logo
US judges keep calling Trump's actions illegal, but undoing them is hard

US judges keep calling Trump's actions illegal, but undoing them is hard

Straits Times24-05-2025

US President Donald Trump has suffered a string of court losses in recent days as federal judges ruled that his administration broke the law on a number of matters. PHOTO: AFP
WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump has suffered a string of court losses in recent days as federal judges ruled that his administration broke the law on a number of matters, including firing officials, shutting down organisations and deporting migrants.
But if the decisions all point in the same direction - Mr Trump and his team have acted lawlessly in egregious ways, judges emphatically said - the real-world consequences may vary.
That is because even assuming all those rulings were to be upheld on appeal, some of Mr Trump's actions would be easier to undo than others. And the slow pace of litigation means the judiciary is often many steps behind and in some cases unable to catch up.
Still, courts serve as a rare check on Mr Trump, who has steam rolled constraints inside the executive branch, enjoys broad immunity for his official acts because of a 2024 Supreme Court ruling and, as a matter of political reality, has little reason to fear impeachment or even serious oversight inquiries by the Republican-controlled Congress.
The Trump administration has responded, as it often does to court losses, by lobbing insults - calling one such ruling a 'rogue judge's attempt to impede on the separation of powers' and another the act of 'an unelected judge with a political axe to grind'.
In an interview with New York Times columnist Ross Douthat, Vice-President J.D. Vance declared: 'I know this is inflammatory, but I think you are seeing an effort by the courts to quite literally overturn the will of the American people.'
The denunciations make clear that appeals are inevitable, so the story is not yet over.
But among the actions struck down by district court judges this week, the simplest to undo is likely Mr Trump's dismissal, without cause, of three Democratic-selected members of an independent watchdog agency that scrutinises counterterrorism policies and actions, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.
On May 21, Judge Reggie B. Walton of the US District Court in Washington ruled that Mr Trump had broken the law in doing so and ordered the reinstatement of two members who had sued.
Mr Trump's move left the board with only one member, largely paralysing the agency because a quorum of three is necessary for it to act. When its employees wrote up an examination of face scanners in airports in May, they released it as an informal staff report rather than as a statutorily authorised board report that is accompanied by member recommendations and submitted to Congress. They cannot start new investigations.
The administration has not said whether it will appeal, but it has made clear it wants the Supreme Court to expand a president's authority to fire the leaders of independent agencies. On May 22, the court permitted Mr Trump, for now, to remove leaders of two other such agencies.
Still, Judge Walton's reasoning suggested that even if the Supreme Court bolsters Mr Trump's power to control some of these agencies, the independent structure of the privacy board might survive since it is an investigative body that does not exercise much, if any, 'executive power', like making and enforcing rules. And if the two oversight board members who sued, Travis LeBlanc and Edward Felten, can return to their offices, collect back pay and finish their terms, there will have been relatively little long-term damage done.
A middle ground, in terms of what it would take to undo the administration's handiwork, is presented by two rulings against Mr Trump this week concerning his efforts to unilaterally shut down parts of the government, or its activities, that were established and funded by Congress.
On May 19, Judge Beryl A. Howell of US District Court in Washington ruled that the administration's takeover of the US Institute of Peace, a nonprofit think tank that Congress established to seek diplomatic solutions to global conflicts, was unlawful and a 'gross usurpation of power'.
She ordered the reinstatement of top officials ousted by the White House and nullified the transfer of the institute's building to the General Services Administration, which manages the federal real estate portfolio. A separate lawsuit remains pending on behalf of the institute's workforce. The administration terminated most of the institute's hundreds of workers in the United States and abroad.
But the Trump administration filed its notice of appeal on May 21 and sought to temporarily block Judge Howell's order. If there is a stay until the Supreme Court weighs in, even a victory and a similar order to reinstate its broader workforce would not make it straightforward for the institute to simply pick back up.
For one, its former employees may not be willing or able to return. Some may have found other jobs in the interim. For another, Republican lawmakers may decide against allocating funding for it in next year's budget, in which case Trump's move, even if lawless, will end up as a mere jump-start.
A ruling on May 22, ordering the Trump administration to halt and reverse Mr Trump's effort to dismantle the Education Department, raises similar complexities. Judge Myong J. Joun of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction ordering officials to reinstate thousands of fired employees.
Judge Joun found that the administration had likely broken multiple laws that require the department to perform various functions, as well as a mandate in the Department of Education Organisation Act 'that the department itself must exist – not just in name only'.
But the administration has also proposed huge cuts in next year's budget – meaning that employees considering whether to return may see little long-term future there regardless.
Perhaps the most fraught action against the Trump administration this week came from Judge Brian E. Murphy of the US District Court in Boston. On May 21, he declared that the administration had violated an order he issued in April barring the deportation of migrants to countries not their own without first giving them sufficient time to object.
The issue centred on several men who were deported after being told they were being sent to South Sudan, a violence-plagued country in Africa where most of them are not from. The flight apparently landed in the East African nation of Djibouti, where there is a US military base.
Judge Murphy said the Homeland Security Department's actions had 'unquestionably' violated his earlier order, and suggested that he may later find officials in contempt.
But the Republican-dominated Congress is also considering reducing the power of judges to hold people in contempt as part of the budget bill. And now that the deportees are out of the United States, it will be difficult to give them the due process the judge said they were denied. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge
Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge

The S$19.83 million project would carry trains and six lanes of traffic, allowing cars to cross the Strait of Messina in 15 minutes. PHOTO: AFP ROME - Italy hopes to begin constructing the world's largest suspension bridge connecting Sicily to the Italian mainland this summer, amid widespread scepticism that it will ever be built. The €13.5 billion (S$19.83 million) project would carry trains and six lanes of traffic, allowing cars to cross the Strait of Messina in 15 minutes. Ms Giorgia Meloni's hard-right government hopes to boost the economy of the impoverished region, although critics say there are better ways to do this – and many believe that after decades of false starts, the bridge will never actually happen. The choppy waters between the eastern tip of Sicily and the western edge of the region of Calabria are legendary as the place where monsters Scylla and Charybdis terrified sailors in Homer's epic poem 'The Odyssey'. These days the challenges are more prosaic, from winds of more than 100kmh to the real risk of earthquakes in a region that lies across two tectonic plates. The government says the bridge will be at the cutting edge of engineering, with the section suspended between its two pillars stretching 3.3km, the longest in the world. But critics point to a long history of public works announced, financed and never completed in Italy, whether due to corruption or political instability, resulting in enormous losses for taxpayers. 'The public does not trust this political class and these projects that become endless construction sites,' said Mr Luigi Storniolo, a member of protest group No Ponte (No Bridge). Infrastructure Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, one of the main champions of the project, insists it will be a game-changer for the local economy. 'The bridge will be a catalyst for development,' he said on a recent visit to Reggio di Calabria, the city where the bridge will begin. 'A senseless project' The government hopes to boost trade in Sicily, which currently suffers from an 'insularity cost' of around €6.5 billion a year, according to regional authorities. Ms Meloni's ministers are expected to give their final approval to the project – which Rome will fund – later in June, and Mr Salvini insists construction will begin this summer. But work had already been announced for the summer of 2024, before being postponed – a common theme in the history of the bridge, the idea of which dates back to the unification of Italy at the end of the 19th century. The first law for the project was passed in 1971. Since then, successive governments have either revived it or cancelled it. In 2012, the idea appeared to be definitely abandoned amid the eurozone debt crisis, only for Ms Meloni's government, which took office in 2022, to return to it once again. Mr Salvini has repeatedly stated that the bridge would create 120,000 jobs in Calabria and Sicily, which have the fourth and the 13th highest unemployment rates respectively in the EU for young people under 29. However, the left-wing CGIL trade union estimates around 2,300 workers a year will be hired during the project, and critics say the jobs created will be offset by long-term losses from the closure of ferries. Mafia risk The project has sparked local protests, with critics warning of the impact on a protected marine zone and an important bird migratory route. Mr Storniolo told AFP it was a 'senseless project' which used up valuable funds when 'our regions already suffer from many problems... healthcare, schools, and infrastructure.' The Italian Court of Auditors has also criticised the extent of the debt-laden Italian state's investment in this one project in its assessment of the 2024 budget. 'They want to make an entire territory believe that its only hope is this bridge – but then the bridge never arrives,' protester Mr Storniolo added. There is also the question of mafia infiltration. The attorney-general of Messina recently warned of the risk that organised crime would benefit from the project, noting that 'the power of the mafia is hidden... behind public contracts'. The government has proposed placing companies relating to the project under control of an anti-mafia structure reporting to the interior ministry. But Italian President Sergio Mattarella blocked this, saying it should only be used for one-off events such as earthquakes or the Olympics. Mr Salvini argued that the bridge can help tackle the mafia, saying: 'You do not fight the mafia... with conferences and protests, but by creating jobs and giving hope to young people.' AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs
Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs

President Donald Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. PHOTO: REUTERS Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs WASHINGTON - Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on June 10 showed. Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of US$75 billion (S$96.5 billion) for the US industry. The documents made public by the US Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union. 'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field', it added. Mr Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, US planemaker Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts. 'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported US$1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took US exports of aircraft worth roughly US$12 billion, while exporting about US$8 billion of aircraft to the US. In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'Current US tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100 per cent domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing US content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88 per cent domestically-sourced content'. The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that US aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilise, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US intel chief warns global nuclear annihilation is closer than ever
US intel chief warns global nuclear annihilation is closer than ever

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US intel chief warns global nuclear annihilation is closer than ever

Ms Tulsi Gabbard accused unnamed political elites of trying to foment conflict between world powers. PHOTO: AFP US intel chief warns global nuclear annihilation is closer than ever WASHINGTON – Ms Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, released a video on June 11 warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever and accusing unnamed political elites of trying to foment conflict between world powers. Ms Gabbard didn't cite any countries by name, but her remarks echoed long time claims by Russian officials and, more recently, by far-right commentators in the US who have warned that the Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's strategic bomber fleet earlier in June made nuclear war more likely. 'As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' Ms Gabbard said in the video posted to X. 'Perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to,' she said. 'It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness.' The video was prompted by the director's visit to Hiroshima, Japan, where she said she saw the aftereffects of the US decision to drop an atomic bomb on the city in 1945. Foreboding music played in the background as archival footage showed the victims of the attack. 'A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes, just one of these nuclear bombs would vaporise everything at its core,' Ms Gabbard said. The video then cut to mock footage of a nuclear attack on San Francisco that obliterated the Golden Gate Bridge. 'Acknowledging the past is critical to inform the future,' the director's deputy chief of staff, Ms Alexa Henning, said in a statement on the evening of June 10. 'DNI Gabbard supports President Trump's clearly stated objectives of bringing about lasting peace and stability and preventing war.' President Donald Trump said the US had 'stopped a nuclear conflict' with its mediation between India and Pakistan after a flare up in clashes between the two adversaries. The US is also looking to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme amid concerns that Israel may be readying an attack on its nuclear sites. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store