&w=3840&q=100)
300 years on, Ahilyabai Holkar still defines true Nari Shakti
Saturday was the 300th birth anniversary of a queen whose contributions revived not just the temples but also led to a re-emergence of a Hindu consciousness read more
A few months ago, while driving through rural West Bengal, the GPS suddenly showed me as being on Ahilyabai Holkar Road. I was aware of Rani Ahilyabai's work in terms of contributing to the construction or reconstruction of temples in key Hindu pilgrim destinations across many parts of India, but Bengal was a surprise. Some research revealed that while she may not have been active in Bengal, the impact of her spiritual contribution was so deep that respect for her was a national phenomenon.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Last Saturday was the 300th anniversary of her birth. As with many such stellar figures, her origins were humble. Born on May 31, 1725 in a village, in what is now Ahmednagar district of Maharashtra, her father was a 'Patil' of their village – a revenue official. One day, the Maratha chieftain Malhar Rao Holkar was passing through the village and spotted little Ahilya in the temple. Impressed with her character, he sought her as his daughter in law.
Ahilya was married to Malhar Rao's son, Khanderao, in 1733. He was about ten and she was eight. Word is that Khanderao had been an errant boy and Malhar Rao had sought to temper him through the alliance with Ahilya. It worked and the older Khanderao began showing higher commitment to working with his father, in the latter's rapidly growing responsibilities as a key pillar of the Maratha confederacy. Ahilya and Khanderao were blessed with a son in 1745 and a daughter in 1748. From her mother-in-law, who almost brought her up to an extent, Ahilya learnt not just values but also accounts and administration.
Life took a dramatic turn in 1754. Khanderao, who had been involved in many battles to expand the influence of the Marathas, was killed during an assault on Kumher Fort. Malhar Rao prevented the grieving Ahilya from committing Sati and over time, taught her the nuances of diplomacy, statecraft and even military affairs.
Chhatri or memorial cenotaph of Malhar Rao Holkar at Alampur, Bhind district of Madhya Pradesh. Built by Ahilayabai Holkar after his death in 1766
In saving Ahilyabai from Sati, Malhar Rao had done Bharat an immense service. The decades that followed saw her work leave an indelible impact not just on the Holkar state, but across the country. It was an anarchic period to live in, even worse to govern a land in central India. As the Mughal empire crumbled, its provinces effectively became independent kingdoms. Incursions from Persia and Afghanistan were frequent. European merchants began to flex their military muscles and take control of territory. The Marathas themselves asserted their might and tried to carve out an empire of their own, overcoming the setback of Panipat 1761 to take control of Delhi for a period.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The guiding hand of Malhar Rao ended with his passing in 1766. Ahilya's son succeeded him but died in less than a year. From that point, till her own death in 1795, Ahilyabai was de facto ruler of the Holkar state herself. Amidst the anarchy around the country, her territory was an island of sanctity and calm. Not only did she preserve the borders of the Holkar state but strengthened it financially – and she did so without expanding her borders. She leveraged her state's geography by revitalising trade routes and growing trade and commerce. Even the communities that indulged in banditry were given an incentive to desist. While inheriting a robust agrarian revenue base from Malhar Rao, as well as revenue from defeated Rajput princes, she created a grain reserve which alleviated conditions when much of the country was impacted by famine. This ensured agricultural continuity.
But her greatest contribution – for which she is held in near-reverence – was in the religious space. She played a pivotal role in the re-installation of idols at Somnath and Kashi Vishwanath. She built temples, ghats, dharamshalas, gardens and ensured prayers at places as far removed from each other as the Char Dham, Mathura, Ayodhya, Gaya, Haridwar and even Kanchipuram. Apart from contributing to Ujjain and Omkareshwar, in her own kingdom. The full list of temples she touched is too long to recount here.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Vishnupad Temple at Gaya in 1885, rebuilt by Ahilyabai
Ahilya Ghat at Varanasi. Source: Wikipedia
Given that so many of these temples were in territories outside her domain, she used to write to rulers of these distant regions, asking for her to be allowed to restore a dilapidated temple or build a new ghat, at her cost. It is said that merely the mention of Ahilyabai's name in such requests was enough. And once permission was granted, her workmen would carry out the work. Coming after centuries of neglect and destruction, her contributions revived not just the temples but led to a reemergence of a Hindu consciousness also. The temples she restored to life are still in existence, the traditions she began still practiced, the ghats she created are still a place for journeys into oneself.
And in an era where rulers undertook vast construction projects from public money for the sole purpose of ensuring their own immortality, perhaps the most remarkable aspect of her religious work was the funding. The money for all of this was drawn from her personal fortune, not public money. And furthermore, in undertaking such projects, she had the clarity that many 'liberals' lack in modern India – seeing the deep, underlying cultural oneness in the land that is Bharat.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In her personal life, she was spartan. Her court was not extravagant, accounts were carefully maintained, and corruption weeded out – remarkable again, in an age where even minor nobles were profligate. Sadly, though, tragedy marked her life. Her son, Malerao, was mentally unstable – accounts say he was also debauched – and died an early death. In 1791, her daughter committed Sati on the funeral pyre of her husband – something Ahilya was unable to prevent. But the noble queen's work continued, till her end came.
The legacy of the woman who truly defined Nari Shakti can be seen in two dimensions. The larger one is national and its impact seen from Kedarnath to Kanchipuram. But her personal legacy is in Madhya Pradesh. In Alampur (Bhind), where she built Malhar Rao Holkar's cenotaph where he was cremated. In places like Indore's Rajwada Palace, which has a museum on the queen. In Indore's Chhatribaug, where she built memorials to her father-in-law, husband and son. In tiny Kampel near Indore, where a kacheri is now a tehsil headquarters. In nearby Omkareshwar's Jyotirlinga, where she contributed a silver idol, a house for drums, a flower-garden, apart from a palanquin and boat to connect this island on the Narmada. At Bakawan and Mardana, where she built Shiva temples.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Vishnupad Temple at Gaya in 1885, rebuilt by Ahilyabai
But if there is one place where one can almost feel her presence, it is the fort of Maheshwar on the banks of the Narmada.
Maheshwar Fort
Maheshwar Fort with temples within
In Maheshwar, the tradition of weaving that Ahilya began continues in the form of glorious Maheshwari sarees that provide employment to women. The ghats are dotted with Shiva lingas. Temples seem to be everywhere, among them the most magnificent is Ahilyeshwar shrine. At sunset, a visitor sitting quietly on these ghats might spot a woman lighting a diya—or was it just his imagination?
The author is a heritage explorer with a penchant for seeking obscure sites. A brand consultant by profession, he tweets @HiddenHeritage. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Commissioner of examinations can make changes to the caste and religion entries of students in SSLC book, rules Kerala high court
Kochi: High court has held that the commissioner of examinations has the authority to make changes to the caste and religion entries of students in their SSLC books under Rule 3(1), Chapter VI of the Kerala Education Rules (KER), 1959. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice D K Singh issued the ruling while allowing a petition filed by Sudhin Krishna C S of Palakkad, who sought a directive to the concerned authorities to change his name and religion in his SSLC book. The petitioner, born to a Muslim father and a Hindu mother, was originally named Mohammed Riyazudeen C S. After attaining majority, he chose not to follow Islam and began practising the Hindu religion, having been raised by his mother in accordance with Hindu tenets. He subsequently applied to the district educational officer seeking changes to his name and religion in the SSLC book, supported by relevant documents, including a certificate from the Arya Samajam, Kozhikode. However, the authorities rejected his request, citing an absence of provisions under the KER, 1959, for altering religious identity in the SSLC book. This led the petitioner to approach the high court. The govt pleader opposed the plea, arguing that no authority had been notified under Rule 3(1), Chapter VI of the KER to effect changes in the caste or religion columns, and that the commissioner of examinations was only authorised to alter the date of birth. The court, however, underscored that the petitioner has a fundamental right to practise a religion of his choice. If a person changes their religion voluntarily and without coercion, fraud, or undue influence, such an act is protected under the Preamble to the Constitution and Article 25, the court noted. Upon examining Rule 3(1), Chapter VI of the KER — titled 'Alteration of Date of Birth etc.' — the court observed that the scope of the rule is not limited to date of birth alone; it also allows for other changes, including religion and caste, to be effected by a competent authority. Accordingly, the court directed the authorities to carry out the changes as requested by the petitioner with respect to his name and religion in the SSLC book.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
TMC assault on BJP backers attack on democracy: SC
NEW DELHI: Coming down heavily on Trinamool Congress (TMC) workers for targeting Hindu families and their women for supporting BJP during the 2021 assembly elections in alleged complicity with West Bengal police, Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to six TMC workers and said such incidents were "grave attacks on the roots of democracy". It allowed an appeal against Calcutta HC's orders granting bail to Sekh Jamir Hossain, Sekh Nurai, Sekh Ashraf, Sekh Karibul and Jayanta Done. 'Cancellation of bail requires a higher threshold than grant of bail' A Supreme Court bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said, "The concerted attack on the (Hindu) complainant's house was launched on the day of election results with the sole objective of wreaking vengeance because he had supported the saffron party. "This is a grave circumstance which convinces us that the accused persons, including the respondents herein, were trying to terrorise members of the opposite political party whom the accused respondents were supporting. " Aware that cancellation of bail requires a higher threshold than grant of bail, the bench said, "Having regard to the facts enumerated above, we feel that the present one is a case wherein the allegations against the accused respondents are so grave that the same shake the conscience of the court." Writing the judgment, Justice Mehta said, "The reprehensible way the incident was perpetrated shows the vengeful attitude of the accused persons and their avowed objective to subdue supporters of the opposite party into submission by hook or by crook. The dastardly offence was nothing short of a grave attack on the roots of democracy." The judgment recorded that the complainant's wife was viciously pulled by the hair and disrobed. The accused persons were about to assault her sexually when the woman gathered the courage to pour kerosene on herself and threatened self-immolation upon which the accused persons ran away, it said. Justices Nath and Mehta said, "There is no possibility of a fair and impartial trial being conducted if the accused respondents are allowed to remain on bail. Thus, on both counts - nature and gravity of the offence which is nothing short of an attack on the roots of democracy, and the imminent likelihood of the accused adversely affecting a fair trial - the bail granted to the accused respondents must be cancelled." This was the second time in recent days that attacks on Hindus by TMC members had the judiciary's attention and intervention. Earlier, a fact-finding team set up by Calcutta HC held that a party MLA and a corporator had identified houses of Hindus which were later targeted by a violent mob protesting against the new waqf law in Murshidabad. Two people were killed in the attack. Asking the trial court to conclude the trial within six months, SC directed the West Bengal home secretary and the director general of police to ensure that proper protection was provided to the complainant and all witnesses so that they could freely appear and depose at the trial. The SC warned that if any violation of these directions was reported by the CBI, it would take suitable action. Immediately after the 2021 assembly elections, in the Muslim majority village of Gumsima, TMC workers wreaked vengeance on a Hindu family for supporting BJP. The head of the family had earlier lodged a police complaint that he was not being allowed to carry out his religious rituals. The evening after election results were declared on May 2, 2021, an armed mob of 40-50 people led by Sekh Mahim threw bombs at the Hindu family's house, looted belongings and disrobed the complainant's wife and molested her. The mob relented only when she poured kerosene on herself and threatened self-immolation. The entire family fled the village to save their lives and dignity. On May 3, 2021, the family approached Sadaipur police station to lodge a complaint. The officer-in-charge did not accept the complaint and advised the complainant to leave the village to save himself and his family. Several similar complaints were not recorded by the police. Calcutta HC on Aug 19, 2021, ordered CBI to investigate all such cases involving rape, murder or attempt to commit such offences. CBI had registered cases in Dec 2021.


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
US proposes interim deal allowing Iran to enrich uranium: Report
The United States has proposed an interim nuclear deal that would permit Iran to carry out low-level uranium enrichment as part of ongoing nuclear negotiations, according to a report by The New York Times on unnamed Iranian and European officials, the report states that the plan -- put forth by the administration of US President Donald Trump -- aims to serve as a temporary measure while a more comprehensive agreement is worked out with global powers to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear proposal, reportedly drafted by the Trump administration's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has been shared with Iranian DEAL WITH STRICT CONDITIONS The idea behind the plan is to serve as a "bridge" between Iran's current nuclear activity and the US demand for Iran to pause all to the report, Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium at low levels, which would be enough to power nuclear energy plants, but not enough to build a return, the US would help Iran to build nuclear reactors and propose the creation of enrichment facilities managed by a group of regional countries. Iran is expected to cease all enrichment activities on its own territory as soon as it begins to reap any benefits from this of the main concerns is still the enrichment facility's location. Iranian officials are pushing for it to be built on Iranian territory, like the Kish or Qeshm islands, but the US insists that it must be outside of Iran. Since these areas are more visible, it might be simpler for foreign observers to keep an eye on them.A US official told The New York Times, "Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media."Iran has not officially responded to the proposal yet, but its Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made it clear on Tuesday that Tehran would not accept any deal that limits its right to enrich uranium. "We do not need anyone's permission to enrich uranium," Araghchi said. "Without respecting our right to enrichment, there will be no agreement."Must Watch