Readers say transport spending should finally focus outside the capital
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments.
Further to your report on the government's £15.6billion transport plan (Metro, Thu). London Assembly member Elly Baker asks why the capital isn't getting its 'fair share'.
Since the 1980s, UK taxpayers have helped to renew much of London's transport networks above and below ground, with new Tube and rail lines, rebuilt rail terminuses, new buses, and now the Elizabeth line with its cathedral-like stations.
By contrast, services between Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds are slow, crowded, and unreliable.
Southampton station is almost unchanged since the 1980s despite a huge increase in passenger numbers. There are many similar examples.
London shows that good public transport is essential for a city to flourish – investment in other cities' and towns' infrastructure is long overdue and only fair. James Sinister, Brighton
London has had more than its fair share of support and filled its boots at the expense of other parts of the UK.
This current plan is about levelling up and giving neglected regions a fair share of transport funding, belatedly. G Dawson, Merseyside.
While the transport projects the government is supporting are a big step, there are notable omissions.
From what I have read, the East Midlands projects seem to be concentrated in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, which have more than 20 stations each – fewer than 42,000 citizens per station.
In contrast, Leicestershire has just ten stations and Northamptonshire a paltry six – that's more than 70,000 citizens per station.
Yet there are relatively straightforward remedies to this. In western Leicestershire, a railway still open to freight and the occasional diversion connects several towns that would benefit from a restored passenger service and reopened stations.
In Northamptonshire it is even easier, as many towns lacking stations actually have passenger railways going through them. What's more, separate fast and slow trains run on one stretch of track and the latter could easily serve two extra stations. There are similar examples in other regions.
So let's see transport investment in parts of regions lacking in them as well. Charles EL Gilman, Mitcham
Ryan Cooper (MetroTalk, Mon) responds to the claim that we have 'lost control' of our borders by saying the world would be better without them.
Does this mean he doesn't want any more Olympics or World Cups and will no longer support Britain/England in those competitions as, without borders, there'll be no countries?
Also, does this mean that I – and anyone else for that matter – can just rock up at his home, barge our way in and make ourselves comfortable because, without borders around countries, there won't be any borders around his home and consequently anyone can just enter as they wish.
I bet he would say that's 'different' and be quick to call the police, citing trespass, in that situation.
Also, what would you do about infrastructure and building places for people to live when everyone is concentrated in one small area of the world? Surely having too many people in one area cannot be good for those living there. Jon, West Midlands
I think Ryan Cooper is being a bit naive in thinking that no borders is the utopian answer to the world's problems. There will always be those who want more than others. There will always be a hierarchy. More Trending
What is he expecting, a benign world government with the interests of all at its heart? Dream on. Remember the great Soviet Union experiment. Or maybe the French Commune. John, Orpington.
Amanda (MetroTalk, Fri) says Clark's call for a £300 licence to deter people from owning cats is prompted less by his concern for the millions of birds and small animals they kill and more by the fact that he 'probably has cat issues, because he was a mouse in his former life'.
Well, I don't believe in reincarnation and I didn't when I was a hamster, either. Carl, Leed
MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables
MORE: Could these viral Pulse Oils be the key to a restful sleep and balanced hormones?
MORE: Plastic surgeon who stabbed rival doctor and tried to burn down his home jailed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Reeves says spending review will be about ‘making working people better off'
Rachel Reeves has acknowledged that not enough people are feeling the progress Labour has made and said her spending review will be about 'making working people better off'. The Chancellor is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. Sir Keir Starmer meanwhile rejected the idea that squeezed police budgets could make communities less safe. The Prime Minister also said that the decision to reinstate most winter fuel payments was not a response to the backlash against the policy. The Chancellor has committed £16.7 billion to nuclear power projects, including £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk. Ms Reeves said the Government was 'making Labour choices' and 'making progress' in an address to the GMB Union Congress in Brighton on Tuesday. She said: 'I know that not enough working people are yet feeling that progress, and that's what tomorrow's spending review is all about – making working people better off, investing in our security, investing in our health, investing in our economy. 'This Government is going for growth because that is the best way to create jobs, boost wages, lift people out of poverty, and sustainably fund our schools and our hospitals and all the public services we rely on. 'And we're doing things differently, because unlike the Tories, I don't think that the only good thing that a government can do is get out of the way.' Sir Keir was asked about reports that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was among those concerned that the financial settlement for police in the spending review could lead to crimes not being investigated. 'No, we will be more safe,' he told GB News. The Prime Minister also rejected the idea that he had reversed course on winter fuel payments amid political pressure. 'We had to take difficult decisions in the budget; the economy was broken,' he told Jeremy Vine on BBC Radio 2. But he cited recent growth figures and falling interest rates as proof that 'the economy has stabilised'. Ms Reeves is under pressure to reverse course on cuts to benefits after she confirmed a U-turn on winter fuel payments that will see them restored to pensioners with an income of less than £35,000-a-year. She stood firm on welfare reforms on Tuesday as a union representative urged her to 'think again' on the cuts. The Chancellor said the current system is 'not sustainable' and that reforms aimed to get those who can work back into work and help 'fulfil the ambitions of people with disabilities themselves to get back into work'. The reforms include plans to tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip.
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves to give speech ahead of Spending Review
Rachel Reeves is set to deliver a speech at the GMB union conference as the Chancellor prepares to unveil her eagerly-awaited Spending Review tomorrow. Ms Reeves is expected to use the address to the union in Brighton today to hail the Government's new £16.7 billion commitment to nuclear power projects. The Chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk. Meanwhile, Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. The funding is part of a wider programme of infrastructure investment worth tens of billions of pounds over the next decade which the Chancellor will confirm at the Spending Review in the House of Commons tomorrow. The review is expected to set out real-terms funding cuts for numerous Whitehall departments and the Chancellor's speech in Brighton will be watched closely for any clues about where the squeeze could be felt the most.
The Independent
20 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump's $45m military parade will see 18 miles of fencing and 175 metal detectors installed in DC
The massive event, which officials estimated to cost a maximum of $45 million, will be held on June 14 to honor the 250th birthday of the Army. It also happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday. Matt McCool of the Secret Service 's Washington Field office said that more than 18 miles of 'anti-scale fencing' would be installed for the event. 'We're preparing for an enormous turnout,' he said. There will also be'multiple drones' in the air, despite Washington D.C. normally being a no-fly zone for drones. Army officials have estimated around 200,000 attendees for the evening military parade, and McCool said he was prepared for "hundreds of thousands" of people. 'We have a ton of magnetometers,' he said. 'If a million people show up, then we're going to have some lines.' A total of 175 magnetometers would be used at security checkpoints controlling access to the daytime Army birthday festival and the nighttime parade. Metropolitan Police Department chief Pamela Smith predicted 'major impacts to traffic' and advised attendees to arrive early and consider forgoing cars for the Metro. 'This is a significant event with a large footprint,' she said. 'We're relying on the public to be an extra set of ears and eyes for us.' The military parade has been designated a National Special Security Event — similar to a presidential inauguration or state funeral. That status is reserved for events that draw large crowds and potential mass protests. It calls for an enhanced degree of high-level coordination among D.C. officials, the FBI, Capitol Police and Washington's National Guard contingent — with the Secret Service taking the lead. The Army birthday celebration had already been planned for months. But earlier this spring, Trump announced his intention to transform the event into a massive military parade complete with 60-ton M1 Abrams battle tanks and Paladin self-propelled howitzers rolling through the city streets. Multiple counter-protests of varying sizes are planned for Saturday, with the largest being a mass march to the White House dubbed the No Kings rally. Officials say they are also on alert for signs that the immigration-related clashes between law enforcement and protesters currently roiling Los Angeles would spread. 'We're paying attention, obviously, to what is happening there. We'll be ready,' McCool said. 'We have a robust plan for civil disobedience.' Agent Phillip Bates of the FBI's Washington Field office, which is tasked with counterterrorism and crisis management, said there were 'no credible threats' to the event at the moment. Lindsey Appiah, the deputy mayor for public safety, told The Associated Press last week that the city had longstanding plans for the Army birthday celebration. But those plans 'got a lot bigger on short notice' when Trump got involved. Still, Appiah said the city has grown 'very flexible, very nimble' at rolling with these sort of changes.
