logo
D.C. Dispatch: Ernst praises DOGE, calls for USAID oversight

D.C. Dispatch: Ernst praises DOGE, calls for USAID oversight

Yahoo14-02-2025

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst spoke at a U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing Feb. 13, 2025, highlighting U.S. Agency for International Development expenditures she said were wasteful such as "reintegration bags" provided to migrants returning to Central American countries. (Photo courtesy of Sen. Joni Ernst's office)
While opponents say actions taken by the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, headed by billionaire Elon Musk, are unconstitutional, U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst defended Musk and DOGE in Congress this week saying these efforts are uncovering wasteful federal spending.
Ernst is the DOGE Caucus Chair in the U.S. Senate and has been a key advocate in Congress for the advisory body. As protests have rallied against Musk and DOGE personnel's steps to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), after breaking into agency headquarters and telling employees earlier in February to prepare for administrative leave, Ernst said an investigation into how funds were appropriated by USAID was overdue.
Ernst at a U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing Thursday pointed to areas of USAID funding that she said were examples of wasteful spending. She criticized expenditures like $27 million appropriated to the International Organization for Migration, a United Nations organization, for assisting migrants as they returned from the U.S. to some Central American countries. She said spending included 'reintegration bags' to migrants that had non-essential items like a Barbie doll, or nearly $69,000 for Battery Dance Corporation to hold 'Dancing to Connect' workshops in Wuhan, China, as a public diplomacy program.
'The question that we really should be asking at this point isn't why USAID's grants are being scrutinized, but why it took so long,' Ernst said.
Ernst said she did not believe all groups receiving support from USAID were corrupt, but asked lawmakers to 'imagine how much more good work could be done' if funding was more appropriately allocated.
Ernst sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week saying she has faced situations in years past where USAID has obstructed oversight efforts, writing 'it is of the utmost importance to conduct a full and independent analysis of the recipients of USAID assistance.' She said the American people support these efforts as shown through President Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 general election.
'Americans are no longer willing to tolerate a status quo where federal agencies, managing billions in taxpayer funds, pursue a counter-productive and potentially anti-American agenda abroad with no accountability,' Ernst wrote. 'I support the President's efforts to achieve government efficiency and rein in unelected bureaucrats. USAID is culpable for decades of unchecked, outlandish expenditures and that behavior must end now.'
Multiple lawsuits are challenging DOGE, with some lawsuits seeking to curtail DOGE personnel's access to individuals' personal information through the U.S. Treasury's payment system while others say Musk's assertion of authority through DOGE, established via executive order, is unconstitutional because he was not appointed as a member of Trump's executive branch with approval from the U.S. Senate.
In an interview with Fox Business News' Larry Kudlow Monday, Ernst praised Trump and Musk's efforts, saying DOGE and Trump's administration are working on issues she tried to tackle through her 'squeal' work finding areas to cut federal spending.
'Without this disruption, it would have been business as usual,' Ernst said. 'I would have gone on pushing out my squeal reports with nobody in the White House to really grab hold of it. So I'm thankful for the President. I am thankful that Elon Musk has taken on this additional duty on top of everything else he does to really focus on cost savings and efficiencies for our American taxpayers.'
In the U.S. House, Reps. Zach Nunn and Ashley Hinson praised the passage of legislation they say will help small businesses struggling with new reporting requirements.
Nunn introduced the 'Protect Small Business from Excessive Paperwork Act' in January. The bill revises requirements set in the 2020 Corporate Transparency Act requiring businesses to report beneficial ownership information in an effort to identify shell companies used by terrorist and criminal organizations. However, Nunn said surveys by the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) found that many small businesses never learned of the new reporting requirements that took effect on Jan. 1, 2024.
According to the National Small Business Association, first-year compliance costs for the reporting requirements will cost the average small business owner nearly $8,000. A news release from Nunn said that as of Jan. 1, 2025, millions of small businesses that have not yet filed the needed reports are facing daily fines of up to $591 and up to two years in jail because of the requirements.
The legislation introduced by Nunn will extend the filing deadline for these reports to Jan. 1, 2026 for small businesses and require the Treasury Department to educate businesses about the new reporting requirements. Nunn said the measure is necessary to protect small businesses that are facing major problems implementing these new 'red tape' requirements.
'Bureaucrats in D.C. sit in their ivory towers, demanding businesses comply with onerous red tape, without considering the burden it puts on businesses,' Nunn said. 'By passing this legislation, we're taking a step forward to roll back unnecessary regulations and simplify requirements for job creators while still adhering to the law.'
The bill passed the U.S. House unanimously Monday.
Hinson praised the bill's passage in a news release and called for further action to repeal the 2020 law, having cosponsored the 'Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act' to reverse changes made by the Corporate Transparency Act.
'It's past time to end the obsessive regulations on our small business community,' Hinson said in a statement. '… End the ridiculous paperwork and regulatory regime, unleash jobs and economic growth—it's that simple.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges
Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges

Boston Globe

time27 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges

In 1789, in an address to the US House of Representatives, James Madison proposed amending the Constitution to include a Bill of Rights. In 1949, George Orwell's novel '1984' was first published. In 1966, a merger was announced between the National and American Football Leagues, to take effect in 1970. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, 34 American crew members were killed when Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a Navy intelligence-gathering ship in the Mediterranean Sea. (Israel later said the Liberty had been mistaken for an Egyptian vessel.) In 1968, US authorities announced the capture in London of James Earl Ray, the suspected assassin of civil rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In 1978, a jury in Clark County, Nev., ruled the so-called 'Mormon Will,' purportedly written by the late billionaire Howard Hughes, was a forgery. Advertisement In 1995, US Marines rescued Captain Scott O'Grady, whose F-16C fighter jet had been shot down by Bosnian Serbs on June 2. In 2009, North Korea's highest court sentenced American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years' hard labor for trespassing and 'hostile acts.' (The women were pardoned in early August 2009 after a trip to Pyongyang by former President Bill Clinton.) In 2017, former FBI Director James Comey, testifying before Congress, asserted that President Trump fired him to interfere with Comey's investigation of Russia's ties to the Trump campaign. In 2021, Ratko Mladić, the military chief known as the 'Butcher of Bosnia' for orchestrating genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in the Balkan nation's 1992-95 war, lost his final legal battle when UN judges rejected his appeal and affirmed his life sentence. In 2023, PresidentTrump was indicted by a grand jury in Miami on 37 felony counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents that had been moved to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida home. (The case against Trump was abandoned following Trump's November 2024 presidential election victory.)

New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London

Hamilton Spectator

time39 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London

BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession . Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. Technology is a major sticking point The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei , a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased . One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. 'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls . China shows signs of easing up on rare earths One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths . They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Plan to revoke student visas adds to tensions Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy
Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy

USA Today

time40 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy

Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy | Opinion There's no other takeaway from this other than: We were happy to pay Musk whatever he wanted as long as he loved Trump, but the minute he stopped loving Trump, we can easily stop paying him. Show Caption Hide Caption 'Two big egos.' Americans not surprised by Trump-Musk feud Americans across the country say they're not surprised by the public feud between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Aside from being globally cathartic, the all-too-predictable breakup of President Donald Trump's unquenchable ego and Elon Musk's immense sense of self-importance pulled the dressing-room curtain back on the Republican Party. And what we saw was both cringeworthy and indecent. Or as I like to call it, the Republican Party. Here are three things this episode of 'Real Annoying Billionaires of Washington, DC' taught us about the conservatives who excitedly welcomed Musk – and his money – into politics: 1. Trump and GOP used taxpayers' money to purchase Elon Musk's support As the president and the weirdo billionaire hurled insults at each other on June 5, Trump posted this threat: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Gee, I wonder who, up until June 5, was helping Musk grease the wheels to line up 'Billions and Billions of Dollars' in additional government contracts? As The New York Times reported in March: 'Within the Trump administration's Defense Department, Elon Musk's SpaceX rocketry is being trumpeted as the nifty new way the Pentagon could move military cargo rapidly around the globe. In the Commerce Department, SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service will now be fully eligible for the federal government's $42 billion rural broadband push, after being largely shut out during the Biden era. … And at the Federal Aviation Administration and the White House itself, Starlink satellite dishes have recently been installed, to expand federal government internet access.' Opinion: Musk erupts, claims Trump is in the Epstein files. Who could've seen this coming? How quickly Trump went from filling Musk's coffers to repay him for his support and campaign contributions to suggesting Musk's contracts were, in fact, a form of government waste and fraud. (I mean … they are a form of government waste and fraud, but not in the way Trump was suggesting.) There's no other takeaway from this other than: We were happy to pay Musk whatever he wanted as long as he loved Trump, but the minute he stopped loving Trump, we can easily stop paying him. I think there's a word for that. 2. Elon Musk, despite all the tush-kissing, never liked or respected Donald Trump Musk's swift about-face on Trump shows what many of us have long suspected: Republicans or Republicans-of-convenience like Musk don't actually like or respect Trump. On Feb. 7, Musk posted on social media: 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' On June 5, Musk posted: '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Going from 'I love you, man' to 'I'm alleging you're connected to a notorious sex offender who was facing child sex trafficking charges before he died of suicide in jail' is quite a journey. And it implies that Musk saw Trump for what he is: a useful, loathsome fool. Opinion: Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. The minute Trump became not useful to Musk, he sang his truth, something I'd bet most Republicans would do if they had untold wealth and didn't have to worry much about repercussions. That tells you all you need to know about the modern-day GOP – liars boosting a lout in their own self-interest. 3. DOGE was nonsense, and Republicans never really liked Musk For all its fanfare, the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency that Musk oversaw accomplished precious little cost-cutting while inflicting massive harm on America's global reputation, the lives of people reliant on U.S. aid, and the overall functioning of the federal government. Republicans knew this yet still tripped over themselves to toss roses at Musk's feet, hailing him as some kind of genius/savior. They wanted his money, and they wanted the disinformation cannon that comes with his right-wing social media platform. But when Musk grew wise to what Republican lawmakers were doing with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act – a deficit-ballooning monstrosity – he turned on his handmaidens and his former love, President Trump. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So Trump, of course, called him crazy. Which begs the question: Why were you letting a crazy person access Americans' most private data and demolish the federal workforce? And are you now going to … you know … make sure the guy you think is crazy didn't do something catastrophically bad? Congressional Republicans had to pick a side, and they've largely stepped into Trump's arms, knowing Musk may well be disliked even more than the sitting president. The Washington Post reported June 6: 'Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperiling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process.' Translation: Musk's DOGE nonsense was for naught, an attempt to fluff a billionaire's ego while cloaking the high-spending, deficit-raising moves Republicans were going to make all along. There's a sucker born every minute, and two Republicans to take 'em. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store