SC diktat will have little bearing on other courts
First the spine-chilling facts about the state-of-affairs in India vis-à-vis the judicial delivery system. A startling reality is that presently there are over five crore cases pending disposal across all courts in the country. Even more bizarre is that many have been 'pending' for decades together. It is mindboggling to think that the bail applications pending in High Courts are approximately between 1.25 and 1.3 lakh, which is a substantial increase considering that it hovered around 60, 000 to 65,000 cases before 2020. There has been a considerable increase in the bail appeals filed annually, which stands around 4.3 lakh today as against the above 3.4 lakh a few years back. Given this precarious situation, many take potshots at the 'lethargic' legal delivery system in the country, which, many opine, remains the bane. This applies to all types of bail, including regular, anticipatory, default and interim bail. Lest one forgets, the Supreme Court has established clear guidelines for the expeditious disposal of bail applications, recognising the importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. As per its ruling, regular bail applications should be resolved within two weeks, and anticipatory bail applications within six weeks, unless situations dictate otherwise.
However, despite such constitutional mandates and rulings by the apex court, there has been no relief for the people given that 'speedy disposal' seems like a term that is yet to see the light of the day, as regards Indian courts, where delays are becoming increasingly common. Of course, the legal fraternity has its own points of view.
While on the one side there has been a steady increase in bail appeals across High Courts with each passing year, a dearth of judges and other judicial staff, on the other hand, are unable to handle the overload of pending cases as regards hearing and disposing of cases. In some instances, the pending bail applications are leading to prolonged detention of the applicants, which reflects poorly on the system. The general presumption is that such inordinate delays in disposing bail applications could eventually lead to a situation whereupon fairness and efficiency could take a backseat. This being the situation on the ground, one wonders if the Supreme Court's latest 'diktat' will have any bearing on the functioning of other courts. This is not the first time that High Courts have been given guidelines as regards handling bail applications. The earlier such 'firm' directions by the apex court have had little to zero impact as the figure of pending bail applications keeps mounting.
Against this backdrop, one wonders the effect of the Supreme Court's reiteration that bail matters should not be delayed even by a day.
'We have time and again emphasised the importance of the liberty of citizens. There should not be a single day's delay in deciding liberty of citizens in bail matters,' said a bench of Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai and Justice AG Masih, while hearing the bail plea of one Vedpal Singh Tanwar in a money laundering case. In the Srikant Upadhyay v State of Bihar (2024) case, Justice Ravikumar, heading a Division Bench, ruled that while bail is the general principle in criminal cases, this does not extend to anticipatory bail, which needs an exceptional power. It was likewise regarding the Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) case.
Although all courts have been asked to follow the Supreme Court directions and expeditiously dispose of bail applications, the common man, caught in the 'justice delayed is justice denied' syndrome, remains doubtful.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Call me a fugitive, not a thief': Vijay Mallya says sorry for Kingfisher crash, not the ‘chor' tag
Vijay Mallya publicly apologized for the failure of Kingfisher Airlines, acknowledging its collapse while denying allegations of theft and criminal intent. He defended his decision to stay away from India, asserting he didn't 'run away' but left on a pre-scheduled visit. Mallya expressed willingness to return to India if assured a fair trial and dignified life. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Business tycoon Vijay Mallya issued a rare and public apology for the failure of Kingfisher Airlines , while strongly denying allegations of theft and defending his reasons for staying away from India 'I apologise to everyone for the failure of Kingfisher Airlines ,' Mallya said during a four-hour podcast with entrepreneur Raj Shamani released on Thursday, acknowledging the collapse of the now-defunct airline that once symbolised his flamboyant business he maintained that the situation was more complex than often portrayed and denied any criminal intent Moreover, in the podcast, Mallya said he would consider returning to India if assured of a fair trial and a dignified existence. "If I have a fair assurance of a fair trail and dignified existence in India, I will think about it (returning to India) seriously."Addressing the allegations of financial misconduct , Mallya said, 'You may call me a fugitive , but I didn't run away. I flew on a prescheduled visit. Fair enough, I didn't return for reasons that I consider are valid… so if you want to call me a fugitive, go ahead. But where is the 'chor' (thief) coming from? Where is the 'chori' (theft)?'The former businessman is accused of defaulting on loans worth over ₹9,000 crore extended to Kingfisher Airlines by a consortium of Indian banks. He has been fighting extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom, where he has lived since multiple legal setbacks, including a UK court ruling in favor of his extradition in 2018, Mallya continues to contest his return to India, citing unfair treatment and media trials.
United News of India
21 minutes ago
- United News of India
CJI Gavai champions cross-border legal synergy at ICA London conference
New Delhi / London, June 5 (UNI) Chief Justice of India Justice B R Gavai inaugurated the third International Conference on 'Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes: Synergizing India–UK Arbitration Practices' in London on Thursday. The high-level event, hosted by the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) during London International Disputes Week, brought together legal luminaries, judges, policymakers, and commercial dispute resolution experts from both nations to strengthen ties in arbitration and mediation. Delivering the inaugural address, CJI Gavai remarked, 'India and the United Kingdom share a rich history, bound by the tradition of arbitration and mediation rooted in our common law heritage.' The conference was also addressed by Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal, Lord Michael Briggs, Judge of the UK Supreme Court, Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK, and eminent lawyers including Harish Salve KC and Geeta Luthra, Vice President of ICA. CJI Gavai reflected on India's arbitration journey, invoking Mahatma Gandhi's commitment to mediation as foundational. 'Disputes are inevitable. What defines a strong commercial relationship is our commitment to resolve them efficiently,' he stated. He emphasised India's progress through amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (notably 2019), the establishment of the Arbitration Council of India, and the 2024 Bill proposing emergency arbitration and appellate tribunals. He lauded the UK's 2025 reforms in its Arbitration Act, promoting summary disposal and legal clarity. Justice Gavai drew from key Indian rulings, including BALCO, Vijay Karia, Amazon versus Future Retail and Gayatri Balasamy, to emphasise judicial minimalism and finality in arbitration. He noted, 'When arbitral awards are upheld without unnecessary interference, it enhances predictability, business trust, and investor confidence.' The CJI praised the growth of Indian institutions like DIAC, MCIA, and IIAC, while commending LCIA's role as a global benchmark. He stressed the importance of collaboration between Indian and UK arbitration bodies to raise global standards. Justice Gavai applauded the adoption of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and hybrid systems such as Arb-Med-Arb. He called the Bar Council of India's recent move to allow foreign lawyers to advise on arbitration in India a 'landmark reform' that balances global openness with domestic integrity. CJI Gavai humorously outlined four transformative reforms he would introduce with a "magical wand". 'If I Had a Wand…,' CJI said, "I would make four reforms for India's Arbitration Regime." Finality of Arbitral Awards – Arbitration must be the final word, not an invitation for years of litigation. Mainstream Institutional Arbitration -- The Arbitration centres should be the norm, not an exception. Elimination of Delays -- Procedural fairness should not become a tool for tactical stalling. Diversity in Arbitrators -- The arbitrator pool must reflect varied perspectives and backgrounds for better outcomes. Chief Justice Gavai concluded by affirming India's unwavering commitment to becoming a preferred global seat for arbitration. He said, 'As India and the UK grow increasingly interconnected in commerce and law, our shared democratic values and legal traditions provide a strong foundation for a unified, efficient, and trustworthy dispute resolution system.' The conference echoed a resounding call for legal harmonisation, technology-driven arbitration, and cross-border cooperation with the shared goal of easing court pendency and bolstering investor confidence through strong alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The event brought together senior dignitaries and legal experts from both India and the UK, including Chief Justice of India B R Gavai (inaugural address), Lord Briggs of Westbourne, Judge of the UK Supreme Court (keynote address), Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK (special address), Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Harish Salve KC, Senior Advocate and International Arbitrator, Sujit Ghosh, Deputy High Commissioner of India to the UK, Arun Chawla, Director General, ICA, Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate and Vice President, ICA, Dr N G Khaitan, President of ICA and Senior Partner at Khaitan and Co, and Karishma Vora, Barrister at 39 Essex Chambers, London and Member of the ICA International Advisory Committee. UNI SNG SS
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
Shashi Tharoor-Led All-Party Delegation Meets US Vice President JD Vance
Washington: The All-Party Parliamentary Delegation led by Shashi Tharoor on Thursday had an "excellent meeting" with the United States Vice President J.D. Vance in Washington, briefing him about Operation Sindoor, terrorism faced by India and regional security. "The All Party Parliamentary Delegation led by Dr. Shashi Tharoor called on Vice President J D Vance this morning. The conversation focused on strengthening the India-US partnership including cooperation in counter-terrorism domain," the Embassy of India in the United States posted on X. The All Party Parliamentary Delegation led by Dr. @ShashiTharoor called on Vice President JD Vance @VP this morning. The conversation focused on strengthening the India - US partnership including cooperation in counter-terrorism domain. — India in USA (@IndianEmbassyUS) June 5, 2025 "Excellent meeting with Vice President J D Vance today in Washington D.C. with our delegation. We had comprehensive discussions covering a wide array of critical issues, from counter-terrorism efforts to enhancing technological cooperation. A truly constructive and productive exchange for strengthening India-US strategic partnership, with a great meeting of minds," Tharoor also posted on X after the meeting. Mr Vance was visiting India when the heinous Pahalgam terror attack took place on April 22. In a strong message of support and solidarity, the US Vice-President had also called Prime Minister Narendra Modi to strongly condemn the terror attack and convey that the United States is ready to provide "all assistance" in the joint fight against terrorism. "Usha and I extend our condolences to the victims of the devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India. Over the past few days, we have been overcome with the beauty of this country and its people. Our thoughts and prayers are with them as they mourn this horrific attack," he had posted on X. Earlier in the day, Mr Tharoor spoke with Ambassador Ken Juster at Council on Foreign Relations on India's fight against terrorism. On Wednesday, the all party delegation met prominent members of the Indian diaspora in USA. The delegation spoke about India's resolute and united stand against terrorism and the new normal created by India through Operation Sindoor. The Indian diaspora members shared their message of solidarity with the victims of terrorism and support for India's fight against terrorism. "Pleasure to host Chairman Shashi Tharoor and members of the Indian Parliamentary Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs. My colleagues and I expressed condolences for the terrorist attack in Pahalgam and reaffirmed Congress's commitment to the US-India partnership," said Gregory Meeks. Later, the delegation interacted with members of the Indian and American Press Corps at the Embassy. The delegation is engaging with members of the US Congress, US thinks tanks and media professionals to brief about Operation Sindoor, terrorism faced by India and regional security. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, delegation head and Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said, "What we are seeking to do in every country is to explain our version of events, our experience of the last few weeks, to seek the solidarity and understanding of those we meet and speak to." "I'm very pleased to say that so far, our batting average is over 100 -- in other words, every single person we have met so far has immediately not only condemned resolutely the terrorist attack upon India and expressed their outrage and their sympathy, but they have also explicitly endorsed India's right to defend itself against terrorism, and this kind of understanding has been most welcome." Tharoor described the Pahalgam terror attack as an egregious disruption during a time of economic and social optimism in Kashmir. "Kashmir was booming. Ordinary Kashmiris are benefiting from vast numbers of tourists coming in, putting money into their hands and their pockets. It was a lovely time. And here's this innocent group of holiday tourists on a dappled meadow in Kashmir being murdered in cold blood by people coming and asking their religion and shooting them between the eyes," he said. "It really was a sickening outrage, and the nation rose as one to support whatever the government chose to do, and what the government chose to do in the end was what most of us would have wanted," he added. He also explained India's calibrated military response and eventual ceasefire. "If you were to go back and look at the briefings the government gave each morning, the message is very clear: we are hitting them because they are hitting us. If they stop, we'll stop. And after 88 hours, the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations reached out to his Indian counterpart and said, let's call it off. And we called it off," Tharoor said. The delegation includes a diverse political mix, with members such as Shambhavi Choudhary of the Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), Sarfaraz Ahmad of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, Milind Murli Deora of the Shiv Sena, Bhubaneswar Kalita and Tejasvi Surya of the BJP, and GM Harish Balayogi of the Telugu Desam Party, a National Democratic Alliance partner.
