WHO flags hypertension as major health threat in South-East Asia; urges stronger action
NEW DELHI: Hypertension, which continues to be a major public health challenge, is a silent killer that affects over 294 million people across the South-East Asia Region, the WHO said on Friday.
Modifiable behavioural risk factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, high salt intake, physical inactivity, unhealthy diets, and mental stress continue to drive its prevalence, said the World Health Organisation (WHO) to mark the World Hypertension Day, observed annually on May 17.
'Hypertension remains a leading contributor to premature mortality from heart attacks and strokes in our region. Worryingly, the unmet need - defined as the gap between those with high blood pressure and those adequately diagnosed, treated, and controlled - remains as high as 88%,' said Saima Wazed, Regional Director for WHO South-East Asia (WHO-SEARO region).
'This indicates that nine out of every 10 people with hypertension are not receiving optimal care,' she added.
'With strong political will, community engagement, and innovative approaches, we can reduce the burden of hypertension and move closer to achieving our global goal of reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by one-third by 2030.'
India has set a target of a 25% relative reduction in the prevalence of hypertension (raised blood pressure) by 2025.
To achieve this, the government has launched the Indian Hypertension Control Initiative (IHCI) to fast-track access to treatment services for over 220 million people in India who have hypertension.
Uncontrolled blood pressure is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) such as heart attacks and stroke and is responsible for one-third of total deaths in India. IHCI, launched in November 2017, is a multi-partner initiative of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), WHO Country Office for India, and Resolve to Save Lives.
Wazed noted that the Region, which includes India, has made bold commitments to address the burden of hypertension through the endorsement of SEAHEARTS - Accelerating Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in the South-East Asia Region.
SEAHEARTS has proven to be a powerful platform, enabling countries to scale population-level interventions that reduce tobacco use, decrease salt intake, eliminate trans-fat, and improve treatment coverage at primary health care, she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
WHO DG holds talks with PM's Secy on partnership at Global Traditional Medicine Centre
Geneva [Switzerland] June 6 (ANI): Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Thursday (local time) held talks with PK Mishra, Principal Secretary to Prime Minister where they discussed their partnership on the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre, outposted in Jamnagar. Ghebreyesus thanked Mishra for India's leadership on the Pandemic Accord adoption, and support of increased assessed contributions to WHO's work to advance health for all. 'Had good meeting with P.K. Mishra, Principal Secretary to PMO India, on the many areas of close collaboration between WHO and India. We discussed our partnership on the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre, outposted in Jamnagar, which will help the world benefit from the potential of traditional medicine and complement modern approaches to health. I thanked Dr Mishra for India's leadership on the Pandemic Accord adoption, and support of increased assessed contributions to WHO's work to advance Health for All. I also commended India for its investment in health care infrastructure, the 'Ayushman Bharat' scheme to expand universal health coverage, and in digital health.' Mishra also held talks with Hara Hiroaki, Vice-Minister for Policy Coordination of Japan, on margins of Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction 2025. In a post on X, the Indian Permanent Mission at Geneva stated, 'Fruitful discussions between Principal Secretary to PM Dr. P.K Mishra and Mr. Hara Hiroaki, Vice-Minister for Policy Coordination of Japan, on margins of GPDRR 2025. Explored enhanced India-Japan collaboration on disaster resilience and exchanging expertise in risk reduction strategies.' Mishra also held talks on disaster preparedness with Major General Ariunbuyan Gombojav, Chief of National Emergency Management Agency of Mongolia, on the sidelines of GPDRR 2025. 'Principal Secretary to PM Dr. P.K Mishra meets with Major General Ariunbuyan Gombojav, Chief of National Emergency Management Agency of Mongolia, on the sidelines of GPDRR 2025. Valuable exchange on disaster preparedness strategies and exploring opportunities for India-Mongolia cooperation in DRR.' Mishra also held talks with Head of UNDRR Kamal Kishore on strengthening India's disaster risk reduction partnerships and advancing global resilience frameworks. Meanwhile, BIMSTEC countries convened at the High-Level UNDRR-BIMSTEC event on the margins of GPDRR 2025 in Geneva. India's head of delegation to GPDRR, Principal Secretary to PM PK Mishra, highlighted the role of the BIMSTEC Centre for Disaster Management, as announced by PM Narendra Modi at the 6th BIMSTEC Summit, to accelerate the region's implementation of the Sendai Framework. (ANI)
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Vodka, Gin, Whiskey Or Rum: How Much Does Your Favourite Alcohol Score On The Health Chart?
If you are even slightly health conscious, the thought of going to a bar and ordering your favourite cocktail might sound tempting, but it often comes with a side of guilt over the harmful impact alcohol can have on your health. The discourse around how bad alcohol is for your body has several answers, depending on who you ask. For instance, a study by the American Heart Association suggests that moderate alcohol consumption may contribute to heart health by increasing HDL ("good") cholesterol and reducing plaque buildup in the arteries. Similarly, a Harvard-cited study also noted that moderate drinking - defined as consuming alcohol in quantities that do not negatively affect the body - can be considered acceptable. 'Even Moderate Drinking Is Not Good' Such studies had made the occasional indulgence in alcohol seem acceptable. But all these studies came with margins of error, and it's important to note that many of these studies are observational in nature. This means that they often rely on self-reported alcohol intake, which can be inaccurate, and typically involve participants who volunteer their health data over specific time periods. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization classifies alcohol as a toxic, psychoactive, and dependence-inducing substance, as well as a Group 1 carcinogen. According to WHO, alcohol contributes to at least seven types of cancer, including common ones such as bowel cancer and breast cancer in women. A study published in March 2022 further reveals that even low levels of alcohol consumption can increase the risk of high blood pressure and heart disease. "No type of alcohol is truly 'safe' in excess, whether it's beer, wine, or spirits," says Dr Swapnil Sharma, Consultant and Chief Surgeon, Liver Transplant, Hepatobiliary, Pancreas and GI Surgery, Wockhardt Hospitals, Mumbai Central. "Once consumed, alcohol enters the bloodstream and is processed by the liver. Excessive intake can damage liver cells, trigger inflammation, and eventually lead to conditions like fatty liver, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even liver failure," Dr Sharma adds. That said, we also understand that in social situations, or after one of "those" days, you might find yourself with a glass in hand. So, if that's the case, which drink should you choose? We asked experts. The 'Healthier' Alcohol Dr Rajesh Jaria, Consultant, Internal Medicine at PD Hinduja Hospital & MRC, Khar, Maharashtra, points out that while alcohol does not offer genuine health benefits, drink choices may differ in terms of calories, sugar content, hangover potential, and the congener effect. Just as inactive ingredients in medicines can cause allergic reactions, different alcoholic drinks contain congeners - compounds that impact the body differently despite ethanol being the key intoxicating ingredient. "A drink with lower alcohol content is always a healthier choice, as is one with higher antioxidant polyphenols. A clear spirit like vodka or light rum would be a better option than a coloured spirit," says Dr Jaria. Dr Sharad Malhotra, Senior Consultant and Director, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, agrees. He explains that not all drinks are created equal-neither in their composition nor their impact on the body. But after speaking to experts, we found a unanimous answer: the least bad alcohol is red wine. "If we must pick a 'better' alcohol, red wine edges ahead-but with serious caveats. Red wine contains antioxidants such as resveratrol and flavonoids that have shown mild cardiovascular benefits in limited studies. However, the quantity matters. One small glass a day for women, and two for men - that's the maximum," says Dr Sharad. "Once you cross that threshold, any protective effect vanishes and the damage begins," he adds. Dr Jaria agrees. He prefers dry red wine, which, according to him, limits sugar and cuts calorie and carbohydrate content. "A drier white wine also offers these benefits, although it contains negligible resveratrol," he says. He also highlights that grape skin contributes resveratrol but also brings tannins - a type of congener known to cause headaches. Additionally, he recommends that when in doubt, choosing a drink with lower alcohol content (e.g., 5 per cent vs 8 per cent) such as beer is often the better option. Which Type of Alcohol Is The Worst? Dr Malhotra warns that flavoured spirits, sugary cocktails, and high-proof liquors like grain alcohol or moonshine top the list of the most harmful drinks. These not only elevate the risk of liver damage but also lead to severe dehydration, blood sugar spikes, and acid reflux. "Sugary mixers in cocktails can overload your pancreas and raise triglyceride levels. Similarly, high-concentration spirits burn the gastrointestinal lining and worsen conditions like ulcers or gastritis," he adds. Dr Manish Dodmani, Consultant, Medical Gastroenterology, KIMS Hospitals, Thane, Maharashtra, notes that in rural parts of India, people often consume country liquor, which can contain as much as 60-70% alcohol. "The higher the alcohol percentage, the worse the impact. So, drinks with 40-45% alcohol, like whiskey or vodka, are among the worst. Beer, with its relatively lower alcohol percentage, is far less harmful," he explains. Dr Jaria also suggests considering hard kombucha, a fermented tea-based drink packed with probiotics and often touted as a health elixir. However, he cautions that versions with higher alcohol content come with the same risks as other alcoholic beverages. How To Pick A Healthier Alcohol Dr Malhotra notes that while all alcoholic drinks are labelled similarly, a few key details can help you make a better choice: The most important bit is Alcohol by Volume (ABV): Opt for lower ABV, especially for casual or regular consumption. Have a look at the percentages: Beer: 4-6% Wine: Up to 14% Vodka: 40-95% Whiskey: 36-50% Gin: 36-50% Rum: 36-50% Tequila: 40-51% Brandy: 35-60% Liquers: Around 15% Other factors to keep in mind when you're picking an alcohol: Added Sugars or Flavours: Avoid artificially flavoured or sweetened cocktails. Sulfites and Preservatives: Those sensitive to sulphites should be cautious when drinking wines or ciders. Fermented vs Distilled: Fermented drinks like beer or wine tend to be less harmful than distilled spirits-though moderation is crucial in either case. The Last Peg At the end of the day, no alcohol is truly 'healthy'- but some choices are less damaging than others. If you choose to drink, aim for moderation and make informed decisions. Look out for lower alcohol content, avoid sugary mixers, and perhaps pick that small glass of red wine over a cocktail loaded with sugar and spirits. And always remember, the healthiest choice will always be a glass of water.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
After 6 years, intervention by 2 ministries and Delhi HC, Australian child born in India through surrogacy gets exit visa nod
It took six years and multiple back-and-forths between two key Union ministries and the Delhi High Court to ensure an exit visa for a six-year-old child born through surrogacy to Indian-origin Australian citizens in 2019, before the Surrogacy Act came into force in 2022. In the absence of clarity among the two ministries – Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) – and after several 'procedural hurdles', the MHA on May 21 directed its Bureau of Immigration to issue an exit visa to the child, subject to payment of late fees for overstay beyond 90 days. The MHA then informed the high court of its decision, recorded in an order by Justice Sachin Datta on May 26. An exit visa is permission granted to a foreigner to leave India in the absence of a valid visa or entry into a country. In the case of the child, born in India and staying here since, his passport as an Australian citizen had no entry stamp to India, thus requiring an exit visa to leave the country. The MHA's decision came after the child's father, an Australian citizen, moved the Delhi High Court earlier this year seeking directions to issue an exit visa for his child, which he had applied for nearly two years ago on April 28, 2023. He is expected to fly out later this month to Australia with his son, say his lawyers Rakesh Kumar and Puneet Kumar. The child's parents are Australian citizens with Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) registration. Born in 2019 in India, the child obtained Australian citizenship in January 2023 following a court order and after complying with the necessary processes. The child's mother, who suffers from Crohn's disease, had decided to go for a gestational surrogacy in 2019 in compliance with Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Guidelines, 2005, which required the execution of a surrogacy agreement with the surrogate mother and intended parent. This was prior to the Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021, which only came into effect in January 2022. The baby was born in Indore in June 2019, and while his mother died in 2021 due to COVID-19, by January 2023, the boy's father obtained the child's Australian citizenship along with a Mumbai civil court order granting him permission to take the minor from India to Australia. Days after issuing an Australian passport to the child in April 2023, his father applied for an exit visa on behalf of his son through the e-portal of the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO). In June 2024, the application was shown as 'completed' on the portal but with directions to 'wait for further instructions.' However, on August 14, 2024, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) issued an office memorandum (OM), informing the MHA that as per provisions of the Surrogacy Act 2021 and its Rules 2022, foreign nationals are not eligible to avail surrogacy services in India and, for a couple of Indian origin (OCI cardholders), they have to obtain a certificate of recommendation from the National Board formed under the Act before availing such surrogacy treatment. The office memorandum also sought documents from the father with respect to the surrogacy, by way of clarification. In further bureaucratic back and forth, in November 2024, the MHA sought that the father submit a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the MoHFW, and days later, the MoHFW telephonically informed the father that they are not responsible for issuing any such NOC. The petitioners – father and son – argued that the Surrogacy Act and its Rules cannot apply retrospectively as it was not in place when the child was born, and had termed the MoHFW's office memorandum of August 2024, directing them to submit proofs of requisite permissions as per the Act, as 'illegal'. When the case was first taken up by Justice Datta in April, it was argued that with the child obtaining admission in a school in Sydney for academic year 2025, the delay in the grant of visa is disrupting the child's education and prolonged absence from regular classes at school has led to issuance of absentee notice by the school, making him likely to suffer cancellation of his admission. At the time of the court hearing, the Union government was granted time to obtain instructions. On May 26, informing the court, the Union government submitted that 'during the year 2015, since there was no regulation on surrogacy in India, MHA had imposed restriction on grant of visa/exit permit to children born out of surrogacy to foreign nationals (including OCI cardholders).' 'Further, during the year 2021, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 was introduced by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and Surrogacy Rules were notified in 2022. The Surrogacy Rules permitted surrogacy only for Indian nationals and OCI cardholder parents. However, in the instant case, surrogacy was commissioned…before commencement of Surrogacy Regulation/law in India in violation of MHA guidelines,' the government told the high court. It added, 'Considering the peculiar circumstances of the case and in the interest of the child, the matter was examined in this Ministry. It has been decided to grant exit permit to the Petitioner No.1 after regularising his overstay period by charging appropriate financial penalty.' Taking the MHA's submission on record, Justice Datta thus directed that following payment of the necessary dues, the exit visa be granted to the child expeditiously, and disposed of the matter.
