logo
Harvard says government has ‘blacklisted' university from grants, with new details on cuts in lawsuit filing

Harvard says government has ‘blacklisted' university from grants, with new details on cuts in lawsuit filing

CNN14-05-2025

The Trump administration has effectively 'blacklisted' Harvard University from getting federal funding as part of its ongoing battle over discrimination and ideology, the university says in a new court filing.
'Defendants subjected Harvard to adverse action by freezing $2.2 billion in multiyear grants and $60 million in multiyear contracts previously awarded to Harvard,' says an amended complaint filed Monday. 'And then the Government blacklisted Harvard from future awards of federal funding and subsequently terminated existing grants.'
Over the course of the past week, the university received grant termination letters from seven different federal agencies – including the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense – announcing that previously promised grants are being terminated, according to the lawsuit.
The letters have very similar wording, with all of them saying the grants 'no longer effectuate agency priorities.'
Harvard, the nation's oldest university, has been at the center of running battle between the Trump administration and elite institutions of higher learning, with Columbia and Ohio State among the other schools that have seen funding pulled.
The new court filing came on the same day that the administration's Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism announced another $450 million in grants to Harvard would be stopped.
'Harvard's campus, once a symbol of academic prestige, has become a breeding ground for virtue signaling and discrimination,' the task force said in a statement, citing antisemitism on campus and alleged racial discrimination in admissions and activities of the Harvard Law Review, which the administration is investigating. The task force did not provide details on which grants would be affected by the latest announcement.
In its new filing, Harvard says work to address discrimination won't be solved by letting research wither.
'The Government has not identified – and cannot identify – any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen or terminated that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation,' the lawsuit says.
The new filing indicates that Harvard, the wealthiest university in the country with an endowment of $53.2 billion, is currently covering the lost federal funding itself, but says that can't last long.
'If Harvard continues to replace the frozen and terminated funding from its own resources, it will be forced to reduce the number of graduate students it admits and the number of faculty and research staff it pays to conduct research. It will be unable to continue procuring and maintaining cutting-edge supplies, equipment, and facilities for research,' the lawsuit says. 'Without the federal funding at issue, Harvard would need to operate at a significantly reduced level.'
Judge Allison Dale Burroughs, an Obama appointee to the federal bench, set oral arguments in the case for July. Since Harvard has not requested an immediate injunction against the government, the funding freeze is likely to remain in place at least through late summer.
The university announced what it characterized as a 'a temporary pause on staff and faculty hiring' in March – before the grant cuts were announced – saying it needed to 'better understand how changes in federal policy will take shape and can assess the scale of their impact.'
Harvard filed its lawsuit against the government shortly after the Trump administration announced the university would have $2.2 billion in grants frozen in response to the school's refusal to agree to several conditions set by the government, including changes to the school's governance and a 'viewpoint diversity' audit of students and professors.
'No government – regardless of which party is in power – should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,' Harvard President Alan Garber said in an April 14 statement announcing their decision.
Harvard says the government's attempt to put extra conditions on their grants violates the university's First Amendment guarantees of academic freedom. They also say that the Trump administration is violating the law by ignoring Harvard's efforts to address antisemitism, including recommendations of a university task force.
'Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus,' the university says in its lawsuit. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of current and future funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism and (civil rights) compliance.'
The funding cut letter from the National Institutes of Health acknowledges that it usually gives recipients of grants the opportunity to address concerns from the agency before pulling funding. But the agency says the university's rejection of the administration's demands shows that 'no corrective action is possible here.'
'NIH perceives these categorical rejections to manifest the University's unwillingness to take corrective action or implement necessary reforms,' the agency wrote.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon told CNBC last month that the demand letter the administration sent to Harvard was not necessarily final and 'was intended to have both parties sit down again and continue their negotiations.'
Suggesting there was potential for 'common ground,' Garber said in a Monday letter to McMahon, 'We hope that the partnership between higher education and the federal government will be vibrant and successful for generations to come.' But he added that they will not back down from their lawsuit as long as the money is cut off.
'Harvard's efforts to achieve these goals are undermined and threatened by the federal government's overreach into the constitutional freedoms of private universities and its continuing disregard of Harvard's compliance with the law,' Garber said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Surprising Trump-Musk rift worsens a huge Tesla problem
Surprising Trump-Musk rift worsens a huge Tesla problem

Miami Herald

time20 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Surprising Trump-Musk rift worsens a huge Tesla problem

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump appear to be in the kind of chaotic relationship that social media lives to warn you about. First the two seemed to be enjoying a business alliance-turned-bromance when Musk was invited to become a special government employee in January and spearhead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The pair cheerily appeared together in photographs as well as in the Oval Office, and they seemed to be harmoniously working together. Musk even donned a red baseball cap that read "Trump was right about everything," which sent a pretty clear statement about the billionaire's beliefs. Related: Elon Musk latest message sends Tesla stock surging Of course, things can change. And when Tesla's (TSLA) sales plummeted 71% as reported during its first quarter earnings call, Musk's tune began to do just that. The Tesla CEO said he would refocus on the EV business, and not long after, he announced he would be stepping away from DOGE entirely. Soon after that shift, Musk suddenly started to take shots at Trump's "big beautiful bill" on X, first disagreeing with it and then seemingly escalating the issue to an all-out war against the president. Now the two have been trading barbs and threats alike, and while it looks like they're having some sort of weird breakup spat that's bristling with resentment, the whole thing is having a bad effect on a situation that Musk promised he would work to repair. Image source: STR/AFP via Getty Images Tesla's reputation has taken a beating this year. Musk's involvement with President Trump and the government rubbed many the wrong way, leading the stock to tank in mid-March when Musk was heads down on the DOGE project. What followed was a rash of people either demonstrating outside Tesla dealerships, vandalizing them, or both. Tesla owners, uncomfortable at being yelled at on the streets, started to offload their cars. Related: Forget tariffs, automakers face an even bigger threat from China Meanwhile, Tesla sales are dropping fast in key markets such as Europe and California. "Tesla's sales in Europe dropped 49% year-over-year in April to 7,261 vehicles, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. Meanwhile, total EV sales in the region rose 34%. So far, Tesla's Europe unit volume is down nearly 40% through the first four months of this year," TheStreet's Todd Campbell reports. Musk's public spat with Trump, including posting the whole thing on social media rather than having private conversations with the president, comes off as attention-seeking and inappropriate for a person of his status. And while the president has responded more or less in kind, it's really Tesla that will suffer further, as Trump is known for his outbursts, and they don't stand out that much from his regular behavior. Tesla, however, had already been beaten down by Musk's involvement with the GOP. While Musk is clearly trying to separate himself from Trump with these moves, the way he's handling them reflects poorly on his plans to reinvigorate the EV brand. It's exactly the move Tesla didn't need at this moment. Trump, in the meantime, has decided he has bigger things to focus on, telling CNN today, "I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem." Related: Analyst says Tesla faces one big beautiful hit from Trump bill The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump
Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump

President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's feud spilled out in public on Thursday, with the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader trading barbs that engulfed news cycles in Washington and abroad. Musk, a Trump ally, was vocal about his disappointment with Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' currently sitting in the Senate. Musk, who spent millions during the 2024 presidential campaign to help elect Trump, called the massive piece of legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump then weighed in on Thursday at the White House during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit, saying, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The spat intensified, with Musk floating the prospects of creating a third party, claiming that without his political contributions, Trump would not be victorious against ex-Vice President Harris in November and accusing the president of having ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump threatened to cut off federal contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Later on Thursday, Musk signaled he might be open to brokering a truce with the commander-in-chief. After speaking with several news outlets Friday morning, Trump suggested he is ready to move on and indicated that he will not be speaking with Musk for a while. Trump told CNN Friday morning that he is 'not even thinking about Elon' and added that the SpaceX and Tesla CEO has 'got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' In the Senate, Trump's agenda bill, which passed the House chamber last month, has sparked concerns and criticism from GOP senators. The first group of GOP Sens., which consists of Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), are arguing they could vote against the bill if it slashes Medicaid benefits. Others, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) have previously said they would not back the legislation if it retains the current debt and spending levels. The GOP can have three defections total if all Democrats vote against the legislation. Sen. Johnson will be on CNN's 'State of the Union where he will likely discuss if any of his concerns regarding the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' have been addressed. As part of a push to root out waste, fraud and abuse within Medicare, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said this week that a bill sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), that would crack down on Medicare Advantage overpayments known as 'upcoding,' could be inserted into Trump's massive legislation. Cassidy will be on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' where he will likely discuss the latest on the reconciliation package along with his recent visit to the White House. NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.); Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-Ma); U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief policy officer Neil Bradley. ABC's 'This Week': Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). NBC's 'Meet the Press': Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). CNN's 'State of the Union': 'Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.); Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.). CBS' 'Face the Nation': National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.); Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas); Save the Children U.S. President and CEO Janti Soeripto. 'Fox News Sunday': Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought; Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.); Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures': White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt; Secretary Of Interior Doug Burgum, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.); House Ways And Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.); Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Pride and community at Sox Mexican Heritage Night game amid immigration crackdowns
Pride and community at Sox Mexican Heritage Night game amid immigration crackdowns

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Pride and community at Sox Mexican Heritage Night game amid immigration crackdowns

There are few things more American than baseball. But on a recent Mexican Heritage Night at Rate Field, it was something more layered, more defiant and deeply moving. Amid the crack of bats and the roar of the crowd, this sliver of the South Side of Chicago felt like it belonged — completely — to its people. To the vendors shouting in Spanish, the kids in their Sox jerseys, the swaying to mariachi in the stands. The smell of and the sound of Banda music coming from the parking lot. They were all there to watch baseball and to celebrate their culture despite the newfound fear sparked by immigration crackdowns in the city of Chicago and its surroundings. In that space, at a Sox game against the Kansas City Royals, for a few sacred hours, joy roared louder than fear. To be sure, few places feel completely safe for Mexicans nowadays. Many now have strong roots in Chicago, their families are a mix of U.S. citizens and loved ones who are lacking permanent legal status. That means that most times, everyone is on high alert. For many Chicagoans, deportations are starting to hit home. Just last Wednesday, an estimated 20 people were rounded up during surprise check-ins at the federal agency's Intensive Supervision Appearance Program offices in Chicago. Similar arrests were reported that day in New York, San Jose and Birmingham. More reports of raids at suburban factories spread through the end of the week. So for many, it is a strange, almost surreal thing to celebrate their roots in a public arena these days. In a country where anti-immigrant rhetoric has again tightened its grip, where deportation raids are haunting families like shadows on back porches, where policies continue to dehumanize under the guise of 'law and order,' showing pride can feel like an act of rebellion. While the White Sox as an organization steers clear of making overt political statements, its commitment is to create an inclusive, welcoming environment, said Sheena Quinn, vice president of public relations for the White Sox. Quinn said that nights like these are not about politics, but about community — about making sure every fan feels seen, valued and celebrated. ,' as my Mexican grandfather said. The team of the people. There's a reason these nights matter. They aren't just cultural marketing or feel-good footnotes. They are necessary sanctuaries — moments of unapologetic presence. In a time when neighbors who lack permanent legal status are being disappeared from their jobs or at immigration hearings, when headlines reduce human beings to statistics or threats, to be seen and celebrated in the open air of a stadium is no small thing. And the beauty of baseball is that it offers something like solidarity, even if unspoken. You can sit next to someone you might never talk to on the street — an old-school South Sider, a first-gen college kid, a Polish grandma, a Mexican father with his daughters — and for nine innings, you're all just fans. The field becomes neutral ground. The flags waving — U.S. and Mexican — remind us that identity isn't binary. It's layered, sometimes conflicted, always rich. There's healing in that. And hope. Because joy, in the face of trauma, is a kind of resistance. Celebrating your culture in the open, without apology or permission, is its own form of protest. And when a community gathers — not in mourning or defense, but in celebration — it says something powerful: We're still here. We belong. So yes, the night ended like any other ballgame. Final score posted. Sox won 2-7 and had a majestic fireworks show while '' by Vicente Fernández played in the background. Fans trailed out to their cars. But what lingered wasn't just a win or a loss. It was a sense of collective breath — a reminder that joy isn't frivolous. It's fuel. It's armor. And in the face of everything this country continues to throw at immigrant communities, that joy under stadium lights may be the most radical thing of all.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store