Ramaphosa calls high-level meeting with Shamilla Bathoi following allegations of NPA infiltration
Advocate Shamila Batohi is due to meet President Cyril Ramaphosa over her recent comments about the state of affairs at the NPA.
Image: File
A RECENT utterance by Advocate Shamila Batohi, the National Director of Public Prosecutions, has resulted in her being summoned to a meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Bathoi's suggestion that the National Prosecuting Authority, the entity that she heads, has been 'infiltrated' and that its integrity might be compromised as rogue prosecutors collude with criminal elements to undermine the authority's work, has resulted in Ramaphosa's reflex action.
Her comments, last week has become a major talking point.
Therefore, the meeting, which will be highly anticipated, especially since there has been widespread calls for Bathoi to step down based on the NPA's failings, especially in high-profile matters, is poised to be a pivotal moment in South Africa's legal landscape.
In a series of candid interviews, Batohi expressed her concerns over what she described as significant breaches of conduct within the NPA, raising alarms about the independence of South Africa's judicial framework.
'The NDPP did make that statement and she later said she used the wrong word about the infiltration.
I'm going to have a meeting with her so that she can really download and take off the chest some of the challenges,' Ramaphosa stated during a visit to Sefako Makgatho Primary School on Tuesday.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Cyril Ramaphosa and chief prosecutor Shamila Batohi set to meet.
Image: Jacques Naude/African News Agency/ANA
The president acknowledged the importance of the meeting, where Batohi will have the opportunity to clarify the scope of her claims and discuss the implications for the NPA's integrity.
Despite the unrest surrounding her statements, Ramaphosa expressed confidence in the progress the NPA has made, saying, 'The NPA has really done considerable work to stabilise itself as well as go on with various prosecutions.'
He emphasised the need to recognise the challenges faced by the authority while avoiding an overarching narrative that dismisses its achievements.
The NPA has faced mounting scrutiny for its handling of high-profile cases, particularly those linked to state capture and the contentious sexual assault trial of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso.
In light of Batohi's comments, criticism has intensified, prompting various political parties to voice their opinions on her future at the helm of the NPA.
ActionSA has called for her resignation, labelling her leadership as ineffective in light of the NPA's shortcomings, while the Democratic Alliance (DA) has rallied behind her, vehemently opposing calls for her dismissal.
In a robust response to her critics, Batohi has maintained her stance, asserting that she remains steadfast in her role and is not considering resignation.
Her term as NDPP is set to expire in January 2026, a period during which she hopes to resolve both internal conflicts and external pressures affecting the NPA's operations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
41 minutes ago
- IOL News
SCA overturns acquittal in R25 million Gupta-linked Nulane Investments case
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has overturned the Free State High Court's decision to acquit former Transnet Board member Iqbal Sharma and other accused in the Nulane Investments scam case. Image: National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has overturned the Free State High Court's decision to acquit all the accused in the R25 million Nulane Investments fraud and money laundering case. The SCA set aside the High Court ruling that ended in eight accused walking free on April 2023, after the court ruled that there was no case to answer under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act. This was after the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) filed an appeal to reverse the judgment. The SCA ordered that the accused be tried before a different judge. The matter relates to the payments that the Free State government made to Nulane to conduct a feasibility study that led to the controversial and failed Gupta-linked Vrede Diary farm project. The suspects included government officials and Gupta-linked associates. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Iqbal Sharma and his company Nulane Investment, former head of the Free State Department of Agriculture (FSDoA), Peter Thabethe, former head of FSDoA Limakatso Moorosi, former FSDoA Chief Financial Officer Seipati Dhlamini, Ronica Ragavan and the company she represents owned by the Gupta's Islandsite Investment, and Dinesh Patel who is Sharma's brother-in-law and a representative of Nulane Investment. 'It is ordered that the first to seventh respondents may be retried for the same offences in respect of which they were acquitted by the Free State High Court on April 21, 2023, as if they had not previously been arraigned, tried and acquitted: provided that a different judge shall preside over the trial,' read the judgment. NPA spokesperson, Mthunzi Mhaga, said this judgment confirms their view that the acting judge, Nompumelelo Gusha, misdirected herself in applying the relevant principles with regard to the case and erred in her strong criticism of the prosecution team. Mhaga said the judgment paves the way for the NPA's Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) to reinstate the case within a reasonable period, adding that the NPA remains resolute in its stance of effectively prosecuting and holding accountable those responsible for state capture-related corruption. 'Beyond this important case, IDAC has made significant progress in its efforts to ensure accountability for serious and complex corruption and related crimes stemming from the state capture era. It has enrolled 50 cases, declared 133 investigations and partnered with the Asset Forfeiture Unit to obtain freezing and preservation orders amounting to R14.3 billion with R8.2bn in confiscation orders deposited to the Criminal Asset Recovery Account (CARA),' Mhaga said. He said IDAC has made progress on several other matters and aims to enroll several new cases in the coming months. "Since becoming permanent and with requisite criminal investigative powers in August 2024, IDAC has expanded its capacity to enable it to deliver effectively on its prosecution-led mandate. It also has established an innovative partnership giving it access to a world-class digital evidence unit that bolsters its ability to extract data from encrypted digital devices to be used as admissible evidence in its cases.'
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Justice delayed, justice derailed — acting judge's ‘litany of errors' in Nulane case dealt blow to accountability
An acting judge's misunderstanding of the law has, for two long years, delayed accountability for alleged State Capture. The high court judge's pronouncements unfairly embarrassed the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and demoralised courageous prosecutors fighting to restore faith in South Africa's justice system. Thankfully the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has now set aside the Nulane judgment. Stingingly, the SCA found that 'the acquittal of the respondents was unfair to the prosecution and compromised the administration of justice'. Why is the Nulane case so important? In 2022, a mix of officials and businesspeople shuffled into a cold Bloemfontein dock, facing charges of orchestrating a R25-million fraud. With this, the NPA brought its first State Capture case to trial. Although R25-million was a pittance compared with what the Guptas would later purloin, Nulane was a dress rehearsal for the later schemes. The fraud itself appears glaringly obvious. In 2012, a Gupta-linked, foreign scrap metal company suddenly announced its intention to invest in an emerging farmers project in the Free State. Strangely, the foreign company insisted that a company it did not name must conduct a feasibility study first. Somehow, Nulane, owned by Iqbal Sharma, was appointed to that role. Evidence showed how Free State officials set about manipulating procurement processes to falsely and quickly appoint Nulane as a sole supplier. The feasibility study simply was outsourced to Deloitte for just R1.5-million. Nulane merely slapped its logo on the final report and sent invoices to the Department of Agriculture. The money went to Nulane and R19-million then ricocheted through various Gupta-controlled bank accounts before being siphoned off to Dubai. By the time the trial began, the Guptas had long fled South Africa. Smaller fish faced charges for PFMA breaches, fraud and money laundering. Despite evidence to the contrary, much of it common cause, the high court outright acquitted one of the accused and granted section 174 discharges to the rest. The high court declared that there was 'not an iota' of evidence to even answer. The acting judge excoriated both the prosecutors and police for presenting a 'lackadaisical' case. The documentary evidence amounted to 'zilch', the judge proclaimed. The investigation was a 'comedy of errors', a phrase the judge called 'the understatement of the millennia'. This insult warrants scrutiny. Did the acting judge mean that no investigations across thousands of years, from Meletus's inquiries into Socrates, were more incompetently conducted than Nulane? Or did she mean the singular noun millennium, thus restricting her comparison to all the other bad investigations since January 2000? Ironically, the high court's reasoning is now discredited on all these scores. The SCA judgment chronicles a litany of errors, misconceptions and misconstructions; some so basic as failing to apply the elements of fraud to the facts. As for the acting judge's finding that the documents proved 'zilch', the SCA found otherwise. The documents and money flows established a prima facie case of fraud and money laundering which the accused should have been called upon to answer. On 'zilch', the SCA remarked: 'The use of this colloquialism is unfortunate; it does not belong in a judgment.' Thank goodness the State appealed. The stakes were high not only because the acquittals were wrong but because the high court judgment undermined extradition efforts. The collapse of Nulane led to the Guptas walking free in Dubai. The judgment also destabilised case theories for prosecuting other State Capture crimes. The court's position on accomplice witnesses, best evidence, common purpose and section 174 discharges created ripple effects that reverberate today. It is heard tell that the high court's errors emboldened magistrates in Free State courts to discharge other financial crime suspects with alarming ease. When cases are lost, criticism of prosecutors is often merciless. Media outlets joined the chorus of social media condemnation. The otherwise astute investigative journalism platform amaBhungane released a video suggesting that Nulane prosecutors lacked sufficient skills for what should have been a slam-dunk case. Legal reporting guru Karyn Maughan proclaimed that the acting judge 'was absolutely justified in describing it as a comedy of errors'. Maughan said she would be 'absolutely amazed' if the State succeeded in its appeal application. It will be amazing to see an apology to the vilified prosecutors and SAPS investigator. The media's ridicule compounded what was an intensely demoralising experience for NPA advocates Witbooi and Serunye and SAPS investigator Lieutenant Colonel Mandla Mtolo. How they managed to persevere despite such unfair criticism is hard to imagine. Of course every prosecution can be improved. But it was the fact that the judge had 'closed her mind to the evidence adduced by the State' that really prevented the NPA from advancing the State's case, as the SCA noted. The NPA's resilience deserves praise. In this instance, the real issue lies not with prosecutors but with wiser case allocation. State Capture cases cannot be entrusted to judges susceptible to their own 'comedy of errors'. The NPA chief, advocate Shamila Batohi, has herself implored heads of court to appoint experienced judges to seminal matters. A similar hint rang out in Bloemfontein's quaintly dilapidated SCA courtroom B when State counsel, Nazeer Cassim SC, remarked that high-stakes cases should be assigned to judges capable of navigating complex legal terrain. It was acting SCA Justice Cagney Musi (also Free State Judge President) who assigned the Nulane case to the acting judge who so badly mishandled it. As Justice Musi pored over his division's work, he must have regretted his decision. Wayward acquittals are a danger. They imperil South Africa's fragile hope of salvaging itself from ruin. Without the credible prospect of prison, South Africa's kleptocracy will only expand until the justice system is nothing but a laughable, hollow threat. One can only but agree with the SCA's finding that the way the high court trial was conducted 'can be summed up in a single sentence: This was a failure of justice. Regrettably, this erodes public confidence in the criminal justice system.' This critique is not about singling out a judge any more than a judge singled out police and prosecutors. Rather, Nulane serves as a lesson in how mistaken opinions, judicial and public, can delay accountability and demoralise those tasked with wielding justice on society's behalf. Nulane also forces us to confront larger questions. 'How many other Nulane judgments are out there?' This is a troubling question. Much like the temperature this week, the standard of acting appointments has, by all accounts, been plummeting for some time. This phenomenon is so noticeable, it has crept into techniques of civil litigation. No matter how strong a party's case may be, many are induced to take a puny settlement rather than risk the potluck of the court roll. Yet this should not be so. High court trials carry huge social stakes. They're not a CCMA con-arb or housebreaking case. It's all very well to develop lawyers or magistrates by gifting them an acting stint. However, acting judges still need to be drawn from an intellectual and professional elite. A deep, nonracial strata of legal excellence exists in South Africa. Many inspired acting appointments are routinely made and these represent the breadth of legal talent in South Africa, so this is not a 'transformation' issue. The problem is the almost back-of-the-envelope selection of adjudicators we see sometimes. The 'proletarianisation' of the Bench is a threat to the state's legitimacy. The goals of inclusion and professional development must be tempered by a primary duty to select judges capable of deciding cases competently. This is the essence of the 'fair public hearing' promise the Constitution contains. It is especially hard for poor and already marginalised litigants to fix the damage made by learner-judges on appeal. As things stand though, NPA prosecutors have been vindicated by the SCA. Nulane also teaches judges and commentators alike to be less star-struck by defence counsel and their adamant speeches and charming tutelage. A careful examination of the record, not only snippets of the argument or judgment, will often reveal that less-flamboyant career prosecutors have indeed made out a case, at least to warrant the accused mounting a defence. Shakespeare's Hamlet lamented the law's delay and the insolence of office. Thankfully, the SCA has set matters right, for now. The NPA can do better but so can the judiciary. South Africa cannot afford further derailments in its pursuit of justice against the greedy stokers of our ruin. DM
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
RAF acting CEO defends delaying in suspending senior official
The Road Accident Fund's top official maintains that he was not going to rubber stamp a board decision to suspend a senior official without applying his mind. Image: File Road Accident (RAF) acting CEO Phathutshedzo Lukhwareni has stood his ground after he took his time to apply his mind before suspending a fellow executive on a recent instruction by the board of directors. Lukhwareni said if his conduct was considered to be insubordination, he was ready to face disciplinary charges. 'I was never going to be a rubber stamp to that decision. I decided to apply my mind until I received the file and did my own assessment with human resources. If that assertion is considered insubordination, I am prepared to face that charge,' he said. Lukhwareni made the comment at a meeting of the Transport Portfolio Committee on Wednesday night when he was quizzed about the delay in placing acting chief investment officer Sefotle Modiba on precautionary suspension in connection with his appointment at the entity. Modiba's suspension was announced by deputy board chairperson Nomonde Mabuya-Moloele at a meeting with the Portfolio Committee earlier this month. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mabuya-Moloele had told the Portfolio Committee that Modiba was placed on precautionary suspension with full pay and benefits with immediate effect in connection with his past employment at the City of Johannesburg. The issue of Modiba was brought up in the meeting when MPs wanted to know if he had been vetted after joining RAF from the City of Johannesburg. Lukhwareni stated that background checks had been done and a reference check was also done with his former employer. 'Vetting is a comprehensive process and we submitted our forms to the State Security Agency and they are being processed at this point in time,' he said. But, Deputy Minister Mkhuleko Hlengwa asked him to update the committee on his status at RAF after a letter was received from the City of Johannesburg indicating that Modiba resigned on the eve of the conclusion of a disciplinary process. 'I don't understand why you want to skirt around that matter. I hope this gives a glimpse of what we are dealing with,' Hlengwa said. 'You can't speak about vetting in your response and don't add the latest developments unless the board did something different,' he said. In response, Lukhwareni confirmed that Modiba has been placed on suspension on Tuesday as per the resolution of the board. Lukhwareni was criticised by committee chairperson Donald Selamolela for being secretive with Parliament. 'We are not here to play. It is after 9pm and listening to you bluffing when you know the context and still want to hide other things. I plead with you, please answer so that we don't have follow up questions,' said Selamolela. Lukhwareni apologised, but Selamolela warned 'you are exhausting your daily limit of apologies'. In explaining the matter further, Lukhwareni said the instruction to suspend Modiba was sent to him a day after the board took the decision. 'As the acting CEO I have the responsibility to consider what the board communicated in arriving in that decision. I was warned about possible delays. When the announcement was made to the Portfolio Committee on Transport, the acting CIO was sitting with us in the boardroom. It can't be correct that you must just sign the letter and when (you do not sign it), it becomes a problem,' he said.
