Families angry and feel ignored on Grenfell Tower demolition decision
The demolition of Grenfell Tower could mean the injustice of the fatal fire is put out of sight and out of mind, a survivor has said.
The Government's decision, shared with families at a private meeting on Wednesday evening, has prompted anger and claims that the voices of many loved ones had been ignored.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, who is also Housing Secretary, is understood to have been met with gasps from a shocked room of mostly bereaved people who felt there had not been enough consultation.
Grenfell United, which represents some bereaved and survivors, said it appeared from the room that 'no-one supported her decision'.
It is understood some asked if the decision could be reversed.
An official update is expected on Friday, but the Government has previously said there will be no changes to the west London site before the eighth anniversary of the disaster – which claimed 72 lives – in June.
What is left of the tower has stood in place in the years since the disaster, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words 'forever in our hearts'.
In a previous update, the Government said structural engineering advice remained unchanged 'in that the building (or that part of it that was significantly damaged) should be carefully taken down'.
Grenfell United said housing secretaries in the years since the June 2017 fire had been repeatedly urged to 'consult the bereaved and survivors meaningfully before reaching a decision on the tower'.
In a statement on Wednesday night, they said: 'Angela Rayner could not give a reason for her decision to demolish the tower.
'She refused to confirm how many bereaved and survivors had been spoken to in the recent, short four-week consultation.
'But judging from the room alone – the vast majority of whom were bereaved – no-one supported her decision. But she claims her decision is based on our views.'
Emma O'Connor, who lived on the 20th floor and managed to escape the burning block on the night, said there had been hope among some that while part of the tower might come down, some of it could be retained and 'erected into a standing memorial'.
She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'If it's really unstable then it should be taken down from the top to the 10th floor, which they say is the most unstable, so it then can be erected into a standing memorial.
'To me, it just seems like if it's out of sight, it's definitely out of mind for the people that are actually responsible for the lack of respect to human beings.'
Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones' gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable
Grenfell United
On the format of the meeting, Ms O'Connor said: 'It was: 'I've made this decision, I'll take questions now.'
'We had three questions at a time and then they would reply back to us, but they're not answering questions, like they're not saying if the decision is reversible, like to actually make sure that something can be erected at a height, like to have a standing memorial.'
A spokesperson for Grenfell Next Of Kin, a separate group representing some bereaved families, said while the decision was 'obviously a very sensitive and difficult' one, families 'understand the hard facts around safety.'
The spokesperson said Ms Rayner had 'announced the decision that the tower will have to be carefully deconstructed'.
They added: 'For the next of kin of the deceased, that building is a shrine and the death place of their immediate families, their brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, husbands, wives and children – but they understand the hard facts around safety.'
But Grenfell United said the meeting 'showed just how upset bereaved and survivors are about not having their views heard or considered in this decision'.
They added: 'Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones' gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable'.
Views have varied on what should happen on the site, with some feeling the tower should remain in place until there are criminal prosecutions over the failings which led to the fire.
The final report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, published in September, concluded the disaster was the result of 'decades of failure' by government and the construction industry to act on the dangers of flammable materials on high-rise buildings.
Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
The near 10-year wait for justice has been described by families as 'unbearable'.
Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower, with recommendations including a 'sacred space', designed to be a 'peaceful place for remembering and reflecting'.
It is expected a planning application for a memorial could be submitted in late 2026.
A Government spokesperson said: 'The priority for the Deputy Prime Minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know her decision on the future of the Grenfell Tower.
'This is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the Deputy Prime Minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Couple backed lose legal fight over winter fuel payment
They also claim the decision to end the benefit for thousands of pensioners across the country last year was "irrational", breached their human rights and wanted the Court of Session in Edinburgh to set aside the policy and restore the payment as part of a judicial review. However, in a ruling published today Lady Hood refused their petition for a judicial review on all grounds. READ MORE: Health secretary Neil Gray faces fresh questions over 'limogate' controversy Police Scotland send 80 officers to Northern Ireland as riots spread SNP ministers reject proposal for major tax rise on second homes in tourist hotspots She found that neither of the UK or Scottish Governments had failed to exercise their duties under the Equality Act 2010 and that also that neither was under a duty to consult. The judge also held that the decisions were neither irrational nor unreasonable and did not breach the Human Rights Act 1998. She concluded: 'I shall therefore repel the petitioners' first to eighth pleas‑in‑law, and refuse the petition. The question of the appropriate remedies, had I found in the petitioners' favour therefore does not arise. I shall reserve all questions of expenses.' She also stated: 'This case is not a verdict, nor even an expression of opinion, on the merits or demerits of government policy as debated in the public arena. "Instead, the current proceedings were brought by the petitioners to test a much narrower question: namely, whether the policy decisions of each of the respondents (and the legislation which brought those policies into effect) are unlawful, and so liable to be struck down by the courts.' Earlier this week, the UK government abandoned plans to withdraw the payments from all but the poorest pensioners after the scheme drew widespread criticism. It was announced that all pensioners on annual incomes under £35,000 would receive £200 a year with over 80s receiving £300. The Scottish Government had already launched its own winter fuel benefit in response to the original cuts which included extra support for those less well-off, but also a universal payment which is unaffected by income. The couple's lawyers the Govan Law Centre said they have no doubt the Fanning's litigation had been influential in securing U-turns by both governments. A spokesperson from the Govan Law Centre told BBC Scotland News: "While our clients have lost their case at first instance, we have no doubt that this litigation has been influential in securing the partial U-turn made by the Scottish government last November and the major policy U-turn confirmed by the UK government earlier this week. "We hope that the Scottish Government will now follow suit and restore the winter fuel payment in full for people such as our clients." The Govan Law Centre added the legal challenge "was always one of process" and the fact the UK Government has already reconsidered the cuts "vindicates" their clients. It said that an appeal would have "reasonable prospects of success" but added it is unlikely that legal aid would be provided for this. About 10 million pensioners in England and Wales lost their allowance under new measures announced by chancellor Rachel Reeves in July last year. Those on pension credit or certain other means-tested benefits retained the annual payments, worth between £100 and £300. In Scotland, the payment was devolved to Holyrood in April 2024, but the Scottish Government followed the actions of their counterparts in Westminster in terminating it in August 2024, arguing £160m had been taken from its budget. A new alternative, called the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment (PAWHP), was due to be introduced the following month, but that has since been pushed back to winter 2025. The current plan is for all pensioner households in Scotland to receive at least £100 regardless of income, while those on pension credit will receive up to £305 depending on age. Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said the universal approach of the devolved Scottish scheme was important - but that wealthier pensioners would be made aware that they could opt out.
BreakingNews.ie
43 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Major disruption expected due to protest over govt plans to purchase Citywest hotel
Major disruption is expected on the N7 on Thursday afternoon due to a protest over government plans to purchase Citywest hotel in Dublin to increase international protection applicants' accommodation. A vehicle rollout protest by the Stop Citywest Hotel Purchase residents group based in Saggart has been organised for 3:15pm. Advertisement A portion of the hotel located in Dublin is already being used by the government to provide housing for IPAs, and the move would see 1,000 people being able to be accommodated there. It has been reported that the hoped for expansion could cost the state €100 million if purchased. The current owners of Citywest received €51 million from the State for the first nine months of last year for use of the facility. The hotel is the biggest in the country. The government has pledged to cease using private accommodation for such applicants replacing it with State owned facilities. Advertisement This afternoon's action, which is expected to disrupt heavy weekend traffic, follows a peaceful protest outside the Dáil last Wednesday. The moving car protest will involve a loop of Saggart village surrounding the hotel and will then continue across three lanes of the N7 to Naas in Co Kildare where it will end. Over the past number of days the residents group have been involved in slow driving protests around the local Saggart area A group spokesperson explained that the 'government's decision' to purchase Citywest Hotel and convert it into a permanent refugee center will have an 'irreversible effect on our village'. Advertisement The spokesperson continued: 'Such an action will not only strain local infrastructure and resources but also place significant stress on both the existing and newly arrived populations. Both groups are likely to suffer from inadequate integration efforts, which are essential for fostering mutual understanding and harmony.' The spokesperson highlighted that the group is fighting to 'reclaim' what they view as their local amenities and save their leisure center, gym, and restaurant, which are part of the Citywest Hotel complex. '(These) are likely to close with the purchase. We want our convention center back so it can again host events. 'Furthermore, transforming such a significant local landmark into a permanent center is affecting local businesses reliant on tourism and disrupting the quiet ambiance many of us value,' the spokesperson noted. 'It is causing challenges in community integration and our security. It is placing a burden on our public services, such as education, healthcare, and transportation, and we have seen very little help from the government for our village'.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK warns British travellers to Israel: Situation could escalate quickly
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Britain on Friday updated its travel guidance to Israel, saying the situation could escalate quickly following Israeli strikes against nuclear and military facilities in Iran. "The situation could escalate quickly and could pose significant risks, including missile fire," an update, opens new tab on the government's website said. The same warning was added to its advice for the occupied Palestinian territories. Britain also re-issued its travel advice for other countries including Iran, Iraq, Saudia Arabia, Egypt and Syria to include a warning on the risk of wider escalation.
