Labour Minister criticises DA's court challenge as anti-transformation
DA's court case against employment quotas labelled anti-transformation by.
Image: Itumeleng English/ Independent Media
The Minister of Employment and Labour, Nomakhosazana Meth, has criticised the Democratic Alliance's (DA) court challenge against employment quotas as anti-transformation.
"The DA's challenge seeks to disrupt efforts aimed at achieving equitable representation and maintaining the inherently unfair status quo. By opposing these amendments, the DA is actively sabotaging the transformation goals that have been pursued since the end of the apartheid era.
"The DA is effectively hindering progress towards equality and fairness in the workplace. This stance is not only anti-transformation, but also a step backward in the fight for equality and fairness in the workplace," said Meth.
This action undermines progress made since 1994 and perpetuates the unequal status quo.
She went on to say that the Employment Equity Amendment Act allows the Minister of Employment and Labour to establish numerical objectives for ensuring fair representation of competent persons from certain groups across all occupational levels.
Meth added that the minister consults relevant industries and seeks advice from the Commission before making decisions, ensuring compliance with the Employment Equity Act.
"Unlike rigid mandatory quotas, which must be achieved at all costs, the Amendment Act introduces flexible employment equity targets. Designated employers can set their annual numerical targets in their employment equity plans, which must comply with sectoral targets.
"However, employers can justify their failure to meet these targets on reasonable grounds.The DA's attack on these regulations is based on the claim that the section 15A scheme is unconstitutional."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
‘You call this leadership?': DA's Liam Jacobs grills SAFA president Danny Jordaan over travel expenses
Democratic Alliance's (DA) member of the portfolio committee on Department of Sports, Arts and Culture, has grilled SAFA president Danny Jordaan on whether he is a responsible leader, over costly travel expenses. Image: Facebook/Liam Jacobs Democratic Alliance (DA) MP and member of the portfolio committee on Sports, Arts and Culture, Liam Jacobs, who's known for his tough line of questioning, grilled SAFA President Danny Jordaan over his leadership and travel expenses. The clash occurred during a briefing on SAFA's 2023/24 annual report, which included audited financial statements and governance issues. Jacobs began his questioning by asking Jordaan, 'Do you believe in the concept of democracy? Can you please put your microphone on when you respond?' Jordaan replied, 'I'm a product of a struggle for democracy...' Jacobs continued, asking whether Jordaan respected the concept of democracy and if he understood the importance of term limits. Jordaan, who appeared caught off guard, said, 'You're asking me a question that is self-evident,' He added, 'I understand it. I was here as a member of Parliament.' Jacobs then pressed Jordaan on his long tenure as SAFA president. 'Are you aware that you are one of the longest-serving presidents of any football association on the planet?' Jordaan responded, 'It's not true,' prompting Jacobs to fire back, 'Twelve years, almost...' As tensions rose, Jordaan interjected, 'I'm still busy with my interrogation here... They must ask the questions and answer. Just order. Now he's engaging me now.' Committee Chairperson Joe McGluva intervened, urging members to allow questions to be asked and responses to follow in an orderly manner. Fellow committee member PA Marlon Daniels objected to Jacobs' conduct, particularly pointing his finger at Jordaan. 'What I witnessed here is not right. It is absolutely rude for a child to have that kind of conduct toward someone old enough to be his father,' Daniels said. McGluva then asked Jacobs to apologise for the gesture if it had occurred. 'I apologise for that,' Jacobs said. Daniels also withdrew the remark calling Jacobs a 'child.' 'I'm terribly sorry. I forgot I'm not at home where I deal with my children like that. So I withdrew...' Meanwhile, Jacobs continued with his line of questioning. 'Do you consider yourself a responsible leader?' Jordaan initially appeared hesitant but ultimately responded, 'The response was yes, Honourable Jacobs.' Jacobs then raised concerns over Jordaan's travel expenses, saying, 'In my hands, as I sit here, I have got something I know you don't think I have.' He mentioned trips, including a R131,000 trip to Ivory Coast and London, two visits to Qatar costing R56,000 and R31,000, and a trip to Vietnam for the Oceania Congress from September 29 to October 3, 2023.' 'What are we as South Africans doing in Vietnam at an Oceania Congress of an organisation that only has 13 members thousands of kilometres away?' Jacobs asked. He also mentioned trips to Cameroon for R105,574 and Morocco for R82,833, questioning the value of such spending amid SAFA's financial strain. However, Jordaan defended the Vietnam trip, saying it was related to South Africa's bid to host the FIFA Women's World Cup. 'You may know, or you may not know, that South Africa made a bid for hosting the Women's World Cup. The CEO was with me. Tumi Tlamini was with me,' Jordaan said. 'Do you have their costs there? Do you have their flight tickets there? This is a campaign.'
Eyewitness News
15 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Child Protection Week: Missing teenager the silver bullet to reinforce safety
CAPE TOWN - The Democratic Alliance (DA) in the Western Cape says it hopes the disappearance of 16-year-old Channelle Plaatjies during Child Protection Week will be the spark that brings about change to protect young lives. The community of Paarl East has rallied to search for the teen, who was reported missing last week. During a search on Monday, police discovered the body of a person in a bushy area behind Allandale Prison in Paarl. However, the body is yet to be positively identified, and an autopsy will be conducted to determine the cause of death. DA Western Cape Spokesperson on Social Development, Wendy Kaizer-Philander, said, "It is with deep sorrow that we as the Democratic Alliance in the Western Cape stand with the Plaatjies family and the broader Paarl community in this time of anguish and uncertainty. We remain resolute to protect every child in this province through the various parliamentary processes."
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Spaza shop fund under fire: Questions over R500m initiative
The R500m Fund, launched to bolster South African-owned spaza shops in townships and rural areas with stock, infrastructure upgrades, and training, has come under intense scrutiny. Image: Itumeleng English/Independent Newspapers A VIRTUAL briefing by the Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) on the progress of the R500 million Spaza Shop Support Fund descended into chaos last week, with MPs from across the political spectrum lambasting officials for 'lacklustre' responses, unresolved corruption risks, and a controversial 'middlemen' supply model that critics warned could hijack the initiative. The Fund, launched to bolster South African-owned spaza shops in townships and rural areas with stock, infrastructure upgrades, and training, was under intense scrutiny. Only 3 000 to 5 000 applications have been received — a fraction of the estimated 200 000 spaza shops nationwide — raising concerns about exclusion, bureaucratic hurdles, and whether foreign-owned shops were being sidelined. The most explosive revelations centred around the Fund's reliance on three unnamed Delivery Channel Partners (DCPs), private wholesalers tasked with supplying spaza shops. Opposition MPs accused the state of creating a 'monopoly' for connected insiders. 'Why are these DCPs not listed in the presentation? Who are they? What are their markups? This is a middlemen scheme!' charged the DA's Nico Pienaar, demanding the Gazette records detailing their selection. FF+'s Henk van den Berg echoed concerns: 'Do spaza shops have to buy from these DCPs? Who pays them, the Fund or the shop owners?' DSBD Deputy Director-General Qinisile Delwa sidestepped specifics, stating only that DCPs were 'vital intermediaries'. Lwandiso Makupula from the Small Enterprise Development and Finance Agency (Sefda) later admitted that 58% of spaza shops are Somali-owned and 25% Ethiopian-owned, leaving just 8% eligible for the Fund. But MPs were unmoved. 'This is a recipe for fronting. Cartels will use locals as fronts to access funds,' warned the ANC's Peter Mabilo. Pienaar slammed the Fund's 'reckless' exemption of spaza shops from immediate Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) and tax registration, calling it a 'free pass for abuse'. 'We're bleeding taxpayers, yet here's a state fund allowing six months' grace before registration. This is anti-formalisation and anti-growth,' he said. DSBD offered no justification, deepening suspicions of lax oversight. With Gauteng dominating applications, rural provinces risk being left behind. 'Your roadshows are failing. Rural spaza shops are lifelines, why aren't they prioritised?' asked chairperson Sonja Boshoff (DA). The ANC's Moses Modise blasted the DSBD's 'pathetic' outreach: 'Where are the community radio ads? The local newspaper campaigns?' Municipal licensing emerged as another crisis point. Many townships lacked digital systems, leaving spaza shops in limbo. 'Some municipalities don't even have licensing capacity. Is DSBD engaging the South African Local Government Association (Salga)?' Boshoff pressed. Delwa conceded that only the Northern Cape was piloting e-licensing, while KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape lead. Despite Makupula's assurance that 'misused grants convert to loans', MPs remained sceptical. 'Where are the anti-corruption measures? Who monitors officials?' Boshoff asked. The MK Party's Sarah Mokoena highlighted registration chaos: 'The online system crashes constantly. Shop owners think they're registered when they're not.'
