on the sidelines for his MCG tantrum after being sent straight to the tribunal. Lynch was reported for striking Adelaide defender Jordan Butts off the ball following a contest between the pair during which he made contact with the head of the Crows defender after a wild swing with his arm. But while the blow glanced off Butts' head, Lynch could still face a hefty ban after being charged with intentional conduct, with severe impact and high contact. The premiership winner also was handed two fines totalling more than $4600, one for engaging in a melee and another for striking. Tom Lynch gets heated. Picture: Mark Stewart Lynch apologised to his teammates and had some sympathy from his coach, Adem Yze, but he was also told there were few excuses for his behaviour. 'He apologised to the group because he knew he let them down just by letting it spill over,' Yze said. '... he's been such a good player at this footy club for a long time. 'He's got white-line fever, and he wants to win.' 'I was going to address it, a couple of reverse free kicks, which was just pure frustration and showing that he cares,' Yze said. 'For him to talk to the group before I even had a chance to talk to them, and then almost put his heart on his sleeve in front of the group, was exactly why he's been the player that he is.' Lynch said the incident was the result of 'frustration' after being manhandled by Adelaide defenders in the mammoth loss. 'I didn't want to cause harm or anything like that. I was just trying to get free or whatever and frustration came out,' Lynch told Seven. 'Clearly … I gave away too many free kicks and it is not good enough as a leader. I thought we were playing pretty well in that second quarter and I pretty much stopped the momentum. Originally published as Richmond forward Tom Lynch has been sent straight to the tribunal for his haymaker at the MCG on Sunday

Junk cleared, house cleaned, new paint: Shock update on former Gin Gin house of horrors Phoebe Bishop stayed in
Junk cleared, house cleaned, new paint: Shock update on former Gin Gin house of horrors Phoebe Bishop stayed in

News.com.au

time8 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Junk cleared, house cleaned, new paint: Shock update on former Gin Gin house of horrors Phoebe Bishop stayed in

The filthy house where allegedly slain teen Pheobe Bishop lived with her housemates – who are now charged with the teen's murder – has been completely cleaned and revamped. Tanika Bromley, 33, and her partner James Wood, 34, were renting the three-bedroom home in Gin Gin home at the time of Pheobe's disappearance in May. The squalid property was among several crime scenes declared during the police probe into the 17-year-old's disappearance, after she failed to check into a flight bound for Brisbane. In early June, despite no-one living in the house, the front lawn was still strewn with rubbish. A bus parked outside the home, carrying a crudely-drawn sign saying 'Let it Ride', was piled up to the roof with junk, along with a small dinghy. But recent pictures have captured the extent of the clean-up work done on the house, just weeks after both Ms Bromley and Mr Wood faced court charged with Pheobe's murder. Rubbish from the yard has been completely cleared away and the exterior facade of the house appears to show a fresh coat of paint. Repairs have also been carried out to the balcony exterior. The boat and bus once parked out the front have also been towed away, and the lawn has been freshly mowed. The pictures are night-and-day compared to the feral state the house was left in, with 7News capturing the extent of rubbish left behind after Ms Bromley and Mr Wood were ordered out of the property during the police investigation. Dog faeces and trash litter the rooms and holes in the walls and doors were hastily patched by the pair, the landlord told 7News. 'A rubbish dump is probably cleaner,' the landlord told the program. 'I just can't understand how someone can live in conditions like this.' The clean-up effort follows Ms Bromley and Mr Wood being charged with Pheobe's murder in early June. They are also facing two counts each of misconduct with a corpse, with police alleging the pair moved Pheobe's body more than once after her death. A massive search effort commenced after Pheobe failed to check into her flight from Bundaberg Airport on May 15, where she was due to fly to Brisbane and then onto Western Australia to visit her boyfriend. Weeks after the search, human remains were discovered in the Good Night Scrub National Park Area, which police later confirmed to be Pheobe's. In an added blow, Ms Bromley has been slapped with a banning order by the NDIS, black-listing her from 'being involved in providing NDIS supports or services to NDIS funded participants'. 'Specifically, Tanika Bromley is prohibited from providing supports and services, directly or indirectly, to NDIS-funded participants,' the banning order, issued on June 12, states. The order covers any activities which could be undertaken by NDIS workers and affiliated consultants and auditors and 'the provision or management of NDIS supports, services or funding to people with disability in the NDIS'. It remains in place for six months and covers all Australian states and territories.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store