Tucker Carlson Tears Into Ted Cruz In The Most Gloriously Awkward Interview You'll See
Internet personality Tucker Carlson clashed with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) over Iran, with the two eventually shouting over each other in a teaser segment posted on X on Tuesday.
In the clip, Carlson ― who opposes the U.S. joining the conflict between Israel and Iran, earning the wrath of the GOP establishment including President Donald Trump ― asked Cruz for some basic facts about Iran, such as the population.
Cruz couldn't answer.
'You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?' Carlson asked in disbelief. 'How could you not know that?'
'I don't sit around memorizing population tables,' Cruz said.
'Well it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson said.
It only grew more awkward from there, as the two raised their voices.
'OK, I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz said.
'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government and you don't know anything about the country,' Carlson fired back.
'No, you don't know anything about the country,' Cruz replied as the two continued to go at it.
Carlson said he would post the full interview on Wednesday.
Story continues below video:
Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/hJNwAHAnxZ
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025
Cruz defended himself on X, sharing the clip and writing: 'Yep, I stand with Trump. Iran can't have a nuclear bomb. Make sure you tune in tomorrow.'
Carlson's opposition to U.S. involvement earned him the ire of Trump, who called him 'kooky' and mocked him for losing his Fox News show in 2023.
Carlson had been among the highest-rated hosts on cable news as he peddled conspiracy theories and white nationalist talking points. He and Fox News parted ways in 2023 after the right-wing network settled a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million related to repeated lies on the news channel about election fraud.
Carlson, who has admitted to lying to his viewers, was found in court documents to have some very different feelings for Trump than the ones he espoused on the air. In private messages from 2021, he said he 'hates' Trump 'passionately' and 'can't wait' to ignore him.
Despite that history, he became one of Trump's biggest boosters on the campaign trail last year, spoke on his behalf at the Republican National Convention and attended the inauguration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's Old Tweet Mocking Obama On Iran Comes Back To Haunt Him
Another old tweet from Donald Trump has gone viral again, but for the wrong reasons. As the president continued to ramp up his rhetoric against Iran, critics pointed to a November 2013 social media post where Trump accused then-President Barack Obama of planning to attack Iran. Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 11, 2013 'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly—not skilled!' Trump wrote, when he was still a reality TV personality. The resurfaced tweet sparked comments about irony, given Trump's recent saber-rattling against Tehran. What is it you said again???? — Martina Navratilova (@Martina) June 17, 2025 There's always a tweet. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 17, 2025 Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Trump will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled! — Mario Callous, x grinder & amusements editor (@idonevenknowho) June 17, 2025 Always — Mason (@masonisonx) June 17, 2025 Guess who tweeted this back in 2013? 🤣'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!'8:55 PM • 11/10/13 — News Watcher (@testbotnews) June 17, 2025 In Trumpworld, projection isn't a defense mechanism—it's a prophecy. — MC Debris (@emceedebris) June 17, 2025 'Atrocious': Eric Trump Slammed For 'Disgusting' Use Of Offensive Slur In Interview 'Good F**king Gawd!': Trump Ripped As Putin's PR Guy After G7 Whine 'Like A Monty Python Skit': Trump's UK Trade Deal Moment Gets Super Weird In A Hurry
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Iran/Israel conflict means for U.S. energy prices going forward
Crude oil prices, maybe surprisingly, dipped modestly on Monday after spiking at the end of last week, even as Iran and Israel continue firing missiles at each other with no easy end in sight. The U.S. oil benchmark hovered around $71 per barrel on June 16—about where it started the year—but up roughly 9% from a week prior. The current price tag is considered a relatively healthy value—profitable for most oil producers without creating particularly high fuel prices. So, even though Israel successfully targeted some of Iran's oil and gas infrastructure over the weekend, oil markets have stayed relatively calm, and Iran, which is not in a position of strength, is reportedly signaling its interest in returning to nuclear negotiations with the U.S. Why? Here are four takeaways: Israel struck Iran's South Pars gas field, the Shahran fuel depot, and the Shahr Rey oil refinery, but all of these targets are for domestic fuel and power consumption, and not global exports. That contributed to a run on fuel and potential shortages within Iran, but it has much less impact on global oil markets and Iran's roughly 1.5 million barrels per day of crude oil exports. 'Everybody is taking a hands-off approach to oil [exporting] infrastructure because it meaningfully complicates and escalates the situation,' said energy forecaster Dan Pickering, founder and chief and investment officer for Pickering Energy Partners consulting and research firm. 'Israel doesn't want to do that, and I don't think Iran does either.' On the other hand, Pickering told Fortune. 'You're one stray bomb away from a problem. If you get to a point where people stop acting rationally, things get crazy quickly.' That's why the range of outcomes is vast from $55 per barrel oil if things calm down—a low price that hurts the bottom lines of oil producers—up to $120 or so if war escalates and overall OPEC production is impacted, Pickering said. Iran sits next to the Strait of Hormuz, and the exports through that relatively narrow body of water account for about 20 million barrels daily, or one-fifth of global consumption. Impacting those flows changes everything. To be clear, oil at or above $120 per barrel is bad for almost everyone because skyrocketing fuel costs would trigger widespread demand destruction around the world. The so-called OPEC+ group increased their monthly quotas, essentially aiming to grow production by more than 2 million barrels daily by the end of the year, and undoing years of self-imposed curtailments. While the decision didn't necessarily anticipate a conflict in Iran, the OPEC's move did give President Trump more leverage in the U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran. 'If anything in this situation could be called elegant, it is a relatively elegant set up when dealing with the risk of problems in the Middle East,' Pickering said of OPEC's moves. 'It looks like the return of production pretty closely mirrors Iran's exports, and so it was probably more geared toward a reduction of exports [through sanctions] as opposed to a conflict.' Kathleen Brooks, research director the the XTB brokerage house, highlighted how Trump wants to keep oil and fuel prices low, and that the White House could actually have a 'calming effect' on markets. 'Instead, we think that U.S. involvement could see the [Israeli] attacks on Iran narrow to nuclear sites, after Israel said that it gathered intelligence that Iran had enough uranium to make nine atomic bombs,' Brooks added. However, the math is changed with any prolonged war. 'With Israel and Iran trading attacks, oil prices have surged to multi-month highs—setting the stage for additional price hikes at gas pumps across the country,' said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. 'As long as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, the risk of further impacts on oil prices remains high.' De Haan projects fuel prices could rise by 10 to 20 cents per gallon moving forward. 'Motorists should prepare for what will likely be modest price increases—for now—but the situation has the potential to worsen at any moment.' Thus far, the national average price of gasoline has risen 1.1 cents per gallon in the last week, averaging $3.08 per gallon as of the morning of June 16, according to GasBuddy. However, the national average is down 9.5 cents from a month ago and 32.7 cents lower than a year ago. As Pickering said, '[Iran] is on the naughty list, but their sanctions haven't been particularly aggressively applied because the world is so focused on oil prices and the impact on inflation and economies. The developed world has decided that cheap gasoline prices are better than truly punishing bad actors.' U.S. oil drillers were showing restraint and capital discipline—and not the 'drill, baby, drill' mentality—last year even when prices were a bit higher than today. 'The volatility is dramatic, OPEC is adding supply, and it's not a given that Iran is going to reduce supply,' Pickering said. 'So, why step up and spend capital speculatively when we could wake up in a month and oil is back to $55?' So, how should everything in the Middle East be viewed from the energy perspective? 'This is a conflict that could have meaningful impacts, so people should be paying attention,' Pickering concluded. 'Right now, it looks like an inconvenience with a potentially temporary price spike. It could become much worse, so pay attention and cross your fingers it doesn't escalate.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Unrelated blast, chaos videos misrepresented as Israel-Iran crisis
"Israel vs Iran today 13/06/2025," reads text superimposed on a Facebook video shared June 15, 2025. It shows a massive blast filmed from the sea and then cuts to a clip of people running across an open area. After decades of enmity and a prolonged shadow war, Israel said its surprise air campaign was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran denies (archived link). At least 24 people have been killed in Israel and hundreds wounded, according to Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu's office. Iran said June 15 that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not issued an updated toll since then. Similar posts surfaced on Facebook and YouTube but neither clip depicts the Israel-Iran conflict. A reverse image search on Google found the first footage published by video licencing agency ViralHog on August 14, 2020 (archived link). "Jet Skiers Capture Shockwave from Beirut," says the caption to the clip which has been mirrored in the false posts. A catastrophic blast on August 4, 2020 -- one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history -- devastated large parts of Lebanon's capital Beirut, killing more than 220 people and injuring over 6,500 (archived link). It was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where tons of ammonium nitrate fertilizer had been unsafely stored for years after arriving by ship. AFP previously debunked posts that have misrepresented the clip as showing a scene from the Gaza war. Similar clips of the port blast captured from the water were posted by Canadian news outlet Global News and American broadcaster Voice of America (archived here and here). Further reverse searches found the second video in a March 1, 2025 report from American news channel NBC 5 about people running away from the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center in Dallas, Texas following reports of an active shooter (archived link). Around 58,000 people were attending a cheer competition when the chaotic evacuation occurred, CBS News separately reported. Authorities said there was no active shooter (archived link). AFP was able to confirm the location of the video by comparing it with Google Maps satellite imagery of the parking lot near the convention centre (archived link). AFP has debunked more misinformation about the Israel-Iran conflict here.
