I own a reselling business with my wife, and our sales are booming thanks to tariffs. I can't attribute this growth to anything else.
Ryan Frankel and his wife, Evelyn, launched Thrift Vintage Fashion in 2020.
The business supplies secondhand clothing nationwide.
Thrift Vintage Fashion saw a 41% revenue increase after tariffs were announced.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Ryan Frankel, a 36-year-old business owner in Miami. It has been edited for length and clarity.
My primary business is Thrift Vintage Fashion, which I launched in 2020 with my wife, Evelyn. We supply secondhand clothing — mostly men's wear, such as T-shirts, sweatshirts, and denim — to stores nationwide. When Trump took office in January, our sales took a steep decline.
Once he came into office, there was a lot of uncertainty. However, we noticed a significant incline once tariffs were announced in February. From February to March, we saw an unprecedented 41% increase in revenue (gross sales). Then we had our best March and April since we started the business.
I can't attribute our growth to anything other than the tariffs.
My family has been in this business for three generations
My grandfather began selling men's secondhand clothing after World War II. In the 90s, my father primarily sold denim and Levi's. When I started working with my father in 2010, we brought the business online and got our name out there.
After I launched Thrift Vintage Fashion, which is primarily a wholesale B2B business, it popped off right away. We did over $1 million in revenue in our first year working out of our garage during peak COVID in 2020. This was mainly due to my experience working with my father over the previous decade and improving the model and ordering efficiency through the TVF website.
Once Trump raised the tariffs, many of our clients reached out to us
Many clients — primarily secondhand clothing stores (big and small), vintage clothing stores, and online resellers — reached out to ask if the tariffs had affected our business. There was a lot of uncertainty, but we were able to confidently say, "No, we're not affected, and we're not going to raise our prices." Since then, we've just seen a slew of new orders come in, in addition to existing clients ordering a lot more.
Consumers preparing for prices to go up is another factor that has increased our secondhand sales. Everyone's talking about how fashion prices are going up, but since secondhand circulates within the US, no tariffs are affecting it at all.
It seems more people are interested in entering the reselling business
People are potentially looking into reselling more, which is positively affecting my wholesale business. We've seen steady growth across the US.
The US has been our primary market for the last three years, and we see increasing interest from new and existing resale clients. Our numbers are growing, our existing customers are doubling down on their business, and there's increasing demand in the secondhand market. I'm biased, as this is my career, but it's an excellent opportunity for shoppers and business owners to consider selling and buying secondhand goods.
There's so much of it out there: eBay, estate sales, garage sales, or storage units. A lot of secondhand merchandise is way better quality than most things produced today, and there's a growing demand for all of it. We're buying more goods and building our supply chain, prepping for growth in both wholesale and retail sectors.
The main challenges are the high costs of collecting, processing, and reselling these garments
Believe it or not, many used clothing articles cost more than many new clothing items made today. So, our company is always up against the perception of selling something used for the same price or more than new clothing. However, this perception is shifting daily, with people recognizing the value of secondhand versus cheap new fashion.
Every day, we're shedding the old stigma of secondhand shops being viewed as "less than." The fact is that the items we sell are in excellent condition. While many brands produce cheap, throwaway fast fashion, older clothes were often made more durably. Whether the clothes were made five or 15 years ago, many desirable styles have become rare by nature and hard to find, thus increasing their value.
The desire for secondhand items will probably continue
If you're already selling secondhand items, that's great; stick with it. You're probably seeing increases already, and I think it will continue. If you're not selling secondhand, especially if you're worried about tariffs, I would consider trying to implement it into your existing business.
There are so many significant factors in buying secondhand that the average American consumer slowly recognizes more each day. There are also opportunities to grow a brand reselling the billions of secondhand garments in circulation. I believe we're past the days of "thrifting" carrying a negative connotation. We're scratching the surface of what's possible with secondhand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. landmark Fog City diner closes permanently after 40 years on the Embarcadero
Fog City, the landmark restaurant that helped launch San Francisco's small plates movement and once defined the modern American diner, closed its doors Friday after four decades in operation. 'With a heavy heart I share some difficult news,' read a message posted by the restaurant on social media. 'Fog City has closed permanently with the last day of service being May 30, 2025. Thank you for the 40 years of patronage!' The closure was unannounced, and no reason was provided. Opened in 1985 as Fog City Diner by restaurateurs Bill Higgins and Bill Upson, the eatery became an immediate part of the city's dining landscape with its whimsical Pat Kuleto design and the inventive cuisine of chef Cindy Pawlcyn. Over the years, its neon signs and bold, globally inspired menu helped cement its place in San Francisco's culinary lore. Though Pawlcyn departed more than a decade ago, a 2013 overhaul saw the diner reimagined as simply Fog City, with a sleeker look by architect Michael Guthrie and a revamped kitchen led by chef Bruce Hill. Hill introduced dishes such as wood-oven roasted chicken with kimchi butter, utilizing his patented chef's press, a stainless steel tool that weighs down food to even out cooking times. Located at 1300 Battery St., the site itself has a layered history — once a roundhouse for trains, then a World War II-era cafeteria, and later a gathering spot for longshoremen. When it was still known as Fog City Diner, the restaurant appeared in Visa commercials, Farley comic strips, and the 1993 Mike Myers film 'So I Married an Axe Murderer.'
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China says Hegseth is touting a Cold War mentality in calling it a threat
BEIJING (AP) — China on Sunday denounced U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for calling the Asian country a threat, accusing him of touting a Cold War mentality as tensions between Washington and Beijing further escalate. The foreign ministry said Hegseth had vilified Beijing with defamatory allegations the previous day before at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference. The statement also accused the United States of inciting conflict and confrontation in the region. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation,' it said, referring to the post-World War II rivalry between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union. 'No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the U.S. itself,' it said, alleging that Washington is also undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific. Hegseth said in Singapore on Saturday that Washington will bolster its defenses overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance toward Taiwan. China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal,' Hegseth said. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' The Chinese statement stressed that the Taiwan question is entirely China's internal affair, saying the U.S. must 'never play with fire' with it. It also alleged Washington had deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea, was 'stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific' and "turning the region into a powder keg.' In a Facebook post on Saturday, China's Embassy in Singapore said Hegseth's speech was 'steeped in provocations and instigation.' The U.S. and China had reached a deal last month to cut U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs from 145% to 30% for 90 days, creating time for negotiators from both sides to reach a more substantive agreement. China also reduced its taxes on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. But it's uncertain if a trade war truce will last. Trump in a social media post on Friday said he would no longer be 'nice' with China when it comes to trade and accused Beijing of breaking an unspecified agreement with the U.S. Tensions escalated anew after the U.S. said on Wednesday it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying there. Separately, the Chinese Embassy in Singapore criticized attempts to link the issue of Taiwan with that of the war in Ukraine after French President Emmanuel Macron warned of a dangerous double standard in focusing on a potential conflict with China at the cost of abandoning Ukraine. 'If one tries to denounce 'double standards' through the lens of a double standard, the only result we can get is still double standard,' it said. China, which usually sends its defense minister to the Shangri-La forum, this time sent a lower-level delegation led by Maj. Gen. Hu Gangfeng, the vice president of the People's Liberation Army National Defense University.
Entrepreneur
2 days ago
- Entrepreneur
Historic Perspectives on Tariff Policies and Modern Impacts
Today, global trade debates over tariffs and trade policies often dominate headlines. A closer examination of these issues reveals that the roots of today's tariff practices extend far back in... This story originally appeared on Due Today, global trade debates over tariffs and trade policies often dominate headlines. A closer examination of these issues reveals that the roots of today's tariff practices extend far back in history. Once designed to aid the recovery of nations emerging from conflict, these policies have taken on new dimensions in today's global economy. The discussion centers on how a policy intended to support post-war reconstruction now influences automotive trade and international business strategies. The Origins of Tariff Policies Tariffs were initially implemented with specific goals in mind. After World War II, several countries that suffered significant devastation had to rebuild their economies. In that context, the United States allowed other nations to impose taxes on American exports. This arrangement helped protect developing markets by limiting the competition from large, well-established American companies. The measure was not designed to penalize the United States. Instead, it was a way for many European and Asian cities, which had endured extensive damage during the war, to gain a foothold in their economic recovery. Cities such as Berlin, Tokyo, and London were among those that benefited. These measures enabled local industries to grow and stabilize, thereby supporting broader recovery efforts during a time when rebuilding was paramount. Over the decades, however, the global economy has seen substantial changes. While the original intention was clear and rooted in the necessities of the post-war period, many of these tariffs have persisted in modern trade regulations. The continued existence of such tariffs now invites scrutiny and debate, as they impact international competition and domestic industries in ways that were not foreseen at their inception. View this post on Instagram Modern Applications and Effects Today's tariff policies continue to influence global trade practices. Authorities still enforce tariffs that were initially designed for a very different time. A key example is evident in the auto industry, where tariffs play a significant role in shaping market dynamics and international competitiveness. The persistence of older tariff rules has led many experts and market watchers to question their continued application. They argue that there is little justification for protecting specific international auto industries when market conditions have evolved dramatically since the post-war era. European manufacturers, such as those from Germany, have grown strong enough to compete in global markets without the need for the historical shields that once protected their nascent industries. The Case of the Auto Industry The automotive sector serves as a clear example where historical tariff policies clash with modern market demands. European countries impose higher tariffs on American-made cars. This protection was once beneficial when U.S. auto makers were expanding their reach and dominating global trade. However, the industry dynamics have shifted. In addition to the auto industry, other sectors are also feeling the impact. The historical justification for high tariffs was protection and recovery support. However, local and international players now argue that tariffs can hinder competitiveness and increase costs for consumers. These criticisms suggest that policy reforms in the tariff system may be necessary to better align with modern market dynamics. Contemporary Critiques of Tariff Policies Recent political debates have brought new perspectives to the forefront. Recent events have sparked controversy over measures to implement reciprocal tariffs. Critics of these new policies see them as mismatched to modern economic circumstances. Some prominent figures have openly questioned the merits of such measures. They point out that the current policies are an extension of historical practices that may no longer have the same benefit. Their arguments assert that applying these old policies in a modern context might create more tension than support economic recovery or growth. The market reactions have been mixed. On one hand, the introduction of reciprocal tariffs has generated political support among certain groups. On the other hand, many economic experts criticize these moves as ill-suited for a globalized market. They argue that such tariffs have a historical basis that does not justify their blanket application in modern times. Examining the Historical Context To fully appreciate the current debates over tariffs, it is essential to examine their historical context. After World War II, Europe and parts of Asia were in dire need of support to rebuild their industries and economies. The tax measures imposed on U.S. goods were part of a broader strategy aimed at jumpstarting these economies. The case of tariffs on automobiles effectively demonstrates this point. With separate tariff rates for U.S. vehicles and those produced elsewhere, questions of fairness and relevance are continually raised. Consumers ultimately bear the costs, and the protective measures may end up stifling competition rather than promoting it. Historical Intent: Tariffs were initially introduced to help rebuild economies after a major conflict. Tariffs were initially introduced to help rebuild economies after a major conflict. Modern Challenge: Outdated tariff rules now clash with current economic realities. Outdated tariff rules now clash with current economic realities. Sector Impact: Industries such as automotive manufacturing face differing tariff rates that affect international trade. Balancing Policy with Modern Economy Modern trade policies must navigate the challenge of adhering to historical precedents while remaining relevant to today's dynamic economy. Policymakers face the task of determining whether longstanding tariff rates continue to serve the best interests of contemporary industries and consumers. The auto industry story is a clear indicator of the broader implications. As European countries impose higher tariffs on American vehicles, the inherent inequities in the system become more pronounced. Industry observers note that the protection once extended to struggling domestic sectors may now contribute to market inefficiencies. For many, the answer lies in modernizing these systems to reflect current global trade practices. Reducing or realigning tariffs could lead to improved relationships between trading nations and more balanced competition. Such adjustments might also foster an environment where domestic companies are encouraged to innovate and compete on a level field. Confronting Political and Economic Debates Political discourse surrounding tariffs has intensified in recent years. The debate centers on whether these measures, which once helped rebuild economies, still play a valuable role. Critics argue that policies introduced many decades ago do not translate well into the current era. They express concerns that continuing with such policies helps fuel trade tensions and creates economic challenges for consumers. Some political figures have been vocal in their criticism. They point out that reciprocal tariffs, intended to create balance, have instead become a source of contention. Critics note that these tariff adjustments often seem disproportionate and fail to address the underlying changes in market conditions. As the debate continues, it is clear that finding a balance will require input from economists, policymakers, and industry representatives alike. The situation calls for a collaborative approach that considers historical context and the demands of modern trade. Looking Ahead The discussion on tariffs is far from over. As international trade evolves, so too will policy debates about how best to protect domestic industries while engaging in a fair exchange with other nations. The historical reasons for imposing tariffs now serve as a reminder of a past era. Yet they also challenge today's policymakers to decide whether these measures continue to meet their intended goals. Looking forward, adjusting these policies might not only reduce tensions but also pave the way for a more efficient trading system. As industries mature and global competition intensifies, many believe that a careful reevaluation of tariff rates is warranted. Such reconsideration could lead to a reduction in consumer costs and stimulate further economic growth. Though tariff policies have deep historical roots, the current economic climate presents an opportunity for reform. The evolution of technology and production methods means that nations can engage in trade with less dependency on protectionist measures. A modern approach could encourage fairer competition and promote innovation in a way that benefits both producers and consumers. Many experts, market analysts, and policymakers continue to monitor trade discussions. They suggest that this issue is not about discarding history but rather about adapting policy to serve modern economies better. The lessons from decades past inform the current debate, and in doing so, offer guidance for possible future changes. In conclusion, examining the history behind tariff policies provides valuable insights into why they exist and how they affect today's industries. The auto industry stands as a clear example where historical practices continue to influence modern trade. With ongoing debates and a call for reform, the future of tariff policies remains a topic that warrants close attention from both policymakers and the public. Featured Image Credit: Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko; Pexels The post Historic Perspectives on Tariff Policies and Modern Impacts appeared first on Due.
