Chilling signs Finland could be the next country on Putin's hit list
Ammunition dumps. Armoured vehicle parks. Combat jet shelters. Helicopter pads.
Finland is convinced the appearance of these along its border with Russia means it is next on President Vladimir Putin's invasion list.
Finland was once part of a Russian Empire.
By President Putin's self-professed standards, that means it should be again.
'Peter the Great waged the Great Northern War for 21 years,' he proclaimed in 2022.
'He was not taking away anything. He was returning. This is how it was.'
Putin went on to claim, 'Clearly, it fell to our lot to return and reinforce as well' for his invasion of Ukraine.
Now, with US President Donald Trump washing his hands of his promise to negotiate peace with Moscow in his first 24 hours, and then first 200 days, President Putin is once again thinking big.
Satellite images published by Finnish and US media show Russian military infrastructure along the 1300km border being renovated and reinforced.
International analysts are painting a gloomy picture for a Europe no longer able to rely upon support from its World War II and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) ally, the United States.
In fact, President Trump has himself expressed great interest in seizing NATO territory by force - Canada and Greenland.
But President Putin has egg on his face.
His anticipated three-day invasion of Ukraine is now in its third year.
His modern tanks, armoured fighting vehicles, artillery and air force have suffered staggering losses.
This, however, is changing fast.
Putin has put his nation on a total war footing. Its entire economy is geared towards fitting out fresh conscripts with new fighting gear. And the production lines are rolling.
Europe is not so well prepared.
Political polarisation and Russian disinformation - and sabotage - campaigns have been sewing confusion. Washington DC's erratic behaviour adds a heightened air of urgency.
Now, Russia is building new warehouses to shelter military vehicles and equipment. Tents are being thrown up to house thousands of troops. Helipads and airfields are being cleared and prepared to accommodate aircraft.
Finland, however, has been here before.
History has taught it to know what comes next.
Finnish Defence Force General Sami Nurmi says his forces are monitoring Russian movements 'very closely' and are 'preparing for the worst'.
Signs and portents
Few analysts and politicians believed Russia's build-up of tanks and troops near the border with Ukraine would lead to invasion. Even less listened to President Putin's belligerent threats to do so.
But he did just that on Thursday, February 24, 2022.
'If the Russians follow their current plans, there can be tens of thousands of new soldiers near the borders of Norway, Finland and the Baltic countries in the coming years,' warns Finnish open source intelligence (OSINT) analyst Emil Kastehelmi.
The threat is not yet imminent.
But Moscow is showing every intention of making it so.
Recent satellite images show heightened activity at four major Russian bases along its borders with Finland and Norway. The old Cold War facilities at Petrozavodsk, Severomorsk-2, and Olenya are being revitalised and expanded.
A relatively undeveloped site at Karmenka, just 60km from the Finnish border, has been expanded to accommodate more than 130 military-grade tents for up to 2000 troops.
Petrozavodsk, about 160km from Finland, has three huge new warehouses to house 150 tanks. The Wall Street Journal reports the city will also get a new Russian army command facility.
Kastehelmi expects further major Russian infrastructure projects to become evident in the coming months.
'It's really difficult to say yet because the war in Ukraine is still heavily ongoing, and achieving a truce seems to be extremely difficult,' he adds.
'The future will show just how heavily the Russians will invest in all of this – military bases, new units, soldiers and so on. But as far as we know now, it's going to be significant.'
Time is on Putin's side
Putin's threats of annexation encompass Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Moldova, Romania - and essentially any sovereign state that at some point in the past came under the control of something resembling a Russian leader.
And the Kremlin is now 'more willing to use military force in a regional war against one or more European NATO countries if it perceives NATO as militarily weakened or politically divided,' Denmark's defence intelligence service has warned.
The military intelligence agency Estonia warned early last year that Moscow's military reforms could produce a massed army on the scale of the former Soviet Union.
Now, London-based think tank the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) warns that Russia would pose 'a significant military challenge to NATO allies, particularly the Baltic States, as early as 2027'.
It adds that member states must 'consider the military, financial and defence industrial investments needed to reduce dependencies on the US and, in extremis, to prepare for a NATO without any US role'.
Finland, however, is way ahead of them.
It had been subject to Russian rule for much of the 19th Century. And it fought fiercely during World War II to avoid falling under Moscow's yoke again.
The long-neutral nation saw fresh writing on the wall in 2022. It, and similarly neutral Sweden, had their surprise applications to join NATO a year later.
Helsinki has closed its borders with Russia and begun construction of a 200 kilometre long fence to seal off its most exposed approaches.
It's also dramatically increased defence spending to modernise its armed forces.
Thousands of old civil defence shelters are being restored.
And citizens have been ordered to prepare 'grab bags' of supplies for an emergency - and to resist occupational forces.
Shadow war
'The challenge is not whether Europe can fight effectively without the United States – it can, and it might soon have to,' warns German paratrooper and Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies analyst Julian Werner.
'The real question is whether Europe will invest today, while it still has the choice of how it wants to fight before circumstances dictate the way it has to.'
International analysts say the fighting has already begun.
Sabotage. Electronic attacks. Propaganda.
Russian ships, and ships with Russian commanders, have been linked to a series of undersea cable and pipeline breaks.
GPS navigation signals have been jammed in Finland, Norway, Estonia, Lithuania and Poland. These nations have also been contending with co-ordinated campaigns to force desperate Middle Eastern refugees and illegal immigrants across their borders.
And saboteurs and spies are being intercepted and arrested across Europe.
'Russia's primary targets have included transportation, government, critical infrastructure, and industry,' the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) reports.
The Kremlin appears keen to confirm its imperial ambitions.
Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov last month proclaimed the 'dangerous' and 'fascist' NATO alliance controlled territory that had 'never belonged to anyone except the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union.'
According to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), it's part of a Kremlin campaign to convince its own citizens - and anybody else who wants to listen - that it holds the moral upper ground.
'Russian Presidential Aide and former Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev recently threatened Finland using narratives resembling those that the Kremlin has used to justify its invasion of Ukraine,' it explains, adding that 'Putin and other Russian officials are attempting to use Russia's previous colonisation efforts to set informational conditions and justify future aggression against NATO states.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
PM ‘scared' to meet Donald Trump in the White House
The Australian's Foreign Editor Greg claims Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is 'scared' to meet with Donald Trump in the White House amid the US asking Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. 'I think Albanese is scared of meeting Trump in the White House because imagine the two of them sitting there and someone says to the president 'well, Mr Trump, do you think Australia, which spends measly 2 per cent of its GDP on defence while America spends 3.5 per cent and defends Australia do you think that is good enough?' Trump would say no, that is a disaster,' Mr Sheridan told Sky News Australia. 'Albanese would have to have a fight with him or give in and do something real in defence.'

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Mary Fowler detail behind bombshell Nathan Cleary exit claim
Nathan Cleary has been increasingly linked with a Panthers exit in recent months, with rumours from an English Super League move to a rugby defection floated. But according to veteran NRL pundit Andrew Voss, the halfback's next move will almost certainly be for love, following Matildas superstar Mary Fowler to the UK where she plays for powerhouse football club Manchester City. Watch the biggest Aussie sports & the best from overseas LIVE on Kayo Sports | New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited time offer. Cleary is contracted to the Panthers until the end of 2027 but Voss believes the time is now for the star halfback to capitalise on the pull of his surname and make the move to the northern hemisphere. 'I'll get a little romantic,' Voss said to his co-host on SEN 1170 Breakfast on Tuesday. 'There is no doubt the young man is in love and his love is on the other side of the world and his love is never coming back to Australia for her sporting career because she can't. 'Nathan has won four premierships, Origin, he's a Test player, World Cup; he has achieved all the things you want to do in a career and I'm saying love might win out here. 'I'm not saying playing union but I can see Cleary playing in the northern hemisphere. 'It's obvious they're in love and how long can that relationship be on the other side of the world when there is a solution?' However, there are two major barriers stopping that move. Firstly Cleary still has two years to run on his Panthers deal after the current season. But much like Penrith's decision to let James Fisher-Harris break his contract for family reasons at the end of last year, it would be a possibility the club would grant his wish to leave especially if it was to follow his heart abroad instead of playing for a rival NRL team or code hopping. The second problem is trickier, and that is the issue that Super League players don't earn anywhere near the money of NRL stars. But as rumours circulate that NRL Europe could soon be a reality, Voss believes Cleary could be playing in England come next year. 'If NRL Europe comes into being and I think it will be announced later in the year with grandiose plans,' he said. 'Teams in London and France, they will pick how they want the comp to look. 'I don't know where the money comes from but I think a London marquee signing of Cleary at some stage makes sense. 'Nathan Cleary ticks a massive box, that gives them the headline they want, they become an A-list couple, I'm talking massive picture here.' Voss' comments come after earlier this year former NRL hardman Mark Carroll urged the halfback to follow his heart. 'The great thing about Cleary is he can have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't have to quit rugby league to be with the love of his life,' Carroll wrote in his weekly column for The Nightly. 'Cleary's won four premierships with Penrith, landed two Clive Churchill medals and played in three winning State of Origin series with NSW. He's represented Australia in five Tests, helping the Kangaroos to a World Cup victory in 2021. 'He will be part of the revived Kangaroo tour at the end of the year, providing he is fit. At 27, the half-back's legacy in the game is ensured. There's not much more for him to prove. 'I'm sure he and Mary have discussed a move and I hope he does take the leap. It would not only be a great love story, but Cleary's move into uncharted rugby league waters would also capture the hearts of fans in two countries.'


The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
RBA hints at more interest rate cuts if tariffs worsen
Minutes from the last Reserve Bank board meeting reveal why they came close to an unusually large cut, as the bank's chief economist outlines how they think Donald Trump's tariffs could hit the domestic economy. The minutes from the bank's May meeting were released on Tuesday, shedding light on its decision to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent. The Reserve Bank considered an even larger reduction of 50 basis points at the meeting, due to uncertainty in global markets. Bank board members said developments in the domestic economy alone, with slowing inflation and weak consumption growth, warranted a 25 basis point cut. Repercussions from tariffs imposed by the US had reinforced the need to cut interest rates. "The rise in global tariffs and increase in policy uncertainty had adversely changed the outlook for growth in Australia's major trading partners," the minutes said. However, a 0.25 per cent cut was agreed upon as being the most appropriate, given there were still risks inflation could kick off again. The board said if global uncertainty weighed heavier than expected, interest rates would need to be cut even more than forecast. "Monetary policy would need to move to an expansionary setting in the event these scenarios materialised," the minutes said. The rates market has forecast the cash rate to drop to 3.1 per cent by the end of the year. However, the central bank said it was not yet time to make a decision on whether a more aggressive approach to cutting interest rates was needed, with board members expressing a preference to "move cautiously and predictably". In a speech to the Economic Society of Australia in Brisbane, RBA chief economist Sarah Hunter outlined some of the bank's thoughts on how Mr Trump's tariffs would impact the domestic economy. She said the bank had identified the key transmission channels that would impact the Australian economy and determine the board's future monetary policy response. Firstly, trade flows would be impacted. That could push down inflation in Australia as countries divert cheap goods from countries with tariff barriers. But a broader disruption to supply chains could also result in prices rising. The tariffs will also weigh on economic growth, as uncertainty causes businesses and to a lesser extent households to delay spending decisions. Much will depend, though, on which direction US authorities go from here. Markets have been supported by their assumption that Trump Always Chickens Out. If the US president lashes out to disprove this theory, markets could be in for a drastic re-pricing, which could further impact households' and businesses' decision-making. How the rest of the world responds will also affect the economic fallout. Governments could provide fiscal support to boost ailing economies, with much hinging on the response of the Chinese administration, given the nation's outsized influence on Australian trade. Central banks, including the RBA, will also have a role to play in dampening the economic shock through easing interest rates. "So how will the current unpredictable and uncertain global environment transmit through to the Australian economy? The short answer is we can't be completely sure," Ms Hunter said. The RBA will continue to monitor all these factors and adjust the assumptions that drive its monetary policy decision-making accordingly, she said. How Australia's economy stacks up against other allies will be revealed when the OECD releases its global economic outlook on Tuesday. The outlook comes a day before the release of data on the domestic economy's performance in the first three months of 2025. Economists tip Wednesday's gross domestic product numbers for the March quarter will show the economy expanded by up to 0.5 per cent. Minutes from the last Reserve Bank board meeting reveal why they came close to an unusually large cut, as the bank's chief economist outlines how they think Donald Trump's tariffs could hit the domestic economy. The minutes from the bank's May meeting were released on Tuesday, shedding light on its decision to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent. The Reserve Bank considered an even larger reduction of 50 basis points at the meeting, due to uncertainty in global markets. Bank board members said developments in the domestic economy alone, with slowing inflation and weak consumption growth, warranted a 25 basis point cut. Repercussions from tariffs imposed by the US had reinforced the need to cut interest rates. "The rise in global tariffs and increase in policy uncertainty had adversely changed the outlook for growth in Australia's major trading partners," the minutes said. However, a 0.25 per cent cut was agreed upon as being the most appropriate, given there were still risks inflation could kick off again. The board said if global uncertainty weighed heavier than expected, interest rates would need to be cut even more than forecast. "Monetary policy would need to move to an expansionary setting in the event these scenarios materialised," the minutes said. The rates market has forecast the cash rate to drop to 3.1 per cent by the end of the year. However, the central bank said it was not yet time to make a decision on whether a more aggressive approach to cutting interest rates was needed, with board members expressing a preference to "move cautiously and predictably". In a speech to the Economic Society of Australia in Brisbane, RBA chief economist Sarah Hunter outlined some of the bank's thoughts on how Mr Trump's tariffs would impact the domestic economy. She said the bank had identified the key transmission channels that would impact the Australian economy and determine the board's future monetary policy response. Firstly, trade flows would be impacted. That could push down inflation in Australia as countries divert cheap goods from countries with tariff barriers. But a broader disruption to supply chains could also result in prices rising. The tariffs will also weigh on economic growth, as uncertainty causes businesses and to a lesser extent households to delay spending decisions. Much will depend, though, on which direction US authorities go from here. Markets have been supported by their assumption that Trump Always Chickens Out. If the US president lashes out to disprove this theory, markets could be in for a drastic re-pricing, which could further impact households' and businesses' decision-making. How the rest of the world responds will also affect the economic fallout. Governments could provide fiscal support to boost ailing economies, with much hinging on the response of the Chinese administration, given the nation's outsized influence on Australian trade. Central banks, including the RBA, will also have a role to play in dampening the economic shock through easing interest rates. "So how will the current unpredictable and uncertain global environment transmit through to the Australian economy? The short answer is we can't be completely sure," Ms Hunter said. The RBA will continue to monitor all these factors and adjust the assumptions that drive its monetary policy decision-making accordingly, she said. How Australia's economy stacks up against other allies will be revealed when the OECD releases its global economic outlook on Tuesday. The outlook comes a day before the release of data on the domestic economy's performance in the first three months of 2025. Economists tip Wednesday's gross domestic product numbers for the March quarter will show the economy expanded by up to 0.5 per cent. Minutes from the last Reserve Bank board meeting reveal why they came close to an unusually large cut, as the bank's chief economist outlines how they think Donald Trump's tariffs could hit the domestic economy. The minutes from the bank's May meeting were released on Tuesday, shedding light on its decision to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent. The Reserve Bank considered an even larger reduction of 50 basis points at the meeting, due to uncertainty in global markets. Bank board members said developments in the domestic economy alone, with slowing inflation and weak consumption growth, warranted a 25 basis point cut. Repercussions from tariffs imposed by the US had reinforced the need to cut interest rates. "The rise in global tariffs and increase in policy uncertainty had adversely changed the outlook for growth in Australia's major trading partners," the minutes said. However, a 0.25 per cent cut was agreed upon as being the most appropriate, given there were still risks inflation could kick off again. The board said if global uncertainty weighed heavier than expected, interest rates would need to be cut even more than forecast. "Monetary policy would need to move to an expansionary setting in the event these scenarios materialised," the minutes said. The rates market has forecast the cash rate to drop to 3.1 per cent by the end of the year. However, the central bank said it was not yet time to make a decision on whether a more aggressive approach to cutting interest rates was needed, with board members expressing a preference to "move cautiously and predictably". In a speech to the Economic Society of Australia in Brisbane, RBA chief economist Sarah Hunter outlined some of the bank's thoughts on how Mr Trump's tariffs would impact the domestic economy. She said the bank had identified the key transmission channels that would impact the Australian economy and determine the board's future monetary policy response. Firstly, trade flows would be impacted. That could push down inflation in Australia as countries divert cheap goods from countries with tariff barriers. But a broader disruption to supply chains could also result in prices rising. The tariffs will also weigh on economic growth, as uncertainty causes businesses and to a lesser extent households to delay spending decisions. Much will depend, though, on which direction US authorities go from here. Markets have been supported by their assumption that Trump Always Chickens Out. If the US president lashes out to disprove this theory, markets could be in for a drastic re-pricing, which could further impact households' and businesses' decision-making. How the rest of the world responds will also affect the economic fallout. Governments could provide fiscal support to boost ailing economies, with much hinging on the response of the Chinese administration, given the nation's outsized influence on Australian trade. Central banks, including the RBA, will also have a role to play in dampening the economic shock through easing interest rates. "So how will the current unpredictable and uncertain global environment transmit through to the Australian economy? The short answer is we can't be completely sure," Ms Hunter said. The RBA will continue to monitor all these factors and adjust the assumptions that drive its monetary policy decision-making accordingly, she said. How Australia's economy stacks up against other allies will be revealed when the OECD releases its global economic outlook on Tuesday. The outlook comes a day before the release of data on the domestic economy's performance in the first three months of 2025. Economists tip Wednesday's gross domestic product numbers for the March quarter will show the economy expanded by up to 0.5 per cent. Minutes from the last Reserve Bank board meeting reveal why they came close to an unusually large cut, as the bank's chief economist outlines how they think Donald Trump's tariffs could hit the domestic economy. The minutes from the bank's May meeting were released on Tuesday, shedding light on its decision to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent. The Reserve Bank considered an even larger reduction of 50 basis points at the meeting, due to uncertainty in global markets. Bank board members said developments in the domestic economy alone, with slowing inflation and weak consumption growth, warranted a 25 basis point cut. Repercussions from tariffs imposed by the US had reinforced the need to cut interest rates. "The rise in global tariffs and increase in policy uncertainty had adversely changed the outlook for growth in Australia's major trading partners," the minutes said. However, a 0.25 per cent cut was agreed upon as being the most appropriate, given there were still risks inflation could kick off again. The board said if global uncertainty weighed heavier than expected, interest rates would need to be cut even more than forecast. "Monetary policy would need to move to an expansionary setting in the event these scenarios materialised," the minutes said. The rates market has forecast the cash rate to drop to 3.1 per cent by the end of the year. However, the central bank said it was not yet time to make a decision on whether a more aggressive approach to cutting interest rates was needed, with board members expressing a preference to "move cautiously and predictably". In a speech to the Economic Society of Australia in Brisbane, RBA chief economist Sarah Hunter outlined some of the bank's thoughts on how Mr Trump's tariffs would impact the domestic economy. She said the bank had identified the key transmission channels that would impact the Australian economy and determine the board's future monetary policy response. Firstly, trade flows would be impacted. That could push down inflation in Australia as countries divert cheap goods from countries with tariff barriers. But a broader disruption to supply chains could also result in prices rising. The tariffs will also weigh on economic growth, as uncertainty causes businesses and to a lesser extent households to delay spending decisions. Much will depend, though, on which direction US authorities go from here. Markets have been supported by their assumption that Trump Always Chickens Out. If the US president lashes out to disprove this theory, markets could be in for a drastic re-pricing, which could further impact households' and businesses' decision-making. How the rest of the world responds will also affect the economic fallout. Governments could provide fiscal support to boost ailing economies, with much hinging on the response of the Chinese administration, given the nation's outsized influence on Australian trade. Central banks, including the RBA, will also have a role to play in dampening the economic shock through easing interest rates. "So how will the current unpredictable and uncertain global environment transmit through to the Australian economy? The short answer is we can't be completely sure," Ms Hunter said. The RBA will continue to monitor all these factors and adjust the assumptions that drive its monetary policy decision-making accordingly, she said. How Australia's economy stacks up against other allies will be revealed when the OECD releases its global economic outlook on Tuesday. The outlook comes a day before the release of data on the domestic economy's performance in the first three months of 2025. Economists tip Wednesday's gross domestic product numbers for the March quarter will show the economy expanded by up to 0.5 per cent.