Is India using Afghanistan to counter Pakistan? Jaishankar's first-ever call to Taliban minister raises BIG questions; What does it mean?
There was a time when the Taliban was completely unreachable for India. When the group returned to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, India quickly shut down its embassy in Kabul. Back then, it seemed like India had lost all access to Afghanistan. But today, things look very different. When Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar recently made a phone call to the Taliban's acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, it surprised many. It was the first time an Indian foreign minister had ever spoken directly to a Taliban leader. What made it even more significant was that the call came at a time when reports suggested a top Taliban official was quietly visiting India.
This wasn't just a routine diplomatic gesture. It was a clear sign that India is thinking in new strategic ways especially when it comes to Pakistan. For years, India kept its distance from the Taliban. But now, with changing global politics and rising tensions with Pakistan, India seems ready to explore new partnerships and also with old adversaries. Why Jaishankar's call was more than just symbolic?
Jaishankar's phone call to the Taliban wasn't just a symbolic gesture it marked a clear shift in India's long-standing foreign policy. For years, India avoided any direct contact with the Taliban, seeing them as puppets of Pakistan. This call breaks that silence. It signals the beginning of direct relations with the Taliban and shows that India is willing to adapt to the new power structure in Afghanistan.
This move tells us three important things: India's first public signal of possible recognition of the Taliban: By talking directly to the Taliban's foreign minister, India is openly showing it's ready to engage with the Taliban regime, something that would have been unthinkable earlier. India may now be open to using Afghanistan as a front against Pakistan: With Taliban-Pakistan ties worsening, India sees a chance to push back against Pakistan by building influence in Afghanistan. India's strategic return to Afghanistan: After the U.S. withdrawal and the Taliban's return to power, China has been active in Afghanistan. Now, with this outreach, India is stepping back into the game possibly to balance China's presence and safeguard its own interests. The Secret visit that says a lot
There are reports, though not officially confirmed, that Mullah Mohammad Ibrahim Sadr, a top Taliban security leader and deputy minister of interior affairs, secretly visited Delhi in early May, just days after the Pahalgam terror attack. He is known to have strong ties with Iran and little affection for Pakistan. According to The Sunday Guardian, he is close to the Taliban's supreme leader and has major influence over their security apparatus.
His possible visit to India sends a strong message especially as tensions between India and Pakistan grow. If this visit did happen, it could mean India is using backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban to send a warning to Islamabad. A wake-up call for Pakistan
Relations between the Taliban and Pakistan are not what they used to be. In fact, they're now quite tense. Ibrahim Sadr is known to be anti-Pakistan, and his growing closeness with India would certainly worry Islamabad. For Pakistan, which has long seen Afghanistan as a strategic asset (its idea of 'strategic depth'), this is a serious concern. India's new approach to Afghanistan
Earlier, India's involvement in Afghanistan focused on building democracy, promoting women's rights, constructing infrastructure like the Afghan Parliament, roads, and dams. But with the Taliban back in power and the US gone, India had to change its approach.
Now, India is choosing realism over idealism. The new strategy is: talk to whoever is in power even if it's the Taliban to ensure that Afghan soil isn't used for anti-India activities and to maintain stability in the region. It's also a move to counter the growing China-Pakistan partnership in the area. Taliban needs India too
The Taliban is desperate for international recognition. So far, very few countries officially engage with them. A relationship with India, would be a big step toward legitimacy for the Taliban.
Afghanistan is also going through a major economic and humanitarian crisis i.e. hunger, unemployment, and lack of infrastructure are everywhere. China is stepping in with money and projects, but many Afghans feel uneasy about becoming too dependent on Beijing.
India, in contrast, has a history of goodwill in Afghanistan. It has built roads, schools, dams, and even the Afghan Parliament. For many Afghans, India is a trusted friend. So if India steps in again, it could be the helping hand Afghanistan really needs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kash Patel on Joe Rogan: FBI director reveals how India is helping America fight fentanyl crisis; take on China-backed trafficking network
FBI Director Kash Patel has claimed that the United States is working closely with Indian law enforcement agencies to dismantle what he describes as a China-backed global fentanyl trafficking network. Speaking on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Patel alleged that while India is not a consumer of fentanyl, it has become an increasingly critical transit point for chemical precursors manufactured in China and passed on to Mexican drug cartels. 'They're going to places like India, and I'm also doing operations in India,' Patel said. 'They're having the Mexican cartels now make this fentanyl down in Mexico still.' Patel claimed that Chinese companies were 'getting cute' by routing fentanyl precursors through third countries, including India, to evade direct enforcement and scrutiny. 'No fentanyl deaths in India' According to Patel, one of the clearest signs of a targeted campaign lies in where fentanyl deaths are and aren't occurring. He said the drug is devastating the United States but has not created comparable crises in countries like India, Australia, or Canada. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo 'You don't hear fentanyl deaths in India. You don't really hear fentanyl deaths in England, Australia, New Zealand, or Five Eyes partners in Canada,' he said. Patel suggested that the absence of deaths in those regions indicated that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was selectively deploying the fentanyl supply chain toward the United States for strategic purposes. 'The CCP have used it as a directed approach because we are their adversary,' Patel claimed. 'Why don't we go and take out generations of young men and women who might grow up to serve in the United States military, or become a cop, or become a teacher?' Read: How Kash Patel broke every Indian-American stereotype Direct engagement with India Patel said that he had personally reached out to Indian officials and that joint operations between the FBI and Indian law enforcement were now underway. 'I literally just got off the phone with the Indian government,' he said. 'I said, I need your help. This stuff's coming into your country and then they're moving it from your country because India is not consuming fentanyl.' He stated that the FBI is working on the ground in India with 'the heads of their government law enforcement authorities' to identify and shut down Indian companies involved in importing or redistributing Chinese fentanyl precursors. 'We're going to find these companies that buy it and we're going to shut them down,' Patel said. Patel also laid out a strategy that includes international legal action. 'We're going to sanction them. We're going to arrest them where we can. We're going to indict them in America if we can. We're going to indict them in India if we can.' Patel's India Connection Patel's interest in Indian cooperation is not merely geopolitical — it's personal. Born to Gujarati immigrant parents who fled East Africa, Patel grew up in a working-class immigrant household and has frequently spoken about the influence of his heritage on his national security outlook. His rise from federal public defender to Trump-era White House official and now FBI Director has often been cast by conservative media as a story of Indian-American exceptionalism — one that defies traditional liberal narratives of the diaspora. His critics, however, argue that he has used his identity to shield controversial moves inside the intelligence establishment. Claims of CCP strategy and Canadian rerouting Patel said that the fentanyl trafficking network has adapted in response to stricter enforcement at the US-Mexico border. According to him, cartels are now using Canada as a northern entry point for distribution. 'They're flying it into Vancouver,' Patel said. 'They're taking the precursors up to Canada, manufacturing it up there, and doing their global distribution routes from up there because we were being so effective down south.' He further alleged that China's economic interest in the trade is minimal and that the real motive is geopolitical sabotage. 'They're not making a ton of money off it,' Patel said. 'So it's really just for that purpose.' A broader appeal to Five Eyes allies Patel stated that fentanyl precursors have been detected in Five Eyes countries — the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand — even though the drug itself has not yet been widely deployed in those regions. 'The fentanyl itself isn't being deployed into your country, but it's there being manufactured,' he said. 'The CCP just hasn't directed it at you yet, and they know that.' He said he has asked allied governments to help dismantle those production networks before they become operational threats. A global drug crisis — or a targeted assault? According to Patel, over 74,000 Americans died of synthetic opioid overdoses in 2023 alone, and the fentanyl epidemic should be viewed not only as a public health emergency but as a 'tier one national security threat.' Patel argued that India's cooperation is critical in confronting what he repeatedly characterised as a CCP-directed campaign to destabilise American society. 'India is not the problem,' he said. 'But if we don't get ahead of it, it could become one.' While none of Patel's claims have yet been independently confirmed by Indian or Chinese officials, his remarks suggest a new phase of international cooperation on drug enforcement — one that places India at the centre of a growing geopolitical storm. Note: Kash Patel's statements about India Timestamp ~00:06:00 — India as a fentanyl transit point Timestamp ~00:06:30 — No fentanyl deaths in India Timestamp ~00:12:22 — Direct outreach to Indian government Timestamp ~00:12:32 — FBI-India law enforcement collaboration Timestamp ~00:12:43 — Indictments in India Joe Rogan Experience #2334 - Kash Patel
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Canada's new citizenship framework to benefit Indian diaspora, proposed law removes first-gen limit
The Canadian government has introduced Bill C-3 to address longstanding citizenship issues, targeting the 2009 'First-Generation Limit' (FGL), which denied or revoked citizenship for many born outside Canada read more While the Donald Trump administration of the US may have tightened immigration policies, posing significant challenges for Indian nationals seeking US green cards and citizenship, the Canadian government may offer them a major respite very soon. Notably, an executive order signed by Trump on January 20 aims to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents on temporary visas, such as H-1B and F-1. In contrast, the Canadian government has introduced Bill C-3 on Thursday (June 5) to address longstanding citizenship issues. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This 'Citizenship Bill' targets the 2009 'First-Generation Limit' (FGL), which denied or revoked citizenship for many born outside Canada or with foreign-born children. The new bill seeks to correct these injustices. Bill C-3 proposes automatically reinstating Canadian citizenship for those affected by the FGL and similar outdated rules. This change could benefit thousands, especially within immigrant communities, including Indian-origin residents and skilled foreign workers with ties to Canada. Beyond addressing past issues, the bill sets a new standard allowing Canadian parents born abroad to pass on their citizenship to their children, even if born abroad, provided the parent demonstrates a 'substantial connection' to Canada. This connection is defined as at least 1,095 cumulative days (three years) of physical presence in Canada before the child's birth or adoption. If enacted, the bill would enable Canadian citizens by descent to regain lost citizenship and extend it to their children born or adopted abroad beyond the first generation, provided the parent meets the physical presence requirement. The bill is currently under legislative review and must pass three readings and receive royal assent to become law. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has mandated that the federal government revise the existing legislation by November 20. Moreover, failure to comply may result in the court striking down or narrowing the contested FGL provisions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Technology must aid, not replace, human mind in judicial decision: CJI
Technology must complement, not replace, the human mind in judicial decision-making, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has said while emphasising that the value of discretion, empathy and judicial interpretation is irreplaceable. In his keynote address on "Role of Technology in the Indian Legal System" at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) of the University of London, the CJI said while the judiciary welcomes innovations like automated cause lists, digital kiosks and virtual assistants, it must ensure that human oversight, ethical guidelines and robust training are integral to their implementation. "The value of discretion, empathy and judicial interpretation is irreplaceable," Justice Gavai said and pointed out that the Indian judiciary is well-positioned to develop homegrown ethical frameworks tailored to the country's constitutional and societal realities. "We possess the technological expertise, the judicial foresight and the democratic mandate to build systems that reflect our values of equality, dignity and justice," he said. "In fact, in the very first week after assuming office as the chief justice of India, I initiated a discussion with the Centre for Research and Planning of the Supreme Court to prepare a comprehensive note on the ethical use of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in the judiciary. "Technology must complement, not replace, the human mind in judicial decision-making," the CJI said, adding, "The emphasis must always be on using technology to enhance trust and transparency -- never to replace the human conscience at the heart of justice." He said though the judiciary has started to embrace technology, with the emergence of artificial-intelligence (AI) tools in judicial processes -- from case management to legal research, document translation and even predictive analytics -- there must be caution. "Around the world, debates are ongoing about the ethical use of AI in legal systems. Concerns include algorithmic bias, misinformation, data manipulation and breaches of confidentiality. For instance, sensitive information, such as the identity of a victim of crime, must never be disclosed due to AI error or the absence of clear protocols. Additionally, a few recent cases have shown that AI tools can generate fabricated citations or biased suggestions if not properly regulated and monitored," the CJI underscored. He added that technology, if anchored in constitutionalism and empathy, can transform access to justice from an abstract ideal into a lived and shared reality. "As we continue our journey toward modernising the Indian legal system, our approach must remain deeply rooted in constitutional values. The integration of technology must be people-centric, inclusive and guided by ethical clarity. Our ultimate goal should be to make justice accessible to every citizen, regardless of language, geography, income or digital literacy," he said. Concluding his address, Justice Gavai said, "I firmly believe that access to justice is not solely the responsibility of the judiciary. It is a shared national commitment. Law schools, civil society, legal-aid institutions and governments must work in unison to develop and promote technological models that are accessible, transparent and inclusive." Meanwhile, at a joint event of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and Trilegal organised on the occasion of London International Disputes Week, CJI Gavai said in recent decades, the justice-delivery mechanism, once confined within the boundaries of courtrooms, has witnessed a significant shift towards modes of alternative dispute resolution, with arbitration emerging as a prominent pillar of that transformation. The CJI was speaking on the topic of "Navigating the evolving landscape: The impact of the 7th edition of the SIAC Rules on India-Related Arbitrations". "At the cusp of this evolution lies the recognition that justice, particularly in complex commercial disputes, need not be adversarial or bureaucratic. Rather, it must be confidential, expert-driven and above all, tailored to the needs of those who seek it. Arbitration, in this context, is a substantive recalibration of how we understand and deliver justice," he said. Justice Gavai pointed out that over the last 10-15 years, India has made a multi-pronged effort towards its aspiration of building a favourable and sought-after place for arbitration. "While legislative reforms have significantly strengthened India's arbitration framework, the judiciary has also played a proactive role in fostering a more arbitration-friendly environment. Various progressive judgments by the Supreme Court of India over the last few years stand testament to this. Nonetheless, the enormity of India as a country has ensured that certain on-ground challenges continue," he said. "The Indian judiciary has and will continue to recognise and respect the autonomy of the arbitral process, ensuring that the courts step in only when demanded by the needs of justice," he added. The CJI said, "In conclusion, I am happy to note that the 7th edition of the SIAC Rules is a forward-looking endeavour, aimed at enhancing efficiency while balancing fairness. For India, whose commercial players are increasingly global in outlook and operation, these rules offer both an opportunity and a challenge -- the opportunity to align with international best practices and the challenge to elevate our own standards while balancing them with India's practical realities.
