Across the U.S., Unions Are Seeking Big Boosts to Paraprofessional Pay
During her first full-time job as a paraprofessional, Priscilla Castro would wake up at 6:00 a.m. to work at a high school in Brooklyn, where she helped educate teenage mothers. She would then head to her own night classes at York College, where she was pursuing her bachelor's degree, sometimes not returning home until past 11 p.m.
At the time, Castro's salary was less than $20,000. Two decades later, after earning both her bachelor's and master's degrees in sociology and urban studies and working as a special education and a language paraprofessional, she is earning $55,000 – still far below what most people would need to earn to afford to live in New York. To help her make ends meet, Castro lived with her parents early on in her career.
But the main reason she has stuck with it? The impact she has had on the kids.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
'We are there with the students every period, so we see the challenges the students go through and their success,' Castro said. 'To me, it's amazing to see, especially when I'm [working with] an autistic child who, for the first time, is learning how to read and learning how to write their name.'
Castro now advocates for other classroom support staff as the president of the paraprofessional chapter of the United Federation of Teachers in New York City. The city is currently struggling with a shortage of more than 1,550 paraprofessionals. Hoping to attract and retain more people to the profession, the union is stepping outside of its traditional collective bargaining practices to push for legislation that would mandate raises of at least $10,000 for the city's paraprofessionals.
Paraprofessionals are usually hourly workers who assist students and teachers with classroom work, supervision and instructing small groups. Roughly 75% of paras don't have a bachelor's degree, according to a 2021 Brown University study. Average pay for paraprofessionals in 2024 was $35,240, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Related
Across the U.S., unions are seeking to boost paraprofessional pay, which remains so low that workers are struggling to get by in many states, according to an April report from the National Education Association.
A 2022 NEA survey found that more than half of paraprofessionals worked other jobs on weekdays after classes ended and 75% said they had a problem making a living wage.
The NEA said in its most recent report that while paraprofessional pay has improved, 'there is still a lot of work to be done.'
In April, paraprofessionals in Boston landed raises ranging from 23% to 31% over three years Most will see a pay increase of nearly $8,000 by the end of the contract, according to the Boston Teachers Union.
Allentown School District in Pennsylvania accepted a contract last fall that will give its paraprofessionals 22% raises. Pittsburgh Public Schools awarded its paras raises of 14% in December.
In addition, California lawmakers are considering a bill that would increase pay for both teachers and staffers, including paraprofessionals, by 50% over the next 10 years.
'I've received strong support from teachers and [other school] employees who are struggling to live in the communities that they work in,' said Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi, who authored the bill.
Related
Dannel Montesano is one of them. She left her paraprofessional job earlier this year to become an office clerk at Liberty Ranch High School in Galt, California. The new job paid just $1 more per hour. It was the only way she could get a raise.
'Our starting paraprofessional pay is $18.63 an hour. This school year, we've had a hard time filling all of the positions because when you can go work at McDonald's for over $20 an hour — and not have as much responsibility working one-on-one with students —- the draw isn't there,' she said.
In New York City, paraprofessionals earn between $31,787 to $52,847 a year, according to the UFT. The city's current system of collective bargaining ensures all job titles receive the same percentage wage increase. But those increases have a varying impact depending on an employee's base pay. The union said in a press release that a 3% pay raise could mean roughly a $900 increase for a paraprofessional but a $6,000 bump for a principal.
More than 1,600 union members rallied in front of City Hall in April to advocate for the paraprofessional pay bill, which would create a separate 'para pay index' that would exist outside of collective bargaining. Each year, the city's general fund would provide full-time paraprofessionals with a check of at least $10,000.
'We have paraprofessionals who are struggling,' Castro said. 'I received an email from a paraprofessional who's living in a shelter with a child. It broke my heart to receive this email. We have to make a difference. We have to ensure that the bill is passed in City Hall, because it would change so many lives.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Campus notes: June 22, 2025
Teagan Graham, Reading, graduated from the University at Buffalo, N.Y., with a bachelor's degree in health and human services/early childhood education. York College The following area students received degrees from York College of Pennsylvania: Master of education: Julianna Kusy, Kutztown; Isabelle Popoter, Spring Township. Master of science in nursing: Elyse Batson, Exeter Township. Bachelor of arts: Isabella Antos, South Heidelberg Township; Lauryn Johnson, Exeter Township; Isabella Hoeltzel, Leesport; Elizabeth Trumbore, Temple. Bachelor of business administration: Gabriel Trevena, South Heidelberg Township. Bachelor of science: Brett Reinert, Douglassville; Haley Akins, Markus Jeschonnek and Brianna Endy, Exeter Township; Alexander LaVerdure, Oley Township;. Bachelor of science in nursing: Morgan Sauers, Gilbertsville; Taryn Boyer, Temple. Items are supplied by the colleges involved.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Opinion: Reading Reform Will Fail Without Families
Across the country, a wave of new reading legislation aims to fix literacy crises, yet there's little direct support for families to help carry the reforms forward. At a recent meeting in my community, one fact hit hard: Our reading pipeline is broken. Instead of the expected 80% of students succeeding with general instruction, only 11% of Milwaukee students are on track. A staggering 65% need frequent, in-depth, individualized support — far more than the system was ever built to provide. When a speaker cited these numbers, the crowd nodded at the urgency and applauded calls to retrain more than 1,000 teachers in evidence-based reading instruction practices. I applauded, too — schools have the greatest opportunity and obligation to provide high-quality reading instruction at scale. But I couldn't shake the feeling that teacher training alone clearly wouldn't be enough. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter In classrooms crowded with kids who have extraordinary needs, even the best teachers can only do so much. Better prepared teachers would be able to gradually increase the share of kids who are on track with reading and prevent more students from falling behind. But many kids would still need targeted small-group support, one-on-one tutoring, and, crucially, support from home. Teachers, no matter how well prepared, build on the foundations kids have. The odds of reading success are largely shaped beyond the classroom. Longitudinal studies consistently confirm the essential role that families play in kids' reading achievement. The early language experiences and alphabet knowledge students bring to school profoundly shape their literacy trajectories. Once kids enter school, parents' influence remains powerful but increasingly overlooked. Too often, schools unintentionally sideline parents, treating them more as homework helpers than true partners. Related Parents facing economic hardship or lingering distrust from their own schooling may not immediately see the value in engaging. Even motivated families struggle to prioritize vague school requests amid a myriad of real-life demands. Rather than grow cynical, school staff must actively earn families' engagement. They need to clearly, specifically, and respectfully show families how their involvement benefits their children's development. This is Marketing 101: speak to what matters. Frame requests in ways that align with parents' hopes and addresses their real concerns. If parents don't understand how a request helps their child, schools have to connect those dots. Research from the Harvard Family Research Project shows that families make a measurable difference when they actively attend conferences, visit the classroom, and volunteer. Other studies document the value of parents engaging in literacy-specific activities like teaching letters, sharing books, and fostering reading at home. Schools can motivate parents by showing them that their efforts directly affect their kids' reading gains. Nearly 40 states have passed legislation to spur reading improvements and sprinkled amid the new curriculum and professional development requirements they've mandated are some directives for parents, too. Wisconsin's Act 20, for example, rightly emphasizes parents' critical roles: sharing family learning histories, monitoring learning disabilities, implementing literacy strategies, tracking reading plans, and even filing complaints when necessary. Yet, the law provides little tangible guidance or support. Ask a Milwaukee parent how to help their child meet reading expectations and you may get a shrug — not from indifference, but from genuine confusion. Schools must translate mandates into meaningful guidance. When staff get strategic about what they ask families to do, they create space for real partnership. Generic advice like 'read aloud every night' can evolve into more specific grade-level guidance like 'Read this book to practice the 'oo' sound your child is learning in class.' Related I recently observed a work session between school staff and local nonprofit tutoring groups. The educators invested months designing targeted, straightforward home literacy activities that were aligned closely with common student needs in the district. Next, they planned to test the tools with real families, revise the instructions based on feedback, and then film demonstration videos, so parents could clearly see what success looks like. Tips are helpful — but seeing another parent do it builds belief. Once complete, these tools will provide teachers with a library of targeted activities to share with families based on specific student needs. The anticipated result? Fewer, clearer asks for families and greater impact. Across the country, different family engagement models are emerging. In New York, the NYC Reads Family Ambassador program held 10-week online sessions to teach families the science of reading. The sessions aimed to strengthen home literacy routines, as well as inform participants who could then share effective strategies with other families. The Indiana Learning Lab hosts virtual workshops that are accessible to parents anytime, enabling them to tune in at their convenience. Both these programs acknowledge that families want to help, but need accessible, credible resources and consistent encouragement. Raising our nation's reading achievement is an all-hands-on-deck effort — inside and outside of school. Teachers, instructional coaches, literacy specialists, staff, administrators and community volunteers can all support families. But for these partnerships to flourish, we've got to get honest about who teaches kids: all of us. Ultimately, the strongest readers aren't shaped in classrooms alone. They're nurtured at home: word by word, story by story, conversation by conversation. To help reading reforms succeed, we need to do more than retrain teachers and revise curricula. We must support the first, most constant teachers all children have: their families.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
L.A. Unified Sees ‘Major Gains' in Fight Against Chronic Absenteeism
Chronic absenteeism remains a problem for LAUSD, but the school district is making gains, Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said on his last house visit of the year aimed at driving student attendance. The district made progress this year with the tricky challenge, Carvalho said during the home visit last month, but officials could not say how much progress was made exactly in reducing chronic absenteeism, defined as missing more than ten percent of the school year. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter 'Our approach is we support, we're not about penalizing,' said Carvalho of the strategy being employed in getting chronically absent kids to class. 'Two years ago, we were in a different position … [but] conditions have improved dramatically.' Carvalho said the number of chronically absent students is slowly dropping closer to pre-pandemic levels, in part because of the district's push to personalize its efforts to bring individual students to class, with well-known tactics like his house visits. Los Angeles isn't the only place struggling with persistent attendance issues. A study from the American Enterprise Institute found that chronic absenteeism nationwide rose over 10% from 2019 to 2024, peaking in 2022 at 28% of students. The same report said the national percentage of students with good attendance fell sharply between 2019 and 2023, compounding the problem. More and more research, in fact, is suggesting that higher levels of chronically absent students could become the new normal. In L.A., chronic absenteeism remains a problem. At the beginning of the school year, nearly one-third of all students in the nation's second-largest district were missing class enough to be deemed chronically absent. That's an improvement from the years following the COVID-19 shutdowns in the district, when nearly half of all students were chronically absent, the worst the problem ever got in LA Unified's history. Carvalho said it's gotten better because he and the district's attendance team got personal in their approach, tailoring efforts to individual families, and knocking on the doors where kids had repeatedly missed school. Attendance counselors, school principals, and sometimes Carvalho himself have visited with thousands of families personally each school year since then, and talked to parents about why their kids are missing class. They offer solutions, like free busing or new school uniforms, or whatever could help. The tactic is a standard tool for LAUSD, one that Carvalho and district attendance workers and officials trumpet as a reason for their success. But chronic absenteeism has been a serious problem for years in L.A. More than 32% of L.A. Unified students were considered chronically absent for the 2023-2024 school year, the latest year for which the data exists. That's well above the historic norms, but still an improvement from the abysmal previous years. Los Angeles Unified had 36% of students consistently missing class in 2022-2023, and just over 45% of students in 2021-22. Fallout from COVID-19 remains the main thing parents and educators blame for the historically high numbers. During Carvalho's last at-home visit of the year, the mother of a chronically absent student said that since the pandemic she's been confused over when to keep her sick home from class. At the start of the 2024-2025 school year, Carvalho said annual incremental gains will be how the district digs itself out. That plan appears to be working, he said in May, with last year seeing a dip and district officials expecting 2024 to have even lower numbers. LAUSD officials told the LA School Report that chronic absenteeism data for the 2024-2025 school year has not been finalized, so they could not quantify the gains. Still, Rudy Gomez, the director of iAttend, LAUSD's district-wide attendance program, said in an interview that the district has made progress fighting chronic absenteeism. 'We have had some significant gains in chronic absenteeism, although we still have a lot of work to do,' said Gomez. 'But we've seen some major gains, all across the board.'