Nahant firefighter facing rape, assault charges placed on leave
A longtime firefighter in Nahant was arraigned on a slew of charges, including four counts of rape, earlier this week, the Essex County District Attorney's office told Boston 25 News Thursday.
He was charged with four counts of rape, two counts of assault and battery causing serious bodily injury, two counts of assault and battery, one count of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and one count of intimidating a witness during his arraignment in Salem Superior Court, the DA's office told Boston 25 News.
Pappalardo, who currently holds the rank of lieutenant, has served as a firefighter in the town since 2004, Nahant Town Administrator Antonio Barletta said.
Pappalardo has been placed on administrative leave with pay in accordance with the fire department's collective bargaining agreement with the town.
'This may change to unpaid leave pending the outcome of a dangerousness hearing expected later this week, as well as an agency review of the matter,' Town Administrator Antonio Barletta said.
Pappalardo received the Medal of Valor during the 33rd Annual Firefighter of the Year Award in November 2022.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two children injured after being hit by car in Woburn, police say
Two children were struck by a car while riding a bike in Woburn on Tuesday. According to police, the collision occurred around 5:15 p.m. in the area of Cambridge Road and Sylvanus Wood Lane. Witnesses reportedly told arriving officers one of the children was operating the bike while the second one was standing on pegs in the back. The juvenile bicyclist took a wide left turn onto Cambridge Road when they were hit head-on by a vehicle, according to police. Both children were taken to an area hospital with minor injures. The driver of the vehicle stayed on scene. The incident remains under investigation. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Severity of damage to Karen Read's taillight comes into question during testimony of Dighton officer
Fireworks on the stand during the retrial of Karen Read after a Dighton Police officer testified Read's taillight wasn't damaged that bad before it was seized by Massachusetts State Police troopers. Dighton Police Sergeant Nicholas Barros said Read's taillight had damage, but not to the extent of what pictures presented in court showed. 'That was the black Lexus,' he said. 'That was not the taillight the day I was there.' Barros described seeing a hole about the size of a dollar bill before State Troopers seized the Lexus from Read's parents Dighton home. 'Did you see anybody from the State Police in any way tamper with that vehicle?' Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan asked on cross. 'I did not,' Barros replied. Barros appeared confident with his memory until Brennan began peppering him with questions. 'Would be fair to say, based on all the additional information you've read and seen, had some effect on your memory?' Brennan questioned. 'I guess,' Barros said. 'His testimony hasn't changed,' Karen Read said outside court. 'He was subpoenaed by the prosecution and said it was damaged and not completely broken a year ago and then he said that again today.' More fireworks during the testimony of the defense's dog bite expert Dr. Marie Russel, when Read's lawyer Robert Alessi demanded a mistrial over the prosecutor's questioning. Alessi argued that Brennan brought up the absence of dog DNA on O'Keefe's clothing when it wasn't in evidence. Brennan pushed back. 'It might be hurtful for the defendant's theories, for the creation they portrayed, for this jury yesterday,' he said. 'But it is not improper.' Judge Beverly Cannone sided with Brennan and rejected the mistrial request. Russell was asked about statements Read has made about a possible collision with O'Keefe. Russell said people suffer something called 'acute grief reaction,' where they blame themselves when bad things happen. Outside of court, Read was asked if she will take the stand. She said she has mixed feelings and did not give a 'yes' or 'no' response. A plow driver is expected to testify on Wednesday. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
3 hours ago
COVID-related agreement continues to shield some on Georgia's death row from execution
ATLANTA -- The fact that the COVID-19 vaccine is not available for newborn babies is shielding a group of prisoners on Georgia's death row from execution. Executions in Georgia were halted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the state attorney general's office entered into an agreement with lawyers for people on death row to set the terms under which they could resume for a specific group of prisoners. At least one of those conditions, having to do with the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, has not been met, and seeking an execution date for a prisoner covered by the agreement would breach the agreement, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shukura Ingram ruled. The agreement includes three conditions that had to be met before executions could be set for the affected prisoners: the expiration of the state's COVID-19 judicial emergency, the resumption of normal visitation at state prisons and the availability of a COVID-19 vaccine 'to all members of the public.' Once those conditions were met, the state agreed to give three months' notice before pursuing an execution warrant for one of the prisoners covered by the agreement and six months' notice for the rest. The state has argued that the agreement should no longer apply, contending the conditions have been met. But defense attorneys say it's still valid because the vaccine isn't yet available to infants under 6 months old, and visitation at state prisons has not returned to normal. Ingram's ruling, issued Friday, addressed only the vaccination question. She plans to handle the visitation issue separately. Ingram wrote that the state's arguments 'all boil down to an attempt to rewrite the Agreement.' The state is '(u)nhappy with the language it drafted' and wants to change it so that the condition would be satisfied once vaccines are available to 'most members of the public.' 'But courts cannot rewrite contracts to relieve a party of their regrets,' she wrote. She ruled that the agreement is 'binding and enforceable,' that the vaccination condition hasn't been met and that seeking an execution warrant before the requirements have been met would breach the agreement. The state attorney general's office plans to appeal, a spokesperson said Tuesday. Ingram noted that the Food and Drug Administration has approved clinical trials for infants under 6 months old, and newborns receive other vaccines. That shows it is possible for the COVID-19 vaccine to ultimately be available for that age group, and the state should have foreseen that that could take years, she wrote. Experts for both sides had testified that it was probable that the COVID-19 vaccine would eventually become available to babies under the age of 6 months, Ingram wrote. That was before Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was appointed U.S. health secretary. Kennedy last week announced that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. A few days later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website, which had said those groups should get the shots, was revised to say the vaccinations 'may' be given to those groups. The agreement covers fewer than 10 of the 34 people currently on Georgia's death row. While Georgia stopped carrying out executions during the pandemic, death penalty cases continued to wind their way through the court system, and as people exhausted their appeals, they became eligible for execution. A committee of a judicial task force on COVID-19 in early 2021 instructed lawyers for people on death row and the state attorney general's office to come up with terms under which executions could safely resume. The two sides reached the agreement in April 2021. The agreement only applied to people on death row whose requests to have their appeals reheard were denied by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals while the judicial emergency was in place. The agreement was to remain in effect through Aug. 1, 2022, or one year from the date on which the conditions were met — whichever was later. The legal fight arose from a lawsuit filed when officials set a May 2022 execution date for Virgil Delano Presnell Jr. The Federal Defender Program, which represents Presnell, said the state had violated the agreement because the conditions hadn't all been met. Based on that argument, a Fulton County Superior Court judge halted the execution less than 24 hours before it was to take place, and the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in December 2022 that the agreement was a binding contract.
