logo
Four key roles for women that will make the world a better place

Four key roles for women that will make the world a better place

Women make up 50 percent of the global population, and studies show that when they participate in political life, economic and security outcomes improve for everyone in society. But showing up and participating are just the start. Research demonstrates there are four key ways in which women create meaningful change in their communities worldwide.
Participation: Why Women's Voices Make Peace Endure
When women are part of peace deals and decision-making processes, peace lasts longer. It's not enough to protect women and girls from violence in conflict zones. When women contribute to peaceful resolutions to conflict, they can prevent violence from escalating again. This was the case in Northern Ireland in the 1990s, where women proved instrumental in shaping the Good Friday Agreement, ending decades of sectarian violence through the collective action of the Northern Ireland Women's Coalition.
Prevention: How Women's Coalitions Are Changing the Course of Conflict
Incorporating women in conflict prevention efforts globally helps stop escalation of violence in the first place. This often takes the form of governments engaging civic organizations led by women, religious leaders, teachers and others in calling for nonviolence. In Mali, Case de la Paix, a multi-ethnic and multi-community coalition of 76 women's associations, has actively worked for regional security, political stability and social cohesion since 2013.
Protection: Ending Violence to Strengthen Peace
Prioritizing the safety of women is central for peace and security for all people. Terrorist groups and gangs use sexual violence as a tool to gain control over communities. When international observers monitor sexual violence, this can de-escalate a conflict. When authorities prosecute these cases, communities recover faster.
Since the 2022 invasion by Russia, Ukrainian women and girls, who have faced increased risk of gender-based violence (GBV), conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV), and human trafficking, have mobilized to establish criminal accountability and transitional justice for survivors. In 2022, Ukraine's War Crime Unit created a specialized CRSV department led by a female prosecutor.
Studies show that women's inclusion in peacekeeping leads to improved operational effectiveness in conflict settings. Women peacekeepers often have better access to communities and can help build trust with local populations, especially women, resulting in greater stability and cooperation. This helps communities recover faster from violent conflict. Despite this, according to UN Peacekeeping, women made up only 30 percent of civilian personnel in peacekeeping operations and 7.9 percent of military, police, justice and corrections personnel in field missions.
These four key areas form the foundation of the Women Peace and Security framework. Participation, protection, prevention, relief and recovery are rooted in United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1325 passed in 2000. The Women, Peace and Security agenda has since been strengthened through the adoption of nine subsequent UNSC resolutions supporting the recognition of women's priorities in peace and security decision-making.
The clear relationship between women's participation and security at both national and international levels creates a more peaceful world. It stands as both a moral and strategic imperative. Countries with high levels of inequality between men and women are more than twice as likely to be fragile states. By continuing to champion the WPS agenda, the United States can strengthen its leadership in promoting effective security strategies for itself while making the world more peaceful.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know
Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know

Miami Herald

time25 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know

Russia has likely not moved one of its nuclear-capable heavy bombers further from Ukraine, analysts and satellite imagery indicate after reports suggested Moscow had transferred one of its hefty Tu-160 supersonic aircraft closer to Alaska following extensive Ukrainian strikes on Russian airfields. Ukraine said it hit 41 of Russia's expensive, hard-to-replace warplanes on June 1 in a meticulously timed operation across three different time zones using drones smuggled over the border. Ukrainian outlet Defence Express reported on Thursday that Russia had relocated one of its Tu-160 strategic bombers to the Anadyr airfield in Russia's far eastern Chukotka region, citing satellite imagery captured by the European Space Agency's Sentinel satellites on June 4. Satellite imagery provided to Newsweek by Planet Labs, captured of Anadyr on May 26 - prior to the audacious Ukrainian strikes - showed three aircraft lined up on the main apron. The image, while low quality, does not indicate the presence of the distinctively shaped Tu-160s, analysts said. A separate image from June 3 showed four aircraft on the main apron of the base, but none of the aircraft - including the one that appeared since May 26 - appear to be the world's heaviest operational bomber, experts told Newsweek. It is fairly standard practice for militaries to move aircraft around and may not indicate anything more than a "sensible approach to looking after your aircraft," said Frank Ledwidge, a senior lecturer in Law and War Studies at Portsmouth University in the U.K. and a former British military intelligence officer. Under the New START Treaty limiting nuclear weapons, strategic bombers have to be kept out in the open, Ledwidge added. Russia will likely move around its aircraft more following the success of the Ukrainian strikes, retired Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, a former senior commander in the U.K.'s Royal Air Force, told Newsweek. Kyiv said after the strikes, it had targeted at least one of Moscow's scarce A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft and several long-range, nuclear-capable bombers across four air bases thousands of miles apart. Russia reported drone assaults on five bases, including strikes on a long-range aviation hub in the country's far east that Kyiv did not publicly acknowledge. One Ukrainian official said 13 aircraft had been destroyed. Satellite imagery from the Siberian air base of Belaya and Olenya, an Arctic base in Murmansk-just two of the targeted bases-showed several destroyed Tu-95 and Tu-22 bombers. Ukraine said it had also attacked the Ivanovo airbase northeast of Moscow and Dyagilevo in the Ryazan region. The Belaya airfield sits just shy of 3,000 miles from Ukraine. At least six Russian Tu-95MS and four Tu-22M3 aircraft appear to have been destroyed, Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow for airpower at the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said in recent days. While unlikely to hack away at how many aerial assaults Russia can mount on Ukraine, the simultaneous strikes known as Operation Spiderweb caused roughly $7 billion in damage, according to Kyiv, and exposed how vulnerable airfields and their aircraft now are to drone strikes while landing an embarrassing slap on the Kremlin. U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier this week that Russian President Vladimir Putin had "very strongly" insisted he would retaliate for the strikes. The main base in Russian territory where the operation was masterminded was "directly next to" an FSB regional headquarters, Ukraine's President, Volodymyr Zelensky, said as he praised the "brilliant" operation. Russia's FSB domestic security agency is the main descendant of the Soviet-era KGB. Russia used a Tu-160 in intensive overnight missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, Kyiv's air force said on Friday. Moscow fired more than 400 attack drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and one anti-radar air-to-surface missile at the war-torn country overnight, according to the air force. Ukraine's military separately said on Friday it had hit Dyagilevo in fresh strikes and the Engels long-range aviation hub in the Saratov region. Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Defense Ministry for comment via email. Related Articles G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic AllianceRussia Offers Political Asylum to Elon Musk Over Trump FeudRussia Reacts to Trump's 'Young Children Fighting' CommentUS Demands 'End' to Military Cooperation Between North Korea and Russia 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Trump's new approach to Russia's war in Ukraine might be his worst yet
Trump's new approach to Russia's war in Ukraine might be his worst yet

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's new approach to Russia's war in Ukraine might be his worst yet

Donald Trump and his team have spent a fair amount of time recently trying to convince the public that the president's policy toward Russia's war in Ukraine is having a positive impact. In mid-March, for example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt boasted, 'I can say we are on the 10th yard line of peace, and we've never been closer to a peace deal than we are in this moment.' Two months later, Trump participated in a two-hour phone meeting with Vladimir Putin, and the Republican touted the discussion as a possible breakthrough. 'The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent,' the American president declared, adding that his chat would 'immediately' lead to new diplomatic negotiations. Soon after, Kyiv came under a large-scale Russian drone and missile attack, described by Ukrainian officials as the largest aerial assault on the country since the war began. It was soon followed by Ukraine's surprise drone attack that proved disastrous for Russia, and that jolted global perceptions. This in turn led Russia to launch one of the largest barrages of missiles and drones of the war at targets across Ukraine. This does not look like 'the 10th yard line of peace.' It was against this backdrop that Trump has apparently come up with a new metaphor. The New York Times reported: As Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, sat beside him watching in silence, President Trump compared Russia and Ukraine to two fighting children who needed to work out their differences for a while before anyone could intervene. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' 'And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday,' the Republican added. 'I said, 'President, maybe you have to keep fighting and suffering a lot, because both sides are suffering, before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart.'' So, a few things. First, comparing this conflict to a dispute among children on a playground is unhelpful, and Trump complaining about anyone engaging in juvenile behavior is unwise, given everything we know about his temperament and frequent tantrums. Second, the idea that the White House is prepared to let Russia and Ukraine 'fight for a while' overlooks the inconvenient fact that they've already been fighting for a while. Indeed, Russia invaded Ukraine back in February 2022 — more than three years ago — which Trump described at the time as 'genius' and part of a 'wonderful' strategy. But let's also not lose sight of the evolution of the American president's thinking. Trump's Plan A for the war in Ukraine was ending the conflict within 24 hours by way of a secret strategy he assured voters was real. When it became obvious that this strategy didn't actually exist, Trump moved on to Plan B: He told Russia that if it failed to end the conflict quickly, the White House 'would have no other choice' but to impose new economic sanctions. When Putin ignored those threats and Trump failed to follow through, the American president floated Plan C (international economic penalties designed to force a ceasefire), Plan D (Trump-backed bilateral talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy) and Plan E (bilateral talks between Trump and Putin). Plan F — White House passivity — is now increasingly coming into focus. Trump's latest plan to end the conflict is apparently to stop trying to end the conflict. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on

Russia used 400 strike drones and 40 missiles against Ukraine overnight, Zelenskyy says
Russia used 400 strike drones and 40 missiles against Ukraine overnight, Zelenskyy says

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russia used 400 strike drones and 40 missiles against Ukraine overnight, Zelenskyy says

Russia bombarded six regions of Ukraine in one of its largest aerial attacks of the three-year war, Ukrainian officials said Friday. The nighttime assault lasted for hours and killed three emergency responders in the capital Kyiv, according to authorities."In total, there were over 400 drone strikes and more than 40 missiles, including ballistic missiles," said President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, speaking at the International Summit of Cities and Regions in Kyiv.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store