
Fluoride to be reintroduced in Calgary water starting next month
Social Sharing
Fluoride will be reintroduced in Calgary's drinking water starting June 30, about 3½ years after Calgarians voted in favour of fluoridation in the October 2021 municipal election.
The fluoridation process will supplement the natural fluoride in the Bow and Elbow Rivers, bringing it to "the optimal level of 0.7 milligrams per litre," the city said in a release.
That's the fluoride level recommended by Health Canada's guidance for community water fluoridation. Health Canada is one of over 90 national and international governments and health organizations that endorse the fluoridation of drinking water.
Fluoride supports oral health by replenishing minerals like calcium and phosphate on the surface of teeth, making enamel stronger and more resistant to acid, bacteria and tooth decay.
The University of Calgary's Cumming School of Medicine conducted research on the subject in 2021. It found that among Grade 2 students in Calgary and Edmonton, children in Calgary were more likely to have cavities than those living in Edmonton, where water has been fluoridated since 1967.
"Fluoridation benefits the community, especially those most vulnerable and without access to dental care," said the city.
Fluoride has no effect on the taste, smell or appearance of drinking water.
Plan years in the making
The 2021 civic election included a referendum on fluoridation, and 62 per cent of those who voted expressed support for fluoride to be reintroduced to the city's drinking water.
The city's newly elected council voted in favour of it the month after the election.
Calgary's water supply was first fluoridated in 1991, with fluoride being added to the city's drinking water for three decades before council voted to end the process in 2011, the year the city's existing fluoridation infrastructure reached the end of its lifecycle.
The 2021 decision resulted in upgrades to the city's infrastructure beginning in 2023, nearly two years after the motion was passed, before being postponed to 2024 and then postponed to this year.
Those upgrades, including installation of new fluoride equipment at the Glenmore and Bearspaw water treatment plants, came with a $28.1-million price tag — and annual costs of $1 million.
"This translates into less than 10 cents per person, per month. This is already funded through council-approved water rates. There is no support from property taxes," said the city.
According to Alberta Health Services, "every $1 spent on community water fluoridation can save up to $93 per person in dental treatment costs."
AHS endorses water fluoridation "as a foundational public health measure to prevent tooth decay and improve oral health."
Calgary joins other Alberta municipalities such as Edmonton, Red Deer and Lethbridge that have water fluoridation.
"The City of Calgary's highest priority is in delivering safe and reliable drinking water to citizens where we continue to meet or perform better than all drinking water regulations," said the city.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Man in his 60s seriously injured after being struck by vehicle in North York
Police investigating after a man in his 60s was taken to hospital with serious, non-life-threatening injuries on Saturday May 31, 2025 (CP24 photo). A man in his 60s was taken to hospital with serious, non-life-threatening injuries after allegedly being struck by a vehicle late Saturday night. In an email to CTV News Toronto, Toronto police say they were called to the area of Victoria Park Avenue and Eglinton Square shortly after 10 p.m. TPS Toronto police officers on scene of a collision on Saturday May 31, 2025 (CP24 photo). The driver involved did remain on scene, police say. The investigation is ongoing. Police are asking any witnesses to come forward.


CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
'Leading and dividing New Brunswick': New book explores Blaine Higgs's legacy
Blaine Higgs "broke an all-time record" for low levels of support in New Brunswick's francophone ridings in both 2020 and 2024, says Gabriel Arsenault, a Université de Moncton political science professor. Though it may have worked in the short term — Higgs was re-elected premier in 2020 — "in the long term that's not a winnable strategy," said Arsenault, editor of a new book of scholarship on Higgs's legacy. Higgs led the Progressive Conservatives to defeat and lost his own seat in October 2024, when Susan Holt and the Liberals won a majority in the legislature. Arsenault is the editor of The Higgs Years: Leading and Dividing New Brunswick, a collection of 15 essays by academics across Canada who looked back at Higgs's time as premier and his leadership. Arsenault said that the book can also shed light on the most recent federal election because many of the things that led to Higgs downfall were paralleled federally. The book is not only important to New Brunswickers but also to people across the country, Arsenault said, since "New Brunswick is in many ways a microcosm of Canada." New Brunswick is in many ways a microcosm of Canada. - Gabriel Arsenault In the most recent federal election, the Conservative Party would also have won "if it weren't for Quebec," according to Arsenault, because "Quebecers massively voted for the Liberal Party and that really cost him the election." When he was first elected premier, in 2019, Higgs's main promise was to balance the books, Arsenault said: "He was very motivated about that issue and he arguably won the election in 2018 because of that issue." On this front, Higgs was successful every year, even during the pandemic. "It was the only jurisdiction in Canada to do so and, even abroad, I would be hard-pressed to find another jurisdiction who managed to do a surplus during the COVID years." One of Higgs's biggest problems, Arsenault said, was that he tried to appease both sides of a coin but actually remained highly divisive. To manage the province's response to the pandemic, Higgs put together a committee that included the leaders of all parties in the legislature, including those with political views quite different from his own. At the time, Higgs's approval rating "was around 90 per cent," Arsenault said, "which is absolutely phenomenal in a democracy.", This flipped entirely in his second term, when Higgs began to face opposition from his own caucus, and eight of his cabinet ministers stepped down. Arsenault also said that the financial surplus during COVID was not completely due to policy decisions because huge numbers of people were immigrating to New Brunswick from urban centres at the time. "Housing is cheaper in New Brunswick and a lot of people from Ontario moved to New Brunswick, bringing with them their income, their money," Arsenault said. But even if he could claim progress with the province's finances and economy, Higgs was divisive in many ways, said Arsenault, pointing to a French-English divide, the government's relationship with Indigenous peoples, and Policy 713, the province's gender-identity policy for schools. This divisiveness was one of Higgs's biggest problems, and it even caused instability within his own party. Higgs underestimated the number of party members who "are 'small c' conservatives," and "think they have a responsibility to defend minorities." Arsenault said the book is a balanced look at Higgs's legacy. He also said that to form a majority government, the Progressive Conservative Party usually needs to be more moderate or centrist than the Higgs government was.


Globe and Mail
32 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
International clinical trial shows exercise improves survival for colon cancer patients
For nearly two decades, researchers from around the world have explored a question in a clinical trial considered the first of its kind: Can physical activity improve cancer survival? The answer, according to their research, is a resounding yes. The study from a trial called the CO.21 Challenge, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Sunday, says a structured exercise program significantly improves survival for colon cancer patients. From 2009 until 2024, researchers looked at the impact of physical activity on patients with Stage 3 or high-risk Stage 2 colon cancer. The trial included 889 patients who'd had surgery and chemotherapy. The participants were randomly assigned to participate in a structured exercise program with an exercise therapist over a three-year period, or they received health education materials on the benefits of physical activity and nutrition. The patients also received cancer surveillance and follow-up care. The results showed a significant improvement in overall survival and disease-free survival among participants assigned to the exercise program in comparison with those who only received the health education materials. The research found patients in the structured exercise program had a 37-per-cent lower risk of death and a 28-per-cent lower risk of recurrence or developing other cancers. Christopher Booth, an oncologist at Kingston Health Sciences Centre and a professor of oncology at Queen's University who co-chaired the global cancer trial, said that he didn't sleep for days after first seeing the results. He experienced a sense of joy and exhilaration, for both patients and for the future of cancer care. 'I think this really does change the landscape of cancer treatment; it opens an entirely new avenue of cancer therapy,' Dr. Booth told The Globe and Mail by phone. Dr. Booth's fellow chair is Kerry Courneya, a professor and Canada Research Chair in physical activity and cancer at the University of Alberta. He said the study shows exercise is no longer only an intervention for quality-of-life. 'It is a treatment for colon cancer that must be made available to all patients,' Dr. Courneya said. Gen X and millennials blindsided by rising rates of cancer Terri Swain-Collins, a 62-year old who lives in Kingston and who participated in the trial, said working with a trainer over a three-year period helped her establish and maintain a fitness plan. She was diagnosed with colon cancer in June, 2021. Ms. Swain-Collins said the sense of accountability made 'all the difference' and simply being told to work out by a doctor would not have been enough. She appreciated the regular check-ins, as well as being able to have someone with her while she logged steps on a treadmill. Dr. Booth, Ms. Swain-Collins's oncologist, said researchers were thrilled to see behavioural changes could lead to positive outcomes for patients. For example, he said they felt better; their fitness improved. On top of that, he said, the scale of the benefit of exercise is, in some cases, better than what is offered through many standard cancer drug regimes. Dr. Booth said it is important to note that the exercise program offered added benefits on top of those from surgery and chemotherapy. After nearly two decades of working on the research (for reference, Dr. Booth started working on it when his wife was pregnant with their child who is now 18), he is hopeful the findings can help change the standards for colon cancer care. But he said knowledge of the benefits of exercise won't be sufficient to see most people change their lifestyle and to sustain change. A new model, he said, should see patients who have had surgery and received chemotherapy treatments with oncologists like himself referred to an exercise specialist who can then work with them over the next three years. 'We need to ensure the health systems provide this structured behaviour change intervention,' he said, adding an exercise consultant should be part of the health care team.