Two Labour MPs denied entry and deported from Israel
Two Labour MPs have been denied entry to and deported from Israel in a move described as 'deeply concerning' by the UK foreign secretary.
Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed were rejected at the Israeli border after being accused of planning to spread 'anti-Israel hatred'.
Ms Yang, who represents Earley and Woodley, and Ms Mohamed, the MP for Sheffield Central, had flown to the country from Luton airport on Saturday afternoon.
Foreign secretary David Lammy hit out at the 'unacceptable' Israeli decision and said it was 'no way to treat British parliamentarians'.
'It is unacceptable, counterproductive, and deeply concerning that two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation to Israel have been detained and refused entry by the Israeli authorities,' Mr Lammy said.
'I have made clear to my counterparts in the Israeli government that this is no way to treat British Parliamentarians, and we have been in contact with both MPs tonight to offer our support.
'The UK government's focus remains securing a return to the ceasefire and negotiations to stop the bloodshed, free the hostages and end the conflict in Gaza.'
The Israeli embassy in the UK said Ms Yang's and Ms Mohamed's visit was 'intended to provoke, harm Israeli citizens, and spread falsehoods about them'.
'It is Israel's responsibility to prevent the entry of such individuals (just as is the practice in the United Kingdom),' it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iran's supreme leader facing fury from within
Iran's supreme leader is facing growing anger from within the regime's ruling inner circle following Israel's attacks on the country's nuclear infrastructure. Israel launched a wave of air strikes on Friday, killing top commanders and nuclear scientists, and bombing sites in an effort to stop Tehran building an atomic weapon. In response Tehran fired a salvo of missiles at Israel, which were largely intercepted. As hardliners continue to threaten vengeance against Israel and its allies in the wake of the strikes, there are signs of a deepening rift between Iran's extreme and moderate voices. It has mainly been left to the hardliners to articulate Iran's official response. The country's state-owned Fars News Agency, closely affiliated with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, quoted a senior military official warning that, apart from attacking Israel, 'the war will spread to all parts of Israel and American bases in the region in the coming days, and the aggressors will be targeted with a decisive and widespread response'. In an attempt to silence criticism of the regime's handling of the crisis, Mohseni Ejeie, Iran's chief judge cleric, issued a warning on Saturday that any Iranian citizen who posted comments on social media supporting Israel's attack would face sentences of up to six years in jail. Even so, as criticism of the regime's handling of the crisis begins to surface, it is likely to find itself under pressure to explain its inability to defend the nation from Israel's assault, despite the vast sums it claims to have spent upgrading the Iranian military. Private text messages shared with The New York Times reveal that some Iranian officials are questioning why Iran's air defences have not been more effective in repelling Israel's attacks, which hit its arsenal of ballistic missiles and assassinated senior figures in Tehran's military chain of command. 'Where is our air defence?' texted one official, while another asked: 'How can Israel come and attack anything it wants, kill our top commanders, and we are incapable of stopping it?' Hamid Hosseini, a member of Iran's Chamber of Commerce's energy committee, said: 'Israel's attack completely caught the leadership by surprise, especially the killing of the top military figures and nuclear scientists. It also exposed our lack of proper air defence and their ability to bombard our critical sites and military bases with no resistance.' Mr Hosseini also raised concerns about Israel's apparent infiltration of Iran's military and security forces, enabling it to conduct covert operations in Iran's armed forces and nuclear targets. In its response to Israel's attack, Iran was also only able to muster 200 missiles, despite an order from Ayatollah Khamenei to launch a barrage of 1,000 and reports that Iran was planning a response in the event of an Israeli attack for over a week. From the start of Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979, the battle between the regime's moderate faction, which seeks to adopt a less confrontational stance towards the West, and the ideological hardliners has been one of the regime's defining characteristics. While Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country's supreme leader, remains the hardliners' undisputed head, Masoud Pezeshkian, the country's recently elected president, is viewed as representing the regime's more moderate wing. To date, Mr Pezeshkian has kept a relatively low profile, condemning the Israeli attacks and calling for unity among the Iranian people, stating: 'Today, more than ever, the Iranian nation needs togetherness, trust, empathy, unity and consensus.' Mr Pezeshkian's electoral victory over conservative hardliner Saeed Jalil last was seen as indicative of Tehran's desire to adopt a more constructive approach with the West, especially in terms of alleviating the sanctions that have hit the Iranian economy hard. The regime's handling of the economy – where funds have been diverted to support military and terrorist operations instead of concentrating on domestic issues – has provoked mounting dissent throughout the country, and seen Khamenei under pressure to adopt a more conciliatory tone. During the election campaign, Mr Pezeshkian, a 71-year-old heart surgeon and member of the Iranian parliament, was highly critical of Iran's repressive morality police. He directly challenged the hardliners' approach by calling for 'unity and cohesion' in Iran, as well as calling for an end to Iran's 'isolation' from the outside world. Mr Pezeshkian also campaigned in favour of engaging in 'constructive negotiations' with Western powers to agree a new deal over the country's nuclear programme, which Iran agreed to kerb in return for an easing of Western sanctions. But while Mr Pezeshkian has tried hard to pursue a more moderate social and foreign policy since taking office, he has had to contend with the institutional resistance of the hardline faction, which regard any deal with the West concerning Iran's nuclear ambitions as tantamount to a sell-out. One indication of the ideological struggle at the heart of the Iranian regime came in March when Mohammad Javad Zarif, the country's moderate former foreign minister, was forced to resign from his position as vice-president. A close ally of Mr Pezeshkian, Mr Zarif's dismissal was said to be related to his opposition to Tehran's deepening alliance with Vladimir Putin, the leader of Russia, which he regarded as being counterproductive to Iran's diplomatic efforts to improve relations with the West. While Israel's military assault against Iran means there is little prospect of Tehran improving relations with the West in the near future, the eruption of hostilities will nevertheless focus attention on the regime's internal wrangling, which could ultimately result in the regime's collapse. For the moment, Iran's hardliners have taken charge of the country's military response to Israel's continuing offensive. But the longer Israel continues to attack key Iranian targets with impunity, the more pressure the hardliners will come under pressure to explain their abject failure to defend the country, a failing that ultimately could lead to their demise.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER HITCHENS: To those bomb-happy fools rejoicing at war I ask you this: Do you really want to see the Middle East become a radioactive wasteland?
Should I have bothered to go to Israel so many times, or to the West Bank or to Iraq or or Jordan or ? Should I have tried so hard to get into , when they so very plainly did not want me there? Perhaps not. What good has all this education done me? Because I actually know something about that part of the world, I am at a terrible disadvantage in what passes for debate on the new war in the Middle East. As streams of militant bilge shoot from the mouths of bomb-happy commentators and politicians, I shout pointlessly at the radio and the TV, on which I no longer appear because I made the same mistake over the Ukraine war.
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iran ‘able to make 50 nuclear bombs'
Iran has enough enriched uranium to make 50 nuclear bombs, and there is intelligence to show it was planning to weaponise it, Israel says. On Saturday, a senior Israeli Defense Forces official said Israel faced an 'immediate existential threat' from Iran, and that operations against Iran would continue until that threat was removed. The claims, which have not been independently verified, dwarf previous estimates. On Thursday, the UN's nuclear watchdog estimated that Iran had enriched enough uranium for nine bombs. The IDF official also told a briefing for journalists that overnight strikes on Iranian air defence systems meant that the 'aerial road to Tehran was now effectively open'. The threat Israel faces from Iran consists of three elements, said the official: Iran's nuclear program, its ballistic missiles, and its sponsorship of cross-border terrorism through proxy groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. 'This is not necessarily over. We are prepared for more rounds,' the official added. 'Our goal in these operations is to remove an existential threat; to remove a ticking time bomb'. Israel has been warning since 2009 that Iran was 'months away' from developing a nuclear bomb, but the claim it had gone beyond enrichment towards developing a weapon is new, as is the number of 50 bombs. The IDF official said its intelligence had been shared with other intelligence agencies and showed that 'concrete progress' had been made in the Iranian regime's efforts to produce weapons components adapted for a nuclear bomb, including a uranium metal core and initiator for triggering an explosion. This stands in contrast to recent assessments made by the US and its security agencies. Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, told Congress in March that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was 'at its highest levels' and 'unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons'. But she added that US intelligence 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003'. Three people were killed in Israel in barrages of Iranian ballistic missile fire on Friday night and early on Saturday morning. In addition, some 70 people were wounded by the estimated 200 ballistic missiles fired from Iran in four waves. Most of the missiles were intercepted by air defences. But a 'small number' made it through air defences, the IDF said. It was clear from live television images that at least one target of the Iranian strikes was the Kirya, a densely built-up area in central Tel Aviv that houses a number of military offices including the IDF's headquarters. The IDF warned that further ballistic missile attacks on Israel were expected but it claimed Iran's ability to launch missiles at Israel would slowly degrade. The Israeli military released footage showing the identification of Iranian ballistic missile launchers in Tehran, shortly before they were targeted. Israel believes Iran has an arsenal of about 2,000 ballistic missiles it could use against Israel and which – until the current strikes – was growing fast. David Lammy, the UK Foreign Secretary, has expressed concern at the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. 'Alarmed by further strikes in the Middle East overnight, with reports of fatalities and injuries in Israel. We must urgently de-escalate & prevent any further harm to civilians,' Mr Lammy wrote on the social media platform X. He added that he had spoken to his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi 'to urge calm.'
