Sarwar accuses Swinney of 'dishonest' by-election campaign
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has accused John Swinney of running a "dishonest and disgraceful" campaign" ahead of last week's Holyrood by-election.Sarwar claimed the SNP were pushing voters to Reform UK through their tactics, which he described as "shameful" on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show programme.But Swinney justified his "two-horse race" remark by saying Labour's vote share had "collapsed" in the by-election and that his party's own data showed a surge for Reform.Scottish Labour won an unexpected victory in Thursday's by-election as Davy Russell took the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat.
The first minister also told the programme he would consider a reshuffle of his cabinet "in due course" following the defeat, which saw the SNP lose a seat previously held by the late Christina McKelvie.
SNP showed 'lack of ambition'
In the run-up to the contest Swinney declared it a "two-horse race" between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK.In a combative interview with presenter Martin Geissler, Sarwar said: "The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse sent a message to John Swinney that he ran a dishonest and disgraceful campaign that attempted to push people into the arms of Reform, rather than confront the issues that he has caused in communities across Scotland."Sarwar also said the SNP campaign, in support of candidate Katy Loudon, showed a lack of ambition and was "running down the clock" on its time in government rather than offering policies that would benefit people.He added the first minister had "no idea about what's affecting the day to day lives of people in Scotland, which is a disgrace."
Davy Russell won the seat for Labour with 8,559 votes, a majority of 602 over the second-placed SNP.Christina McKelvie, who died in March from secondary breast cancer, had held the seat since 2011.Reform UK finished third with 7,088 votes, following a campaign that attracted criticism for a controversial advert that claimed Sarwar would prioritise people from Asian backgrounds. The party's deputy leader Richard Tice said the result was a "massive boost" going into the May 2026 vote.Meanwhile, Sarwar also urged Sir Keir Starmer's government to move faster with delivering change that would put extra money in people's pockets.However he attacked media pundits for being "obsessed with a Labour government" in Westminster.
Swinney later denied his "two horse race" comment was an attempt to eat into Labour's vote by spotlighting Reform.The first minister told the programme he had been "standing up to Farage for months" and this had been crystallised during the by-election campaign. Swinney also told the programme he believed Reform voters were motivated by anger at the cost of living.When asked about the possibility of a cabinet reshuffle, the first minister replied: "I've got a cabinet minister coming back from maternity leave in Mairi McAllan, so I have to look at the team. I'll be doing that in due course."He added that his party were still in "the process of recovery" after he was sworn in as first minister last May with the SNP facing "significant difficulties" at the time. Swinney also said he would focus on improving public services - such as cutting waiting times for GPs - and mitigating the cost of living crisis before the 2026 Holyrood election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
John Swinney insists he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster
The First Minister doesn't intend to resign after losing the formerly safe seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Going Nowhere Going Nowhere John Swinney insists he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster JOHN Swinney yesterday insisted he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster. The First Minister shrugged off calls from SNP grandees to resign after losing the formerly safe seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse to Labour. 2 The First MInister did hint that a long-rumoured cabinet reshuffle is imminent Credit: PA 2 Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Mr Swinney of pushing voters to Reform UK. Credit: Getty Former deputy leader Jim Sillars and ex-Cabinet minister Alex Neil urged him to end his year-long reign. But Mr Swinney claimed Nats are making 'real progress' on key policies. He said: 'Twelve months ago, the party turned to me at a moment of real jeopardy. "It asked me to use all my skills and experience to bring people together. 'We will win again.' But he did signal a long-rumoured cabinet reshuffle is imminent, saying: 'I'll have to look at the team.' And he failed to rule out a fresh coalition with Greens if the SNP fall well short of a majority at next year's Holyrood election, as polls suggest. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Mr Swinney of pushing voters to Reform UK. His deputy Jackie Baillie said: 'Far from steadying the ship, John Swinney has sailed the SNP into another iceberg.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system
This, according to senior criminologists and ex-police officers, is not just a failure of admin, it's the result of austerity-era cuts that stripped police forces of capacity, dismantled the state-run Forensic Science Service in 2012, and left fragmented, underfunded systems to cope with ballooning evidence demands. Austerity didn't just weaken institutions; it disassembled infrastructure. READ MORE: Nigel Farage could cut the Barnett Formula. Here's what devolution experts think of that While these failings may seem like an English and Welsh concern, they tell a broader UK-wide story. Because when public services are cut in England, the Barnett formula translates those cuts into reduced budget allocations for Holyrood, too. Scotland has long borne the dual burden of being denied full fiscal autonomy while also seeing its devolved budget squeezed by decisions made for entirely different priorities south of the Border. Cuts to police, criminal courts, housing, public health, and local government in England have systematically eroded the spending floor on which Scottish services rest. So when justice collapses in England, it affects Scotland financially – even if the governance is separate. And now, against this backdrop of UK-wide budgetary degradation, Nigel Farage has called for the scrapping of the Barnett formula entirely. It's a move that's politically convenient, historically illiterate, and economically reckless. But more than anything, it's a distillation of what's already happening by stealth. Successive UK governments have undermined the foundations of the Barnett system – and devolution itself – for more than a decade. READ MORE: Furious Anas Sarwar clashes with BBC journalist over Labour policies It's obvious to every Scot that Farage's view relies on a mischaracterisation of Barnett as a subsidy, when in fact it simply ensures Scotland receives a proportional share of changes to spending in England for devolved services. It doesn't calculate entitlement or need, it mirrors policy shifts at Westminster. If England increases education or health spending, Scotland sees a relative uplift. If England cuts deeply, Scotland's budget falls, even if demand remains or rises. This has led to an absurd and punitive dynamic where Scotland loses funding not by its own decisions, but because England spends less. And when Scotland chooses to maintain higher standards in public services, it must do so from a proportionately smaller pot. Perversely, it doesn't stop there, though. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, Westminster has begun bypassing devolved governments directly. Funds like the Levelling Up Fund and Shared Prosperity Fund are allocated by UK ministers to local authorities, often bypassing Holyrood entirely. Promises made in The Vow on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum to deliver near-federal powers and respect Scottish decision-making have unravelled. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action' The Internal Market Act has overridden devolved laws under the banner of market 'consistency'. Powers that returned from Brussels in areas like food standards, procurement, and agriculture were supposed to go to Holyrood, but in many cases they were retained by Westminster. The Sewel Convention, once a safeguard of devolved consent, has been treated as optional. Farage's proposal to scrap Barnett isn't an outlier, it's the natural conclusion of a decade-long pattern: cut services in England, shrink the Barnett allocation, bypass devolved institutions, and then blame the devolved nations for 'taking more than their share'. There's no consideration of fairness, or implementation of a needs-based analysis, it's a strategy of erosion; one that gouges out the Union from the centre while draping itself in the flag. The failures of justice in England, catastrophic as they are, expose a deeper injustice: the systematic unravelling of the constitutional promises made to Scotland. Ron Lumiere via email
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Sleekit' Swinney slips out £1.7m bill for army of spin doctors during by-election
The First Minister has been dubbed 'sleekit' after the average £100,000 bill for each of his 17 spin-doctors was slipped out under cover of the Hamilton by-election. The 'shameful' details were quietly released as Scotland woke up to Labour shock win over the SNP on Friday. An obscure parliamentary written answer showed taxpayers were charged more than £1.7million for 17 special advisers, known as SpAds, in the last financial year. Appointed by the First Minister, SpAds are temporary civil servants who are not bound by neutrality rules and offer explicit political advice and brief the media. Scottish Tory finance spokesman Craig Hoy said: 'The SNP have wasted a shameful amount of taxpayers' money on their army of spin-doctors. 'You'd be forgiven for thinking sleekit Swinney snuck out these bombshell figures on a day when people's minds were elsewhere.' Labour narrowly won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection in the early hours of Friday morning by 602 votes, defying expectations that the SNP would hold the seat. The SpAd costs were released via a 'Government inspired question', a device that lets ministers make information public with minimal fanfare. On June 5, the day of the byelection, a question tabled in the name of SNP loyalist Rona Mackay asked the total cost of employing special advisers in 2024/25. The next day, as politicians pored over the result, minister for parliamentary business Jamie Hepburn, who was SNP campaign coordinator in the byelection, replied. He revealed the total cost was £1,745,042, which included salary costs, employer national insurance, and employer pension contributions. Nine SpAds were paid between £71,393 and £78,719, seven between £84,983 and £97,644, and one - most likely chief of staff Colin McAllister - between £108,781 and £116,435. Ministers are currently paid £109,584. When Ms Mackay, the MSP for Strathkelvin and Bearsden, asked the same question last year it was not until September that she received a reply. Scottish Labour deputy Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'Scots are sick of footing the bill for an SNP government that is still failing to deliver. 'And this sleekit attempt to sneak these figures out during a by-election won't hide the fact that the SNP cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.' Lib Dem MSP Willie Rennie added: 'The SNP are investing more effort in making excuses for their failures in government.' The SpAd bill has more than trebled since the SNP came to power in 2007, when Alex Salmond had seven full-time special advisers costing £566,000. However the cost last year was lower than 2023/24, when Humza Yousaf employed a record 19 SpAds costing £1,906,963. SpAds are exempt from political neutrality rules and can advise ministers on everything from political strategy to speech-writing and policy. Critics believe they have been central to creating a 'secret Scotland' culture within the SNP Government. In 2022, the Scottish Information Commissioner found 'significant and systemic failures' in the way the SNP Government responds to freedom of information (FoI) requests. This included evidence that many FoI responses were sent to SpAds for comment before they were issued. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'Due to the appointment of a new First Minister in May 2024, there were several changes to the Special Adviser team. 'The number and total cost of special advisers reduced in comparison to the previous year.'
