logo
Fears planning rules could force festivals to leave Wales

Fears planning rules could force festivals to leave Wales

Yahoo09-02-2025

Festival organisers say they could be forced to move in 2026 because of new rules to control temporary campsites.
Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority members have supported plans that will force landowners to apply for planning permission for pop-up campsites which can exist for up to 28 days a year.
Festival organiser Amber Lort-Phillips said her "Big Retreat" wellbeing festival may have to move to England in 2026.
The authority said the new rules were designed to "create a level playing field" and claimed they had "strong support".
Under current rules, land owners can open temporary campsites in Wales under "permitted development" for up to 28 days a year.
In England, it is 60 days, and the Welsh government will soon consult on extending the period in the rest of Wales.
The Pembrokeshire park authority is the only one in Wales to plan tighter restrictions since tougher rules were drawn up for Gower in 1977.
The two other national parks in Wales have no plans to change the 28-day rule.
Couple moving to England over campsite rules
Concerns pop-up campsites 'harming communities'
Push for new national park on 75th birthday
Although there will be no effect on festivals with temporary campsites in 2025, Ms Lort-Phillips fears her four day well-being festival in Lawrenny, which brings an estimated £1m to the local economy, could have to move next year.
"It's essential. We couldn't run without our permitted development, because it's how we run our campsite.
"The impact is we might have to move it. It's our home for the Big Retreat and it's not fair. We are potentially having to look at other sites and move the festival outside of Wales."
She claimed there was "no real evidence" for a blanket approach and there was no guarantee temporary campsites would get planning permission.
The National Park said it "aims to prioritise applications" to minimise delays.
The Pembrokeshire authority's chief executive, Tegryn Jones, told BBC Wales there was "no control" over temporary campsites and they took up 12% of the authority's enforcement time.
He said pop-up campsites led to a "stream of complaints" and they were "seeking to take a small measure to even the playing field".
The measures have been supported by Ben Carden from the Woodlands Champions Club which runs 16 sites in Pembrokeshire.
"Quite often, there are serious implications with pop-up campsites," he said.
"There can be noise nuisance for local residents. I attended one pop-up campsite that had over 200 pitches and which had just three toilets and one washbasin.
"There needs to be a standard of camping."
Joe Worley who runs Westival, a music festival based in Manorbier which attracts about 2,500 visitors every June, said he had not "received any direct consultation".
The change which "came as a big shock", he said.
"The [2026] event wouldn't be able to go ahead without the campsite. If we couldn't get planning permitted on that particular field, that could mean moving to a new site," he said.
"It feels quite damaging to a lot of businesses."
The authority said 120 people responded to a public consultation, which equates to about 0.5% of the park's population of 23,000.
Many were complaining about the effect on landscape, biodiversity, pressure on local infrastructure and noise.
But Ms Lort-Phillips criticised the consultation process and said the measures would harm "economic development" in the park.
Mr Jones said he "did not accept that".
Dai Williams set up a temporary campsite on his land near Druidstone in 2021 to provide extra income which he said had a "fantastic response" from visitors.
He argued that the park's plans were a "knee-jerk" reaction to the post-Covid surge in visitors, warning that the new regulations might "shut down" businesses.
A further consultation is being held until 21 February with a final decision expected in the spring. The changes are due to come into force on 1 January 2026.
How to survive a 1,200 mile walk with your teenage son
Are festivals turning from hedonism to health kicks?
What's it like at the eisteddfod as a non-Welsh speaker?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supermom runner claims gold in grueling marathon — even after stopping to breastfeed three times
Supermom runner claims gold in grueling marathon — even after stopping to breastfeed three times

New York Post

time4 days ago

  • New York Post

Supermom runner claims gold in grueling marathon — even after stopping to breastfeed three times

Who runs the world? Moms. A new mom won an ultramarathon — even with stopping to breastfeed her newborn three times. Stephanie Case, 42, came in first place at a 100-kilometer race in Wales on May 17. 4 This woman is the definition of a supermom. The Canadian woman who lives in Chamonix, France, sat down at three different points during the Ultra-Trail Snowdonia in Eryri National Park to breastfeed her six-month-old daughter. It was her first race post-partum, according to NPR. After a three-year break from competing, three rounds of IVF and two miscarriages, she was excited to be back in the race with her baby by her side. And all that excitement must have hyped her up because she powered through faster than any of the other women on the course. 'Well that was a surprise,' Case wrote on Instagram. 'I WON?!?' The runner didn't know she'd placed first until after she'd crossed the finish line because she'd started the race 30 minutes after the first group of competitors. She got special permission to pause to breastfeed, on the one condition that she couldn't accept aid during the stops, so she did. 4 Case explained how she took many breaks to breastfeed her child in the midst of the race. Case's partner carried their baby to the 20-, 50- and 80-kilometer checkpoints and handed the little one over for a few minutes to feed. Mom would then kick it back into gear and continue running after her baby was fed. She paid more attention to her fuel intake and feeding schedule than to her time. 'During the race, I was taking in about 80 to 100 grams of carbohydrates an hour,' she told NPR. 'And I kept that up until about 65K, and then I had to pull back a bit because I was getting quite nauseous. And then I ramped it back up again and was kind of done at 95K.' 4 'Well that was a surprise,' Case wrote on Instagram. 'I WON?!?' Instagram/theultrarunnergirl 'That's when I started getting really nauseous.' And this Welsh course isn't a flat plain. 'It's not what you would think of as a typical running race,' Case noted. Snowdonia has 21,325 feet of elevation gain as runners have to traverse the highest mountain in Wales — Snowdon — known in Welsh as Yr Wyddfa. 'Really it's almost like scrambling or climbing, where you're going up kind of a vertical wall of rock,' Case said. Yet, she finished the race in just over 16 hours and 53 minutes — beating the other 60-something females. Her time was four minutes faster than the runner-up's. 'It was meant to be my warmup to Hardrock,' Case posted on Instagram, referencing the July 11 Hardrock Hundred Mile Endurance Run in Colorado. That course is 102.5 miles in length, with 33,000 feet of climb. Warm up or not, Case acknowledges how difficult the race she won was. 'I don't want anyone to feel badly about themselves out of a story like this. I'm quite open about how hard it is and how much support I have, and the messy parts of it,' Case told the Guardian. 'At 95k, I was done, dry heaving and peeing all over myself. I ran with devices internally. It's not all rainbows and bunnies and a lot of things have to come together for something like that to happen.' Based on the response she's received from people, Case's accomplishment is inspiring people. 4 Case finished the race in just over 16 hours and 53 minutes — beating the other 60-something females. Her time was four minutes faster than the runner-up's. Instagram/theultrarunnergirl 'I think the response has been overwhelmingly positive,' Case told NPR, adding that the reaction 'has shown me that we still have these ideas in our head culturally about what a new mom should look like.' 'We don't have to lose ourselves in becoming a mom and we can keep setting big goals for ourselves.'

Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say
Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say

A coalition of mayors has called for powers to be given to local authorities to create visitor levies across England, in an attempt to boost tourist infrastructure and regional growth. The group of mayors from around the country, led by Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram, is calling on the government to grant devolved powers to allow regions to create a visitor levy, which could see a small charge added to overnight stays. Mr Rotheram said the overnight charges are 'the kind most of us wouldn't think twice about when travelling abroad' and 'would give us the power to reinvest directly into the things that make our area so special'. Other mayors have echoed his sentiment. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: 'A modest overnight accommodation levy, similar to other international cities, would boost our economy, deliver growth and help cement London's reputation as a global tourism and business destination.' A similar law is already in place in Scotland, passed in 2024, which allows councils to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so. Edinburgh has already made headway with this power, voting in January to add a five per cent surcharge on visitors' overnight stays by 2026. A bill has also been proposed by Welsh lawmakers to introduce a small visitor levy that could see visitors to the country paying up to £1.25 per night by 2027. The mayors say England is 'at risk of falling behind' as Scotland and Wales move ahead with their own tourism levies, so are calling for rapid action from the central government. The mayors have argued that the powers to create a visitor levy would unlock 'vital' funding for tourism and cultural infrastructure and drive regional growth, as well as reduce dependence on funding from the central government. English legislation does not allow cities to create a visitor levy; however, using legal workarounds has meant Liverpool and Manchester have introduced a form of tourism levy. The city councils both introduced a tourism-based Business Improvement District (BID), using existing legal power to establish a form of tourist tax that allows hoteliers to charge £1 (in Manchester) or £2 (in Liverpool) per night as part of a 'city visitor charge'. The mayors said that the BID visitor levy in Liverpool has received strong backing, while in Manchester, a recent survey revealed 70 per cent of tourists are willing to pay a small charge if it is used to visibly enhance tourism services. However, the local authorities are hoping to see devolved powers to create visitor levies written into law. The campaign is backed by the mayors of the Liverpool City Region, Greater Manchester, London, the North East, the West Midlands and West Yorkshire. 'These regions collectively attract hundreds of millions of visitors annually and contribute billions to the UK economy,' the group said. 'Yet none currently benefit from a dedicated funding stream to reinvest in tourism resilience and growth.' The Liverpool City Region predicts that a visitor levy could raise nearly £11 million per year for the area from the over 60 million visitors it receives annually. Greater Manchester says that a £1 to £5 overnight tax could raise between £8 million and £40 million per year, which could help fund key infrastructures such as the regeneration of Old Trafford or airport development. Over in the capital, the group said tourism accounts for one in seven jobs and nearly 12 per cent of London's economy, whereas visitor economies stand at £6.1 billion in the North East and £16.3 billion in Birmingham.

Why is there a row about the railway line between Oxford and Cambridge?
Why is there a row about the railway line between Oxford and Cambridge?

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Why is there a row about the railway line between Oxford and Cambridge?

A row has broken out about the railway line between Oxford and Cambridge. The East West Rail Project is set to make travel across Britain easier, according to Network Rail, by re-establishing a link between the two university towns. But it is classed as an England and Wales project, meaning that Wales does not get a share of funding, unlike in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Opposition parties have called for the project to be changed to England-only. Rail infrastructure in Wales is a reserved matter, which means it is the responsibility of the UK government rather than the Welsh government. The Liberal Democrats said Wales would get more than £300m if the government changed the project to England-only. Wales would get that money through the Barnett Formula - the population-based method which decides how much money devolved governments get to spend. Politicians have similarly called on Wales to get "up to £5bn" of consequential funding from the HS2 project, which has also been classed as England and Wales. Wales's first minister, Eluned Morgan, told Sky News earlier this year she was expecting an "uplift" in money for Welsh railways and branded the HS2 funding "unfair". In a landmark speech last month, Baroness Morgan called for a "fair deal" for Wales as she sought to reset the relationship between the Welsh and UK governments. David Chadwick, Liberal Democrat MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe, said it was "HS2 all over again". "All we want is Wales to be treated fairly, to receive the same treatment as Scotland and Northern Ireland," he said. Ben Lake, Plaid Cymru's MP for Ceredigion Preseli, said neither the East West Rail Project or HS2 have been "designed to deliver benefits to communities in Wales". "The UK government has previously designated large rail projects in England, such as Cross Rail in London, as projects benefitting England alone, and if it were to reclassify HS2 and the Oxford to Cambridge projects in the same way, Wales could stand to gain billions in consequential funding," he added. Sam Rowlands, the Welsh Conservatives' shadow transport secretary, said the project highlighted "further unfairness in funding". "The Welsh Conservatives have consistently called for Wales's fair share of HS2 funding and maintain that this new project must also deliver fair consequential funding," he added. Sky News has asked the Treasury for its response.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store