Two men found dead in woods next to Salem Walmart
Two men were found dead in a wooded area near a Salem Walmart Wednesday afternoon, according to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.
Salem police were called to 450 Highland Ave. shortly after 2:20 p.m. after a man walking his dog discovered one of the bodies, the district attorney's office said in a press release. Officers soon found the bodies of the two men.
'At this point, an investigation led by the Essex County District Attorney's Office, along with the Massachusetts State Police and the Salem Police, is underway to determine the cause of death and if foul play was involved,' the district attorney's office wrote.
Anyone with information about the deaths is asked to call Massachusetts State Police at 978-745-8909 or Salem police at 978-744-1212.
Thunderbirds defeat P-Bruins in opening game of first-round series
Skier who crashed on N.H. mountain died 'doing what he loved best'
Nigerian man pleads guilty to $10M pandemic unemployment fraud scheme
Springfield, police ratify new contract for nearly 500 officers
Karen Read's own words coming back to bite as prosecutor weaves in videos at trial
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kelly Dever denies seeing key figures near Karen Read's vehicle in 'disaster' testimony: expert
Karen Read's defense team put a hostile witness on the stand Monday in the form of a Boston police officer who was working for the Canton Police Department the morning Karen Read and two friends discovered John O'Keefe dead under a pile of snow. Kelly Dever, who was on duty that morning but did not play any role in the investigation, previously told the FBI that she saw two key figures in the case standing near Read's SUV in the sallyport at Canton's police headquarters for "a wildly long time." They were ATF Agent Brian Higgins — who was carrying on a flirtatious relationship with Read behind O'Keefe's back — and then-Canton Police Chief Kenneth Berkowitz. They would have been placed next to the vehicle before other investigators found fragments that matched Read's taillight at the crime scene. Lead Detective's Text Messages Cast Shadow Over Karen Read Murder Trial Dever testified that she retracted that statement immediately because the FBI agents showed her a timeline that indicated she left work well before Read's Lexus arrived. Then she accused Read's defense team of trying to coerce her into lying about it on the stand. "You threatened to charge me with perjury during our phone call prior to the first trial if I didn't lie on the stand right now," she told defense attorney Alan Jackson, from the witness stand. "I'm telling you, I did not see anything. Factually, I've been provided evidence by a timeline that it is not correct." Read On The Fox News App Karen Read Sells Home And Taps Retirement Fund To Pay Mounting Legal Bills In Murder Retrial WATCH: Karen Read challenges officer's testimony in tense murder trial Read denied that her team pressured Dever in remarks to reporters outside the courthouse Monday afternoon. "We subpoenaed her to testify to what she told other authorities and just wanted her to be as honest with us as she was with them," she said. "And today she's now telling us that was a lie." She later claimed that Dever seems like "a compromised person." Dever was visibly frustrated at times, huffing on the stand and at one point snapping at Jackson for mispronouncing her name. Mother Of Slain Boston Police Officer Wends Wordless Message To Karen Read In Courtroom Showdown "Like you can't remember my name, I don't remember," she said. The defense is trying to show jurors that there is reasonable doubt in the investigation's findings — noting that the lead detective was fired for sending inappropriate texts and that Canton police made a series of sloppy missteps early in the investigation, before state police arrived. Their position is that her SUV never struck O'Keefe, and something or someone else caused his fatal injuries. In her first trial, they also alleged that police framed Read. Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub "[Dever] illustrated perfectly the defense theory — that sketchy cops are lying to help the prosecution," said Mark Bederow, a New York City-based criminal defense lawyer who is following the case. He called her testimony "a disaster" and questioned whether she had been pressured by colleagues in law enforcement into recanting her story, rather than the defense. "It was a risky move to call her, but her demeanor was so awful that combined with what she admitted telling the feds, it likely helped the defense," Bederow told Fox News Digital. Karen Read Judge Blocks Sandra Birchmore Mentions; Expert Says Cases Should Be Wake-up Call For Police Retired Massachusetts Superior Court Judge and Boston College professor Jack Lu called Dever "a profile in courage" and that putting her on the stand suggests desperation from the defense. "She's out of central casting, says that she has confirmed her prior memory is factually, irrefutably wrong," he told Fox News Digital. "If they say she has damaged her future ability to testify that is laughable." She's also facing blowback. Lu pointed to a Facebook group called Free Karen Read with more than 40,000 members, where a user urged others to call the police commissioner's office if they "believe Kelly Dever should be given the axe." Dever could not immediately be reached for comment. It's up to the jurors to decide whether she was truthful on the stand or when she first made her statements to the article source: Kelly Dever denies seeing key figures near Karen Read's vehicle in 'disaster' testimony: expert
CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
New filings in Karen Read trial include proposed instructions for jury deliberations
On Tuesday, Norfolk Superior Court released a number of requests by both defense attorneys and prosecutors that could shape the way the jury deliberates about Karen Read's fate. The defense is three days into presenting its case, which is expected to take one-and-a-half to two weeks, so the case will be wrapping up and going to the jury soon. As a result, lawyers are requesting a number of proposed jury instructions, among other things. Read is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. A hung jury during her first trial led to a mistrial. Prosecutors accuse her of hitting and killing John O'Keefe, a Boston police officer who she was dating, with her SUV in 2022. The defense says she is being framed and O'Keefe was killed during a fight. Karen Read attorneys seek "missing witness instruction" The defense team has requested the jury receive what's called a "missing witness instruction" for Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Michael Proctor. Albert and Higgins were in the house at 34 Fairview in Canton on January 28 and 29, and have been repeatedly called alternate suspects in the death of O'Keefe by the defense. Michael Proctor is a former Massachusetts State Police Trooper who was fired in connection to his behavior in this investigation, including offensive text messages he sent about Karen Read. None of the three men were called as witnesses by prosecutors, unlike in Read's first trial. Based on a filing dated June 2, the defense also doesn't plan to call these men as witnesses, and instead wants to be able to argue they are "missing witnesses" in closing arguments to the jury. A missing witness argument and jury instruction means that the court "may instruct the jury that an adverse inference may be drawn from a party's failure to call a witness" under Massachusetts law. To meet the requirements, the witness must be available, friendly (or not hostile) to the party, expected to give non-repetitive testimony, and where "there is no logical or tactical explanation for the failure to call the witness." The defense is requesting that they be allowed to argue this issue in their closing arguments, and that the judge should instruct the jury on the issue when she gives them instructions before deliberations. Karen Read attorneys' proposed jury instructions Ahead of closing arguments and jury deliberations, lawyers from both sides propose jury instructions for the judge to consider. The judge will ultimately read instructions to the jurors before they deliberate, which will include an explanation of the law in question, the legal standards, advice for deliberations, and any particular defenses or specifications relevant to the case at hand. Karen Read's defense team has requested instructions for the missing witnesses described above, as well is what's known as a Bowden instruction, which allows the jury to consider the consequences of a substandard police investigation. The defense requested the following line: "If you find that any omissions in the investigation were significant and not adequately explained, you may consider whether the omissions tend to affect the quality, reliability or credibility of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth." However, the defense did not request a third-party culprit instruction. In Read's first trial, the defense argued that either Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, or Colin Albert could have killed John O'Keefe, rather than Karen Read. In Read's retrial, the defense appears to have shifted strategy, focusing instead on an insufficient police investigation and not requesting an instruction for a third-party culprit theory. Prosecution's suggested jury instructions The Commonwealth separately filed a motion for its own proposed jury instructions, as is typical at this stage in a trial. In particular, the Commonwealth requested a "consciousness of guilt" instruction that would read in part, "you have heard evidence suggesting that the defendant: may have intentionally tried to destroy, conceal or falsify evidence in this case and may have intentionally attempted to harass and intimidate witnesses whom the defendant believed would testify against her." "If the Commonwealth has proved that the defendant did, you may consider whether such actions indicate feelings of guilt by the defendant and whether, in turn, such feelings of guilt might tend to show actual guilt on these charges," the proposed instruction continues. Judge Beverly Cannone ultimately will read these proposals, conference with lawyers, and come up with jury instructions that are considered fair to both sides.
CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Police investigating after stolen car crashes near Evergreen Park shopping center; 1 dead
Evergreen Park police said one person died in a crash when a stolen car plowed into another vehicle near a shopping center in Evergreen Park. As of 11:20 a.m., crews were working to reconstruct the two-car crash that was in the Walmart parking lot and on 95th Street, across from Evergreen Plaza. CBS Skywatch was over the scene, were a dark gray car with severe front-end damage was against the median and sidewalk separating the parking lot from 95th Street. A light gray car with severe side impact and back-end damage was in the corner of the parking lot. Police said officers responded to a report of a stolen car at the Speedway Gas Station on 95th Street. When they arrived, police said a woman got out of the car and went into the gas station while the man behind the wheel sped away. Police said the driver of the stolen car crashed into another car at 95th and Campbell. The car was going fast enough that it appeared to have sent the other car spinning into the Walmart parking lot, damaging or knocking over several trees in the process. The driver of the stolen car was taken to Christ Medial Center where he was pronounced dead, police said. The driver of the other car was taken to Little Company of Mary Hospital with non-life threatening injuries, police said. The woman who was with the man driving the stolen car was taken into custody at the gas station.
